Then blacks aren't in disadvantage.
Blacks and whites share the same living standards. It's not even a racial issue, but a character issue.

Although machines are taking humans jobs, it's not bad. Just look how many opportunities first world countries (the most developed technological ones) have to offer. By a quick search on the internet it's possible to see the disponible offers for these countries that aren't disponible for the rest of the world. So I think there isn't any excuse for a first world citizen go rogue.

West can only overcome east mass production if they totally automate the process. In human competition west will always lose, as western citizens don't accept the same working standards easterns do. Easterns accept to work more for less and without protesting for labor rights. How can be western market competitive if it goes on the exactly opposite direction?

Keep in mind internet adoption didn't reach everywhere yet, as its implementation is still too expensive in some places, consequently local communities don't have enough resources to pay for the installation (anthem) or to pay for a satellite internet monthly subscription.
And without internet, virtual transactions aren't possible, even if people were seeking for this. I think it is the main challenge to overcome physical transactions and to adopt a fully digital system, but I expect satellite internet investments are going to increase soon as it's the most practical source of signal as far as I know, what will make the service cheaper, covering the whole world with signal. When this happens we will be ready to phase out physical cash completely. Older people will have to adapt to it as they did before towards vehicles, electricity, television and more...

It's like that saying *fools rush in*, isn't it?
I know there is a lot of pressure from people on the internet saying bitcoin is dead always the price start falling, so it's important to be very focused on your goal: if you believe bitcoin's potential and if you have been following its progress since the beginning don't change your mind just because some non-adopters are badmouthing bitcoin and making fun of its enthusiasts, otherwise you will be the one prejudiced later, not them, as you are the one holding these coins.

I think media and corporations aren't stupid, it's just part of the plan to destabilize the country and create chaos. Media, corporations, social movements, politicians... All of them have a role on this novel: corporations fund social movements that are protected by politicians and this chain is endorsed and kept by the media and its celebrities who work to make common citizens accept normally the violence, riot and degradation as the protesters were just fighting for their rights. It's not happening only in United States however.

On free countries where the politics are polarized, like United States, there is a lot of sabotage to inflate the numbers and drive the common sense/public opinion against the establishment's targets, in this case: Trump's administration and supporters.
There are several cases of people who didn't die from coronavirus, but they were counted as if they did on the statistics. On the other hand, at strict shady countries where free of speech is limited or masked by authorities, the number os deaths is underestimated, as there isn't transparency, then it causes a false impression some countries are being very effective combating coronavirus, while others are being disastrous.

Exactly, it's too easy for scammers. Their only *loss* are these worthless tokens.
But I mean if bounty hunters claimed to be paid in decent crypto currencies, developers would have to make a larger initial investment to run their projects, what would make many scammers give up using icos to earn money and deceive people, as they would have to really invest resources from their pockets into the project. However, as you said and I agree, scammers always come up with innovative ways... But it can't be an excuse for people on the other side stop fighting them back!

That is true. Just look what these developers have to lose... Nothing! They don't put any money from their pockets on these projects to pay promoters. They are just paying worthless tokens created from thin air.
Meanwhile bounty hunters are losing time promoting projects that can be aborted at any time justified by any shameless excuse. But I can't blame solely developers. If these scams are still running it's because there are still bounty hunter applying to join them... If there weren't anyone, projects would have to raise their standards and pay at least minimum decent rates to their promoters. And having to pay something worthful, scammers would think twice before launching their coins.

It's not any secret the leftwing ideology increases criminality where their ideas are applied. Even the leftists know it and when they see people are aware about these facts they put someone more *moderated* as their candidate on the front line, that is why I think they preferred Biden rather than Sanders, because they knew an assumed socialist wouldn't please american people to guarantee them a victory.
However a moderated leftist is just the guy who will clean the way for the extremist come next without resistance.

I respectfully don't agree on this. If Trump thinks children are not safe in Biden's America why should he shake hands with him?
It would smell hypocrisy or connivance to me. Trump has popularity because he has personality and doesn't try to please adversaries like traditional politicians do.

I expect we pass through this pandemic stable as we are doing at this moment. If bitcoin is able to stay stable while traditional economies are falling it's without doubts a great achievement for the digital currency, what can boost new investments in bitcoin futurely.
If at the end of this our national economies are too weak and crypto currency is at least stable, our countries can even take advantage of crypto currency and adopt it at least through an experimental level: adopting and incentivizing adoption, investing and accepting investments.
It can be a method to attract external money to the country (investments).

Most food stores (supermarkets) make small profit, but in quantity from its customers. Any adoption they make on their systems need to be worthful when they analyze how much percent of that public is going to be benefited by the adoption.
Then for now it's not interesting for supermarkets owners as this adoption will benefit probably less than 1% of their customers, and if compared to the profit they already make with fiat it's even less interesting. Bitcoin adoption must increase first among individuals before supermarkets and food stores in general start adopting this.

That is the most important protection you can get, to keep your body healthy and well fed. The mask and alcohol measures are just secondary.
Actually, after watching a documentary about a russian hermit family living at taiga by themselves for decades that was discovered by a group of geologists who probably infected most of the family members who become sick and died suddenly, as their immune systems were weak and they didn't have other people around to pass diseases to each other and fortify their immunity, I start thinking if the safety W.H.O protocols are really benefical.

The same could happen after this pandemic. People are protecting themselves too much with masks, alcohol and social distancing, what could led many of us to just weak our immunity more and more. Once we have to return to our normal duties, in contact with other people our bodies will be weaker and simple diseases will take us down...

For an example: it's like that child who can't walk on barefoot, play outside the house, get caught in the rain and so on... Because the mother is super protective. It will surely affect the child not only psychologically, but also physically.

I confirm my participation on this campaign and that I'm going to keep this appointment by the end following the stated rules.
I also confirm my signature and avatar are updated correctly as my bitcoin deposit address as well. Thanks!

To introduce celebrities into crypto universe is a smart movement from many crypto exchanges and other related businesses, as they work promoting not only crypto currencies, but also crypto businesses. Although I can't assure this athlete is being paid to promote bitcoin in this case, I see no problem on this.
The range of this kind of advertisement is too long: celebrities can reach not only their fans and followers, but also at media vehicles in general. The only issue is when celebrities start promoting ponzi schemes or the called shit coins, but that is not the case here.

Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=493772
Current amount of posts (including this one): 1168
How many merit have you earned in the last 120 days: zero
Bitcoin SegWit Address for Payouts: 36xUVajyWZY37nEXnHXuJYTd1PvorVe3Nr

PS.: I would like to change my application from gambling thread to politics thread, because I'm more confortable with this subject. Thanks!

Payment received. Thank you CryptopreneurBrainboss for accepting me on this campaign and for being an attentive and efficient manager.
I wish all the best to you!
And also thanks to Dsdaq for running this campaign, of course! I'm very thankful for this opportunity!

edit: I hope I contributed to the campaign positively and that you liked my participation.

If combined with other sources of income you can rely on bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but never solely on them. I say this because we shouldn't put all our hope in a currency, that is just a mean of payment or a store of value to generate passive profit, not a production method.
Only goods and technology production can rebuild a country solid and those should be the main sectors to rely during crisis times, keep currencies secondary.

I think they aren't going to ban anything too. Even for government there is much more to lose than to win with a bitcoin ban. But I see there is a lot of politics going on the background of this discussion in India. Some sectors want its ban, while the supreme court doesn't agree on this.
What I see is that even big fishes connected to government may have be into crypto universe, so it creates a division of opinions on this matter, where each one defends their interests, and consequently creating an indecision on what to do towards bitcoin.

In fact crypto universe is lacking opportunities for who wants to perform tasks, execute micro jobs to earn without investment. Many people talk about affiliate marketing, freelancing, blogging, translation... But it is too hard to make profit from that as there is a lot of competition.
People are looking for jobs or tasks they can do and be hired immediately, being paid right after (in useful currency, of course, not dead coins), after all that is the american way of life which really works and all people around the world would like to have access too on their countries, isn't it?

Well, bitcoin was the first crypto currency to be developed, all the rest was just a copy of bitcoin somehow, furthermore altcoins don't bring any notorious practical benefit if compared to bitcoin.
The one which most approached to bitcoin was ethereum due its platform, smart contracts, but still it wasn't enough to overcome bitcoin, what means if an altcoin wants to do this, it has to bring something more exciting to crypto universe.

But keep in mind it's not impossible for an altcoin to *win over bitcoin*, just because something didn't happen by now it doesn't mean it will never happen, especially on this volatile universe of crypto currencies where changes happen suddenly and without warnings!

As I see you can put governments and world bodies such the ones mentioned by you together, as they have the same interests, plus they will act on the same direction towards bitcoin, in other worlds: against the called *revolution*, although I don't like this term very much.
On the other side there are some businesses and individuals who are really freely and act independently. Do you really think they can stand against so powerful forces wishes? It looks a lost battle for me... What some people want doesn't matter when you look who is on the opposite side and how powerful they are.