|
Those of you in the signature campaign need to change to the new sig code
|
|
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified, open spots in twitter and facebook
|
|
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified. This campaign is now over, you may remove your sigs
|
|
|
|
|
Payments sent to those who qualified
|
|
|
|
I was going through the "Zepher" account and saw that he is giving out 10 positives for the same guy even though it was on different occasions (he does that with several users).
Your point being? If I successfully traded big amount of money with someone, I am not allowed to leave them a rating for each time? Do "Zepher" and "minerjones" have some sort of connection? Like siblings parted at birth?  minerjones 2017-01-04 10.00000000 Reference PIZZA!!!!!!!! yum The reference is a pizza picture... It's an internal thing, and a very valid rating. I can't exactly remember what the deal was with that Pizza, but I do remember it. It looks for me like a circlejerk of trust trading or maybe all these accounts are just owned by one guy - this is definitely fishy.
I hope some more ppl will check this out.
No. These people are literally trading thousands, tens of thousands (USD) worth of coins every month. If this is the case it is fine. Not knowing them seeing a pizza picture as refrence for a 10 btc trade in 2017 was a pretty big flag.
Another trust thread. It is always the same. Bitcointalk.org priority: 1. Shitposters 2. Trust farmers 3. Bitcoin 4. Shitcoins Btw can anyone explain me how different trust reports for user x from the same user y counts? I was going through the "Zepher" account and saw that he is giving out 10 positives for the same guy even though it was on different occasions (he does that with several users). Edit Do "Zepher" and "minerjones" have some sort of connection? Like siblings parted at birth? minerjones 2017-01-04 10.00000000 Reference PIZZA!!!!!!!! yum The reference is a pizza picture... Edit 2 It looks for me like a circlejerk of trust trading or maybe all these accounts are just owned by one guy - this is definitely fishy. I hope some more ppl will check this out. what drugs are you on?? many of us have traded $100K plus with both of these guys - they are on different continents and are both super trusted.. MJ holds physicals for me and on some occasions has shipped $50K plus deliveries on my behalf. also - there is a world outside of this forum where many of us transact.... See the reference i quoted. Having successful trades in the past is no guarantee. We had more then one of these mr. Long cons. Maybe you are on drugs or just arent here long enough? Of course there is the real world - but this is the internet and most people here dont know each other in real life. The only things they can check are the digital history and the reference i quoted without further information is a red flag no buts here. If you were referencing 2 regular users i'd have a problem with the rating but MJ is pretty legit. No reason to doubt his rating even though it might look fishy. I'm sure he would explain the reference if absolutely necessary but I doubt it comes to that. |
|
|
|
Whether this campaign will continue sir? Thanks
yes, i will post when its closing |
|
|
|
Wtf? That campaign is over don't apply
Last update from yahoo. All participants of this campaign has already been payed out. But this message from yahoo make me interested Xaurum team just contacted me and the tokens should be ready on monday/tuesday.
Lol they are just waiting for their tokens to be released that's why yahoo didn't closed it Exactly, once the team contacts me and pays tokens this will be locked. Until then, i'll leave this thread open for communication purposes |
|
|
|
Here is your application. I do not see 1 damn link posted buddy. It shows you clearly in the OP what an application and the work should look like. You did NOT follow the rules |
|
|
|
---
Hey Bud! Stan T is a scammer! As far as i know he is using the Lydian group and promoting his own coin, I don't like such people. I will suggest you to not get involved in any of the project that is created by them or endorsed by them. can you let us know which is the BCT account of that guy here? this is the account I was contacted on. Just had another conversation with this Stan T guy and apparently he thinks since I ask for payment up front when I manage a campaign that I'm a scammer. He says " I have you", LMAO. Also if you don't have a linkedin profile you are noone, or if you didn't drop out of school and make millions you are noone. Best to just stay away from this for now guys. wait a min. he took me to eBTG admin Channel. Do he took to you there also?? Then a guy named Waynes started talking to me, and he was upfront to pay me then started calling me a scammer and shut me from the group. I first thought that Chahal would not be involved in this scammy shit. But guess what? he is too involved in this. I will suggest everyone to stay away from this project. i am pretty sure Yahoo and atriz were also dragged by that Stan guy to some eBTG project. @yahoo why not to tag their thread and account? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2268158.0I am only tagging the accounts associated with LYdian since I know they're connected. |
|
|
|
---
Hey Bud! Stan T is a scammer! As far as i know he is using the Lydian group and promoting his own coin, I don't like such people. I will suggest you to not get involved in any of the project that is created by them or endorsed by them. can you let us know which is the BCT account of that guy here? this is the account I was contacted on. Just had another conversation with this Stan T guy and apparently he thinks since I ask for payment up front when I manage a campaign that I'm a scammer. He says " I have you", LMAO. Also if you don't have a linkedin profile you are noone, or if you didn't drop out of school and make millions you are noone. Best to just stay away from this for now guys. |
|
|
|
Because I want it open for the world to see the trolls.
Bitcointalk is a lot more open then a Telegram chat with you as the admin!  That is correct. I have talked with the Stan T account on Telegram today and sent an email as well. Waiting for a reply as to this "extortion" and waiting for verification of funds. Where you invited to a secret chat or group chat BTW? Stan had messaged me on this forum and gave me his telegram name. We had a chat where he also offered me to take over their bounty campaign. I decided to decline the offer for my own reasons. Also joined the telegram chat mentioned above asking for proof of the extortion attempt by you and proof of funds. All i got was heckled by the CEO and someone else so I decided the claims are false against you and the ICO is likely a scam. They don't wanna answer anything , just call everyone trolls. Account tagged |
|
|
|
Because I want it open for the world to see the trolls.
Bitcointalk is a lot more open then a Telegram chat with you as the admin! That is correct. I have talked with the Stan T account on Telegram today and sent an email as well. Waiting for a reply as to this "extortion" and waiting for verification of funds. |
|
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified
|
|
|
|
Can you tell me why you don't add me to the spreadsheets? Thank you. Because this is full |
|
|
|
The worst type of scammer. Payed for a fake campaign and disappeared. Abolutely pathetic!  As I already posted at the previous thread here is the tx where some of the applicants were payed upfront: https://blockchain.info/en/tx/473c2db446a78c42273464a427ccf74ce475974edd773fac2aa8c970a879ce2eThere is too many strange things around this thread but i think there is a chance that this guy was realy hacked (he realy payed over 200$ and said that the campaign is a scam, wtf?). Imho ofc thats your right but you butthurt too much about the time you've spent for applying for it. I have no doubt those recipients were part of the scam. I have little doubt that Nizar93 wasn't, in fact, hacked. And if he was, he deserves the neg for not stopping this sooner. Don't let the change in English quality fool you. That's part of the scam, and if you believe that just because the offer was made in relatively good English, you're a sucker. You don't think he could have had someone else post for him? You should really calm down with your accusations. I do understand you are mad because you were promised something and it wasn't delivered, but you cannot just go around and say everyone who claims to be paid is involved into this situation. I also applied for this campaign, got accepted and got paid - am I gonna get red trust as well, just because you say so? Before tagging anyone, admins should check the IP address on nizar93 account to see if IP address changed in last couple of days. They shoud also check out his writing style 3 months before and how it suddenly changed 2 weeks ago. He either had some insanely intensive English languag lessons or it's not the same person writing. Now, I'm not defending nizar93 because he myabe tried to sell his account or he didn't secure his account well enough, but you cannot just create conspiracy theories and give negative trust to everyone who applied for the campaign. On the same note, I seriously don't see any point in making a campaign, and revoking it 3 hours later. You would expect that a scammer would let the 4 day campaign finish and then disappear/not pay? Next time before posting please think how your unbacked allegations can affect someone's reputation here. So now no one answers? Should I also give you negative trust because you spread FUD, back to kindergarden?
Or was it really just about blaming someone?
I hope that at least someone would answer and we can have a serious discussion about this.
Hope you get your negative trust removed. At least you are willing to pick this up and talk about it. I wonder if Beerwizzard also received negative trust rating as he also confirmed the receipt of the payment which is basically all I have confirmed in the campaign ann  I have removed your rating for now, but in the future if something looks fishy stay the hell away from it. I may not be so nice to remove a 2nd rating for ignorance |
|
|
|
Hello Sir
According to rules Mondays 23:59 FORUM TIME is deadline for submitting links.Now its 5.22 pm Monday.
I have already submitted my twitter tweets and retweets links in my appilation. But in spreadsheet I can see 1 link short beside my name.
Can you please check it Sir.
Bitcointalk username : risatrakib
Thanks Sir
No worries you still have the rest of the day to qualify, just updated the sheet a bit early so tonights grading is a little easier |
|
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified
|
|
|
|
|
Tagged for now, also gonna tag the swiss guy. Obviously if the account was hacked then there's no way the swiss acct is telling the truth, and if he wasn't hacked then more would be able to prove they were paid
|
|
|
|
I would like the Atriz=decoded discussion reopened myself just because I feel that could be possible.
I would disagree, but you never know. Yes I could be 100% wrong but the thread did pose some interesting thoughts before it turned into xxxx=xxxxx=xxxxx=xxxxx and went way off topic. I don't wanna hijack this thread any longer with my offtopic bs, so i'll stick to the topic on hand from here on out. |
|
|
|
Padding Trust, ( at the very least), will skew others on the same Web Of Trust (WOT). Perhaps a Neutral should be used in many cases of personal opinion on a user. Examples: "I like what he said." , "I trust this person", "Sold a widget for 0.00001 BTC", "Great guy", and so on.
I have excluded several because a 1 trade, 2 post Newbie showed up as Trusted on my WOT.
Also, maybe the community should adopt a minimum buy/sell/trade value before actually handing out a Positive. I think this has been brought up before, IIR.
I'm in agreement with this right here. Doesn't feel right that a person can spend 8$ and get them a pretty green mark. I cannot say 1 way or the other if these users were buying the email deal just for the green mark but I can say I find it strangely odd that Atriz, Decoded, and Jamal all purchased this. I would like the Atriz=decoded discussion reopened myself just because I feel that could be possible. I know that jamal has a skype group in which decoded is a member and either decoded created an account and joined it with Atriz or Atriz joined it by referral. I also remember when I tagged Cazkys account from a thread in which only Atriz had replied in, I strangely got an add on skype from Decoded thanking me for tagging the guy. Coincidence? Maybe. Regardless I do agree that positives and neutrals should be handed out more sparingly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
