First of all they have to prove their identities for example on ICOBench where you can see ID report from the team.
Secondly they shouldn´t have big soft cap, they should manage their project without big investments needed. Less money raised in ICO, bigger market cap after ICO means higher returns.
I agree with your first suggestion and it is might definitely help on the long run. Project team and developers should be subjected to KYC compliant before they can get their ICO onboard. And to do this, a trusted and reputable third party who is neutral should be entrusted with the process. I think this is one of the things regulation will address. |
|
|
|
|
This report is not good for a young developing industry like crypto. It totally paints the industry black and dark. Fraud can't be totally eliminated as it is in other works of life, but this one must be drastically reduced to avoid bad stinks. Regulation-wise and Technology-wise, something must be done to reduce this.
|
|
|
|
I've been here for years and I can say that following the hype never works for investors, this is simply an advise.
Few examples: Synereo, Savedroid, Electroneum.
Even though these projects managed to get the money they needed and much more, they still didn't manage to deliver what they promised. Or in some cases, not even get listed in decent exchanges or give ROI back.
Cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere and there will be more and more ICOs until these things get regulated (maybe years from now). So If you're an investor and you don't want to stupidly lose your money in the process, I highly suggest everyone to start researching about the projects he's interested in instead of taking his decisions based on Tweets from McAfee, press releases, scores in Icobench, etc.
This is the best post am reading today which highlighted practical examples. I think developers and project team should stop giving false hope to investors by offering what they don't have or what they can't offer. But that will still continue until proper regulation is put in place. |
|
|
|
I would not say that the market is growing rapidly, we see that bitcoin fluctuates for a long time in about the same range ... I think the market will grow in 2019 but not much, there will be no big surprises.
The market of late has shown signs of major movement and a bit steady in its growth. This is why I won't rule out big surprises as the market can be full of surprises and it can go in any direction. |
|
|
|
|
Buying less priced coins does not necessarily translate into more profits except you take note of other contributing factors like the potential of the project, availability of market and market volume, utility of the coin and so on. Aside those, you will just end up buying pump and dump coins.
|
|
|
|
|
Wallets can be hacked and much more possible when one exposed his private keys, got phished or storage system hacked. Apart from that and keep assets in offline storage and making use of other multi-factor authentications, I think one will be less vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
Bounty hunter are getting the coin after their hardwork.so they just want to encargó their money. They just 3 to 5 % of total supply so i dont think they are solely responsible for dumping. But from crypto ecosystem the bounty hunter must be motivated by giving Them in form of usd or btc itself. They feel good And help the project to reach to mass
Even out of the 3-5%, we might still have only 1-2% being dumped while the rest are still with the many hunters that decide to hold for better price or just so because they believe in the project. But hunters are to blame for it. |
|
|
|
|
Bounty FOMO is what is keeping me going. Who knows my next bounty may be my biggest jackpot and so on, I keep my head up and it is just a matter of time before my accumulation turns to something magnificent. I pick few good bounties from bountyhive and follow up with other bounties from some selective well-known bounty managers on the forum.
|
|
|
|
|
After reading a few posts from this thread, I could deduce that DCT have some issues with distribution of bounty. If a project can't handle properly their bounty program, my conclusion is that their marketing is poor. Poor marketing might be what they need to address to get themselves known to the world if they are serious about what they are offering.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on how humble you are to keep learning and advancing your scope. Becoming a pro doesn't have a timeline. You grow everyday. A pro is not above mistake and can be prone to error once a while. When this happens, a pro learn and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe in crypto startups, but when it comes to startup exchange, I'd be more careful. In most cases I stick with the tested and proven ones. The only reason to check out new exchange is when they offer a different market or listed a coin that I have and not listed in other exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
I observe a practice with Binance. They are team of professionals and experts that are always on top of their game and often times, they think and work ahead of what is going on in the space. They've launched new innovations that others are now following suit. I believe if anything closing down is going to happen, they already see it and probably a backup solution is in place. As big as this exchange is, if it gets shut down, the whole market will be down. Am not ready for another long bear.
|
|
|
|
|
When EOS first launched last year, the noise was everywhere that it will beat or replace ETH and same thing happened with TRX. However, I didn't see these blockchains competing or dragging post, but have been coexisting with one another. Days after BNB blockchain is launched, the hype will go down and each developer to his own blockchain and everybody wins. Let's see what features BNB blockchain have in stock before making any further comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
This is total disrespect to the rulership of King Bitcoin. No doubt about the fact that BNB is performing very well at the moment and has great and innovative team behind it but it's never going to be bitcoin or replace it. Bitcoin is the face of cryptocurrency and it will forever be.
|
|
|
|
|
The two major ecosystems that many projects are focusing on are exchange platforms and stable coins. 1 in every 3 new projects is either an exchange or a stable coin and to factual, these two ecosystems are saturated and becoming over-saturated. I think we don't need more of this two in the space for now.
|
|
|
|
Isnt it obvious? Investors hate hunters cause they usually dump tokens when they received it. Thats make some investors bleed on their funds while the price going down. Actually not all hunters are dumpers especially those who knew which project has potential amd can increase its price in the future. You cant blame them for dumping cause they got the tokens for free unlike investors who invest their money.
You missed a point right there. You don't say hunters get those tokens for free given the amount of time, energy and other unaccounted resources they put together to campaign for these projects. Price all those efforts and they worth something of which in some cases the tokens received doesn't worth the efforts at all. Hunters got no token for free. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
