Why did you drag me into this? I didn't comment or say anything about your exchange. However, now that I'm here, I will also add that the bumping service you hired is exclusively used to bump scam threads. I hope you realize they aren't even actually bumping your thread at all, thanks to recent changes made by theymos. Any chance you can tell me what the name of the service is? Did you hire them from Fiverr by any chance? Whoever it is, you should probably ask for your money back. Yet was not involved, but was voting for this flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2697312;page=iflagsYou have outplayed yourself by this " I didn't comment or say anything", please sort your accounts and try to play few persons a bit better. You left me a red trust before I supported the flag. If you hadn't done that, I probably would have never heard of you, or your scam exchange. |
|
|
|
OK... just switched in to my morvillz account. Oh shit, I meant nutildah! Yeah that's right, I'm nutildah. Almost forgot for a second.
Seeing as how this account never said anything about your exchange - didn't merit a post against it, didn't support a flag against it, didn't do jack - why did you feel the need to invoke my presence in your nefarious list of notorious ne'er-do-wellers?
Tried to sarcasm? Actually you forgot which accounts you have used to vote? Damn, you just exposed yourself as we never dreamed - https://prnt.sc/pofb7eDamn dude. You really got me. The jig is up. Only one problem: I supported the flag after you involved me in your meltdown. I would have never heard of you had you not left me a negative trust for... for what exactly? I don't quite understand. |
|
|
|
|
OK... just switched in to my morvillz account. Oh shit, I meant nutildah! Yeah that's right, I'm nutildah. Almost forgot for a second.
Seeing as how this account never said anything about your exchange - didn't merit a post against it, didn't support a flag against it, didn't do jack - why did you feel the need to invoke my presence in your nefarious list of notorious ne'er-do-wellers?
|
|
|
|
morvillz7z - +1 trust from mosprognoz *Advertising Sportsbet.io
nutildah - +1 trust from: mosprognoz, JollyGood, shasan(loans) *Advertising Sportsbet.io
JollyGood - +1 trust from: mosprognoz, nutildah,Coinfan,Coinfan,s1lverbox
mosprognoz - +1 trust from shasan(loans), shasan(loans), nutildah, JollyGood,Coinfan
Coinfan - +1 trust from JollyGood, mosprognoz,s1lverbox
s1lverbox - +1 trust from JollyGood, Coinfan
That's basically a rigging of reputation and big probability of all them being one person or paid provocators.
All of them started fighting scam not recently, their current orders are probably is :b2bp2p, coinsbit, us
All of them exchange reputation between each other and do -trust also together
Why did you drag me into this? I didn't comment or say anything about your exchange. However, now that I'm here, I will also add that the bumping service you hired is exclusively used to bump scam threads. I hope you realize they aren't even actually bumping your thread at all, thanks to recent changes made by theymos. Any chance you can tell me what the name of the service is? Did you hire them from Fiverr by any chance? Whoever it is, you should probably ask for your money back. |
|
|
|
I made poopie in my diapey.
Pretend time is fun.  |
|
|
|
Plagiarism is an accusation indeed when someone is accused as making its own when its not, in this case there is no plagiarism, as all references are there.
You copied text from your references word-for-word without providing quotations. It technically is plagiarism, and at very best its extremely lazy to not come up with your own wording based on the information contained in the references. In regards to the Whitepaper where the reference links need to be visible as you mentioned directly under the research materials are optional, it is more important that the references are in the Whitepaper, this is yet onother discussion in how a Whitepaper needs to be build up, as we not differ with the Whitepaper from any other big trustworthy projects.
Sorry but "other big trustworthy projects" simply don't engage in the behavior you do. They don't lift material straight from another source. Even if its a reference, they credit the reference while rewriting the information contained therein using their own words. With full respect to your opinion that people associate a team with scam with lack of social media profiles I can not agree upon, every person before making statements or allegations need to do their own due diligence, as you mentioned that i should be aware of this I can only comment that this is wrong in my case.
So it sounds like you're not going to add social media profiles for your team members. Again, this is standard procedure when it comes to ICOs. Again, its lazy to shift the burden of responsibility onto your investors. While I agree they should perform "due diligence" on their own, its not exactly easy to find you on the internet given you share a name with a couple of well-known personalities. Example: If you performed a non difficult research by only looking at our website, you can find our email and also my phone number from the CEO that you said that might not exist at all, you could drop me a Whatsapp message and had yourself introduced, and after a nice chat we could have a video call for you to provide a constructive feedback in this forum what gives you more credibility, and you should know this as well, especially in this forum.
Anybody can do any of this. It doesn't mean they are who they say they are. Again, its bizarre that you don't think you need social media profile links on your web page. |
|
|
|
... As for if theymos opts to lock this thread, I'm ready to serve his dog the following ... I fail to see the problem here. |
|
|
|
 Just to be on-topic for a minute, so no one can say that I never was, I think we're not going much lower for quite a long time, if ever. We may briefly touch $7700 but that's it. Going by recent volumes and just my breadth of experience from watching the wall, I think we're due for an eventual catapult back above $10k before the year's end. I'm not going to predict when before Jan 1st, but I do predict that by Jan 1st we will be above $10k. I'll even put my name on it.  Right, so um, almost like I said (almost), we barely, briefly nicked $7700, just a lil' nickarooski. Just like a buzz cut a little too close to the scalp, before BOOMARINO. Mr. Fucking T to the A.  Who TF knows where we're going after today but I'm feeling better about my >10k by Jan 1st call already. |
|
|
|
Dear members,
My name is Umit Kurt, inventor of iGO Safe and CEO of IGO Tech LTD.
The reason that I am writing is to highlight some of the above accusations in regards to plagiarism of the invention which is totally incorrect.
I didn't say you plagiarized your invention, I said you plagiarized your white paper. I even qualified my statement in my first post: To be fair plagiarized parts are only language surrounding the idea and not the technical aspects of the idea itself -- those parts seem to be original. From your whitepaper ( archived): From page 6: From seat belts to Electronic Stability Control, car safety has come a long way since the first automobiles were developed during the 19th century. Car safety is as old as the automobile itself. The first recorded fatality involving a vehicle happened in 1869 when Mary Ward, an Anglo-Irish scientist, was killed when she fell under the wheels of an experimental steam car built by her cousins. It’s likely that this event spurred authorities to adopt vehicle and road safety measures to protect not only drivers but also pedestrians. From an article on hyundai.news: 11 May 2018 - From seat belts to Electronic Stability Control, car safety has come a long way since the first automobiles were developed during the 19th century.
Car safety is as old as the automobile itself. The first recorded fatality involving a vehicle happened in 1869 when Mary Ward, an Anglo-Irish scientist, was killed when she fell under the wheels of an experimental steam car built by her cousins. It’s likely that this event spurred authorities to adopt vehicle and road safety measures to protect not only drivers, but also pedestrians. Also on page 6: Constantly evolving vehicles have created the need for more car safety features than vehicles of the past. As cars become faster and more efficient, they must also become safer. From a carsdirect.com article: Constantly evolving vehicles have created the need for more car safety features than vehicles of the past. As cars become faster and more efficient, they must also become safer. From page 11: Improvements in roadway and automobile designs have steadily reduced injury and death rates in all first world countries. Nevertheless, auto collisions are the leading cause of injury-related deaths, an estimated total of 1.2 million in 2014, or 25% of the total from all causes. Of those killed by autos, nearly two-thirds are pedestrians. Risk compensation theory has been used in arguments against safety devices, regulations and modifications of vehicles despite the efficacy of saving lives. From an article on sciencedaily.com: Improvements in roadway and automobile designs have steadily reduced injury and death rates in all first world countries.
Nevertheless, auto collisions are the leading cause of injury-related deaths, an estimated total of 1.2 million in 2004, or 25% of the total from all causes.
Of those killed by autos, nearly two-thirds are pedestrians.
Risk compensation theory has been used in arguments against safety devices, regulations and modifications of vehicles despite the efficacy of saving lives. Your white paper is littered with plagiarism of this sort. Even if some instances of it is lifted directly from your references, you should put the parts you are taking word-for-word in quotations. Otherwise it looks like you are passing their writing off as your own. The team does exist and I am one of the members. In regards to the social media profiles, information will be updated and even without, it shouldn't be a reason to mention that we don't exist.
Its highly suspicious that you didn't just include it in the first version of your website. Its absurd to think people will trust you without being able to verify any of your team members through social media links. Have you not studied what ICO norms are in this regard? Ico Template, many project are using ICO templates as it is more convenient and adapting them to their taste doesn't make them illegitimate.
This is true, but it just looks lazy. Every opinion is valuable and with respect towards anyonce taste, for some this project is not interesting, and for the other it is, also this doesn't make any project illegitimate. So, please do not make any other false accusations towards us as it might damage our image.
I strongly recommend you at least put annotations in your white paper where you are citing other sources. More importantly, you need to include social media links to your team members. Really, this is standard procedure and its hard to believe you are unaware of this. Coinsbit looks like a scammy exchange, it lists several projects known to be scams (such as KEP for example). The burden of proof is on you to prove you are not a scam in an environment where more often a project is a scam than not. |
|
|
|
|
^^^
colossal stupidity.
even if it was a joke, its not funny... better ways to make jokes via necrobumping satoshi threads.
|
|
|
|
Not that it means anything, but the Bitcointalk Bitcoin SV faction seems to be breaking from Craig Wright, or else they are just breaking... THEYMOS HELP PLEASE!
CLOSE THIS BLACKPR TROLL'S TOPIC!We are not responsible for CSW actions. But we are so sorry for it. Very big sorry for it. Theymos, please sorry for CSW words if you can. Please protect us from these BlackPR trolls Fight with real scam, not with us. Think there's a lot of coke going around Bitcoin SV - Bitcointalk Wing. -- Recommended reading: http://stiffed.biz (on topic) |
|
|
|
I had to do a reverse Google Image search to see where this came from, and found this gem of a website: http://www.stiffed.biz/Its pretty entertaining if nothing else. |
|
|
|
Whoever this guy is has clearly been losing it over the past week, for whatever reason... and its been pretty entertaining. Bitcoin is scam created by darknet pedophiles.
BSV is created by clever man CSW
Put your obsolete bitcoin in the your asses. Go to the hell with your f@cking BTC to darknets, where it should be
...
BSV - is shiny future of cryptocurrencies
BTC - is a shady past of cryptocurrencies
You degradants cannot stop evolution
You will never stop us, monkeys. It's very late for stopping a train. Theymos on our side, fools
THEYMOS HELP!
CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC!
 |
|
|
|
THEYMOS HELP!
CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC!
- your coin is up 16% today - this thread doesn't appear until the 2nd page of Google Search results for "Bitcoin SV scam" - no, and - why wait until today to post this plea for help from the man viciously defamed by your dev? |
|
|
|
What happened? The forum turned to a highly-centralised place with spam, fake accusations and fraudsters.
Its actually better now that those awful CoinIdol articles aren't being posted in the News section every day. I don't understand your beef with JollyGood and mosprognoz. I think they are just passionate about scam busting. But I don't have to understand, because you're banned. |
|
|
|
I'll always like Joe Rogan, and I realize this is the Onion, but he does ask some pretty dumb questions sometimes... Maybe just as a side effect of being too stoned. Maybe it's not Joe Rogan, but that AI version of him by Dessa? Hah, that's pretty funny. They forgot to have him work in something about DMT during his chimp hockey team advertisement. Other than that it was perfect. Well we all knew deep down that 7700 wasnt going to hold and when it broke it would get ugly.
I did not know, either deep down on the inside or otherwise. Me neither. So much so I signed my name to a prediction saying the opposite.  I can only hope I am redeemed by the second half of it coming true (BTC > 10k by Jan 1st). |
|
|
|
 I'll always like Joe Rogan, and I realize this is the Onion, but he does ask some pretty dumb questions sometimes... Maybe just as a side effect of being too stoned. I haven't listened to him in the last 2 years, which coincides with the time I stopped smoking pot. Apparently he's turned much more mainstream since then. Quantum thingy....
"Our machine performed the target computation in 200 seconds, and from measurements in our experiment we determined that it would take the world's fastest supercomputer 10,000 years to produce a similar output," Google researchers said
All lies. It's just modern propaganda to scare the masses. There is no such thing as QC. Which tenet of your religion does quantum computing violate? |
|
|
|
I can't believe the thread was launched on September 16th and it already has 65 pages of spam! That must be some kind of a record. We're talking an average of 36 posts per day of just straight 1-2 liner spam all written by the same group of accounts. My hunch is its one person controlling all the accounts. Probably the dumbest part is it started 5 days after the new bumping changes went into effect! Man, this exchange got suckered pretty hard. Scammers scamming scammers I suppose. |
|
|
|
So please for the good of crypto and the credibility of your website design a structure that brings closure either way to such allegations in a promt period of time.....
Dude... you are promoting them via referral program for some shittokens. To be honest you should be tagged for that, but I will wait for the opinion of Nutildah and Jollygood . It is against the rules to post referral links so I reported the comment. |
|
|
|
Hello coinsbit community lately I see that there is news about the coinsbit exchange is a scam?
But I see this community some people give support to coinsbit, so for now I am still confused which one I can trust right now about coinsbit
There is no Coinsbit community. There is 1 spammer or group of spammers hired by Coinsbit, then there is me and mosprognoz pointing out how this exchange is shady as hell, and occasionally a Cryptotalk sig campaigner wanders by. You can read more here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195285.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194551.0Likely further discussion will be added there. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
