the documents and statements h4ns published confirm that I did not cheat him!  The documents and statements proved you promised to repay h4ns. You failed to do so. Not only did you cheat him, you, game-protect or Game Protect of game-protect.com, are a scammer. |
|
|
|
Now today he talks about writing the White Paper - where he still owns the Copyrights
He doesn't own the copyright. Filing a claim for ownership isn't the same thing as owning a copyright. Do you have anything besides trolling and lies to promote your shitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
New poll up:
[453] HOUSTON
[454] INDIANAPOLIS
Right now the spread is between 0 and +1 Houston. I don't really follow either of these two teams but I thought I would pick a couple of different teams to keep things varied.
|
|
|
|
I could have just wrote "only tards believe Faketoshi now" and saved a lot of words.
You seem to be giving too much credit to early believers of faketoshi. He was never really believable, so there has been a decent amount of tard or wanton gullibility regarding anyone who believed that goofball in any kind of way that got to greater than not status. Of course, in the beginning the public did not have as many examples of how much of a fucktwat he was, but his story was never really convincing in any kind of meaningful way that should have brought any quasi-reasonable person over a 50% belief probability threshold. Hmm... I can't deny that you have a point there. Very unfortunate to see so many people giving Craig the attention he so much craves.
Its the conference's fault for giving him a platform. But considering that he's filling in for Roger Ver, I don't know why anybody would actually be there at all. |
|
|
|
As far as I know, the real Satoshi NEVER showed signs of being an asshole.
This. CSW's temperament doesn't match Satoshi's in the slightest. Interesting... I wonder what the settlement is going to be comprised of. No doubt Craig's handlers will engineer it so that he can somehow "save face" in the minds of those who have already drunk the Kool Aid. He will somehow continue the ruse that he is Satoshi into infinity, even if it will only be entertained by ever-reducing slivers of the most mentally feeble of supporters.
I admire the prose. Thanks BTW. I guess I could have just wrote "only tards believe Faketoshi now" and saved a lot of words. I wanted to use the word "reducting," but Google spellcheck doesn't like it, and maybe its better for talking about making soup or something. |
|
|
|
I'm a massive cunt. Completely unoriginal in thought, I rehash the same tired, disproven talking points time and again, without reason, solicitation or any semblance of sanity. In short, I can't get laid, and now I'm taking it out on bitcoin.
We know. |
|
|
|
We should have league tables of which governments are being cuntiest.
UK should always be in second place.
Turkey have taken the lead away from China briefly, knocking USA and Venezuela back, tied for 5th place.
I would put North Korea at #1... they are completely fucked. I tried to include all continents for affirmative action's sake: 1. North Korea 2. Venezuela 3. China 4. Turkey 5. United States 6. Israel 7. Russia 8. Zimbabwe 9. Syria 10. Thailand (that one is for Elwar) Honorable mentions: Iran, U.K., Philippines |
|
|
|
From the latest trust system meltdown scammer: Hatch doesn't even work.
In this topic, the Earths platform has been announced. If you don’t have a Hatch Core wallet that is used only for a HATCH coin, you need to contact HATCH support. Of course, the very next comment was: In this topic, the Earths platform has been announced. If you don’t have a Hatch Core wallet that is used only for a HATCH coin, you need to contact HATCH support.
You are Hatch Support.  See? |
|
|
|
ABC News aired a video on Sunday that host Tom Llamas said depicted a Turkish attack in northern Syria against Kurdish civilians. Turkey is indeed pushing into Syria and slaughtering Kurds along the way, but the video ABC News played last night is from a military gun demonstration in Kentucky that was published to YouTube in 2017. Notice the date (Oct 11) top left. And you even see the crowd standing still with there mobile phones recording the demonstration..LOL.  https://gizmodo.com/abc-news-broadcasts-fake-syria-bombing-video-thats-actu-1839028685Pretty bonehead move by ABC. Their credibility will likely suffer from it. Yet, the end of the article you linked sums up the situation pretty well: To be clear, there’s no question that Turkish forces are currently slaughtering the Kurds, as countless journalists and civilians on the ground can attest. But this particular video is fake and it’s a shame that it was broadcast. |
|
|
|
@OP: there is a warning flag being put on your account. You are trying to recruit advertisers for a ponzi scheme. People need to know they are dealing with fraudsters and will likely get nothing for their participation in this project. If you delete this thread, or at least its contents, and lock it, then I will consider withdrawing my support for the flag. Just PM me after doing so. |
|
|
|
I encounter a weird situation with them when trading on their platform. Say a particular coin current rate is 0.00000001 and I try to buy 20000 coins at market rate, it says insufficient fund. Then when I lower the amount of coin i want to buy to 10000 instead, it bought 10000 coins at 0.00000002 and 0.00000003. Is that a norm ?
No... not at all. But you'd need to post some screenshots for us to figure out what's going on. If I were you I'd pull my coins out of there immediately, if you can. They're a pretty scummy exchange. |
|
|
|
I voted for nutildah, based on my scientific analysis of blame disbursement in this thread.
Could also be that Nixon guy who is also mentioned a lot but isn't an option in the poll unfortunately.
Those are both strong options. Even though Nixon's brain is being kept alive inside a jar in a secret military base in Antarctica, I didn't think to include him as an option seeing as how he was also a Republican. But you could very well be right, who knows. I get all my news through 2 sources: a week-old copy of USA Today that I have delivered to my palm frond hut in the Philippines, and Infowars stories that I hear second hand from my outlaw miner friend, Leroy F. Haven't they been trying to impeach the president since before he started his first day?  lol Indeed. But now the shitstraws have just piled too high on the camel's back. It couldn't carry any more shit, and its back broke. Too many shitstraws. |
|
|
|
Boom. Big step for lightning. Never saw that coming, but it sounds like a fantastic idea. Perhaps blockchain.com will follow in their steps, and other wallets where the blockchain is maintained by a 3rd party (Exodus for example). In other development-related news, I wonder why there's been little to no talk of the Schnorr + Taproot soft fork that may be implemented in 2020. I wondered into the Development & Technical Discussion section and didn't see anything about it. https://bitcoinist.com/schnorr-taproot-soft-fork-promises-big-things-for-bitcoin/Sounds like this could go a long way in terms of increasing fungibility/anonymity and lowering fees. |
|
|
|
Opposed all of them. Why is that asshole still not banned?
Same here, opposed all. I am not sure if theymos is following here, maybe someone has to bring this to his attention. Well, theymos would probably say "the trust system is not moderated," but perhaps at least a temp ban is in order. On a side note, the project they are advertising is undoubtedly a scam, and they probably have some sort of mental disorder to boot. At least they know how to use the trust system features, even if incorrectly. |
|
|
|
|
Interesting... I wonder what the settlement is going to be comprised of. No doubt Craig's handlers will engineer it so that he can somehow "save face" in the minds of those who have already drunk the Kool Aid. He will somehow continue the ruse that he is Satoshi into infinity, even if it will only be entertained by ever-reducing slivers of the most mentally feeble of supporters.
|
|
|
|
Hey when you guys post your bets why don't you use the format
Team1@Team2 spread
Bengals @ Ravens -6.5 sounds great
Redskins @ Dolphins +2.5 sounds good (Dolphins win eventually win 1 and this one might be it)
Cowboys @ Jets +6.5 sounds great
So we know both teams and who the home team is without having to check.
This may sound like a dumb question, but does the spread refer to the home team? For example, its the Ravens that are -6.5? I'm going to guess the answer is "yes" without actually researching the spreads. Godwin and Evans' performances gave me a leg up on this week's fantasy game so far, even if TB lost their game. Its still gonna be a close one... |
|
|
|
Not too sure those who thought there would be violence in theaters where it was being shown caused so much unnecessary angst about nothing.
It wasn't about incel culture but about a guy who was fed up about how society treated him with his medical condition and the abuse set upon him.
It was a character story and anybody who read a comic book with him in it, would know nobody would copy what the joker is.
He is the most maniacal villain since introduced to pop culture and could not be replicated even if somebody tried.
Any attempts would be a fail so unless already mentally ill, that individual wouldn't even try.
This is a good analysis of the movie and I concur with most of it. However, its really hard to walk away from it feeling at all sympathetic for him, given events that occurred in the second half of the movie. Outside the theater there were signs reminding everyone that jokes about bombs in a crowded public area are punishable by up to 5 years in prison, but I think those might always be there... not too sure. |
|
|
|
Nixon was being investigated under a criminal proceeding, which was the basis for subpoenas, which he defied, which was the basis for the article of impeachment against him. Anything else is just you attempting to redefine my argument and demanding I defend your interpretation.
You're now saying one thing lead to the other. Before you were saying one thing was the same as the other, which is not true. The Nixon impeachment was based upon the criminal Watergate incident, so yes, it was a criminal proceeding.
An impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding. I think you at least understand this now. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
