The fact he didn't wouldn't prove anything. And if he did post it I'm sure you deleted it by now.



So now you're threatening to frame me? Just stop already. You're just making a fool of yourself.

Yes. And CrockRoch's too.

Please stop lying. Here's the archived version fortunately took on time before you deleted it:
https://archive.is/Teqab Post #139
Besides it's quoted by MicroGuy here.

You have just confirmed you're a liar and a scammer. Congratulations.

That sounds like you have too many inputs and the created transaction would be too big.

Try sending a lower amount, you could send several transactions if needed. Or you can enable advanced options and choose the exact inputs for your TX.

Description:
I'm auctioning several .COM domains. All of them are registered on Namecheap and can only be transferred to another NC account, for free.

Starting bid for each domain:
US$ 10 for every domain, unless stated otherwise below.
Each domain has an independent auction.

Minimum increment:
US$ 1

Buy it now:
US$ 20 each for those starting at $5 or $10
US$ 30 each for those starting at $15

List of domains:

888Satoshis.com - Starting at $5
BitcoinInn.com
BitcoinPizzaDay.com
BitDescuentos.com (bitdiscounts in Spanish) - Starting at $15
BitHashie.com
BitOfertas.com (bitoffers in Spanish) - Starting at $15
BitTienda.com (bitstore in Spanish) - Starting at $15
BuyHashes.com
DigDoges.com - Starting at $5
DogeBids.com - Starting at $5
DogeStats.com - Starting at $5
GavinCoin.com
GetHashes.com
PrimeFaucet.com - Starting at $15
XBTbids.com
Bitcoïn.com [xn--bitcon-mwa.com] (Bitcoïn is how bitcoin is correctly spelled in French to sound well)

End date and time:
48 hours after the first bid of a particular domain or 6 hours after the last bid of that domain, whichever is later.
Every domain has its own auction and ends independently.
I may lock the thread (close all the auctions) at any time as long as no domains have any open bids at that moment.

Newbies:
Users with less than 28 activity can't bid, unless they BIN and pay immediately.

Payment:
Please bid in US dollars. Final prices will be converted to BTC at the current Bitstamp rate at the moment of the payment.
The payment must be sent to me or the escrow less than 48h after the auction is closed,
otherwise I may leave negative trust and may sell it to next higher bidder who must complete the deal according to their bid.

After an auction is closed I'll send a signed message (to be verified here) with the payment address. If you prefer to use escrow instead PM me right away.

I'm not sure if you're trolling or if this is a real opinion, but I'm replying just in case...

So at least you don't deny they're helping a scammer. You just think helping a scammer is not enough reason to flag them?
They should care about the content of the site they're promoting. It's completely clear this is a scam and that people will lose their money. Helping a scammer is untrustworthy.
In real life helping someone do anything bad is bad. If you help someone to rob then you're an accomplice.

"Scammer" may be arguable. Untrustworthy definitely applies.

If you have proof anyone promoted a scam then you should say it.

So you admit OP deserves to get flagged. Why is that? Are you admitting he's a scammer? So everyone who helps him is an accomplice?

Wrong again. Casinos advertise the house edge they have and people participating know the chances are against them. They're not offered a secure win.
If you know about a casino, faucet or other that deceive their users with lies then you should say it. Do not cover any scammers.

This is the main part that makes me believe you're just trolling. Anyway:
The secret seed is secret only during that day. The next day it changes and the previous seed becomes public so all participants can check whether their bets were fair (I'm a developer too, all the seeds are -or should be- public at some time so gamblers can verify). The casino's house edge is public and easily verifiable. Again, if you know of a casino that deceives their users by hiding the secret seed after it's changed or by any other means then say it. Do not help any scammer.


If you want to keep trolling arguing about how helping a scammer is good then do it on the threads created for that or make a new one. Do not do that here anymore because it's off-topic. I won't reply to you here anymore.

Is his personal information public? If it's not then of course 19 BTC (if that's the real amount he was holding)  would be enough to run away for a scammer. Any amount worth more than his account would.

If he had the worst intentions he could have kept those 19 BTC, used a small part of that to buy a hero/legendary account and try again. Even if he had intentions to scam at the beginning (that we'll never know) I think the fact he gave the money back should be rewarded somehow. Replacing that negative by a neutral would be a good way.

In that odd example you used the fact the robber's identity is known or not would be a very important point. If the robber got just a little money but he's completely anonymous then he could just keep that little money and try again later if he's a criminal. If he gives the little money back (while being anonymous) then I would think he's really repented. And that example implies he intended to steal from the beginning which we don't know here.

If his personal information is public then that would be a strong reason to give the money back even if he had bad intentions. Anyone let me know if that's the case. That would invalidate my point but I still wouldn't leave a negative 

Absolutely, I'll remove it after you pay to them.

I've successfully verified the signature. Thanks.
However please include the date. Otherwise this could be a re-used message or it could be re-used in the future by a hacker.

What message did you sign?
Please sign something like this:

And signing with an address older than 3 months would be much better. Or even before the last forum hack.

How? Because of experience. I've been here a while and know how scammers operate.

Just write a message including your username and date and sign it with an address containing $250 worth of BTC or more, and confirm you'll use a trusted member of this forum as escrow and I'll remove that feedback and apologize. It's extremely simple if you're not trying to scam.

Feds? There are no feds!
Is this so hard to understand?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.msg13583846#msg13583846

You forgot one point (probably among others):

The activity made by the site/company to earn money must be completely crystal clear. It must not be hard to explain.

Yes I do! Absolutely!

Are you an alt of the scammer or just naive?

The real reason that thread was locked is this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.msg13583846#msg13583846

I can't believe people even consider the seizure is real. Of course it's just a lame attempt of the scammer to gain some time:

As I said here, there's absolutely no doubt the seizure is fake. Read this in detail:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.msg13583846#msg13583846
I wonder if faking that seizure notice counts legally as faking documents. I guess Sector will spend a long time in jail.

Just after I posted this of course Sector locked that thread.

I don't know why but it seems some people are still not sure whether that so called seizure is fake or not. Of course it's fake!

As I said yesterday here the seizure notice was using https. Of course the Government doesn't do that, they seize the domain, not the SSL certificates so they can't use https.

To make things worst the SSL certificate the seizure notice was using was granted on 10/05/2015. Even if for some crazy reason the Government would have decided to use SSL of course they would have used a new certificate issued in January.

I already left negative trust on OP's profile with this information but it seems only a few read it. And it seems definitely OP read it because he already modified that fake seizure site removing the SSL certificate and making it http instead of https. Fortunately I archived the SSL site here: https://archive.is/p5r8V Just in case here's an archive of the updated version without SSL: https://archive.is/NoITS

Here's a screenshot of the certificate used on the fake seizure notice as it was yesterday (about 13h ago):
http://imgur.com/a/v3lHu
I don't have the fingerprints of the SSL certification when the site was running normally but I could bet they're the same.

So stop this discussion wasting your time. If you were scammed here start legal actions already. OP is just trying to gain some time here with these lies.

In that case there's no doubt at all the U.S. government isn't involved at all (hopefully not yet). It's just plain scam as said by you and lottery248.
Victims should start legal actions immediately.

Almost certainly he's just plain scamming and trying to hide it with a fake domain seizure. I find it extremely suspicious the "seizure" page is https with a certificate granted on 10/05/2015. Can someone check whether it's the same certificate used when the site was online?

Update: Read more information here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.msg13583846#msg13583846