|
^
As long as you're wearing a clean pair of socks and your hair is combed, I'm not worried.
|
|
|
|
I have explained why I do not comment on MPEx. Unlike Havelock, where an email addy and a few Satoshi are the only prerequisites to trading, investment aficionados must employ an intermediary--a broker--to deal with MPEx. Just like Joe Sixpack must deal with NYSY through a brokerage. The workings of the hand reaching into Joe Sixpack's pocket are my main interest. If you wish, I could research the brokerage firms dealing with MPEx. Feel free to post links and success stories  |
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic.... You don't understand how interweb works. The trail of slime you left behind you can't be deleted. You have done this once too many times, and now both you and your scamming brother are getting fed to the lions for the amusement of all.
Just like REAL Christians.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... Nah, this is not going away. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... ...
I dono but maybe I read the news to much, but every company I have ever seen go public has never hide a key player unless something is a foul. This should be interesting if they can produce a Mr. John K Freeman, maybe they will do like tocobell and find all the Ronald McDonalds bwhaha.
Pretty sure if it was Ok'd with the SEC all parties in the IPO would be listed... like directors. So can we see what you sent the SEC?
Mr. Freeman is not only a key player, he is the asset issuer. What's more, there are many "John K. Freeman[ s]," but the issuer is not "K," but rather "Kenton," limiting us to a much narrower set   https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit@RiverBoatBTC: will post the fraudulent SEC filing in a sec.Here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... OIC, ty. You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below: ,,, Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities? Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit] prospectus HK company registration[/edit] and some old arrest records--nothing else. Is this the same Mr. Freeman?  *edited |
|
|
|
|
^Reminds me of my cat's doctorate dissertation.
Very wisdom.
Much learnings.
Could you two scholars divine the true meaning of The NotLambchop Papyri in private?
ty
|
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... Whelp, hope you weren't banking on Havelock coin to cover the balance. Today, you've raised a whopping .506 BTC, which translates to two hundred-eighty-nine dollars and forty-three cents, by Stamp price. I'm afraid it's time to start seeking alternate funding. Perhaps returning to gainful employment in the booming field of property foreclosure? |
|
|
|
Hopefully less than two weeks until launch...
Ahh! "Two Weeks(tm)" Well we're aiming for the 31st but I didn't want to say that and then be wrong. Good thing you didn't. So, "Two Weeks(tm)"? |
|
|
|
...
AsicMiner, have had no experience with them. Is there anyone here who can share experience about AsicMiner?
Sure.  |
|
|
|
|
For the Nth time:
1. I know nothing of MPEx beyond the fact that it has a self-imposed 30BTC barrier to entry. Those who can afford to spend that amount just for a seat at the table either know what they are doing, or have an extremely well-defended psychosis, one I'd be unlikely to alter.
2. I also do not comment on CriptoTrade, CryptoStocks, MexTexBits, assrape.me and many other "exchanges."
Ain't nobody got time for dat.
|
|
|
|
|
Protip: If you would like to keep Bitcoin mining decentralized, don't invest in mining companies.
|
|
|
|
Someone took a big dump... pity I wasn't paying attention to grab some cheap shares.
I had to call my brother to have him put bids in , it seems someone dumped around a thousand shares at whatever the bids were and drove it down to .002 - going forward I need to make sure i have valid bids in on those kinds of scenarios. ... I see you've finally managed to convince your bro to stick his finger in the dyke. A winner is you! |
|
|
|
Btc goes up, stock goes down! Btc goes down, stock goes down! I'm fuckin' lost here, this is a good company but such a falling price usually points to insider knowledge... What are we missing?
Btc goes up people want to cash out. Btc goes down people want to cash out. This is a good company and they are on the right track. Very undervalued for their potential at the moment. You bet! How's MintSpare doing, all good? We have been working with Mintspare closely during the past few months and they have a bright future ahead of them. They should and will start to post and respond to requests on this forum.
We do hold the Bitcoins raised during their offering in escrow and only distribute those funds as needed.
...We are in constant contact with them to make sure the company is active and making progress.
*For those not current on the MintSpare saga [Havelock ticker: MS], this jewel is currently trading @1/25th of its issue price, with months since a comment from the issuer or Havelock. (Havelock claims to still be holding 100BTC in escrow). |
|
|
|
I'm really really not getting it.
So far as I can see, you've proved the following:
1. Any asset traded on a BTC exchange does not have the level of government protection that shares traded on the NYSE do.
In the same sense as a bottle of Chateau Lafite Rothschild could be said to have better acidity and balance than a can of Drano, yes. You have a way with words. 2. That a couple of brothers are hustling really hard to build their businesses.
The couple of brothers have been doing nothing *but* hustling. Since they were in their teens. Their "business," if you haven't caught on, is "making money." That's the only common thread in all of their schemes--to make money any way they can. They WORSHIP the stuff. The ghetto "pile of money" picture is not my photoshop--that's Branny's dream. He posted it on his self-promotion website. It's his ideal. That ghetto pile of money is more dear to him than his God, better than speedballs, better than sex. So yeah, hustle. ...
4. That the person they used to incorporate their business is shady.
The two totally different and unrelated people who YOU BOUGHT SHARES IN are BOTH "shady." And I don't mean Benny and Branny, i mean the directors of the companies you've "invested" in. Do you understand that? Did you read the prospectus? Not Benny, not Branny, but THOSE OTHER TWO SHADY PEOPLE. ...I'm unable to draw a line from these factoids to the inference that this somehow proves fraudulent intent. All of this just sounds like the normal activity of starting a company.
You think that these two are willing to swindle US government ...but not you. Because ...because real convictions! Comrades, hand in hand on the barricades against The Bankers, The SEC and... and The MAN!! OK Wild One. Just remember, YOU are The Man they're sticking it to. Without even a kiss first. We wanna be free. We wanna be free to ride our machines without being hassled by The Man! And we wanna get LOADED!! |
|
|
|
^Huh. OK. BTW, there are two possible explanations as to why Voorhees got off so easy. Perhaps, as you've suggested, the SEC didn't want to to come down hard on a gambling operator flagrantly ignoring SEC's own regulations. Because ~pause for effect~ ...bad publicity. Or Voorhees genuinely cooperated I have no idea. |
|
|
|
Benny, you can't possibly be as clueless as you pretend to be. The price of your [Nth]PO is set @ .0022, where it will stay for another month--until your [Nth]PO ends.Nothing I could possibly do will affect that price, not for another month. That said: 1. No one wants what you're selling. Today's total sales are exactly 21 sharez, or .506 BTC. 2. Wouldn't touch it at *any* price, since what you are selling is shares in NOTHING. Or, to be more exact, in BIG TRENDS CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED, which is run by this d00d, John Kenton Freeman: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... OIC, ty. You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below: ,,, Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities? Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit] prospectus HK company registration[/edit] and some old arrest records--nothing else. Is this the same Mr. Freeman? *edited Keep threadstalkin, gives you the exposure you crave and deserve |
|
|
|
|
I just use it without an account, the links stay good indefinitely. Never even thought about registering.
|
|
|
|
^ Try http://postimg.org . Free, no useless fluff, and works from everything--including TOR browsers. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's a tempest in a teacup. Only 23 shares total sold today, ~1/2 BTC.
Gifted panhandlers make more.
|
|
|
|
Absolutely! Nice volume today, too. Plenty of sells. Havelock a bit hard to get a hold of, but if you just pound F5... Last price was .0030 Edit lol no, someone put a bid @.00339998 and got sold into International high finance. Intoxicating  |
|
|
|
You don't understand how interweb works. The trail of slime you left behind you can't be deleted. You have done this once too many times, and now both you and your scamming brother are getting fed to the lions for the amusement of all.
Just like REAL Christians.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... Nah, this is not going away. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... ...
I dono but maybe I read the news to much, but every company I have ever seen go public has never hide a key player unless something is a foul. This should be interesting if they can produce a Mr. John K Freeman, maybe they will do like tocobell and find all the Ronald McDonalds bwhaha.
Pretty sure if it was Ok'd with the SEC all parties in the IPO would be listed... like directors. So can we see what you sent the SEC?
Mr. Freeman is not only a key player, he is the asset issuer. What's more, there are many "John K. Freeman[ s]," but the issuer is not "K," but rather "Kenton," limiting us to a much narrower set https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit@RiverBoatBTC: will post the fraudulent SEC filing in a sec.Here: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic... OIC, ty. You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below: ,,, Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities? Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit] prospectus HK company registration[/edit] and some old arrest records--nothing else. Is this the same Mr. Freeman? *edited
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, back at the ranch...   @Gleb Gamow: Of course people are going to be mad. Benny and Branny are mad because they thought Bitcoiners were theirs for the bilking, and are now finding out it's not as easy as it once was. Their "investors" are mad because who likes to be told that they've been had? Who likes finding out his "investment portfolio" would be more valuable had it contained old candy wrappers and used Kleenex? All's as it should be. *Next buy over .22BTC? 574 @ .001305 = .7491 BTC Time to give your brother a call again, Branny. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
