Of course it applies to real life, you need to carefully check team's currently statistics before betting. Teams which have only a *star* player and nothing more are just useful to promote the best player's career individually. The strategy for rival teams is very easy on these cases: just neutralize the best player during the match with fierce chasing and the rest of the team won't be able to do anything.
On the other hand, balanced teams which have many average players can offer a harder challenge to rivals. That is because the team's strategy relies on different elements and not only in one super-star player, so it's hard to neutralize such strategies.

As average teams aren't the favorite ones you can make a nice profit by picking the right one at the right match if you read these statistics correctly and of course, if you are lucky.

Well, maybe for tier one countries it's something new, but it's already happening since a long time ago in third world countries which have to replace their national currencies from times to times due to bad economic decisions such as populist welfare programs, high state expenses, corruption, low productivity and the classic money printing without limits as if it was a solution.
Besides all complainments USD is still one of the best and most trusful currencies in the world, otherwise we wouldn't have stablecoins here backed by american dollar. On long run this bubble will pop, but it will take a long time yet. By that time many other countries will have suffered already so the strongest economical countries, like USA, will have time to adjust their strategies to avoid the same happening in their countries.

I agree. Central banks are never going to be closed. It's literally a money making machine.

I can't see a blockchain usage for online education. Maybe some people think if you pay or are paid to study online through crypto currency it's already a blockchain usage, but actually it's just a payment method for a service like any other. Education is usually taught by centralized institutions which have their own private methods to store data, or it's just a business between two individuals (teacher and student), being a public blockchain not adequate on these cases.

On the other hand maybe I'm missing something here and there will be a usage for blockchain in education futurely, who knows...

Since they keep P2P transactions they can continue dealing with bitcoin even if it becomes banned in Nigeria. Although there is always some risk, especially in that country, where the police authorities are abusive, corrupt and extortionist.

I heard a story days ago about a nigerian citizen who had his house invaded by police forces who were searching for fiat (bribery) in order to not punish the citizen, however this citizen didn't commit any crime apparently. Nevertheless, the police didn't find much money there, because most of his savings were safely stored in bitcoin, so they had to go away with pennies. After the incident, the man was very grateful for having bitcoin, as his loss would be much higher if all his money were in fiat. That is good nigerians are using bitcoin also to protect themselves against abusive state agents behavior. And with such levels of corruption in a country the less you need authorities' help, the better, so I'm not sure if it would be a good idea to take cases involving bitcoin to the court.

As they can't regulate it in a efficient way they try to forbid exchanges between btc and fiat maximum as possible. This way bitcoin holders will be unable to cashout their profits to local currency and consequently unable to spend their money, as very few places accept bitcoin as payment method. I can't deny it's a smart move from the government, but people can still hold their bitcoins safely for the future, that is what really matters.
Unfortunatelly those who need to convert crypto to fiat frequently are prejudiced for now. P2P transactions are a possible solution, but not everyone has access to trustful dealers to trade with.

So why don't you add links to your official page, discord, telegram?
I've found your Twitter and Youtube Official Teaser, although I can't see any gameplay yet. You need to post a more complete thread if you want attention from potential players and investors.
There are many exciting blockchain games in development right now. A lot of quality and creativity are a must to be competitive on this field nowadays.

This is the kind of idea which may not work at this moment, but in some years who knows... I think strategy games are the best way to play PvP introducing gambling to it. I say that because these matches have many views on youtube and it's not something repetitive which relies only on luck, but rather in players' skills which amaze the public.
Besides the games you suggested I would add real time strategy games which I consider an upgrade since the old strategy table games like chess. This game genre community isn't so big, but it increases year by year and a gambling addition may turn things more interesting for a different public.

They look so confused about bitcoin yet, what is very surprising since we are already in 2021 and bitcoin is alive for more than 10 years. Probably they are just waiting other countries act about bitcoin to reproduce the same regulations in Bangladesh. In such events the most influent country on the area is the first to introduce the regulations, followed by other countries right after.
Personally I think legalizing bitcoin isn't a good thing, as it will cut your profits and introduce more bureaucracy to be followed, however it's inevitable. The currently gray area is the best status in my opinion.

That is true. But I think he just wanted to mean in a simplistic way fiat and cryptocurrency have the same finality, that is to make us able to acquire products and services through negociations in our societies. For that reason people who are against crypto currency should be more open minded about it, especially authorities who use their power to create obstacles difficulting crypto usage or even trying to ban it.

Bitcoin showed impressive results during the pandemic, while fiat went through the opposite way, what turned many economists and politicians against bitcoin in third world countries which are the most affected by the fiat devaluation. Sadly they see only the half empty glass and not the benefits bitcoin brought to many people during the pandemic.

Take in consideration the streamer will be making profit for that propaganda anyway, after all he is being sponsored. He can play with his own money, lose everything during the match, but his profit is guaranteed in the end due to the sponsor.

For me it doesn't make difference if the streamer is playing with his own money or with money given by the casino since the provably fair system is working, what means that is a legit gameplay with legit results. And of course, since the streamer doesn't promise *safe strategies* to gamble, what would mean misleading advertising.

I'm receiving emails from Freebitco.in <noreply @ freebitco . in> offering wheel of fortune free spins to be claimed through a clickable link.
Although I can't find any wheel of fortune tab on my Freebitco.in account.

Is it safe? Can I click the link without risks?

The public reasons depend on the country, but the main concern of all countries restricting bitcoin usage is about weaking their national currencies and consequently the local economies.
In Nigeria for an example, politicians fear that bitcoin weaks their fiat more than it already is.

Bitcoin has made the Naira almost useless, says Nigerian Senator

Transactions which can take a long time to be completed if you don't pay expensive fees is the main negative side of bitcoin and crypto currency in general in my opinion.

Nothing justifies a bitcoin ban. Bitcoin can't harm a country which is already harmed by a weak economy and corrupt public agents. It only benefits a country's citizens on their individuality, by increasing their purchasing power for real, protecting their patrimony against corrosive inflation.

If these guys were gambling through digital means, why were they in situ instead of their homes or any other distant place playing safely? With so many gambling options nowadays I think it's foolishness to break not only the country's rules, but also the social distancing rules entering the stadium knowing that isn't being allowed for now.

Do you mean we can play the *bitcoin game*  successfuly making profit and even starting for free while others are going to play the same game, but losing money?
I think I didn't understand very well your comparison about Fortnite and bitcoin investment.

---

Anyway the main reason people are afraid of bitcoin is the high volatility and loss chance over their investments, without any doubts. With so many ponzi schemes and other traps around people tend to not believe in investments besides those guaranteed by the banks (which are unprofitable when put against inflation).

Hello. Thanks for letting me know.
I've already answered both questions of your poll. I hope more people take it as well, after all it's of everyone's business here what the best online crypto casinos are.

That is why a public poll like the one @GoodLuckMate created is very welcome.

I agree with you. If that situation happens the casino reputation is over. It will make a lot of whales run away from the fishy casino, because this is the kind of gambler who places the biggest bets and have more chances of achieving the jackpot. I think no casino owners want to distance this gambler category from their tables.
Casinos doing that may think they are smart when freezing big winners funds, but in fact they will be the main prejudiced after such news spread in forums like bitcointalk and reddit.

As long as there is high liquidity in the market, yes.

Money = purchasing power

In other words: as long as there are people willing to trade with these coins, consequently valuating it a price, you have purchasing power in your hands. But once no one has interest for it anymore, your coins lose all their purchasing power. However not only crypto currency is under this risk, but also and more probable are the fiat currencies which lose value along the years.

Thinking this way everything in life is gambling. Investments like this aren't supposed to return large profit sums on short run, like any other passive income investment, after all it's not a ponzi scheme. If the investor isn't able to take the risks on short-medium run this kind of deal isn't for him. However on long run the chances are at bitcoin side, that is what I believe.
Furthermore I like the idea of earning interest on crypto currency because even in a crashed and bearish market scenario you can cashout some profit without sacrificing your initial investments.

Luck?

Sorry, but I can't see how skills will help you in an unpredictable market. Let's say you sell some btcs today expecting to buy again tomorrow or so cheaper to repeat the process, but instead bitcoin's price rise and you end up with loss by buying more btc. What means you would make more profit by being a holder instead a trader.

That is why I think the trading activity isn't sustainable.

Besides the traditional staking I know some altcoins projects like StormX work like a third party service which already offer cashback feature when shopping in sites like AliExpress, Agoda and Wish. Maybe Amazon can reproduce this feature with their own token on their site, although I don't know how free they are to offer benefits to customers because SEC vigilance.

---

I have no doubts if Amazon really launches a digital currency the success will be huge. But as the public becomes more demanding with so many interesting altcoins options around, Amazon needs to offer nice features to their currency's holders.