|
Network stake weight is nearly triple total supply. Awesome job, keep staking
|
|
|
|
so theres approx only 150,000 right now? it will be interesting to see the % of coins being staked in the coming weeks/months. anyone good at math and wants to make some educated guesstimates on what the money supply will be in 30 days or 6 months?
edit: I think dropping the pos % down by 1000% every 30 days or something might help keep the coin supply from getting crazy...
And lower incentive to hold, resulting in a BALLS style dump |
|
|
|
Wait until Balls are 1 satoshi, then buy  HyperStake is stable @ 200-220 satoshi. BalLs have more value then the 50 satoshi now. Price is falling because blockchain is very slow. You believe it just will be better or we need a fork Dev? I am actively monitoring the situation. Staking has started to even out. People sending all their coins at once is why it's slow If everyone split up their deposits and did a few small ones every day for 8 days (then never again), blocks would return to normal time and staking would smooth out furtherIs it maybe a good idea to introduce a blocksplitter so blockes are smaler? A very simple version of coincontroll but then autometicly when the recieved blockes are to big the wallet splitts the blockes into smaller blockes? Not a fork needed only a new wallet version for desktop users only. There are no more splits. The protocol switch was something that could have been used in MMXIV if it went well. It didn't, so it won't I have an solution for splitting the blockes! Check my wallet: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/address/SjNQy7avCu6nySQtHQK4azoNnxwt2ZYhDbI Bought some extra BALLS two days ago when price was cheap and splited the Withdrawals into 25k portions. This morning I did a few payments to myself of 12.5K and now my investment is spreaded over more blockes. If some more people do this after they recieved their stake a better distribution of the BALLS in the wallets is establisched. So people pay yourself some BALLS in small portions to make blockchain more stable. Correct. I suggest at least 1 transaction per day over 8 days. Then you will stake daily. He meant automated splits in the code like MMXIV and 10k have |
|
|
|
Any particular reason why supporters of BALLS weren't told about this coin? Seems very shady to me...
I've been talking about it for over 2 weeks So i guess you was told you just chose not to listen Actually I did a search in the BALLS forum, and not until today has anybody mentioned anything about this 10k coin. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I would think an announcement would have been made in there about this new coin. Like.. Hey all loyal followers! Try out this new coin of mine! Nothing.. Oh well. It doesn't really matter to me, just sharing an idea actually. Good luck with this coin! I'll still hold my balls for now.  There's nearly 60 people in our IRC channel - #MMXIV on Freenode - This is the way to learn the latest ideas |
|
|
|
I have definitely not moved on |
|
|
|
|
Ecstatic to see both MMXIV and 10k on the front page of Bittrex for the third day in a row
|
|
|
|
|
Good to see both MMXIV and 10k on the front page of Bittrex for the third day in a row
|
|
|
|
just an update my 10k wallet and mmxiv wallet are working great, staking perfectly, coins matured and all, thanks for all your help, and also dont worry about the dump, its a proven coin with a good record and im sure will be around for a long long time people just want to free up some BTC for 10k thats all, it is a good time to buy though thats for sure
Agreed. Just a small hiccup during wealth redistribution. Nothing wrong with coins changing hands and shaking up the market; keeps it interesting! |
|
|
|
Any particular reason why supporters of BALLS weren't told about this coin? Seems very shady to me...
I've been talking about it for over 2 weeks |
|
|
|
how many 10K will there ever be , max?
I'm not sure if there is a max number. If not then after several years the number would be beyond reason. Even if it got to one satoshi, but continued to have support there. 500 of these coins would get you over 1000 BTC...theoretically This question is on many people's minds. However, with widespread adoption the total number of coins is not that big a thing. At some point in future if (when widely adopted) and it does become a huge problem for some reason, it can be sorted then with an adjustment to the staking parameters. You can ask a similar question - how many fiat dollars are there in total out there in the money supply? I have left it very easy to modify this later if needed. We can also raise fees, add stake modifiers, or do it a new way. Many options in the future As far as the max...how high can you count? Looking into this with more detail. It's not about how high one can count. having just 1 coin staking as you desire will get to this in 5 years: 8.2634497615169870410629960038999 e+191 If I am wrong I would love for someone to show me, but the numbers will start getting to extreme. Is that what you trying to test? Edit: 1 coin per block is just too much. To lengthen time on this, 10 '10k-toshis' might be a more feasible block value...again theoretically. But not my coin and I can't complain as I'm doing well.Good luck getting that coin to work. We spent a long time trying to make mining reward 1 * COIN / 100000, but couldn't get it to stake properly |
|
|
|
how many 10K will there ever be , max?
I'm not sure if there is a max number. If not then after several years the number would be beyond reason. Even if it got to one satoshi, but continued to have support there. 500 of these coins would get you over 1000 BTC...theoretically This question is on many people's minds. However, with widespread adoption the total number of coins is not that big a thing. At some point in future if (when widely adopted) and it does become a huge problem for some reason, it can be sorted then with an adjustment to the staking parameters. You can ask a similar question - how many fiat dollars are there in total out there in the money supply? I have left it very easy to modify this later if needed. We can also raise fees, add stake modifiers, or do it a new way. Many options in the future As far as the max...how high can you count? |
|
|
|
or snowballs can expect a reasonable suport, even restoring liquidity network - at the moment, you can not talk about it?
I do not control nor actively monitor day to day prices for coins based on yearly averaging systems; anyone who does will always make less than they should be and become upset. Use these three coins how they are meant to be used and you will be making a shitload of money, regardless of the price. If you want liquidity, put up orders on either side, sells or buys. Why is it my job to make people trade? I did not contact any exchanges to add it. Anyone who did, did so on their own Pushing prices up to sell coins myself or let someone else get out at the peak is not my goal. If anyone here is looking for quick flips, you're on your own |
|
|
|
approx how much time remaining to close the pow phase ?
About 3500 more blocks until PoW is done forever |
|
|
|
|
Yea...I'm just going to start deleting the stupid shit in here from now on. Not worth the finger twitches to type a response
Anyone comparing 10k (which stakes hourly) to BALLS (which stakes every 8 days) is legitimately stupid
|
|
|
|
@iGotSpots I think you are doing a terrific job. I have my concerns that I am watching closely to see how it unfolds, but overall great job so far.
I am looking forward to the future plans and what is in store for 10K.
Thanks. I think even through inflation, 10000% stake creates enough of an incentive to hold Even if the price drops 25% per day you are still making money if you are staking |
|
|
|
Wait until Balls are 1 satoshi, then buy HyperStake is stable @ 200-220 satoshi. BalLs have more value then the 50 satoshi now. Price is falling because blockchain is very slow. You believe it just will be better or we need a fork Dev? I am actively monitoring the situation. Staking has started to even out. People sending all their coins at once is why it's slow If everyone split up their deposits and did a few small ones every day for 8 days (then never again), blocks would return to normal time and staking would smooth out further Is it maybe a good idea to introduce a blocksplitter so blockes are smaler? A very simple version of coincontroll but then autometicly when the recieved blockes are to big the wallet splitts the blockes into smaller blockes? Not a fork needed only a new wallet version for desktop users only. There are no more splits. The protocol switch was something that could have been used in MMXIV if it went well. It didn't, so it won't |
|
|
|
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree, if someone was heavily invested in snowballs I can see why he'd want to hear more about what you are doing with it.
Then that's the thread to use. If you come in here and assume I've abandoned BALLS, I will immediately write you off as someone not worth my time for not paying attention to a coin where your money is. I have way more at stake if any of these coins fail than anyone else does, so to think I'm moving on when I have very significant holdings is both narrow minded and moronic Elitist? Maybe, but I don't give a shit |
|
|
|
I get not stressing the haters, but I don't see how assuming being the creator of 3 coins that are still around and selling staking hardware on top of that is very time intensive and might spread oneself thin, makes a person stupid.
When someone's first post here is: gave up on snowballs eh? moved on to another 1 with the same crap =/ It makes you a stupid person, yes, and I couldn't possibly give less of a shit about their opinion |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
