Yep, look what happened to TradeSatoshi. They surprised their customers with KYC and used it as an excuse to grab as many coins as they could. Look at them now, a total disgrace of an exchange. Yep, look what happen to Livecoin. They surprised their customer with disabling the Monero and Monacoin wallets with the excuse that they been attacked with some bug and lock customers coins, total disgrace of an exchange. Livecoin.net Scam https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5159692.0;allI fail to see what this has to do with KYC issues... The fact is exchanges that pull KYC requests on customers out of the blue and with-hold their coins for not satisfying them are scam exchanges, and nobody should be using them. |
|
|
|
Relevant meme:  True story. |
|
|
|
|
New poll up.
[253] BUFFALO
[254] CLEVELAND
11/10 1:00 PM
Average spread is currently about -3 Cleveland, which I find a bit odd seeing as how they are 6-2 and Cleveland is 2-6.
I'm thinking of taking the under at 40 on this one.
I would have posted the Chargers/Raiders game as that one only has a spread of 1, but it starts in about 22 hours, so... oh well.
|
|
|
|
I grabbed some stats for the dirty turds who participated in the last few pages of this thread, [update] counting only posts created since the introduction of the merit system, and merits earned on those posts: UserName |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
nutildah | 318849| 1407| 227|
That's it. I'm only Writing posts in haiku form Cryptohunter sucks. |
|
|
|
I might type out 50 words to you, you hit me back with 5400..
His last post was over 2,500 words... That would be almost $200 worth of work for me. Yet he did it for free, and I'd be surprised if anybody actually reads the whole thing. What a waste of lifetime. |
|
|
|
|
It annoys me as arguing with people isn't as easy when you want to go back and read the context of a post, only to have to spend too much time searching for said post.
I think Foxpup's answer makes the most sense. Posts get deleted from it all the time relative to others, as it is of course the biggest thread on the forum. It is a test of the limits of SMF, and a testament to the glory of Bitcoin.
Long live the WO thread. Can't stop, won't stop.
|
|
|
|
The explanation is simple: An investment fraud scheme promotes the investment fraud!  It would be a waste of money to promote their shitty games offer with 50% more rake like competitor casinos!  You should resolve the existing scam accusation against you before attempting to carry on "business" on this forum. Without resolving this issue, you will forever be labeled a scammer, and nobody will ever trust you again. I am already in the process of holding h4ns liable for the criminal offenses he committed towards Game Protect!  Let this be a warning to anyone considering giving money to game-protect: if you pay them, and they do nothing, and you complain about it online, expect to get threatened with lawsuits. |
|
|
|
I don't need an entourage, you seldom travel without one.
Nobody has an "entourage", and neither is anybody traveling anywhere. This is a forum. I can't stop other people from writing comments, nor encourage them, nor do I try to. Anybody is free to do as they please. Thanks for again proving you have trouble separating your personal feelings about discussions in Politics & Society and forum policy discussion in other sections.
Your projections don't change the fact that you're the only one here trying to do any censoring. How long did the Russia-gate investigations last? 3 years? When did these accusations about manipulation in the 2016 elections start surfacing? Very recently.
Don't know, don't care. Its irrelevant to this discussion. Democrats only allow investigations of their opponents though, investigations of anyone they support is just meddling of course.
 |
|
|
|
Game Protect gladly invests a lot of time and money to hold a customer liable who commits several criminal offenses towards Game Protect.
Your reputation is completely trashed by your own doing. shown at my profile and Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Check their trust page to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.shown above my threads is caused by this false and misleading red flag created by h4ns! The flag is neither false nor misleading. It really doesn't matter if it seems false and misleading to you -- everybody else can see that it is neither of these things. It is the system working perfectly as intended. Nobody owes you any further explanation of anything. You, however, owe h4ns 210 euro. |
|
|
|
The explanation is simple: An investment fraud scheme promotes the investment fraud! It would be a waste of money to promote their shitty games offer with 50% more rake like competitor casinos! You should resolve the existing scam accusation against you before attempting to carry on "business" on this forum. Without resolving this issue, you will forever be labeled a scammer, and nobody will ever trust you again. |
|
|
|
Game Protect gladly invests a lot of time and money to hold a customer liable who commits several criminal offenses towards Game Protect.
If you were actually serious about this you would have just done it instead of saying you were going to do it a hundred times on a forum. Your reputation is completely trashed by your own doing. Just fuck off and get a real job as your game-protect business is finished. |
|
|
|
What irony?
Careful you don't break your necks sucking each other off too hard while you fantasize and project.
You don't see yourself doing the slightest bit of fantasizing and projection there? Whew lordy. Do I have an entourage following me around agreeing with me like you do?
Not anymore. I don't see any except for yours. IS it really though? Or does any space that doesn't immediately censor and ban anyone right of Mao Zedong qualify as a "right wing circle jerk" to you?
The only one attempting to do any censoring around these parts is you. Remember your whole thread in Meta about not being able to censor people you disagree with? Real investigations are not done in public and take time.
They are so secretive that nobody ever hears about them and none of their findings ever result in any legal action. Pretty cool how when you are wrong about something you can just say, "...yet!!! Hasn't happened yet! It will someday though. Might be 20 years from now, but it could still happen! Therefore, I'm not wrong!" It really is a game-protect level maneuver. Biden is unlelectable not just because he is a documented molester, but because he is falling apart, incompetent, and is also yes, a criminal.
|
|
|
|
Careful you don't break your necks sucking each other off too hard while you fantasize and project.
Oh, the irony. Everyone knows when you get together with people who all agree with you your correctness instantly goes up 20%.
Usually P&S is a circle-jerkery of right-wingers, but you don't seem to be getting much support from your team in this thread. I suspect its because of a combination of things. Same stale failed formula. Accuse until you run out of arguments, then shift to the next accusation, and form groups of hive minded people to stand around and assure yourselves that THIS TIME you got him.
You just did that by pivoting from Biden's Ukraine involvement to him being a creepy old man. The only thing you're missing is the hive. I think they've moved on, perhaps in search of a new queen bee. |
|
|
|
Polls, always with the polls. Polls are easily manipulated. It amazes me how many of you forgot all the polls with 90%+ saying Hillary was going to win already. Keep dreaming, the Democrats don't have anyone with a chance in hell of beating Trump.
The poll isn't about the general election, its about the primary election. Joe has to make it to the primary without springing a leak or molesting another child on camera first. I like how your reason why Biden's legacy is over just pivoted from the whole Ukraine ordeal to "springing a leak" (whatever that means) or "molesting another child on camera" (a thing that never happened). So what if he's a bit touchy. In this day and age, its standard behavior for a presidential candidate to boast about grabbing women by the pussy. Even though the conspiratards have convinced me to rally around Creepy Uncle Joe in support against their fuckery, I would be thrilled if Sanders actually became the nominee after toasting Biden and Warren in the debates. That may spell the end of the "Biden Legacy." It certainly won't be the Ukraine ordeal. Trump's legacy, on the other hand, currently hinges on it. Actually I was referring to his poor physical condition with his eyes randomly popping blood vessels, his teeth falling out, and him losing his mind. "A bit touchy" you say? There are whole compilations of videos of him groping small children and women making them visibly uncomfortable. These aren't even the long versions. But you are right, lets break out some more NO U!!!'s and project back on like 20 year old comments said in private, lets forget the public pattern of on camera molestation of your guy, because after all the end justify the means don't they? Biden's legacy is over, but unlike the constant fraudulent accusations against Trump, real criminal investigations are in private and take time. You keep fantasizing that any of these rejects has a chance in a fair vote. That is why it has been nonstop Russia Gate leading into a fraudulent impeachment all based on nothing, because that is the only chance they have of beating Trump is to use the tools designed to protect this nation from corruption as political weapons. If you think the American people are going to stand by and let that happen without a response, you are even more out of it than Joe Biden. Just keep reading them polls, it will make you feel better until its all over, just like last time. Well, at least you seem to be over your Ukraine delusion, so that's a step in the right direction. |
|
|
|
[edited out]
Sorry to equate your casual dismissal of something to declaring said thing to be a "farce." How dare I. Jbreher selective representation of facts and incredible leaps of logic Like what? Asking for links to the evidence so one is able to reach a conclusion themself? Hardly a seleective representation of facts, nor any leap of logic whatsoever. I thought trustlessness was one of the core principles behind this grand journey we all share. Don't trust - verify. amirite? Well, you _could_ have just verified the information yourself instead of throwing the ball back to the non-SV crowd. Which is exactly why I was asking for evidence. Your links do not make the case. Especially after such evidence was presented to you in my post that you overlooked in order to ask for evidence.
Evidence? Okay. Let's examine this together, shall we? Here's your original post: https://twitter.com/rusty_twit/status/1187995784957947904?s=20 ? Nope, no evidence in there. Discussion and allegation, no evidence. https://twitter.com/rusty_twit/status/1189678498337574912 ? Maybe. Not dispositive, however. The total of penalty txs over the probable time interval of the event show less than 1BTC lost through penalty txs. But tell me - why is it assumed that there were penalty claims? If his counterparties were on the beneficial side of a stale closing tx, what is their incentive to issue a penalty? They stand to win more through just letting the mistaken stale tx broadcasts lie as is. Seems we need to at least consider that possibility before closing the case. As at least one scenario. https://bitcoinist.com/4-bitcoin-loss-on-lightning-network-is-fud-says-community/ ? Oh yes - "says community". Hearsay is not evidence. I'm still wanting to see the evidence that leads you to conclude that his claim was a fabrication. Or are you just relying on the conclusions of others? You know breher, for a self-proclaimed bitcoin expert, you sure require a lot of hand holding when it comes to technical issues. It almost seems as if you are playing dumb sometimes. I'm busy right now but I will get back to you on this, even though you already known damn well why the 4 BTC LN loser is full of shit. |
|
|
|
tman and nutildah and xldiv ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT
 Sorry but that's the only line I actually read when scrolling through your latest monstrosity. |
|
|
|
I just checked the first page of both "Announcements (Altcoins)" and "Tokens (Altcoins)" boards.
Thanks to the new bumping system, except Moozicore which is now the third thread in "Tokens (Altcoins)" boards, none of these threads were on the first page of the board and bumping services are only wasting their money as their attempts are useless. (Better to say project owners are wasting their money.)
It just goes to show how little research the projects that hire these services do in terms of their marketing... They never even realize its a waste of money. They just get sold on the idea that it needs to be done, and throw money at it. To me, this lack of attentiveness is a sign of a scam project, who I believe are the main customers of this type of service... Its the same reason why scams plagiarize their white papers, website content and hastily produce fake teams -- they are in it for the short term only. |
|
|
|
I would agree with you, that if he solves the case with h4ns, it would increase his credibility somewhat. I already announced that I will hold h4ns liable for the criminal offenses he committed and the damage his false and misleading public defamation campaign towards Game Protect caused!  Stop saying you're going to do it and actually do it. No need to keep repeating yourself. Do it already instead of just threatening to do it. You've announced you were doing it over a hundred times already. Glad to see that thereafter my credibility on bitcointalk.org will be better!  You're truly disturbed if you think that your credibility will be better after suing one of your customers for complaining about you not honoring your word. Then or now, you will be lucky to ever have another customer again. |
|
|
|
So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?
No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect. So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever? You asked me a question and I answered it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
