Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 07:39:32 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 [304] 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 »
6061  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bakkt has traded only 7 BTC so far on: October 06, 2019, 07:00:32 AM
This was always the "moonshot bet" of the NYSE ownership, looks like an underwhelming start to Bakkt trading with only 7 BTC traded.

How will Wall Street react to Bitcoin-settled futures?

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2vLp43pI2A/
Bakkt was surely disappointing on the first day but its effects were never expected to be seen on its initial launch! Bakkt effects on the market would gradually show throughout the weeks or months. It is a long term effect that we are looking for, not just a single day or a week lasting one but one that could last for years. A lot of people have had some misconceptions about how Bakkt could pump the price with its release which raised it too much high. Because of a lot of expectations, when it didn't perform as well as what people thought, they readily said that Bakkt was a disappointment and such but everything you expected was only hyped made by other people. Its path is just beginning so let us just wait for its progress instead of expecting it to suddenly pump with its launch.
6062  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Popularity of BITCOIN on Twitter Declining? on: October 06, 2019, 05:55:20 AM
Many people say that BTC has grown in adoption and use. But I think despite of this fact the popularity of bitcoin is going downwards. Here is a very interesting graphic I found which shows the number of posts with #Bitcoin on Twitter I think the graph is pretty identical with the price graph.



However I personally think there are two reasons behind the boom which came during the bull run.
1. Bounties & Bounty Hunters: During the Bull run bounty hunting was at its peak and all the bounty hunters participated heavily in twitter campaigns. Most of the tweets had some basic condition to add a few hashtags related to cryptocurrency I think that was the reason why the graph looks so tall during the bull run.

2. Trading Mentors & Media: A lot of hype was also created by all types of media around the world when they continuously posted around regarding bitcoin and how it went to moon. Moreover even every damn trader became a trade mentor because every coin was going up people gave calls blindly and became trading mentor. These mentors were giving calls on daily basis with these usual hashtags relating to bitcoin.

These can be the two reasons why chart shows such a long tower in December 2017.


Passing the popularity of bitcoin as decreasing just based on the #Bitcoin statistics on twitter doesn't really prove all that much. Sure it is one part of its popularity but people don't necessarily add #Bitcoin on most of their posts when it's about their account status or whatnot. Most posts that have #Bitcoin would be posts that are more on about advertisement or more about the latest news and updates regarding Bitcoin. It can be considered as a part of its popularity, but we shouldn't base everything about it on twitter. Just like what you said, bounty campaigns might have required the addition of #Bitcoin on tweets, this just makes the graph of today look normal or it is generally the average amount of #Bitcoin that twitter gets.
6063  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Notice: Coinexchange is shutting on: October 06, 2019, 04:02:55 AM
Coinexchange is shutting down their exchange for no good reason....Guys please take your Coins/Tokens out.
The website and withdrawals will remain operational until the 1st of December 2019.

With how many exchanges there are, I wouldn't be surprised that some of those who are performing underwhelmingly would shut down their services. Besides, market competition between exchanges is quite fierce so the closing of one exchange isn't that particularly rare. Sad to say for its users though. Gotta find another exchange to participate in instead.
6064  Economy / Economics / Re: Conservation Law on: October 06, 2019, 02:31:51 AM
As an engineer I learn about this Law some years ago, they call it the Conservation Law, and it applies for energy and for the mass... The law is simple:

Quote
for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy, the mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system's mass cannot change, so quantity can neither be added nor be removed. Hence, the quantity of mass is conserved over time.

And is the same for energy...

Now, after that intro lets move to the real question:

¿Why there is no economic conservation law?

This is a real problem because is really easy for the human to create money from nowhere, and the best example is a coin hard fork, when we saw the born of bitcoin cash, there was a crazy big amount of money created from nowhere. So, you think someday human will stop creating money from his imagination and create a Money conservation law?

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass
The conservation of mass law is a natural force of nature that cannot be changed nor manipulated. Human economy might seem like it is naturally controlled by supply and demand but it is in fact manipulated by how much bills banks made. This is why the global debt keeps on increasing because banks keep on printing money. By the end of it all, bills would've depreciated so much that the financial market would almost certainly crash. A global institution that manages the finite money of the world would be a nice idea, limiting the printing of bills to fit the world in itself. Of course, this would take astronomical resources to do since we are talking in a global scale, with differences currencies in the world. Is just an idea though.
6065  Economy / Economics / Re: 4th industrial revolution and what part in it blockchain might play on: October 06, 2019, 01:34:14 AM
Everyone knows that the 4th industrial revolution has to be data-driven and the biggest tech companies are racing to position them selfs for more data-oriented businesses, but given the fact that data storage is the biggest issue for them, blockchain can find itself very useful in this situation. One of the biggest things to watch out for in the coming years would be companies that align them selfs with the crypto community or are developing a blockchain of their own. For example, Samsung is one of the biggest phone producers in the world, more and more people are using phones as they go compared to a pc. Imagine implementing a hardware wallet to make your own blockchain network. Making it more secure and positioning your self „storing“ or controlling all of the input data from a phone.
This could be a new internet, without the problem of building huge servers to store the data for business applications. It could be stored on your phone on your hardware wallet nice and safe! Link to a Samsungs new hardware wallet for crypto (https://www.coindesk.com/samsung-at-last-adds-bitcoin-functionality-to-its-blockchain-phones)
Vice President of Samsung Electronics, Joowan Kim,  who is also in charge of major mobile service strategy and business development just announced a partnership with a blockchain company called Lympo which has been building a data platform based on health trackers and fitness activity (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AenafGYSrho&t=) (have your English subtitles on). The most important aspect of it is that using Lympo you can choose if you what to store your data safely or you can monetize it. I think the future will be based on voluntary data exposure, imagine if all of the phones on the market are stealing your data and selling them to the biggest bidder (kinda like now) and you can choose to keep it safe or monetising it for your self, getting rewards from it. The choice is clear! It looks like Samsung is looking in too that direction partnering up with blockchain data platform companies like Lympo and building a new internet based on safeguarding your data on a hardware wallet, most important giving you the choice of selling your own data, making you own it. In that case, making Samsung one of the biggest sellers of data. Keep in mind all of the biggest companies like Google and Facebook, makes the most money from ads and the only way they can sell most of them is using the data provided by their users. If you control the data the advertisers are forced to work with you. What do you think, is Samsung is really planning to do this? Is project like Lympo are setup for tremendous growth? (Not shilling but what your honest opinion)  Have you seen any company taking steps to insure to be on top of the 4th industrial revolution? Please share more information on the future tech and how blockchain-based solutions may play a part in it. Thanks in advance!  Cheesy Cheesy

Blockchain in itself has a huge part to play in the 4th industrial revolution. With its decentralized transactions, banks would go down and be replaced with it. Plus, with the recent news of how development of quantum computers is progressing, you can guess already how blockchain coupled with quantum computers would dominate the 4th industrial revolution. There's also the probable release of SWIFT with how Japan pushes for international network for cryptocurrency payments. That also shows how blockchain is already a large part of the upcoming revolution
6066  Economy / Economics / Re: Retirees in Mexico say their life savings were stolen by a Mexican bank on: October 05, 2019, 01:31:03 PM
Quote
SAN MIGUEL DE ALLENDE, MEXICO — Not long after Kathy and Jim Machir retired nine years ago, they left San Diego for a new home along the cobblestoned streets of this vibrant mountain town four hours northwest of Mexico City.

"We had been on vacation to San Miguel once and loved it," Jim Machir, now 72, said.

San Miguel de Allende is famous for its colonial architecture, bustling art scene, mild climate and low cost of living.

It has long been a magnet for American retirees, and more than 1,000 U.S. expats now call it home.

The Machirs sold their house in the U.S. and used the proceeds to begin building a new house in San Miguel de Allende.

But their retirement dream turned into a nightmare in December 2018 when they suddenly found themselves unable to pay their contractors.

Their story may send a chill down the spines of the more than 1 million other U.S. citizens, many of them retirees, who live in Mexico. The life savings they had entrusted to their local banker of more than six years had all but disappeared.

"I was speechless," said Kathy Machir, 67, recalling the moment she found out she had roughly 40 cents left in her account. "It just gives you a sense of ultimate betrayal, loss, horror…"

But the Machirs weren't the only ones.

NBC News spoke to nine American families who say Marcela Zavala Taylor, a former banker with Grupo Financiero Monex, had gained their trust only to disappear after they discovered money had gone missing from their personal accounts. These families, whose estimated losses total more than $7 million dollars, all say they were blindsided by what had happened.

NBC News has chosen not to disclose how much money each individual said they lost over concerns they expressed about their safety.

Jim Karger, 67, and his wife Kelly, 59, moved from Dallas, Texas to San Miguel to retire nearly 18 years ago. The Kargers said they began to rely on Zavala after the brick-and-mortar Monex branch in San Miguel had closed. She continued to represent Monex and handle the accounts of several clients in the area so they wouldn't have to travel.

"She was a very warm person," said Jim Karger, who, like the Machirs, alleges Taylor took advantage of his trust.

The Kargers and various other individuals say that Taylor's family is well-known in the area. Her father, Manuel Zavala, was once the town's mayor and her mother was an American. This, they say, contributed to their trust in Taylor. Taylor's parents are not accused of any wrongdoing.

"She wanted to know about your family. I knew about her family. We didn't consider Marcela Zavala our banker, we also considered her our friend," Karger said.

For a while, the Kargers said they had no trouble accessing their money as periodic statements would come in and money would be available through a runner.

And even last June, when the Kargers stopped receiving bank statements, they said Taylor told them that it was because Monex had been upgrading its computer system. At the time, they believed her. But by December, they finally realized something was wrong.

"She became harder to find, which was never the case," Jim Karger said. "Getting money was more difficult."

Karger's worst fears were confirmed when he visited the Monex branch in the nearby city of Querétaro.

"He said to me, 'It's all gone. All the money is gone,'" Kelly Karger said, recalling the phone conversation she had with her husband as she was out having lunch with a friend. "I just remember bending [over], just stopping in the street thinking, 'I'm going to be sick.'"

Devastated, Karger said she was eventually able to go through years of bank statements and determine that money was slowly siphoned out of their accounts.

However, it wasn't just regular clients who had allegedly lost money at the hands of Taylor, but family too.

Lani Van Petten, Marcela's U.S.-born aunt, said she was comfortable having a family member look after the money she had saved to buy a house and pay for her granddaughter's education.

"It worked smoothly because I never asked questions," Van Petten said. "I never got a statement. I thought, 'Oh well, you know, Marcela's on top of it, no problem.'"

That is, until December came around, and Van Petten needed to pay for her granddaughter's schooling.

"I had been telling her since mid-December, 'I've got to pay for Maria Jose's school, so, you know, send the money,'" she recalls telling Taylor.

But Marcela never answered, she said.

Van Petten then called Monex.

"They told me she no longer worked there," she said. "And they told me I had 1000 pesos in my account [about $50] and that it was all gone. I started to cry. That was the obvious thing to do."

In a statement to NBC News, Monex said 45 of the 50 complaints received from clients have been resolved and that the remaining five are still in negotiations.

"Monex reiterates that it is an institution that acts with strict adherence to national and international rules that all its businesses and operations fulfill according to law and are regulated and supervised by the corresponding authorities," Monex wrote in a translated statement.

Several of the people NBC News spoke to say getting their money back from Monex has been an uphill battle, especially when it comes to getting refunded for 100 percent of the amount they say was initially in their accounts. They also told NBC News they were upset with the way Monex responded to their concerns and believe the bank was involved in the alleged fraud. But many of them, including the Machirs and Van Petten, have since settled and said they were asked by Monex to pursue legal action against Taylor. They have signed confidentiality agreements that keep them from disclosing how much of their losses they were able to recover.

Monex also said it has initiated criminal legal action against the former banker and has strengthened its internal controls. However, Monex declined to say where or when it had filed any lawsuit against Taylor.

NBC News checked with Mexican legal authorities who said they have no record of any complaints related to the alleged fraud.


Taylor did not respond to several requests for comment.

Van Petten said that if she saw her niece, "I'd probably hold her hand and say, 'Marcela is this possible? Could you really have done all this?'" But Van Petten claims she has not been able to speak to Taylor or any of her family members.

The alleged victims say they don't want the hundreds of thousands of other Americans living in Mexico to go through the same thing they did and advise expats against placing all of their money in one spot.

"I think it comes down to doing your homework before you make any decision, and especially if you're going to do it in a foreign country," Kelly Karger said.

Kathy Machir agrees, adding, "Be alert. Be aware. Don't put all your eggs in one basket."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/american-retirees-mexico-say-their-life-savings-vanished-mexican-bank-n1059666

....



This could serve as a cautionary tale. A good reason to diversify holdings between banks and other stores of value like bitcoin.  Smiley

Banks have pulled stunts like this for years. They appear to be growing bolder and more blatant with exploitive and predatory practices. Deficit, debt and economic slow down could represent levers which increase these tendencies. As floundering economies can have a tendency to influence leveraged assets held by banks into forming massive credit bubbles, which were unromantically bailed out in 2008. Those negative circumstances coupled with banks already over extending balance sheets could result in many banks inventing ways to make up the difference to maintain their bottom line.

There's a fine line where deregulated currencies and trustless financial systems carry a potential to outperform traditional financial institutions which are regulated and insured. It goes against the grain in terms of conventional wisdom. Yet perhaps we will soon see it as a harsh reality which could be a scary scenario to contemplate.

Correct me if I'm wrong but according to the statements, It wasn't really the Mexican Bank that was at fault but rather was the worker under them? Am I right? Although banks can pull off stunts like this and just sacrifice one person to obtain a lot of profit, and though it's actually the same with bitcoin. Letting someone manage your wallet is basically what happened to the post but on banks this time. I'm just clarifying things, I'm not really with banks on this one. Banks could lie and lie all the time and they would still get the profit, but on bitcoin, the wallet is in your hands. No one, not anyone, can manage it and only you can access it. Unless you, of course, give it to someone. You have no one to blame if you get scammed at that point. Banks should just come to terms that their era is over, it's the era of blockchain now.
6067  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: 3 things should not be too in trading on: October 05, 2019, 12:39:54 PM
What the op just said are the ones new traders shouldn't follow or do when they start trading. They should probably instead look for a mentor rather than self research about trading since self research is the one that causes most traders to have incorrect knowledge about some aspects of trading.

Also knowing too many methods isn't really wrong or bad, you just have to apply the proper method at the right time. Mistaking the usage of a method is one of the causes for loss of traders.
6068  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: 6 ways to help you not be emotionally dominated when trading cryptocurrencies on: October 05, 2019, 12:06:50 PM
Facing bitcoin is almost always the same as how you face gambling. You trust what you see in the board and gather info yourself about how your opponent plays (if there was one). You'd rather lose because of your own mistake rather than lose cause you followed some randok "sure win" guide found on the net.

It isn't an exaggeration to call investments in bitcoin as a gamble and you basically face the gambling table when you start investing, and you stay on that table for a lot of years.
6069  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Dice - A small mistake emptied my wallet. on: October 05, 2019, 08:31:58 AM
A small mistake on dice made my wallet get emptied. Only mistake is that I didn't added an additional zero to the bet amount. Instead of 0.00005 btc I mistakenly placed 0.0005 btc. Further on the consecutive bets went for a double the value. This all of the sudden emptied my wallet. I didn't watched the wallet until the bet amount in the tab turned zero. Further watched the bet history and understood what big mistake I've done.

Bro. My condolence. With how big the amount of bitcoin is, having to encoubter countless amount of zeroes is quite normal and you just gotta get used to it. Though it rrally bloody hurts when that happens to you. Big lesson though. Either double check when you go betting or.... Stop gambling hahaha. Just kidding but you gotta really check things properly though.
6070  Economy / Economics / Re: Don't spend bitcoin. Not now. on: October 05, 2019, 07:51:11 AM
Bitcoin was not made to spend. Not for now. There is a misinterpretation of what Satoshi wrote in the Whitepaper: "A peer-to-peer eletronic cash system". He created bitcoin to be an electronic money system. This is a fact.

Before becoming a monetary system, Bitcoin must be able to preserve value over time. After that, he becomes able to earn society's trust and become a genuine cash.

People accept dollars because they believe that money is still backed by gold (as it was until the end of Bretton Woods), or because (unfortunately) they believe the government will guarantee the value of the currency.

That is, people believe in Dollar because they are sure that money will be at the same value tomorrow. Although this is not true.

99% of the world's population still does not understand, do not know and do not trust Bitcoin. And everything is fine. Bitcoin adoption is a lengthy process that may take decades or centuries to happen.

Bitcoin has never been about just being a simple means of payment. It is not like VISA or Mastercard. He is a legitimate Digital Asset and as such needs to earn trust until it is adopted as money.

Do not spend your Bitcoins. Not now.
The reason why bitcoin is used for exchanges is to let it adapt itself to the world. It was meant to be speant, so that people all over the world can feel its possible influence for the current financial market. Holding the coins is fine and all, but not spending them rill everyone could accept them is just ridiculous. You basically just said to stop the circulation of bitcoin itself. Imagine stopping the circulation of dollars around the globe, mayhem would occur right? Cause the world just lost a currency used by most people. Even thought the effects of holding bitcoin wont be as worse as what would happen in the said situation, it still gives off a negative effect for the adaptation and progress of bitcoin in the market.
6071  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What do you think Bitcoins biggest vulnerability is? on: October 05, 2019, 06:44:28 AM
What do you think Bitcoins biggest vulnerability is?
Its volatility could be called as both a strength and a weakness. Cause people are afraid of how it changes so much in just days in the market and yet thats how most bitcoin owners profit, because it's close to unpredictable. There's also the factor that government refuses to accept it so the masses also adopt to the same policy. Those that are ignorant of the benefits of bitcoin or crypto that is.
I wouldn't really say security as a weakness since that's always a part of a system and the community are striving to improve it anyway so I wouldnt really count on itbas its weakness.
6072  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Exacly what is the Reason? on: October 05, 2019, 06:03:35 AM
Exacly what is the Reason bull run have not started yet?

There is allready good things happening Bakkt, Binance, bitmex large volumes and so...


Still that all its not enough?
Bakkt is here, but the effects on the market were a disappointment to a lot. Even though it was hyped and people told the community that with its launch, bitcoin price would rise, when the launch happened, instead of going up, it went down. Besides, those factors may affect the market but since they were a bit of a disappointment, they really didnt do much to affect the bullrun
6073  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why don't US gov buy a trillion worth of bitcoin? on: October 05, 2019, 04:11:37 AM
We all know the US gov rules, dictate to rest of the world.
So if they cornered the btc market, afterwards the btc price could only go up, factor with this  a few btc friendly directives, and a massive coup would have been achieved.
What is the downside?
By buying a huge amount of bitcoin, they would be forced to partake in the community since owning bitcoin doesn't really help in the other natters that they manage. Besides, wasting a million, billion dollars on something you wouldn't get profit for isn't really that of a good thing. By controlling majority of the market, they wouldn't really profit cause everyone by then would know that someone is manipulating it in a huge/large scale.
6074  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I've chosen Bitcoin as my school subject issue. Need a bit of help on: October 05, 2019, 02:25:00 AM
The overall topic for my project assignment is: Rethink. I think rethinking money fits in perfectly but I've run into some problems. The subject matter needs to be problematized and it needs a conclusion at the end answering my thesis question/research issue. I'm not really sure what my question should be though. I also need a product. Any suggestions?
You should probably consider on how you can easily inform the possible panel about the information dump you would give to them. Bitcoin isn't that easy to describe since it involves a lot of information starting from blockchain itselg. Using bitcoin as a product can be fine but since it has a few problems, try to find one that fits in perfectly with your topic that hasn't been really discussed in the past. Remember to search whether your problem statement has been indicated and resolved in the past.
6075  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There isn't always a clear reason why BTC went up or down on: October 05, 2019, 12:54:14 AM
I see a lot of topics talking about why bitcoin did this or that. Sometimes there are clear indicators as of why but many times it simply happens. Coincidence, trading bots and simple TA can affect the price and create a snowball effect easily.

Imagine 3 whales with 1000 btc each decide to sell bitcoin and by chance they do so at the same time. Of course the price will tank and people will wonder why, bots will follow and so on.
It's basic demand and supply kinda thing. Only bitcoin is limited and not all people own it. Plus, FUDs, Analysis chart, famous person saying not to hold, etc are some of the reasons why the price changes at times. Bitcoin always has some kind of issue or news about it that affects it price, whether it be small or big news, which naturally affects the perception of bitcoin owners whcih then makes them sell the coin all of a sudden.
6076  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What's next for bitcoin ? on: October 04, 2019, 09:59:50 AM
We have been through a rough ride but what's next for bitcoin ? It has survived some brutal sanctions which were implemented by regulators but still manages to flourish (sustain), but don't you think bitcoin can earn more reputation by doing something good for the community like donating for environment cause, could pledge to help Amazon rainforest to recover from the recent disaster which will create more bitcoin sympathizers. Don't you think bitcoin community needs to focus on world affair so that we can be a part of mainstream and recognized by people ?  
Bitcoin isn't controlled by anyone so a plan to donate would need to be talked about by the community and only those who agree could join the said charity donation. I don't expect the majority to partake in that kind of session though. The community doesn't need to partake in charity to become famous since it's basically just a matter of time. And bitcoin won't be the one featured, it would most likely be the user who donated, or could be labeled as an anonymous donator.
6077  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What did you know about Bitcoin before becoming a bitcoiner? on: October 04, 2019, 08:58:44 AM
This is a question to people who at some point discovered Bitcoin, but only became Bitcoin enthusiasts later - what was your experience?

I'll start with my story - I have first learned about Bitcoin in 2012 when I was looking for payment options for one online deal. In the end I used some other payment options, and Bitcoin didn't catch my interest, although I did claim a 0.005 BTC faucet once.

Then in 2014 I have learned about Dogecoin, and I still have vague understanding of cryptocurrency, I traded my BTC for DOGE and even tried to mine DOGE on my GPU. Then I quickly forgot about crypto again.

After that Bitcoin caught my attention in 2016 and I finally became a bitcoiner.

Looking back at all this, I wonder why it took me so long to became more involved in Bitcoin. What if millions of other people know about Bitcoin, but don't consider it as payment option or investment or store of value - how can we catch their attention?
I started with one of my friends saying about bitcoin and how one of his friends used the computer at our school to farm them. This was the time when bitcoin was still fairly unknown and still didn't have much monetary value. I tried dabbing into it for a bit but wasn't that interested then. When my friend updated me that bitcoin was rising and I should try it out again, I became more involved and that's what happened. It was I think around end of 2015 or the start of 2016.
Probably people don't consider it is cause they don't know much about how bitcoin works as a payment/investment option. Well, they're hugely missing out on the big things that way though.
6078  Economy / Economics / Re: How did the Bakkt launch go? Quick recap on: October 04, 2019, 08:26:24 AM
Alright so Bakkt launched this thing and then the price of Bitcoin sank faster than whale shit.   What happened?

How do I sign up and get an account at Bakkt?  Did Bakkt get rekkt?  Or did Bakkt do the rekkting?
It didn't really bring out the benefits it would have when it released. Many were disappointed with the results when Bakkt launched since they expected a price pump on bitcoin. It went the other way. A lot of people were hyped about the Bakkt launch and when the launch started, the same amount of people were disappointed. Bakkt got rekt, and not really their fault but the market also got rekt. Big time.
6079  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Do you think majority of the people heard or read Bitcoin one time or another on: October 04, 2019, 07:38:17 AM
Bitcoin has come along way we have seen massive adoption and so many videos, news, and articles about websites and many people have invested and are now using Bitcoin do you think after ten years majority of people around the world have heard or read Bitcoin one time or another?
I actually knew of bitcoins existence back when it started cause of some of my friends who told me about it one time. I didn't really take notice of it until after a few years when its reputation has spread quite a bit. The majority should know of the word bitcoin or crypto and should have heard it once or twice especially after bitcoin reached its all-time high price. A lot of people were suddenly invested in it since they never expected something unknown to them to be able to reach such a price in the market. Most of the people who know about bitcoin though are those in the financial business markets and jobs that have relations to the financial market.
6080  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: No Capacity to Kill Bitcoin! on: October 04, 2019, 06:13:25 AM
- Congressman claims the US has no capacity to Kill Bitcoin!

No one can kill Bitcoin, Only the Catastrophic event can sure kill it. (example A meteor hit earth)

True. Bitcoin is way too spread out across the globe. And even if you did terminate the majority of its holders, since bitcoin or rather crypto is not controlled by anyone, the coin would still exist somewhere and would still be able to come back.
Podcast Topic: Wes Carlson and Omar have an informal discussion on varies topics including the following highlights:

- New people discovering Bitcoin - fear and greed

This is natural. People are scared of new things and would rather stick to the old ways since they are more experienced with doing that. On the other hand, people who start participating in bitcoin would naturally feel greed with how large its price was in the past and its possibility of repeating that event. Humans are naturally greedy human beings after all.
Pages: « 1 ... 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 [304] 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!