He could of edited them as well. You never know.

Like I said on other thread :

Oh your gonna give someone your account?

 You can just make a new account send $2 to it then give it too someone? That isn't so trust able is it?

 No you are a scammer. Just admit it please thank you!

 And you need to stop lying.

 Thanks

1. A charitable group just received 1,000s of Big Mo' candy bars for $0.00.
2. They sell them for $0.50 worth of BTC each.
3. They just acquired $0.50 worth of BTC for $0.00

The commonly spread belief that we are heading for the third major Elliott wave is wrong, bitcoin is a commodity not a stock.
Wave 1 started out from worthlessness during the genesis block, you can figure out the rest from here.

I predict a bubble echo of 6.72$ till the final crash to 0.02$ (with several smaller ones in-between).

I derped. I meant a PACK. I'll extend this to 30 bids.

Really? This what I'm talking about. Why would I need to even counter something so obviously wrong? Ever heard of this weird invention?:

That's why I said they a SIMILARLY divisible. You cannot say gold can't be divided down to say 0.1g, it's indisputable that it can. The theoretical limit of divisibility of gold is down to a single atom. It isn't as practicable as with Bitcoin and it's way more limited than it is with Bitcoin. But it is possible and that's all I was trying to say with the adjective similarly. If I was trying to claim there is no difference I would have used the adjective EQUALLY.

And to answer that other question, you're damn right if I had no other choice to buy some food and all I had was 50g gold bars I would have shaved one off a bit.


But my main point in mentioning the divisibility was that art and diamonds in comparison aren't at all. Meaning art and diamonds you either own them or you have to sell them while gold and bitcoins you can save the majority but only sell a small portion if you need to which spreads them around which is something the OP was arguing isn't happening because people are hoarding.

Now can we stop this on the level of the intelligence of a 9 year old discussion, pretty please?

Actually, I think the problem with gold is the counterfeiting.  1/4 grain is no problem.

See what happened to coins like TBX, FBX etc.

Are you seriously going to argue about this?

Here is a brain teaser, just for fun: Who is the buyer and who is the seller in this (or any) transaction?

I may be walking out on a deductive limb him here, but it looks to me like notme's post was a direct response to somebody else explicitly stating that they didn't understand what was quoted in the OP.  I don't think notme was trying to give you, or the community in general, a powerful and intriguing lessong in math or economics or whatever.