Let's do a profit calculation.. The nano can do 20MHASH of x11 0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY 500$ = 1,32BTC 1.32/0.003 = 440 It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming.. How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.
|
|
|
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks. keep up the good work. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Will do! Thank you! Definitely need some spare time to do some upgrades/clean up. Future plans :p
|
|
|
BTC mining is still profitable. I have a few asics running, they're profitable, just not as much as gpu mining is at this moment.
Do you have free electricity? Otherwise then no they probably aren't. Even 10 cents profit is profit, thus profitable. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
will we be able to mine for 1 more year ? Is it possible for Eth to be turn into solid POS coin by this time ? I think 7950/7970/R9280x r the most efficient cards for mining Ethereum. Is there any timeline of schedule for Eth to be turn into POS only coin ?
By the time it goes POS, ETH mining won't be profitable anymore with the huge difficulty increases. I predict only 2 more months of profitable mining. By then it will become like BTC mining where there are none to little profits with those with free electricity. Huh? When it goes POS <-- there won't be any more hardware mining done anymore because it's "POS". And i don't really understand why you're making a comparison with BTC mining. BTC mining is still profitable. I have a few asics running, they're profitable, just not as much as gpu mining is at this moment.
|
|
|
I've tried pretty much every mine and every configuration possible, but nothing ever shows up on the website. I've tried different miners and everything, but I am truly at a loss why it doesn't work. Using a 390 and Win10 are my only guesses. Quite frustrating...
You're probably doing something else wrong. Windows 10 isn't the issue because i have rigs with win 10 and are working perfectly. your 390 isn't the issue either. Probably a configuration issue. Post your configs here and there will be someone who will point you to the mistake. Greetings
|
|
|
how do i set up a proxy solo mineing ? was thinking of youseing my digitalocean droplet for that.
solo mineing with prozx so i can connect more GPU's to it
the things i found did help much "might be that i'm stupid" i dont rule that out
There's a few tutorials online on how to set it up. Watch out though, it isn't very stable and you'll need to have a decent amount of hash to find blocks. You'll eventually find some, but that'll take some time (depending on your hash rate.) I would suggest to just connect to a pool. (one that doesn't have more than 50% of the network) "isn't very stable"? I've had the cpp-ethereum daemon segfault roughly twice a day. Try running the go version... runs fine, will keep running fine until there's that little moment where it loses sync. Even on a very decent server with a very stable connection.
|
|
|
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me. You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.
Thank you very much for your kind words. This is more valuable to me then money! Really appreciate it! :-)
|
|
|
how do i set up a proxy solo mineing ? was thinking of youseing my digitalocean droplet for that.
solo mineing with prozx so i can connect more GPU's to it
the things i found did help much "might be that i'm stupid" i dont rule that out
There's a few tutorials online on how to set it up. Watch out though, it isn't very stable and you'll need to have a decent amount of hash to find blocks. You'll eventually find some, but that'll take some time (depending on your hash rate.) I would suggest to just connect to a pool. (one that doesn't have more than 50% of the network)
|
|
|
Mm, imagine ethereum and sia working together ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) .....
|
|
|
is there a way to choose a payout amount on this pool?
No, you get payed out in full block amounts when it's your turn. 5 ether each time.
|
|
|
Regenerate your dag file as well. Could help.
|
|
|
I own the lepa g1600 and i'm very happy with it.
Up to you..
|
|
|
I have one problem, how i connect 6x USB 3.0 Riser to a MOBO?
As i see the H81 got only usb2.0
You don't need 6x usb..you need 6x pci 1x or 16x. The usb is the connection from the risercard to the pci connection :-)
|
|
|
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I have yes. Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) But if it was true. They should mention it. Greetings ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Maybe you should stop trolling and start Open sourcing. The public kernel code kan be improved alot, but nobody cares because they have binaries that works. Everybody have heard of sgminer. They compile it and run it and get bad results.
95% download it. They don't compile it themselves sp. Most don't want that hassle. I believe that most don't even know how to succesfully compile sgminer. Also, most use windows these days. They google, they find cryptomining blog and they have their faster miner. No hassle and it works. :-)
|
|
|
Sure, in a way you're right, it's not "really" opensource, but it's available to everyone. So next time if you compare, compare with what is available to the general public. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Thank you all.
Im just thinking about the Nano, it use only 150W at 28Mhs i saw.
That test was a few months ago. Hashrate has dropped a little due to the bigger DAG file. It's more like 26Mh @ 150W. But more interesting = 22Mh @ 65W with some down clocking. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) It is not possible for 22MH @65W. The maximum down voltage is -100 mV with MSI afterburner as far as I know. It's about Power Target or TDP Limit or however you want to call it and not voltage. I have a feeling eliovp uses custom bios too... ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You can pull the bios from the card, mod it manually and rewrite it. Not that difficult. However, when you do it wrong, you could break it and bye bye to your warranty.. Use to do that a lot when running only on linux. Thx to Wolf though :-)
|
|
|
As I mentioned before, GPU mining hash has grown about 30% in the last two weeks... Maybe closer to 50% as Eth has gained another 300Mh since then.
The x11 algo used to have 500GHASH. The Quark algo used to have 200-300 GHASH the lyra2v2 algo used to have 100GHASH etc.. People move their rigs to mine etherum. If etherum go pos, they will move their rigs back to what they used to mine. ps. The quark algo is now paying above 0.5BTC/GHASH @ http://www.zpool.ca (0,015234BTC / Day ($6.4)) The 980ti should do 30MHASH with my buyable private miner on the 980ti with a little overclock. (0.1BTC) The quark opensource kernal does 2.5MHASH on the r9 280x The quark opensource kernel(nicehash package) does at least 16MH on a 280x I remember my fury x doing 25Mh at stock settings....
|
|
|
Thank you all.
Im just thinking about the Nano, it use only 150W at 28Mhs i saw.
That test was a few months ago. Hashrate has dropped a little due to the bigger DAG file. It's more like 26Mh @ 150W. But more interesting = 22Mh @ 65W with some down clocking. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) It is not possible for 22MH @65W. The maximum down voltage is -100 mV with MSI afterburner as far as I know. Ok, if you say so ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Thank you all.
Im just thinking about the Nano, it use only 150W at 28Mhs i saw.
That test was a few months ago. Hashrate has dropped a little due to the bigger DAG file. It's more like 26Mh @ 150W. But more interesting = 22Mh @ 65W with some down clocking. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I'm having a hard time believing that.Atm 95 Nano's running all @ 22Mh per card. (Basically more because i'm doing more than 2.1Ghz) Complete farm is at exactly 7.6 KW 7.6 KW / 95 = 80Watt (not including mobo's / processors / memory) Here's a picture of my meter (fusebox only for the farm) at this moment. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_cBBoZ_PTwOVGdod0k2c1dLU3M3NkdFZ3JUY2kxamhxME1ZA bit unclear because it's dark in here. Greetings. Damn, that's pretty crazy. Without the other components those cards indeed pull 65 watts each. But, my 970's do 20.5 Mh/s at around 150 watts but they are much cheaper. In fact - at least with the prices available to me - a 970 is paying for itself in 72 days while a Nano will only hit ROI in exactly a 100 days. That is with $0.15 per kWh. But I'm already at the limit of how much electricity I can pull so I can see why those Nanos are appealing. And if Eth gets out of the picture efficiency once again will be key. Bought them all in bulk at a very nice price, so your calculation is a bit off in my case ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Can you tell me which components you are using for you gpu rigs? 5 GPU per rig? and which brand you use for the gpus? is it possible to put 6 Nanos?
Thanks
6Nano's per rig.
|
|
|
|