I hope you got the irony: "The FED is worried Tether is printing money out of thin air"
I'm still drinking my coffee. The irony was unintentional on my side. But now, as you've pointed it out, ... you can't imagine how big is the smile on my face ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Regarding Trezor itself, they have recognized the possible glitches and intended to embed the security element into device, reportedly in 2022. Until that time my preferences are hardware wallets with security element inside, my private keys that control fund for every day use reside in Ledger nano which has all benefits of having security element inside .Clearly, at least in theory, without Secure Elements problems can occur. Still, it didn't happen. For years. I also have a Ledger. But if I'd have to now, I would not buy Ledger products, although it works good. Two things to mention is the leak of customers' addresses and the fact it's closed source. The thing is.. although it has Secure Elements, you don't know how good it's used. So while you do have a point, let's stay open for multiple choices.
|
|
|
Hopefully they are not going to chase our friends at bitfinex!
Well, Tether does need to be shaken a little and become properly backed sooner or later. Their schemes that allow them "print money out of thin air" (which in this case may indeed be true) may affect Bitcoin beyond our (or at least my) understanding. For example the bad reputation of Tether will simply help the central banks when they'll launch CBDCs....
|
|
|
maybe more coins?),
and maybe more vector attacks? AFAIK, Pi has no secure element inside so all procedures on generation of keys, their hold and security were left to the mercy of code which might have flaws that open doors to malicious apps relevant to those coins. I would not trust any homemade product when it comes to cryptocurrencies you posses. Saving a few bucks...hmm, it's not worth it. Well, Trezor itself doesn't have secure elements and it's going just fine. Some will prefer to do it homemade because they trust their own hands' work more than anything done by others. Some just don't have at hand reliable shops where to buy from proper hardware wallets. It's not only about costs and features, it's more. There's a potential market for this kind of devices. And if one is somewhat unsure he'll succeed in implementing it, a lower price may be handy.
|
|
|
the number of active bitcoin users' addresses has fallen to its lowest level since April 2020, which is a serious alarm for this popular cryptocurrency. With a large proportion of new investors leaving the market after recent falls, the share of whales (large holders) of total Bitcoins has now reached new historical records.
We're in the middle of a bull run. More people are HODLing, why would they spend now? Lightning Network gained popularity. Off-chain transactions are not counted. Counting the "active" addresses is more and more an useless and inaccurate indicator; of course, it's good for a bit of FUD ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Nice! Although longer name than preev, it makes more sense. I'll throw in also a suggestion: please consider digit grouping for bigger numbers.
Also, right now it's just a competitor for preev with the (undeniably) nice touch of historical data. Not bad, but you have the tools for more. Maybe for medium-long term you'd also add more fiat currencies (maybe from xe or similar) and more (all?) crypto coins that can be traded, at least for spot price. Then the website will become important.
|
|
|
On the one hand, with the creation of a central bank for digital currency there will be a lot of regulation to regulate crypto and this makes many projects unable to enter the market but there is a positive side that is increasingly being recognized by the Government of cryptocurrency and this is a good development for investors because it will narrow the space scam project move
The thing is... CBDC is not crypto. It's something that can be done even without a blockchain. It's centralized. It's just another digital representation of fiat money. And since it's their stuff, they can easily make laws only for this, ignoring or banning actual crypto. So unfortunately your hopes don't really have any basis. I know because I had similar hopes until I realized the truth.
|
|
|
Nu te pui cu "sectantii".
Denial. Sunt extrem de multi care prefera sa creada orice poveste cat timp asta ii ajuta sa se minta singuri ca investitia lor nu este o teapa. Una din cele mai simple directii de motivare (aiurea) e ca "dusmanii" sunt "gelosi" pe "averea lor" si de aceea zic ca e teapa (mda, stiu, suna ca o manea; oare de ce?!)
|
|
|
I found GamePi device locally for around 35$ so I don't have to pay any shipping cost, and online price on other websites is also around $30, I just liked the image I posted from waveshare website. PiTrezor is supporting same coins as Trezor One, but Trezor Model T is supporting more coins, it has bigger memory and everything is entered on device not on computer.
Oh, then it's very good. At 30-35$ the price is very good for basically a Trezor clone, even if it's "only" Trezor One. It will do.
|
|
|
or check the first, last and one middle 3 characters
I always check first 3-5 chars, some 3-5 chars somewhere in the middle and 2-3 at the end. I've got this habit since Bitsler website taught me to many years ago and it kept me safe. make sure you double-check the wallet address properly before clicking send.
Indeed, the double check is very important. And it's not because one will get transaction error - that would mean that the transaction was not sent -, instead it's because one may send money to address different from what's intended (for example because of clipboard malware). Also double check would mean that one checks that the recipient address is for the same currency as intended. One more thing I'd advise the newbies is to play around a little with the wallet of their choice before using it with real money. Electrum for example (if you use it, please download from electrum.org and verify it!) can be used also on testnet blockchain, with testnet coins. One can get some small amount of testnet coins from faucet and play around with electrum. This way he can learn about change addresses, fee, and all the steps needed for a proper transaction.
|
|
|
At 67$ GamePi is already at the cost of Nano S. But I guess that this Pi based design may offer bigger flexibility (maybe more coins?), I didn't look at the git though (I may do that some other day).
However, I like it. One more option for those interested. I do like Pi Zero (I have a Pi Zero W for other purpose), maybe that's why I like it even more.
|
|
|
Why do I say that forums can improve our ability to think independently?
Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and such actively monitor and filter whatever is posted there. Forums - and especially this one (bitcointalk) - encourage freedom on speech. This allows people discuss without barriers and improves the chances for one "open his eyes" and start thinking independently. However, it won't work for everybody, some prefer to spread (or believe!) misinformation here too. And I don't think that any forum can do anything about that. Of course, this forum is not perfect either. But you'll learn that nothing is actually perfect on this world. What can forums do better? I'm not sure. But I'm sure that if a certain forum doesn't fit your needs, you'll find another one. This is how internet works.
|
|
|
I didn't really expect to see more payout than, let's say, a BCH faucet, but 0 sats seems like lowballing ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I also agree that LTC or ETH would be better alternatives than BCH... BCH isn't well liked by a lot of people in this community. If the pay is that low, I'd go lower than BCH or ETH, for example Dogecoin. This would allow the user see that he has been earning something, even if it's a tiny fraction of a cent. Before you guys crucify me, we decided to use Bitcoin Cash instead of Bitcoin due to the fees but we are looking into lightning possibly.
Bitcoin fees are not big (just stay at least on SegWit), so BCH is not a valid choice, whatever you say. And if you set a minimum threshold for payment and batch it like freebitco.in does, you won't have to pay much (you'll probably have to do something like that whatever coins you offer anyway).
|
|
|
I got attracted by the crowd and I felt it was too easy to play after watching the board man shuffle series of games I was able to spot the match box without staking and at that point it appeared too simple. I had to stake $4 for a start and I won $8 I was so amazed at how easy this game was and I had to stake the entire Fiats currency in my pockets which was about $45 and ended up losing everything.
I've got a similar experience many years ago. I was a student back then, I've been receiving money from my parents on a monthly basis and that day I've lost all the money for that month and some extra for buying winter clothes for myself. The only lie was that I didn't find clothes I like yet, but for more than a month I've eaten almost exclusively bread with lard so that I've received new money next month and I've also put aside enough money for those clothes. It was not pleasant and it was a good experience for "if it's too good to be true...", since it was no proper/fair gambling in my case, it was a scam disguised in gambling at the corner of the street.
|
|
|
The month seems very slow so far.
August is usually a slow month. And past month was good, so August had no chance to compete with it. However: I don't say that this is an ultimate solution, but one idea could be to change (at some point) the look/colors of the signatures/avatars, if it's you who has done the graphics and the effort for change is small (else it may not worth it for my crazy idea). I mean that there may be that people already got used with your current advertising and don't pay that much attention to it like one month ago. It may be just a worthless crazy idea, but I thought I'd share it. It may also be that you may need more people/posts in the altcoin/token areas...
|
|
|
risk was mitigated
The culprit post is archived and linked, the culprit post is also quoted in this topic... it's like OP would really love to advertise the scammer... Of course, one has to... have a certain death wish to try out that, but on the other hand, it was already the same with the initial topic imho...
|
|
|
Money is money, no matter it's transferred as bitcoin, altcoin stable coin, whatever... In some cases a casino may attract more players by implementing more payment methods - more altcoins - because for each and everyone the best to spend is the one he already has at hand. Of course, Bitcoin is king. Of course, some will prefer stable coins because they work/think in dollars, or course that especially when bitcoin's mempool is full, most known altcoins will be preferred. But really, I think that casinos should simply allow all the coins that can be traded at an exchange. Or at least the ones with bigger trading volumes.
|
|
|
Easy, but takes time and annoying if you want to update the file inside encrypted archive.
Whenever I needed that I unpacked everything, updated the file, packed everything again... and it was not slow. But again, this is not the "pro" solution, I clearly know that.
|
|
|
|