Adding a jackpot will be more interesting.
Sure, as long as the amount is nice and it should be progressive jackpot so the amount could be bigger than the max profit per bet that they have at the moment. But I think real gambler would like to see them to increase the bankroll first instead of the jackpot. adding jackpot usually leads to a higher house edge jackpots are fine but I see them more as a marketing tool,you can't be counting to hit a jackpot often or at all (like Primedice's for example) I would prefer them to sort the things out first and get a decent bankroll and organise a good promo campaign to increase their players base We are implementing a jackpot shortly. We are working to increase the bankroll. Promo campaigns will be started soon... Will it be a new unique jackpot or will be just a similar one to other sites? Hope it wont be like the one on PD ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) , to be honest I like the jackpot rules on YoloDice which is simple and can be won with small bet but of course smaller bet = lower chance to hit. I am not sure about other site. But our jackpot is not like PD. PD has a manual jackpot. Our jackpot will be automated.
|
|
|
good to know that you are adding jackpot soon. also try 2 increase your bankroll please
yes we are working to increase the bankroll as well
|
|
|
Can i participate. Helarrie56 Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Your user id is not found at casinolize
|
|
|
Can i participate. kellyheller Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Your user id is not found at casinolize
|
|
|
Adding a jackpot will be more interesting.
Sure, as long as the amount is nice and it should be progressive jackpot so the amount could be bigger than the max profit per bet that they have at the moment. But I think real gambler would like to see them to increase the bankroll first instead of the jackpot. adding jackpot usually leads to a higher house edge jackpots are fine but I see them more as a marketing tool,you can't be counting to hit a jackpot often or at all (like Primedice's for example) I would prefer them to sort the things out first and get a decent bankroll and organise a good promo campaign to increase their players base We are implementing a jackpot shortly. We are working to increase the bankroll. Promo campaigns will be started soon...
|
|
|
Adding a jackpot will be more interesting.
Sure, as long as the amount is nice and it should be progressive jackpot so the amount could be bigger than the max profit per bet that they have at the moment. But I think real gambler would like to see them to increase the bankroll first instead of the jackpot. It is going to be a progressive jackpot. Regarding bankroll, we are working on it.
|
|
|
Adding a jackpot will be more interesting.
It will be added in the next few days
|
|
|
It's good to see a new site around, with lower than standard house. I have few recommendations: 1. Remove the white space around https://www.casinolize.com/play-dice/images/Play-Now.pngor just save it with Transparency. This is PNG. 2. Make the whole design a little more 'flat'. Modern. 3. Invest some funds into your bankroll. 3BTC is nothing. Your max profit of 0.03079955 is too low to attract any serious player. Cheers! Thank you for your suggestions. Initially we planned to have a white background, hence there was a white space around the image. Anyway we will have it fixed soon. Regarding the design change, we will do it in the following months. We are working to increase the bank roll. That will be done soon.
|
|
|
Your site has 5.14411347 BTC wagered and about 1.16 BTC profit at the time of this post, That is over 20% profit. This must be wrong?
What do you mean wrong? I do not see anything wrong here, because people can bet huge amount and lose it suddenly, of course it will increase site wagered and profit. Why can it be wrong then? Do you think that they even manipulate the wagering and the profit just to attract more people around here? I guess you didn't read the earlier posts. Our Profit is shown as 1.19 BTC, because we played it from our funds before we launched it live. We allocated 3 BTC for bank roll. The profit 1.19 BTC shown on the site is the profit made my our team as a part of testing.
It's not uncommon for casinos early stats to be heavily influenced by the house's own tests in my exp. Nothing strange from that anyway. Thanks for your response on our behalf
|
|
|
Your site has 5.14411347 BTC wagered and about 1.16 BTC profit at the time of this post, That is over 20% profit. This must be wrong?
We have answered to this question earlier on this thread. Please see below: Our Profit is shown as 1.19 BTC, because we played it from our funds before we launched it live. We allocated 3 BTC for bank roll. The profit 1.19 BTC shown on the site is the profit made my our team as a part of testing.
|
|
|
It is working okay now !
Thank you...
|
|
|
Im tring this one... for sure.. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Good Luck
|
|
|
username: gamzuletova Thanks
Millibetting thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) username: 3x1t
Thank you in advance
Added
|
|
|
username: EverythingBitcoin
Thanks
Your account not found at casinolize.com Please register for an account again
|
|
|
It is not a wise task to leave a day job and focus completely on bitcoin
|
|
|
username: prixod30 gogo,i win all your btc ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Added
|
|
|
username:mrnikita
thanks
Added
|
|
|
haven't heard of this coin yet
|
|
|
so no bets under 2x is considered to be walid for the bonus wagered amount? this would make almost impossible to wager 88x times especially when normal rollovers are up to 40x (20-40x usually) its like duckdice all over again but with much worse terms,please reconsider your terms
We are not aware of duckdice bonus terms. Why don't you suggest a reasonable terms? If we feel that it makes sense, we will try to implement it. We request all the users to suggest a reasonable terms. We will try to implement the best suggested terms.
|
|
|
|