Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 09:05:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 ... 475 »
6181  Other / New forum software / Re: I Suggest in Forum Chat Box and Simple Games Section on: November 17, 2015, 01:43:53 PM
- Chat Box
No it would be prone to abuse and with the amount of users there would need to be various subsections and constant moderation even with Activity limits it still would be a challenge to regulate it unless directly linked to forum accounts which would require more coding.

-Bitcoin themed arcade games
Since no one else touched on the topic I'll put in 2 cents.

That seems like a fun way to use forum money, having people create community games that get people interested in Bitcoin is not a complete waste of resources and a means of education and entertainment, it would even be a fun addition to the Bounty system besides forum bugs and the forum could create its own little section for that fairly cheaply so maybe that is not a complete waste of resources if it becomes to much of a burden it could be offsite on its own server but with the budget the forum has it's not something that is unfeasible.
6182  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 17, 2015, 01:21:29 PM

I dont see a problem with people posting in spammy threads, you know when you enter a thread that allows nothing but low quality posts. Maybe call it recreational posting, I dont know. Its spam, yes, but it is not derailing or diminishing an otherwise good thread. These are IMHO the bigger problem. People that do not read threads and just post their 3-4 sentences of emptyness or rehash other answers. Obviously if you are only here for giveaways or to post each day what you drank, there should be no one paying for your posts, but even if, I dont think this is a problem. Its not like the forum has a storrage problem. It has a spam problem and the spammy threads are not causing the problem. What is causing the problem is bad posts in otherwise good threads.

This -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243734.msg12990564#msg12990564

is spam, but its not easy to find if you dont follow the thread. Its annoying for those seeking help and a possible distraction as well. It might even be dangerous  in the sense of "oh just export your private key and upload it here". Its also difficult to report as it might be an honest mistake.

This -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1090962.msg12995337#msg12995337

is harmless, easy to find and not a problem. At least in my opinion.

I agree with what you said Shorena, that said the list users have complied so far is mainly individuals with most of their posts being one liners and located in off-topic and games and rounds and are singled out for that in the descriptions i'll call those type of posters recreational posters as well.

Example: This person just posted their username and guessed the price of something but did not really add any content etc. (Banned) The problem is if recreational posting is all they do then it is spam and looking back a few pages you can see the pattern.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=532293;sa=showPosts

That said posting bad advice in Project Development and Technical Discussion is definitely not harmless and can cause problems if the advice is misinforming and misleading and that is important to note, although in those cases I generally would look into if they were making an honest mistake and in need of correction or just padding to their post count there are some good newbies there but there are definitely bad seeds among them as well.

The point you mentioned is that their is a difference in how people view spam, the tendency of the forum is to look closely towards the recreational spam as it is an obvious type of bloat and less on the subliminal type like the post you linked which might require people to pay more attention although they are a big problem, that said both posts are spam in my opinion but one is easier to see than the other with a casual glance and look at post statistics.

That said there are cases where the persons posts may look like Spam but are on topic example people who only are posting bids in Auction threads but for the most part you don't see to many of those but it's up to people to scrutineer those type of posters before listing them.

I'll pick on Kolloh as an example since that's a name I recognize from luckyb.it as a regular user, the posts may be short but reading the context and areas of the forum they are in they aren't that bad however they would still end up on some peoples lists such as guitarplinker as they met his criteria of spam.

Reading back a few pages in posts you see there not all shit or else Stingleword would not have added the user to luckyb.its campaign when it was still running however if you look at a users most recent page or the length of an average post a person may end up with a different conclusion or opinion, example a warning vs a perma ban etc.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=349689;sa=showPosts;start=20

But I don't see any such restrictive exclusions on yobit campaign page.

Actually what most of the campaigners expect,I think,is that their promoters to be 'seen' in the relevant sections of the forum like games and rounds,investor based games with their signatures.

But how far the relevant section threads are in need of constructive,lengthy posts ?
Most of the threads need just usernames or just our 'two cents'.
And I appreciate yobit campaign/er for being genuine in this respect and not imposing any restrictions unlike many other campaigns.

And my first question in this thread was actually meant for XinXan as to what exactly prompted him to put me on the 'hit list' without taking all these things in to account.
I was wondering if he really expected highly constructive and lengthy posts in the relevant sections from me before he put me on the list.

That is one of the issues with yobit paying for all the topics it gives its members more freedom but at the same time users do not like seeing the spam spread to different areas of the forum, recreational spam tends to spread to other sub boards like services D@T etc, and looking through the thread yobit is now banning users from the campaign if they are purely recreational posters like Shorena mentioned or making crap posts in other sections.

As for why XinXan added you well he will need to respond, but in my opinion as Shorena and others have put it most if not all of your posts were that of a recreational poster and not really adding content in general to the forum, even if they were correct for the type of thread you posted in it is frowned upon if that is all the user does, not taking into account that most of your posts in general were short in length. As mark mentioned Bitcointalk is a forum for discussion and not a giveaway talk so its important to do both.

Really this Topic is now going off....
So much nuisance is created just for one user?
I suggest To OP that he should LOCK THIS THREAD and only unlock it when he wants to add more spammers (For Editing ) then again lock it..
This thread should be for information purposes only not for discussion ..

Your right, that said it's important to explain to users who are spamming where they are making mistakes if they ask.
I'll stop discussing this as well I feel like the point has got across with the help of others to explain their criteria for being added to the list.

*Deleted a Post so that the thread will start clean on the next page this is a long blurb apologies for anyone who gets confused by the quote links
6183  Economy / Economics / Re: Could the fact that ISIS use bitcoin ruin bitcoin? on: November 17, 2015, 11:45:01 AM
they must buy first, this mean that they will help the market , unless they want to dump at lower price, which is stupid

and i doubt they are mining...

Actually in some of the places ISIS control they do tend to run the utilities as well as all the other services, that said I'm not sure if a Geographic flag would show up where a Bitcoin miner is minting coins if you join a mining pool so that would be speculation on my part.
It is an interesting question.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/world/middleeast/offering-services-isis-ensconces-itself-in-seized-territories.html?_r=0
6184  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ever dreamed about Bitcoin? on: November 17, 2015, 11:40:56 AM
Have you dreamed about Bitcoin before? Well, recently I dreamed that someone sent me 5 BTC to my Mycelium wallet. I told my friend (in the dream) that those Bitcoin worth around 3000 USD. If that was true ... One Bitcoin is equal to 600 USD in my dream.

Well, I hope the dream come true one day - be it free 5 BTC or 600 USD per Bitcoin.

That's an interesting dream
As for dreaming about Bitcoin, once in a while but not a full dream just a feeling that its worth checking what Bitcoin is doing today, during the quick rally it was a feeling of needing to buy Bitcoin and see where it would go while not a dream sometimes Bitcoin makes me feel like that.
6185  Economy / Economics / Re: Could the fact that ISIS use bitcoin ruin bitcoin? on: November 17, 2015, 11:29:13 AM
No, the argument has been used countless times, the MOST USED Currency to finance terrorism has always been the US dollar for decades.
That does not mean that the US Dollar is a Terrorist currency, just as much as Bitcoin can be used by anyone, the FIAT/Crypto that is used to exchange funds is not at fault what we blame is how it is used and that is what people should be concerned and correlate it to.

The question is if people will bother to skim beneath the surface and look at the currency from a more balanced viewpoint.

Examples:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/412/banc/rep/rep12jun15-e.pdf
https://twitter.com/DougBlackAB/status/611922954885165056?ref_src=twsrc
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/senate-drops-its-digital-currency-report-in-bitcoin-s-ledger-1.3122748
6186  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Any Islamic State supporters here? on: November 17, 2015, 11:18:32 AM
The forum is not PC but that said I doubt your going to find any sincere Islamic State Supporters blatantly calling themselves out in this thread, looks more like troll bait than anything else.

I guess sarcasm is fair game although no one would be sarcastic about the tragedy in Paris and those people in ISIS calling for more blood as they are crazy, cynicism for some things the United States government and military do would be shared even amongst Americans.

If anything the forum leans more towards Anon with the Libertarian roots  Wink
http://www.newsweek.com/isis-calls-anonymous-idiots-response-hacker-groups-declaration-total-war-395313
6187  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 17, 2015, 11:06:26 AM
-snip-
I understand.
Should/can we make lengthy,constructive post every time even in the non demanding contexts, specially in games and rounds section where you just need to post your username most of the time?

No, adding a sentence that is not saying anything to your post is not increasing the quality of the post. There are threads where its not possible to post constructive, like give aways or "what did you drink today". I also think one should not expect a discussion when entering such a thread.

The main issue in my opinion is balancing the amount of posts in those types threads a user that posts exclusively in those threads are not really adding any content or quality posts to the forum most campaigns exclude those sections as a what did you drink today post in off-topic doesn't really merit much discussion or a giveaway in investor based games, on the other hand while discussing your personal preference of a Bitcoin wallet a bit of good discussion can occur as people prefer different ways of storing their coins.

The problem in my opinion is if the majority of a users posts are in the former type of threads then they would be spamming even if it is one of those type of threads that is non demanding.
6188  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: short guide to cryptocurrency The language of Bitcoin on: November 17, 2015, 10:58:04 AM
Nice Graphic, they are always helpful in getting info lol.
This one has a simple enough explanation of the terms people might debate the terminology a bit here and there.
Thanks for sharing he-he but its still fun to be sarcastic
6189  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Western Forces in Middle East on: November 17, 2015, 10:13:52 AM
Why are we there ?

Should we be there ?

Why are we there ?

To take oil and gas cheaply, destabilize the region and build up ISIS through funding rebels to topple other government heads like Al Assad.

Should we be there ?

That depends

If your pro Israel a weaker middle east allows it to expand its territory with relative ease.
If your job is in the military and you get work for building weapons to fight then there would be no jobs see American budget on military spending, and the idea of war investments for peace.

If your trying to create peace in the Middle East
(NO you'll only make it worse killing the dictators there they are what creates meta-stability in that chaotic environment destroying them creates a serious power vacuum where more radical elements moderated by these dictators can now thrive in)

And if your a corporation less government to deal with less tax = a better bankroll, hiring a few thugs to keep an oil area safe is cheaper than taxes on production.


6190  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 17, 2015, 10:01:34 AM

Please clarify your word 'sometimes'?


It means if it can be written as one sentence there is no need to split it into pieces especially when its short.
Most of the time...

Watching thread and I might add in a few on the list now and then.
6191  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Diff thread Nov 11 to Nov 24 Set up stage-picks are now open! on: November 17, 2015, 09:54:27 AM
Pick +11.2% to 11.3 %

That difficulty is something else I'll match it's present state for my call
Bitcoin Difficulty:    65,848,255,180
Estimated Next Difficulty:    73,229,045,484 (+11.21%)
Adjust time:    After 1050 Blocks, About 6.5 days
6192  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: RitzGrandCasino not provably fair (Has nothing to do with their sig program) on: November 17, 2015, 02:26:20 AM
I have reason to believe that Team Paul Vernon was behind this site: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1173703.msg12961390#msg12961390

I haven't heard anything about this site in a long time, the sites original form does not seem to be operational anymore but it seems to be rebranded as it leads to a facebook landing page for a service called luckygator filled with fake likes so in regards to the RNG issue it seems the scam accusation still stands, but the thread would need to be rebranded to a lucky gator scam accusation thread, either way avoid the app.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lucky-Gator-Casino-and-Slots/876708109028031
6193  Economy / Speculation / Re: 100 bitcoins. Will I be a millionaire by 2020? on: November 17, 2015, 02:17:54 AM
What do you think? I think I might be close. I'm guessing $10,000 per bitcoin by then.

It feels weird that I missed this thread but as I am not checking that many pages inserts a joke

If I Had 100 BTC and 20/20 Vision I would be looking back at 2015 and saying I wish I did that and also pat myself on the back for a job well done.
6194  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin and the fashion industry. on: November 17, 2015, 02:13:04 AM
Demographically an undercatered segment of the Bitcoin market is to fashion, albeit statistically its mainly male users who might not be looking into clothing as much that said their is a potential market there for products like yours as people like Bitcoin swag.
It's worth a shot in my opinion best of luck with your venture.
6195  Economy / Economics / Re: I'm dying while waiting bank transfer... on: November 17, 2015, 02:03:46 AM
Any change? Has your transaction gone through? What bank do you use? Transfers for me don't usually take a week to transfer Undecided

Why do you buy from coinbase? Can't you do a bank purchase?

Mine didn't process yet but I got a notification they are getting some new provider to speed it up on cavirtex, kind of curious though on coinbase as it seems to be just as slow.
6196  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin is coming back, stronger than ever! on: November 17, 2015, 02:01:55 AM
The google trends high a new high between 1-7 november, now the interest is going down.

So many opportunists only looking for bitcoin when the price goes up. Thus we need the price to be high in order to find more people.

The google trends is a lag indicator, since its going down it really did mirror the Bitcoin price.
Either way the awareness helped now we just have to wait for the next big event and perhaps a few interesting ones like Bitcoin Black Friday before halving.
6197  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Black Friday - Episode 4: A New Hope on: November 12, 2015, 06:48:08 AM
I'm glad to see another year of Bitcoin Black Friday also nice touch putting in the Star War Reference
Thanks for your dedication to it Smiley
6198  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2015-11-11 BITCOINSPIES - Bitcoin Dominating Google Trends on: November 12, 2015, 06:45:02 AM

The trends tend to be lagging indicators because of the time it takes for them to load
However attention has shown a strong correlation to Bitcoin rallies, what would be interesting is to see if it matches the price resettlement or if the attention keeps on rising when the trend data is caught up.
6199  Other / Off-topic / Re: 2016, The Year of Bitcoin? on: November 12, 2015, 06:43:11 AM
2016 is the Year of Bitcoin in my opinion simply due to halving and it being a significant checkpoint we can look at to see what has occurred since the last halving.
Either way this halving is something I look forward to experiencing Smiley
6200  Economy / Economics / Re: America's new debt ceiling - $19,600,000,000,000 on: November 12, 2015, 06:27:13 AM
That is a lot of debt, basically the one year income of a High-End Middle class member of society
Watching some of the Republican and Democratic Debates the only one that seems to be targeting the Debt Ceiling and lowering all forms of spending including the military machine is Rand Paul.
Either way it will be interesting to see if someone will try to push that debt down.
Pages: « 1 ... 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 ... 475 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!