what part?

ok heres an image to help


A= world wide bitcoin network
B= a mining pools network.
C= a pool, note a pool can be anywhere in the world, does not need physical attachment to a stratum location or asic location
E=a stratum servers, note a stratum can be anywhere in the world, does not need physical attachment to a pool location or asic location
F=a asic miner, note a asic can be anywhere in the world, does not need physical attachment to a pool location or stratum location

ok.. now then the pool(a) handles the transaction validation and decides what transactions it needs to put into a block. it then makes a BLOCKHEADER and sends that over the internet to the stratum servers(d). these stratum servers then over the internet send this small blockheader along with the difficulty required to the asics(f)

please note that that the asics do not receive 1mb of data that is 2000 transactions(based on a full block) they receive a blockheader and a difficulty and they transmit back a possible solution.(said it twice incase you glossed over it)

to clarify:
asics, stratums and pools do not send out every hash attempt to the bitcoin network and pools do not send every transaction to the stratum/asics..

so no matter how many transactions a block may have. an asic does not care, because all they handle is a blockheader and subsequent hashs. not full blocks.
no matter if the asic is in china and the pool is in iceland. an asic does not care, because all they handle is blockheader and subsequent hashs. not full blocks.

so many pools have asic farms in china so they can be just an hour delivery away from the asic manufacturers, rather then days oversea's shipping.
but the POOL server can be anywhere in the world. because what a pool handles (true blocks headers and hashes) vs what the asic handles(headers and hashes) are 2 different things.

So do you still consider it as a sybil attack by mix of Classic and Core nodes, or you just close the thread to dont continue to spread FUD when you acknowledge yourselves some people are preffering to use good vps server because of better bandwith (and DDoS protection) and not as a intention to attack Bitcoin network ?

You seem to be someone for the forums run by the owner of r/northkorea (aka r/bitcoin) and bitcointalk.org

Of course, I prefer the libertarian forums. Only core cheerleaders prefer the totalitarian ones.

Which is 100 times more decentralized than 3 with Blockstream collaborating people in a totalitarian country.

Many Classic nodes are in tech clouds because of well protection against denial service of attacks which small block criminals rountinely attacking Classic nodes. I cant understand who continue support Core and their BorgStream overlords anymore, all I see are FUDsters and denial of service attack criminals. Or any honest Core supporteer who preffer competetion and dont feed FUDsters left here ?

1. POOLS handle the tx validations and propagation, not the individual miners(asics).. in china. there are warehouses of miners(asics) but the pool handling the proper data are in iceland switzerland, america etc.
miners are just handed a piece of data AFTER the pool has combined and validated a few thousand txs, the asics job is then to hash out a piece of data that is not the whole block.. they contain no hard drives, the asics do not check balances or signatures. they just hash a small piece of data over and over. again it is the pools central server that does all of that and the pools central server is not hindered by the chinese fire wall because they dont have the pool server in china.

the ASIC miners are in china because they want the factory very close to the manufacturer to save hours/days on delivery of new units.

EG
i can join eligius pool which is not hosted in china, using an asic miner held in china. and the china firewall will not restrict my miner in any way because the data my miner handles is not the same data the pool handles.

anyone else debating the bloat argument should really compare 2mb old style txs to a blockstream roadmapped segwit+confidential payment codes and see that its blockstream that are more bloated and offering less transactions per megabyte

thank you for this explanation, I think I understand more about nodes.  In regards to the last sentence - Aren't transactions traceable to someones identity anyway?