Yo!Mix ima slobodno mjesto za jednog člana u avatar kampanji.

^^Ovo!

Bilo bi dobro da imamo verziju foruma koja bi bila prilagođenija mobilnim platformama, pa makar samo za čitanje i brze odgovore dok smo u pokretu i daleko od naših računala i laptopa. Nije problem ako je za uređivanje kompliciranih postova i dalje potrbno računalo s pravom tipkovnicom i mišem. Ništa se ne gubi, samo bi dobili polje korisničko iskustvo na mobitelima i tabletima.

I have to admit, after reading all of this, I find this quite disturbing. I didn't know that Rollbit was one of "those" platforms.

@Rollbit Razer, I was hoping for reassurance from Rollbit casino that overly invasive verification isn't gonna become the norm.  That you recognize the privacy concerns and will work to address them.  This response though just doesn't provide that kind of reassurance in my opinion.  It comes across more as trying to justify excessive security measures rather than recognizing the valid concerns being raised.


There is one question, though. Is this sort of verification check a normal thing you do whenever someone deposits substantial amount into Rollbit, or do you just happen to do it right before someone tries to withdraw to their personal wallet? Because, you know, there's a world of difference between the two scenarios.

Non-custodial Bitcoin wallets don't actually store a balance.  There's no ledger inside the wallet keeping track of how much bitcoin you have.  Instead, your wallet calculates the balance by looking at the blockchain and adding up all the Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs) associated with your wallet addresses.   So you can't just deduct some bitcoin from your wallet balance without making an on-chain transaction to spend some UTXOs.  The balance is just a calculation, not a real thing stored in the wallet itself and  to spend bitcoin, your wallet has to create a transaction sending some UTXOs to a new address on the blockchain.

---

No. That's not how the Lightning Network works.

I did some googling and couldn't find much info on this 3A Exchange besides a couple sponsored articles on some obscure news sites.  Their website 3Aex(dot)com doesn't seem to have any old history either so I'm not sure if they were ever seriously operating.  OP, are you sure this is where you transferred money? Just curious why would you send funds there without double checking if it was legit?  Especially if they don't have much of an online footprint or reputation. 

I know this doesn't help you to get your money back, but just something to think about for next time. 

[banned mixer] kampanja ima slobodnih mjesta za nekoliko novih članova za avatar kampanju.

Plaća se do 35 postova tjedno. Nema minimuma. Postovi u Local sekcijama se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:

---

[banned mixer] kampanja ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Hero/Legendary člana.

That's not correct! So, if I offer you a certain amount of bitcoins in exchange for a product or service that you offer, you wouldn't accept it? Doesn't Stake casino pay you in bitcoin to promote them here? So how can you say that bitcoin does not serve as money for you?

I don't have to exchange it for fiat to recognize its actual value. I can use it to pay for products/services, just like fiat currency. In most cases, it's even more practical.

Yeah, we can't overlook the Gambling board either.  And in the Bitcoin Discussion, Beginners & Help boards too...  This issue pops up all over the forum all the time.  Some folks don't seem to think reading other people's posts is worth their time. Especially when they're trying to squeeze in 50-60 posts a week for their sig. campaigns.

Vjerojatno sam to rekao mnogo puta prije, ali reći ću opet, sig. kampanje uglavnom nisu problem, ali problem nastaje kada se pojave kampanje poput bitvesta. Odjednom na površinu isplivaju članovi koji su jedva sposobni složiti dvije suvisle rečenice a sada proizvode 50-60 postova tjedno da bi popunili njihovu kvotu. 99% postova sa bitvest ili eloncoin sigom možeš komotno ignorirati i bez čitanja. A slična situacija je i sa altcoins kampanjama. Jednostavno nema gotovo nikakve kontrole kvalitete nakon što netko upadne u kampanju.

Problem u ranim danima je vjerojatno bio da nitko nije mogao znati da će oni jednog dana biti legende.  Btw, tehnički gledano, satoshi nikada nije pisao na bitcointalk-u.

I'm not really sure how blockchain data would help here.  The way I see it, every post already shows the exact time it was made, even if someone goes back and edits it later and  that original timestamp doesn't change.  So I don't really get what would the last block number actually prove that we don't already know from the existing timestamps? I just feel like it wouldn't add anything useful.  But hey maybe I'm missing something.

A few days ago, another user had a similar problem with this mixer. The transaction from the mixer side was created with a low fee, so it took some time to confirm. Maybe it's the same in your case?

Can you see the incoming transaction in your wallet? Even if it's unconfirmed, you should still have a transaction to the address where you requested mixed coins.

Oh, so now you're finally catching on that invisible things can serve an aesthetic purpose? Well, I appreciate your newfound common sense. Maybe next time, you'll actually think before you speak. 


Well, I know a bunch of people who would disagree with that. Aesthetics is not only about what you can feel with your senses.  For many people, aesthetics can be about the elegance of the design, the technology or even digital assets.  For example, mathematicians and physicists often think some theorems and definitions are beautiful or elegant, attaching importance to the aesthetics of their work (ref: Mathematical beauty).

"A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns." - G.H. Hardy

And, in the world of technology, Steve Jobs famously stated, "Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works."

So just because something doesn't fit your personal view of aesthetics doesn't mean it's not artistic or good design for other people.  Aesthetics are subjective, you know?  What one person finds beautiful or elegant, someone else might think is whack.

Having patience and sticking to healthy gambling habits can make for a more controlled, maybe even satisfying, gambling experience.  But it depends on what you want to get out of it.  Just remember - being successful at gambling doesn't automatically mean you'll make money. There's always risk involved when you gamble, and the house tends to have better odds than you.


What do you mean by 'value will catch up'? Could you elaborate on that?

You walked  right into that, didn't you? Hahahaha!

Visual aesthetic is quite common, but yes, invisible things can serve an aesthetic purpose as well.  Music is a perfect example - you listen to it, not look at it. But even abstract concepts and ideas, like math for example, can be aesthetically pleasing if it's elegant and well-structured.

As for calling you stupid, I wouldn't go that way.  You just seem like you don't know a lot about this topic. I'm always trying to educate myself more on things I don't understand well. You should try it.

Groundnut oil production might work as a business idea in some parts of the world, but you gotta think about a few things first.  Whether you can actually get the peanuts to make the oil in the first place.  Peanuts grow okay in different climates, but I think they like warm, tropical regions the most. So it can get tricky finding enough raw peanuts in places where they aren't grown much.  Not to mention more expensive.  But where peanuts are all over the place already the business could make good money.

So while making groundnut oil could maybe work out, you really gotta check if the climate and weather conditions, and thus the availability of peanuts raw material, where you live make sense before jumping in.

[banned site] kampanja je bila privremeno pauzirana prošlog tjedna, ali ponovno će se nastaviti od sljedećeg petka i trenutno ima slobodnih mjesta za nove članove.
Plaća se maksimalno 25 postova tjedno, a nema minimalnog zahtjeva. Postovi u Local sekciji se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:

That was a stupid move. Was it before or after you bought yourself a new iPhone?

You might want to think about giving your resume skills section a little makeover.

Yes, that's it!  Bitcoin serves an aesthetic purpose, at least for me – can't speak for everyone else. It's all about finding beauty in those numbers. Glad we got that sorted out!


Hey there! Mocking someone's religion ain't cool. It's basically a form of religious discrimination.

So, you think all things got to have some official purpose?  Nah, I don't think so! Sometimes stuff just exists cuz people like how it looks or it's fun or whatever and  the whole idea of purpose is kinda subjective anyway and means different stuff to different folks.  When you look at the big picture of life and everything, some say trying to figure out your purpose is a basic human thing to do, but that doesn't mean every single thing in the universe has got to have a cosmic purpose or whatever.  I mean, take a pretty waterfall for example.  Its just water going over some rocks - doesn't really do anything.  But people enjoy looking at it and hearing the sound of water.  It exists for its own sake.  Or dancing - it don't accomplish anything concrete necessarily but people do it cuz it's fun and it feels good.  Life is messy and complicated like that.

The same goes for Bitcoin.  Who's to say it must serve some grand purpose? Perhaps we're just here for the joy of watching those pretty numbers dance on our screens. 

You have failed to understand that the Services board was not originally created specifically for signature and bounty campaigns; they came much, much later. I don't deny that bounty campaigns are a form of Bitcoin-related services, but claiming that such a campaign is more important or popular than some other "poor people's" service is pure speculation. Do you have some metrics or stats to support such a statement?

---

"Exchanges" and "Web Wallets" have their own child boards under the "Service Discussion", why do you think campaigns can't have the same under the "Services" board?