Until BenCodie was DT trusted by BitcoinGirl.Club , the only other person to DT trust them is ny2cafuse
Wait a minute. I have no idea how BenCodie was added, it's a mistake 100%. Other day I was checking my list and was considering to update the whole list before changing the mind to do it later. It's now restored. That post will come back to haunt you one of these days... Archive [N] [ 1] [ 2] I really hate this archive sites. They take ages to load and I feel lost there. What hunt you mean if you please write something about it. Not that I really care. @theymos, I know you never cared about such cases even though is expected from someone with your stature to care about things like that.
He cared that's why we had this new trust setting idea. But now he seems lost. Not knowing what to do anymore. |
|
|
|
Looks like a "neutral left in retaliation", and that's probably what it is, but its also meaningless. OP will never join a sig campaign so who cares, not that it would even affect that.
It is left in retaliation with the intention of offending the member they don't like. It is unnecessary like you said meaningless. Point is we are seeing more and more such feedback from a very specific person and is doing it carelessly which is causing all sorts of reputation attack. Yeah but this guy made an alt account and then entered a contest with it, which is a bit slimy. Looking back at it, figmentofmyass entered 5 alt accounts into that same contest, lol. I was not questioning your feedback although this reference was not on the feedback but from years of seeing you, I believed you had a good reason for that. Now you left no question of-course. However, 99% of the time the "retaliation" is due to them being an asshole, not because they are "speaking their mind" or "fighting injustice." Unfortunately, that's exactly what JollyGood became for the last few years. You will realize it when you will give some time and read the replies he left for others. There are some common words which he offers to people he wants to offend with of course leaving either a neutral or a negative. |
|
|
|
Newcastle seems back in the track. They had a good start in Champions league first round in the away match. They seemed lost after losing to City, then Liverpool and followed by Brignton. It's good news for Sportsbet family. but what stands out the most is that Newcastle had 8 different goalscorers. This is a interesting stat. |
|
|
|
Look BitcoinGirl. I have seen you in various threads and you always seem reasonable. Please try to be neutral and you will get me. Your behavior has become too rude in the last couple of weeks.
He has all his rights to act how he likes. So do I or is there a double standard for some specific people? My point was you were offending him with that topic where you had no business at all. Whatever emotion he had, that were towards other members. Right to act does not mean you start offending random person. Is it forbidden to talk about other people's business? Do you always talk about your own thing only? Don't you interrupt whenever you see something is not right in your opinion? The thread wasn't created without making a reply in cryptofrka's thread. At first, I responded to him in Cryptofrka's thread and then Cryptofrka asked me and others not to write off-topic things. So, to be ON topic, I need a thread. Right? Please point me where do you see the wrong action. I don't think you needed a topic for that. The users you wanted to protect have years of reputation on the forum. They know very well how to deal with any situation. I have cleared my position a couple of times and here I am doing it again. The topic was created because Cryptofrka asked not to write these things in his Merit source application thread for obvious reasons. It was not supposed to be your problem but Cryptofrka's. If that thread was created by Cryptofrka then it was understandable. Please try to understand. It was Cryptofrka's merit application thread where BenCodie wrote his post and then I and other members also responded. BenCodie replied back with some bad attitude and I wanted to write him back. Meanwhile, Cryptofrka asked not to post off-topic there. So what is wrong here? Impress Rikafip? Why pick him only?
Because he reacted to your topic and expressed his thoughts. I did not ask Rikafip to respond there. Let's say I was defending some other forum members in a random thread and I never had interaction with them personally. If they respond, is it my problem? Do I have any influence to make them write their thoughts? There are no point to keep arguing and repeat the same. I question, you explain; you question, I reply. It's an endless loop. So, I ignore all above and we move on. Please do not tie me with JollyGood. I never had interaction with him. Now it seems you are interacting [at-least JollyGood is trying]. Are you becoming his friends? LOL To be honest BitcoinGirl, I am annoyed now. Where do you see I am interacting with him? If he is trying, that's from himself. He just shared his belief about my actions and that's it. You are supporting BenCodie without even considering the point I wrote. Can I say you are trying to be friends with BenCodie? Just agree and disagree makes friends and enemies here? I must be tooooo new here. The "you" is a plural which is addressing you [Shishir99] and JollyGood but I was giving importance to JollyGood when I wrote "[at-least...]". In that drama it seemed you and JollyGood was trying to be the baby babysitter for members like Rikafip and some others. People does not like at, it sense like you were trying to impress them.
I don't know about the others, but I really didn't get the impression that he (or Jollygood) were trying to imporess me or anyone else. I was referring to this reply from you. |
|
|
|
Of all the negatives on your profile, it is only JG that bothers you?
In case you don't understand, it's because JollyGood deliberately wanted to offend the OP, wanted some more attention. DaveF left a neutral, I don't know if that was really necessary but I don't think DaveF had any other motive. But the motive of JollyGood is very clear. A person can have a past, for that they may not be proud but that does not mean they can not change. I have no opinion for OP but after 5 years why it's necessary to leave another negative feedback? Offend a member. What puzzles me is why he's so concerned about JG's negative ... Read the response for Stalker22, you may understand the reason now. The reason for all these topics are summarized on my last post. It is another example of unnecessary use of Feedback system. These types of unnecessary practices are the root of all problems everyone is experiencing because of you. You don't get it, do you?
To be honest it's not your fault, your mental state is questionable.
The problem is many members who have you in their trust list do not see it unfortunately. They are still are appreciating the past works you did to bring you today [it could be a part of your plan from the beginning] but unfortunately they do not realize that their trust for you are now is in misuse and causing the forum a great problem.
You are causing problem by constantly offending everyone except some very close circle members those are offering their trust.
Additionally, I just realized the inspiration for all these unnecessary conducts by JollyGood could be [1.] His obsession to see himself as a the top feedback sender [2.] His obsession to make his distrust list a long as possible. Just look at the number of people he distrust and number of feedback he left so far. |
|
|
|
I see people started to use the phrase LOL. I also was addressing the same on one of my other post but it seems JollyGood does not understand English slag. I am sorry to announce I will not open a discussion on the number of balls I have  To improve your knowledge my dear JollyGood. Consider reading: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=you%27ve%20got%20no%20ballsYou have no self-respect, you are a coward, you can't face your problems like a man, etc. It most certainly is not positive or negative feedback. It is safe to therefore conclude the only remaining option would be neutral feedback.
It is another example of unnecessary use of Feedback system. These types of unnecessary practices are the root of all problems everyone is experiencing because of you. You don't get it, do you? To be honest it's not your fault, your mental state is questionable. The problem is many members who have you in their trust list do not see it unfortunately. They are still are appreciating the past works you did to bring you today [it could be a part of your plan from the beginning] but unfortunately they do not realize that their trust for you are now is in misuse and causing the forum a great problem. You are causing problem by constantly offending everyone except some very close circle members those are offering their trust. A person can have an alternative account. It's even encouraged by Theymos. There were no necessary for this feedback but to offend the OP: BEWARE: "unibitcoinist" cannot be trusted... |
|
|
|
Your behavior has become too rude in the last couple of weeks.
He has all his rights to act how he likes. So do I or is there a double standard for some specific people? My point was you were offending him with that topic where you had no business at all. Whatever emotion he had, that were towards other members. Right to act does not mean you start offending random person. I don't think you needed a topic for that. The users you wanted to protect have years of reputation on the forum. They know very well how to deal with any situation. I have cleared my position a couple of times and here I am doing it again. The topic was created because Cryptofrka asked not to write these things in his Merit source application thread for obvious reasons. It was not supposed to be your problem but Cryptofrka's. If that thread was created by Cryptofrka then it was understandable. Impress Rikafip? Why pick him only?
Because he reacted to your topic and expressed his thoughts. Your behavior has become too rude in the last couple of weeks. He has all his rights to act how he likes. So do I or is there a double standard for some specific people? It is exactly that. If you agree with his point of view you are a saint but if you dare to go against this view he will troll you. If you really upset him too much he will create a thread, list all the names that have trusted you and ask them to distrust you. This is the level of low mentality people you are dealing with and I have to say you have shown patience in the manner you have expressed yourself. In that drama it seemed you and JollyGood was trying to be the baby babysitter for members like Rikafip and some others. People does not like at, it sense like you were trying to impress them. Please do not tie me with JollyGood. I never had interaction with him. What he was doing is exclusively related to his personal beliefs. The hypocrisy of this deranged individual BitcoinGirl.Club is still at all-time gutter low. He trolls and colludes in order to attack when he wants (making new friends along the way) yet he has the tenacity to say you were colluding with me and others. He makes it up as he goes along. Let us get one thing straight, you did nothing wrong by standing up for yourself and that is what they cannot accept. You have every right to be here in the forum in the manner you want to express yourself, none of these trolls are either superior or senior to anybody in any capacity regardless of which member registered first. Impress Rikafip? Why pick him only? I was talking about his recent behavior. He had a very bad attitude in the Whirlwind ANN thread and there were more forum users. Then he started to continue these things in other threads as well. People might exchange some words in the hit of the moment. But, when they continue doing it with a cool head, I doubt about their personality. These are diversion tactics used by trolls to justify their actions. They are effectively saying they attacked you because they did not like what you wrote when you did not attack anybody. You are dealing with narcissists with egos the size of the planet Jupiter who cannot accept they are trolls and that makes your patience even more remarkable. You are a mental patient in DT network. No wonder why all these drama around because of you. One notable thing is you are a coward who run away from accountability when questions are against you. Truth is you have no balls to have a decent conversation. You are a pussy. Please do not tie me with JollyGood. I never had interaction with him. Now it seems you are interacting [at-least JollyGood is trying]. Are you becoming his friends? LOL Edit I have BenCodie and BitcoinGirl.Club on my ignore list because that is where they deserve to be. I occasionally take a look at their posts when they are quoted by other members, other than that I have zero interest in them or the nonsense they spout. You do not have to justify yourself to these trolls. Forget about them when they make false accusations about you.
My dear, I, you and other who are reading knows very well that you are a liar. The whole post you wrong was about me and you say you have no interest. You have no balls. |
|
|
|
I think if the signature campaigns starts to pay for posting on this board then we will see different situation. Right now people have no incentive for discussion there. It's also true that most Bitcoiners don't find politics interesting. I dare you to go to that board and try to have a serious discussion with guys like BADecker or tom tung what's his name! Do it!!! I dare you!
I could not believe that the board was not in my ignore list but I just did LOL. No idea if Hugeblack is accepting the dare, but I will not find the board anymore. Peace 😃 |
|
|
|
I know that there is other accelerators, but do they actually work? Does anyone here have experience with services listed above and it worked? I only used ViaBTC and as long as it works, I won't look for alternatives.
ViaBTC is my only one choice too. As long as they are not making any change to their service, I do not see any reason to look for others. Please correct me if I am wrong. Share your experience with these tool if they ever worked for you...
With ViaBTC you are always happy, even with the free accelerator if it meets the maximum accepted size requirement. Mixers and casino are the biggest scam of crypto industry and you are promoting it in your signature with the hyperlink as well. Atleast I am not sharing a probable scam thing, I am not posting bogus link.
It just that your rank is higher but making fun of memebrs is not a contribution.
Depends on how you look at the business. Not everyone wants their coins are traced to see how much wealthy you are. Gambling is an entertainment and you are paying for the entertainment. By the way, your intention was not different too. |
|
|
|
That's a bad news for the business. I saw them on the forum and if I am not wrong then they have an active campaign too. As far as I can remember they hold only one key, so how it's possible to lose the assets if other keys are not exposed? The hacker defiantly got the data of all these users. |
|
|
|
Your behavior has become too rude in the last couple of weeks.
He has all his rights to act how he likes. I don't think you needed a topic for that. The users you wanted to protect have years of reputation on the forum. They know very well how to deal with any situation. In that drama it seemed you and JollyGood was trying to be the baby babysitter for members like Rikafip and some others. People does not like at, it sense like you were trying to impress them. |
|
|
|
although there is yet hope for a rebound.
Your Chelsea is so frustrating that in this round I am going with a draw even though it's Aston Villa. You just lost a point because Aston Villa is better than us. I was mistaken; there's no way this so-called project will bring us back to life; it's Potter Pro Max all over again. The team appears disorganised, and the coach is already frustrated and waiting for his sack letter. I can't tell you how furious I am that we had 8 days to prepare for this game, whilst Aston Villa had 3 days and they still beat us. All shit. I was fucking close though. In normal situation I would go with Chelsea to win. I have home advantage in mind so thought okay lets go with a draw because it looked like they lost interest of winning, so not time for think about winning. I have not checked who is next for them but whoever it is, I will either go with the opponent or another draw. Sorry darling, your team have no hope. |
|
|
|
although there is yet hope for a rebound.
Your Chelsea is so frustrating that in this round I am going with a draw even though it's Aston Villa. |
|
|
|
Edited: Deleted for wrong understanding. The Whirlwind forum representative has was last online in July 2023. Has there been any comment or statement made in any thread in the forum that can indicate what is happening (or will happen) to the remaining escrow funds? If you are genuinely interested and not spamming for signature payment then go and find yourself. No one is working for you to bring you an executive summary. It helps to avoid legal issues around the reception of funds for these services that have been unspent or improperly spent.
What possible legal issue you think it could have? I don't think we even should suggest anything. It's completely depend on the person who provided the service. Even if he decides to use the fund for his own, I see no issue. |
|
|
|
|
Another day another bad news. RIP Joerii. It was a pleasure to have you with bitcoin and its people. My condolence to the family and close ones.
|
|
|
|
Locking a thread isn't censoring; it's just giving a signal that the OP no longer wants to keep the debate going. Know what I mean?
If you read the posts leading up to the thread lock, users were addressing flaws in JG. He locked the thread because the thread had the potential of circling to hurt his own reputation.
That's exactly what the Chymist meant, you don't need to say it loud LOL Pathetic but not entirely unexpected conduct by BitcoinGirl.Club again. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5466079.msg62886644#msg62886644It was interesting response for the observation I had on his thread. I did not expect anything better from him. In fact it proves the point I wanted to make. Anyway, fuck everything. I couldn't wait to reply @examplens when I read your post earlier LOL So we can expect Jollygood's tag on Satoshi's feedback page. Something like "BEWARE: This user cannot be trusted. Satoshi created Bitcoin, and after that, he left the forum leaving many questions unanswered. I will revise this feedback if he comes again and provides some answers." I don't understand why did not he done it any yet? Do you think it's a double standard from JollyGood? Feel free to leave your opinion about it 😂 Or should we still start a request from theymos to open a new board next to Reputation "JollyGood's tags - Revisions and appeals" You are asking theymos to give him some especial privilege. Please don't even think about it, if such privilege is given to him, he will become more careless and start to feel that he is The One Above All [reminds me CH LOL]. Following your imagination, I think he will then tag theymos's feedback page with something like, " BEWARE: This user cannot be trusted. Theymos collected bitcoin to launch the forum software, and after even a decade, there are no new forum software. It raises many questions and all are unanswered. I will revise this feedback if he give some explanations and launch the software." |
|
|
|
I count your post, it consist of around 10,850 characters in Bangladesh language, so just assume it's half from 21,799 characters.
It's defiantly something to do with the character limit. I believe Bot will be able to give a better answer in this regard. |
|
|
|
This Is My Latest Post Due To My Faith To Respected Members Of BitcoinTalk.
Buy a soap and a cheap petroleum jelly. Wash your hand with the soap, clean it properly. You guess the rest 👉👌 LOL By the way, which side you think I am? Respectful or disrespectful? I Will Prove It You already proved that you are a wanker. |
|
|
|
I just kept quiet. Just looking around, no plans to tell anyone. I will send you my wallet address. you definitely understand what I mean....  It was one time offer only for the OP. You go and fuck yourself 😘 You should be careful with troll posts like this, especially by saying "Are we in a deal?" as the OP could easily take you up on your offer, send the 500 eur then you are entitled to honor the deal...or, stuck with drama because you didn't (even if you refund).
At least state that you're joking/being sarcastic when you are when it comes to anything relating a transaction, for your own protection of not entering a contract that you actually don't want to be involved in.
Don't be such serious LOL I don't think such stupid people even can afford to have such amount. We are dealing with scammers and scammers do not give but take from you. |
|
|
|
Over the past few years I've slowly "orange-pilled" a number of family/friends. I've tried my hardest to get them to purchase hardware wallets to securely store their BTC. For some, this is far too complicated/they are too lazy to do it themselves. So, I took it upon myself to secure it for them. This makes me wonder how many people are out there that would pay for a service like this. Does anyone have experience with creating a business around this idea? A custodial service is one thing but could this evolve into more of a hedge fund structure where management fees/performance fees are generated? Any advice or ideas are appreciated, especially with this being my first post I think we already have a service the way you are thinking. They had a review campaign not very long ago and they had over 100 members in the review campaign. Next time when I will see the service I will try to update the post. The idea is contradictory to Bitcoin and be your own bank, as they trust you as if they were the bank's customers.
A n-of-m multi-Sig wallet where one key to a business or service providers and all other keys are between the family members may give a solution. The members can sign their own keys to move the fund but if one member does not agree or anything happen to them then the rest of the members can reach out to the service provider and show their reasons to get the transaction singed by the service. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
