regarding unemployment:

the only thing I'd say causes more unemployment than minimum wage laws is the progress of technology. And that should be a good thing. Technology is freeing humans from stressful, monotone and harmful work. A cause for celebration. Productivity is going through the roof. The one reason why this is a cause for lament instead of celebration is that we have a system where you need to earn money in order to sustain yourself and the most accepted form of getting money is to work for it/have a job. Sooner or later something has to break, because the trend of accelerating progress in technology and the correlated trend of decreasing availability of jobs won't be stopping any time soon.

Yes, there will always be creation of new jobs, which didn't exist before but is the rate at which these are created really equivalent to the rate of job destruction caused by technology? I don't think so. 250 years ago technology displaced human labor from agriculture...into industry. Later the same happened to industry jobs and now most developed economies have a 70 - 80% share of service industry in their economies. Technology has already begun to displace human labor from there as well. But human labor has nowhere left to migrate.

"Whatever happens happen, im not responsible for it and no one is."

As long as you believe this, you will continue to be a victim.

So you're either Spanish or Greek. I once worked in an foreign language school in Tarifa, Spain. The main teacher there could not pronounce one single English word a hundred percent correctly, still he was teacher. Even here in Germany, I had English teachers with very strong accent. So never mind, your English skills seem to be good enough for teaching. Furthermore, I myself do not speak to English speakers frequently, but I managed to strip off most of my accent myself. You can learn that, too.

Or if you like music, try to make something out of it. I learned to play the guitar when I was 13, all by myself, until now I haven't learned to play by musical score, but I nevertheless I give guitar lessons to beginners once in a while.

I agree that it's not always free will that leads to success or failure. Often the successful are predetermined to be successful because they have the predetermined personality to achieve (which is both a positive and a negative characteristic). I'm not a big "achiever", but I don't want to be one either, I'm content with keeping life simple. I don't need much money. Just try some things according to your abilities and in the end you will still live. If you are able to save a Euro or two and put it into bitcoin, in the end you might still achieve financial freedom. Even if you can't work against - as you might see them - big forces, which keep the successful on top and keep your spirit down, you can try to use the small forces in yourself to make the best out of it. The best for one might not always be perfect, but it's still better than a lifelong depression.

Bitcoin isn't a cure-all. It can solve some issues regarding economy and politics, but it won't solve unemployment. You can however use trading to make money - even if you start small. And I do live in Greece btw where unemployment is like 30% / young unemployment is over 60%.

The primary problem is not Bitcoin, the socioeconomic environment etc etc. These are excuses. 99% of the people don't have a vision of what they want to achieve. They live life as life comes to them instead of planning it. Once you have a proper vision, and reinforce it through your subconscious (subconscious programming, visualization etc), stuff will start falling into place. With no vision/purpose, you can't do much. Your body and mind are like a car that goes circles - with no destination.

I must admit this boredom is more difficult to endure than the FUD madness of the previous bear market.

What's your age range and your skills?  Rpietilla is in his late 30s I think (even though some of his pictures look older.. he he he), so he has had some opportunities (and most likely should admit luck) to have achieved a form of financial freedom - nonetheless, NO one's financial freedom is completely ensured unless they are sure that their assets are sufficiently diversified and hedged.  Also, the person must be able to live within the means of the passive income from the assets.  Accordingly, there may be a need to continuously monitor the status of such "financial freedom" - unless the wealth buffer remains sufficiently great in order to make any threat to "FF" a non-issue.