One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time. How many (out of how many) are biologically his? One is not his. She doesn’t know. He treats her identically to the others and loves her just as much.
|
|
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time.
|
|
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support.
|
|
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
|
|
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements. You appear to like thinking in absolutes. Life doesn't work that way. If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them. You don't get it. What is best for me, what I mean by putting myself first, is that my kids have the best possible life I can give them. What you call sacrificing for others is my selfishness. And the stronger and smarter and richer I am, the more I can do for them. Like making your children homeless or putting them into state custody per the example of the court case earlier in the thread.
|
|
|
Because it’s warm there and you don’t die in winter. I can’t be fucked looking it up but I bet Florida also has a disproportionate number of homeless.
Also statistics are a funny thing. Republican states probably underreport. “No need for funding for homeless, we don’t have any!”
Reminds of the politician who said that sodomy should be made illegal because there weren’t any gays in his state.
|
|
|
I’m not from the US either but I’m familiar with its geography. Fargo is in North Dakota. It’s bitterly cold in winter. You will die from exposure if you are in the open. San Diego is close to the Mexican border. It is warm. You will not die.
California also has a population of 40 million. North Dakota has a population of 800,000.
That’s two very good reasons why you would expect more homeless in California than North Dakota.
I don’t even know why I am talking about this.
|
|
|
You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego? Choose one.
|
|
|
The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male. Mostly they are just losers. So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.
|
|
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
|
|
|
Try to see it from the judges perspective. There are 4 kids which need to be raised. That takes money. Let’s assume the wife can’t work because the kids are too little and there’s too many of them.
The judge’s primary job is to make sure the kids are looked after. Everyone else can stand in line.
The daughter is his - he has to pay child support for her. The sons, well he says he loves them and has raised them as his own. But he comes into court waving a piece of paper (which could be forged for all the judge knows) and flapping his gums about how this is his get out of jail free card and now he doesn’t have to pay any money to raise his sons hahahahahaha.
The judge doesn’t give a fuck about a piece of paper. He knows that if he orders child support for only the daughter, that’s not enough money and probably all 5 of them (mother, daughter, three sons) will either be homeless or destitute. So he orders child support for all four kids.
The husband goes on a massive media campaign because MUH RIGHTS. He kicks up a national fuss. Does the husband give a shit about the kids? No he doesn’t. He only cares about MUH RIGHTS.
So the kids are now the center of a national media firestorm. They are probably getting picked on at school. So the judge uses the only tool in his toolkit and revokes access, because it’s obvious the hunsbad doesn’t give a fuck about the kids either.
I expect I am wasting my breath in here but there you go.
Won't somebody think of the men?! Proper men are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves and others. In your world Ibian it’s the betas or rabbits or whatever you call them that won’t pay child support.
|
|
|
Try to see it from the judges perspective. There are 4 kids which need to be raised. That takes money. Let’s assume the wife can’t work because the kids are too little and there’s too many of them.
The judge’s primary job is to make sure the kids are looked after. Everyone else can stand in line.
The daughter is his - he has to pay child support for her. The sons, well he says he loves them and has raised them as his own. But he comes into court waving a piece of paper (which could be forged for all the judge knows) and flapping his gums about how this is his get out of jail free card and now he doesn’t have to pay any money to raise his sons hahahahahaha.
The judge doesn’t give a fuck about a piece of paper. He knows that if he orders child support for only the daughter, that’s not enough money and probably all 5 of them (mother, daughter, three sons) will either be homeless or destitute. So he orders child support for all four kids.
The husband goes on a massive media campaign because MUH RIGHTS. He kicks up a national fuss. Does the husband give a shit about the kids? No he doesn’t. He only cares about MUH RIGHTS.
So the kids are now the center of a national media firestorm. They are probably getting picked on at school. So the judge uses the only tool in his toolkit and revokes access, because it’s obvious the hunsbad doesn’t give a fuck about the kids either, he just wants to be flow first class to New York to talk to Howard Stern about MUH RIGHTS.
I expect I am wasting my breath in here but there you go.
|
|
|
The average transaction fee on Bcash is now more expensive than the average transaction fee on Bitcoin. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.ibb.co%2FbsBAMS%2F12_BDAF55_9175_4_C4_A_BAFC_1_DE718_ADA9_AF.png&t=663&c=cBhbcT9oDGw8Kw)
|
|
|
Care to explain Jojo? I’m not inclined to click the link.
Yeah, wouldn't recommend it. It is a huge pile of steaming, stinking, corporate links. Coinbase is now monetizing their customers data. This is the first time my scrypt blocker has triggered on coinbase. No offense but why are you even going there? Or is it at least GDAX?
|
|
|
Care to explain Jojo? I’m not inclined to click the link.
|
|
|
ether can stop tanking any time here...dammit
We did talk about this.
|
|
|
Purple line is shorts on BfX. Squish squish squelch. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.ibb.co%2FcDyegS%2F4241803_B_C872_4856_AFBA_3754_B23_C063_D.jpg&t=663&c=x8N3JKZaqqf97w)
|
|
|
It will be anti-money laundering. He’s either buying or selling BTC to drug dealers / organized crime.
AML is the charge. He 's a pretty careful guy, though. Maybe it was a one-off bad trade like that. But he's stating now it's a DoHS play for relevance in the face of btc @NODEfather 3h3 hours ago https://twitter.com/NODEfather/status/964908384628572160Everyone asking me about why I was arrested for selling Bitcoin for Cash. Homeland Security came to my home to handcuff me. This is their plan to regulate BTC via legislation from a judge. @Potus has lost control of DHS/ICE. DHS is not needed when BTC wins https://twitter.com/NODEfather/with_replies worth a read He can make up any BS story he likes. AML is taken really seriously. Anyone doing Local Bitcoin is asking for trouble. If you are taking large quantities of fiat in a brown paper bag in an alley, maybe you should stop and think for a second.
|
|
|
|