WARNING:

Scam accusation against this project.

User Hatch Support has gone out of their way to leave erroneous flags against a dozen different highly reputable members of the forum who supported a warning flag against their project. This behavior is highly suspicious and it is recommended that you stay away from this project as it displays several warning signs consistent with scam projects (plagiarized white paper, no team).

It would almost certainly be a mistake to provide them with sensitive data like a passport.

Thanks Hairy. He insists on making it an argument about whether or not a piece of software has the ability to act immorally on its own, which is of course, never what the argument was about.

breher: just because you ignore a defense doesn't mean its not a defense. I'm tired of playing these word games with you. Look at the scoreboard: your favorite altcoins are dying slow but measurable deaths because they were built on the fraudulent premise that they are the real bitcoin. Had they not tried so hard to blatantly piggyback off bitcoin's good name, perhaps they would both be doing better than they currently are. They would almost certainly be better respected by the general community.

No, it doesn't say that. And what they actually said was:


They clearly asked for a refund. You said you would give it to them. You lied. You, game-protect, or Game Protect of game-protect.com, are a scammer.

No, we can't. He is utterly devoid of anything commendable. Please don't give him an excuse to think meaning behind his existence here is salvageable. You'll only spur more shitposts from him.


Yes, that would be handy. Unfortunately the only thing we can rely on is willpower.

What it demonstrates is that you are completely full of shit. Everything you say is covered in fecal material. Just because you can't smell your own shitty breath doesn't mean everybody else can't.

Well, now you've called me a hypocrite twice.

Good, I'm glad you're satisfied with this example and I don't have to compile all the instances of you calling people a hypocrite in the past, that would take weeks.


I support all of their policy positions?? Wow, project much? Of course not. Only others do that. Just like how only other people can be hypocritical. There's no way you could be these things. 

You should have realized you weren't perfect when you got excluded from DT 4 and a half years ago. Your unwavering approach of never admitting error or exhibiting the slightest trace of humility hasn't exactly paid off since then.

You just linked it yourself:

Game-Protect.com did not refund my money and stopped replying to my emails

In this thread is ample proof that you, game-protect of game-protect.com are a scammer.

Just because you, game-protect of game-protect.com scammed one of your own clients by threatening them with a lawsuit instead of repaying them doesn't mean you repaid them.

No, he didn't lie about anything. He published all that information in his first post on the matter.

The only one lying here is you. You said you would refund your client. You failed to do this. You (game-protect, or Game Protect of game-protect.com) are a scammer.

Its proof game-protect, or Game Protect, of game-protect.com is a scammer. Everyone should avoid doing business with them.

OK, for starters:


PS: I'm not a Democrat.

Calling everyone a hypocrite is TS's go-to move. It somehow magically eradicates all the evidence of his own hypocrisy. So long as he can still type that word on a keyboard, the irony will be lost on him.

Maybe he means that if Trump gets removed from office, it opens up a rift in the space-time continuum and we return to a different parallel universe in 2016 where Clinton won the election. In which case the results of the 2018 election would indeed be reversed.

Seems like a try for Trump's impeachment is all but certain at this point. Even FOX News ran a poll indicating that 51% of voters not only want to see Trump impeached but removed from office. The White House's refusal to cooperate with the House Democrats impeachment inquiry is being labeled as obstruction of justice, almost guaranteeing the impeachment process will become a reality. And of course we know what Joe Biden thinks (hint: he's for it).

So, who's fault is it? Of course the blame needs to be assigned to a subversive, undermining and anti-American party, or how would conservatives know where to aim their righteous indignation? Its surely coming. Let's guess where its going.

Everyone gets two votes, as it may very well be a combination of factors. For example, I think that George Soros teamed up with the Lizard People to punish Trump for not bending to their One Government / New World Order agenda. I added "Donald Trump" as a joke option at the end, because as we all know, he's probably the most perfect president America has ever had. And definitely the best.

Want to see how it played out among FOX News viewers?

I am talking about the reason why BSV was born: it was born as a scam. You ignored my entire defense so you could pursue this one semantic alleyway about technology having the sentience to act immorally, which is of course NOT what I am implying. That is fucking weak fucking sauce.

If you want to counter something, counter the reasoning below:

Don't try to make this an argument of semantics when you know full well what I'm referring to. That's weak sauce.

Its a fork of a fork being peddled by two of the biggest charlatans in the crypto space as "the real bitcoin." It is not. Its a copy of a copy of somebody else's invention by a man who is claiming it to be his own.

CSW is a conniving pathological liar who sold the whole premise of his coin based on the lie that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. He is not. He doesn't know what Satoshi wanted from a hole in the ground.

You can continue to believe otherwise and we will continue believing that you are some sort of weird cultist.

As it is unlikely that Craig will be able to pull any more rabbits out of his ass and Coingeek won't be able to publish them, there is no reason why this coin will ever regain any of its former price.

There's already a big block experiment: BCH. Why wouldn't big blockers just stick with that one?

You guys really shot yourselves in the foot during your whole civil war ordeal.

Whatever Ver did in the past for bitcoin has been far overshadowed by the negative he's done for it since.


This point, while true, has nothing to do with anything.


Seeing as how there never was a Blockalypse that's not likely to ever happen. We'll revisit it when BCH approaches 1/10th the price of BTC.

And as far as BSV is concerned, well let's not. Its been proven an outright scam by this point and there's nothing left to be said.

No, its not. CSW and Roger Ver are leaders of the big block movement. Amir Taaki (not a salacious character btw) and Mark Karpeles are not leaders of anything.


That's the problem: things you find to be reasonable and rational rarely are to others. It might come as a surprise to you but the problem isn't them. If you were right (about anything, really) your two favorite altcoins wouldn't have suffered such drastic declines as compared to bitcoin.


You don't have to be here.