Can I see detailed information about the team ?
I think this information can be found on the official website of the project. There is also brief information about the team and there is also a link to their personal pages linkedin. There is also information in the white paper. Where is the official website? Couldn't see from the OP. And the purpose again of this project? Buy and sell services and subscriptions on their website? But the website is not yet up, right? |
|
|
|
I think, you need to make your OP more substantial. You can get the snippets from your website. You have a lot of critical info to post here. Also, you are aiming for huge amount here based from here -  I wonder how you can sell your token with that rate. Lil bit expensive even if you have bonus. |
|
|
|
I hope you are aware that FuryCoin has many cryptonight coins!
The difference will be how it will be accepted on platforms, websites or people and who will be buying and mining too!
Did you even need a 200 million FURY premine?
Well, you did not have to worry about encouraging community creation that way because when coin is good, it just draws people in.
They need to prove that their coin is significant in some aspect. If people will realize that this is just another coin trying to survive in the trading business, this will not stay longer. But even if the development is slow, yet, there's a purpose behind this coin, then maybe, they will achieve something here. |
|
|
|
Mass adoption is really a hard task to tackle for every project.
Having browsed the whitepaper, the website, the FAQs - seems that everything was well-thought of.
And by the way, why not make the WORBLI token directly to EOS token? Is there some valid reasoning why such decision?
Also, checking this thread, you might need some sort of promotional campaign to entice users check out your project.
Hey there, So WORBLI couldn't be built on EOS for many reasons. The main ones are that we are implementing AML/KYC verification on our platform. We can't do that on the way EOS is built. On top of that, if we're targeting enterprise, businesses will want to be sure their business is not subject to having them be voted in and out at the hands of the community. That is a horrible business model for what WORBLI is aiming to achieve. By fixing the price of RAM, businesses can be sure that things will be more stable on WORBLI and when a dapp needs to interact witth a user for AML/KYC, the end-user will authorize the dapp to use their private data on a case by case basis. If we look at the standard today, every time a company requires AML/KYC we leave our data out in the open. We only have to authorize them to use it once and they have permanent access and we don't know what is going on behind the curtains. WORBLI empowers users to control this a bit further. Thanks for reaching out.  Okay thank you for elaborating the answer on that. Appreciate it. Now, you have to strengthen your marketing strategies, especially we are still at the bearish market. Hard to attract investors. But, if you are active in your social media channels, it might help in getting potential users on board. |
|
|
|
i see on website that LANEAXIS raised over 2.4 mil. is there shows accurate current amount raised some where?
2.4 mln is the current raised amount. There is no accurate ammount in numbers. But they raised sofecap (2 mln usd). So project will developed in any way. What do you think about the potential of reaching HardCap? Despite the market situation, I see the interest growing in the project, and more people understanding the real meaning and importance of the project. But at least we have the guarantee of continuity of development With this kind of company, established and legit, reaching their soft cap is more than enough to get going. And to raise more than that amount would be a big help to fast track their developments. There are crap projects that can raise $2M easily, but afterwards they have nothing to develop. But this one has real product/service. So you can expect that the value of your token will be of worth someday. |
|
|
|
I believe it will not affect an ongoing ICO project as long as the project is genuine with very high potential to hit in the market. Sometimes, it's how the team promotes their project. There are times that crap projects with very articulate marketing team can acquire huge amount of money, while an innovative one with poor marketing can't even get an audience from the community. So long that a project is authentic in their goals and has very strong team, I think the eth price is not that significant. Maybe, you can buy more tokens now with the current value.  |
|
|
|
|
Any profile references of your team?
Is your project registered in Estonia? The contact number says so.
And can we access the alpha version of your platform? Many projects have created trading via the aid of AI.
|
|
|
|
Well, if the market decides that bitcoin is worth $6000(for a few years at least, I doubt it though), then I'm fine with it. A bit of stability is good in my book as it makes mechants probably want it more, as I assume one of the reasons some merchants don't accept BTC is because of the huge price volatility.
That's price stability and IMO, that is actually great since merchants would somewhat reconsider in accepting bitcoin as a payment option. Number one enemy of merchants when it comes to accepting bitcoin is the price volatility. They are afraid that they would lose profits if they hold on to bitcoin for long, and securing a third-party payment processor would also cost them some $$$ on the side. Needless to say, the stagnant price would urge merchants to accept it and see whether it will be better for their business or not.
There are benefits in that aspect - having stable market price. With more and more merchants that might consider accepting crypto as payment, it means, more adoption of the usage of cryptocurrencies. Price volatility is one major hindrance in exhausting bitcoin's full potential in the ecommerce industry. Thus, it will slowly create high demand of bitcoin in the market, and eventually increase its value. But you'll never know what the future holds for bitcoin. The price can change easily. |
|
|
|
Yes I store it in wavesplatform buuur to withraw its imposible fee 0.001 waves and kubo in sell price in wavesplatform is 0 no price so I have to forget this kubo ...I think this is bo shit no withraw no price and I cant exchange it all exchange price btc..waves...is 0 so what hhhhh
Every transaction in waves dex needs at least 0.001 wave (basic tx fee). So if you don't have that amount, you can't trade nor send assets. And if there's no trading activity for this kuboscoin, then, you can't do anything about it. Unless, this is being traded in other exchanges. And if in case another exchange is trading this kuboscoin, you need your external exchange kuboscoin addy & 0.001 wave in order to transfer those assets. Transactions in waves is pretty fast and straightforward. So you don't need a valid ERC20 wallet for this specific asset. You misunderstood the instruction because you try to put an eth wallet where it can't receive your coins. |
|
|
|
Ethereum has given us the power to do what Bitcoins couldn't do, that is owing our own tokens without much infrastructure and technology development from the contract creator. There is a downside in every good thing and I think many people owing it doesn't make it bad.
That's the reason why many creators abused the eth platform. They make this system as their playing ground of getting money from naive users. Though waves asset is very easy to create than eth token, yet, many developers prefer to create under eth platform because of its popularity of usage.
This is another issue. I once listened to an interview of Vitalik, where he categorically rejected the idea of moderating smart contract on their network. While this is easy to say and avoid any accountability on their part, I think it would be much better for the long term future of Ethereum if they introduced some kind of review process. How hard could be spotting and preventing fake ICO's from using their blockchain? I don't think it could be too hard.
Loose regulations in creating smart contract will bring a lot of scam/crap tokens. If the eth dev team will just provide some sort of regulations, number of scammers might lessen. But that's a lot of work to do on their part. Good research/investigative team is needed to implement such system. |
|
|
|
It seemed to me that the white paper was too short. I would like to see more technical details, rather than an advertising brochure. Engine ERC 20 has long been changed to ERC 223.
Why did you copy the post of dzkrb? Just to increase your post count? It seemed to me that the white paper was too short. I would like to see more technical details, rather than an advertising brochure. Engine ERC 20 has long been changed to ERC 223.
And I believe, I don't think this project will go somewhere. Checked this project previously and up until now, no major developments on this thread. A 3-page whitepaper? Common, it's like the flyer of a product that the sales guy is handing you upon entering a mall.  You are about to get huge money here, if successfully launched. So better create a more detailed and substantial wp. 10B supply is something even if it's worth 1 sat. Sports and casino bettings are money makers. Everyone knows that. I don't understand those users who are saying this is a great project, where there's really nothing in it. |
|
|
|
|
Do you have list of books that will be available on your platform this coming year?
You should have at least draft list of those books that you wanted to deploy on your system.
Also, is the shipping fee shouldered by the buyer? What if they pay via RiseCoin?
Do they have some sort of benefits derived from using your coin?
|
|
|
|
|
How much is the approximate cost of flyBOX?
What is the advantage of having FCC tokens when someone wants to purchase this equipment?
Any discount? And if there's any, what is the potential rate of discount?
|
|
|
|
|
Supply chain industry has really big issues to solve either by advanced technology or via blockchain.
Many projects have been deployed to resolve such issues but I believe this industry is really complicated.
And if you want to solve the recurring issues in this industry, I think the experience of your team is significant in order to deliver your results.
Will wait if you will disclose your team members in the future and see what they've got...
|
|
|
|
From my friend: "So my good friend Tomasz decided to make his own Crypto coin. I really like Tomasz, he's a good guy, smart funny and passionate about his buisness. In an effort to be supportive of him I decided to invest $500 into his Aga crypto coin about 2 months ago tops. Looking at my $500 investment today it's now worth $5681. Pretty Amazing! I don't know anything about crypto really but I do know that's over 11 times my investment. I'm attaching the link to share with friends maybe you you can have the same fortune as I. https://www.facebook.com/AgaPlatformToken/" Six months from now, let's see if he will say the same statement to you. Waves platform is a weak one for me and most of the assets couldn't sustain its life. Even with large team and have the capability to make it big, they ended up abandoning the project. Maybe right now, you still have the buy orders but give it at least couple of months and you know what I'm trying to convey here. |
|
|
|
It's good to know that you have your app available already for potential consumers. It's been almost a year that your app is out but seems that not so many people are into this (for android users only). Maybe you can provide us approx. # of active users of your app, if possible.  What are your plans to attract users as well as partners on this platform? |
|
|
|
What are the prospects for this project? I do not see people's interest, no one needs a token, even launching an airdrop did not stir up interest. 1-2 transactions per day on the exchange idex, and all, idax - there is no trade, exrates - there is no trade. Github - there is nothing  information about token is not even posted on coinmarketcap. 4 Generation Relational Blockchain very strange. I've been following the progress of this project also, but seems that people are not really into trading right now. I'm also looking forward for that 4th gen relational blockchain that they promised, but haven't seen any good progress yet? Maybe updates from the dev team? |
|
|
|
To participate in an ico is very easy and straightforward
1. Figure out the purpose of the project
2. Figure out the functionality of the product they are offering
3. Check out the team and laid out roadmap
4. Invest when your research work makes u confident
Most of the projects launched recently are crap and have no real purpose. To add from the above pointers, look out for projects that have real applications already in the market or been operational already. Check how many users are currently using their platform. This will give you idea if they will have the potential to hit in the market. And if you are not yet confident with your decision but have positive feeling towards the project, just wait for them in the exchanges, there's a chance that you can get them in cheaper prices. |
|
|
|
How are you going to pay the owners with dead coins valued at 0 sat already?
Is the lowest default value at 1 sat? Because if it's already dead, it's either 1sat or no value at all?
And what will you do with those dead coins?
A majority of the coins of the coins have not been delisted from the exchange, we will send an amount of WLTHS coins based on the current price of WLTHS and the current price of the abandoned project. If the price of said coin is 0 or has not been listed, a swap ratio will be determined by the WealthSalvage team. We're still in the process of creating a concrete set of plans for the dead coins after the completion of the swap. That information will be provided on the platform when decided. Okay thanks for the answers. So you are collecting trash here huh!  A lot of users own at least one dead coin. Most of them I believe, are tokens. And yes, a large number of them are also either delisted or not even listed at all. Time to discard those dead coins. When can we see the list of possible coins included in the swap? |
|
|
|
100T supply?? And waves token? Even if this is a community take-over, it will not go anywhere.
Waves assets are difficult to revive. Very few are really into trading in the Waves Dex.
Maybe that's the reason why the original dev team abandoned this project - they couldn't see any future on this.
Just accept that fact and move on. There's no solid reason to bring it back. This will again be dead soon.
I appreciate the constructive input and fair points from your view points. That being said, I will like to let this run its course and do all in my power/influence to make this project succeed. I just want to do right by the community and build a useful wave platform token that is supported by a strong community. Once again, thanks again for your input and for the time you took aside to read up on us and comment. Okay, sounds great! If you are sincere in making this project alive and kicking, why not? I just gave my thoughts regarding waves assets and it's a tough job what you are about to embark on. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
