I dont know why people are posted here ! It was solved in post #2 or 3, the problem was - for those that get similar, that the current user did not have access to the X session (as he wasnt logged into it)

kokade_prod=# select solution from share where upstreamresult = 'Y'
;
                                                                                                                             solution                                                                                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 00000001d219003dfd0ec774541ac59c6b566c2b11a64e99d745a2e70028f3e100000000fc415a3 869208702e88db306d9473f116b0412fd76739780b29953fea82d83d24e11de451c00824f8c5b32 da00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000
(1 row)

kokade_prod=#




Dont worry about the bounty, have fun you!

Alright SQL problem fixed now - didnt realize postgres has it's own way of placeholding. 

Going to reinstall memcached shortly but, all just seems wierd - there no way to get more verbose logging out of pushpoold as to why it's not liking memcached? What verison of memcached does it definatly work OK with?

Well, with memcached commented out - it runs + authenticates.

I am on Debian lenny,

Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-26lenny2) (dannf@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Tue Jan 25 05:59:43 UTC 2011
pushpool@kokade:~/pushpool/sbin$ memcached -h
memcached 1.2.2

Any ideas? Really want memcached running.

And a new, second problem (when running without memcached), and a miner submits a share, I get this error.
 pg_sharelog failed: ERROR:  syntax error at or near ","
LINE 1: ..., reason, solution) VALUES (nextval('share_seq'),?,?,?,?,?,?...

Settings:

If I connect via psql on command line, and run
insert into share (id,ourresult,reason,remotehost,solution, updatestreamresult, account_username) VALUES (nextval('share_seq'),NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL)
it works fine - has something changed in regards to the placeholders for sharelog since page #1 on this thread was made?

Last bitta info before anyone can help, i've got a little further, but now completely stumped.  It's a memcache issue by the looks of things.

It works fine w/out memcached

If I run memcached as current user, with "memcached -u pushpool -p 10000", and configure pushpool accordingly, it hangs. Same if I configure it to use the "servers" one which runs as demon on port 11211.

memcached output: (ran with -vv)

slab class   2: chunk size    120 perslab  8738
slab class   3: chunk size    152 perslab  6898
slab class   4: chunk size    192 perslab  5461
slab class   5: chunk size    240 perslab  4369
slab class   6: chunk size    304 perslab  3449
slab class   7: chunk size    384 perslab  2730
slab class   8: chunk size    480 perslab  2184
slab class   9: chunk size    600 perslab  1747
slab class  10: chunk size    752 perslab  1394
slab class  11: chunk size    944 perslab  1110
slab class  12: chunk size   1184 perslab   885
slab class  13: chunk size   1480 perslab   708
slab class  14: chunk size   1856 perslab   564
slab class  15: chunk size   2320 perslab   451
slab class  16: chunk size   2904 perslab   361
slab class  17: chunk size   3632 perslab   288
slab class  18: chunk size   4544 perslab   230
slab class  19: chunk size   5680 perslab   184
slab class  20: chunk size   7104 perslab   147
slab class  21: chunk size   8880 perslab   118
slab class  22: chunk size  11104 perslab    94
slab class  23: chunk size  13880 perslab    75
slab class  24: chunk size  17352 perslab    60
slab class  25: chunk size  21696 perslab    48
slab class  26: chunk size  27120 perslab    38
slab class  27: chunk size  33904 perslab    30
slab class  28: chunk size  42384 perslab    24
slab class  29: chunk size  52984 perslab    19
slab class  30: chunk size  66232 perslab    15
slab class  31: chunk size  82792 perslab    12
slab class  32: chunk size 103496 perslab    10
slab class  33: chunk size 129376 perslab     8
slab class  34: chunk size 161720 perslab     6
slab class  35: chunk size 202152 perslab     5
slab class  36: chunk size 252696 perslab     4
slab class  37: chunk size 315872 perslab     3
slab class  38: chunk size 394840 perslab     2
slab class  39: chunk size 493552 perslab     2
<3 server listening
<7 new client connection

--And now everything hangs, nothing sent back to miner or client at this point--

--If I kill memcached this is the output--

^CSIGINT handled.
pushpoold: libmemcached/io.cc:356: memcached_return_t memcached_io_read(memcached_server_st*, void*, size_t, ssize_t*): Assertion `0' failed.
pushpool@kokade:~/pushpool/sbin$

And then, pushpoold also falls over.

So yeah, that's what i've nailed it down to, but, cant seem to get any further? I dont like the idea of running this without memcached :S

Seems even wierder, as, first time i connect to it i do "get /" and it gives me back the 400 bad req, then, going forward, it just hangs.

Trying both

pushpool@kokade:~$ curl --user admin.testt --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "getinfo", "params": [] }' http://127.0.0.1:8336
Enter host password for user 'admin.testt':
[2011-07-03 16:47:7.632542] client host ::ffff:127.0.0.1 port 56792 connected
curl: (52) Empty reply from server
pushpool@kokade:~$ curl --user admin.testt --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "getinfo", "params": [] }' http://127.0.0.1:8337
Enter host password for user 'admin.testt':
^C
pushpool@kokade:~$ curl --user admin.testt --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "getinfo", "params": [] }' http://127.0.0.1:8337
Enter host password for user 'admin.testt':

This is the output from local, it just hangs when I connect to 8337, locally or remote.



kokade:/etc# ps -ef | grep mem
root      9428  8347  0 18:48 pts/1    00:00:00 grep mem
nobody   20417     1  0 02:12 ?        00:00:01 /usr/bin/memcached -m 64 -p 11211 -u nobody -l 127.0.0.1


memcached is running, and I can access it on the port written in the conf (11211)


kokade:/etc# telnet localhost 11211
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.


Also, the local namecoind RPC is working fine

pushpool@kokade:~$ curl --user namecoind --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "getinfo", "params": [] }' http://127.0.0.1:8332
Enter host password for user 'namecoind':
{"result":{"version":32151,"balance":0.00000000,"blocks":15214,"connections":8,"proxy":"","generate":false,"genproclimit":-1,"difficulty":55882.45237847,"hashespersec":0,"testnet":false,"keypoololdest":1309711291,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"errors":""},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}


Any more ideas? This is frustration!

What's going on, here, it just seems to hang when I request any work or connect to it

The debug messages arnt of much use either.


pushpool@kokade:~$ ./pushpoold -D=2 -E
pushpool@kokade:~$ [2011-07-03 16:28:7.180078] Listening on host :: port 8336
[2011-07-03 16:28:7.180286] Listening on host :: port 8337
[2011-07-03 16:28:7.180352] Listening on host 127.0.0.1 port 8338
[2011-07-03 16:28:7.196675] initialized


1) I can telnet to port 8337, and do a GET request (get back a 400) - server.json configures 8337 to be the port.
2) namecoind (what im trying to set up a pool) is running - from the machine running pushpool, I can telnet to the right port (8332), and a "GET /" rightfully gives me 401 unauth.  I've double checked the RPC password's are correct.

When I try to set a miner, to connect to the server, on potr 8337, it seems to connect and do nothing.

Any ideas? Or any ideas where I can get more verbose output? Also, the postgres to select user/password seems correct in json.

no irc clients means no irssi screens right?

oops, true this.  I thought it was to do with endian.h - which seems to exist and be included. Mucho apologies.

doing the fix mentioned earlier (some macro + another include) seems to have made it compile, but, not tested it out yet.

For reference, also on Lenny debian.

kokade:~/bc/pushpool-0.5.1# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-26lenny2) (dannf@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Tue Jan 25 05:59:43 UTC 2011

Hey

trying to compile pushpoold on 64bit debian


kokade:~/bc/pushpool-0.5.1# make
make  all-am
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1'
gcc  -O2 -Wall -g -I/usr/local/include -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -o pushpoold hist.o htab.o anet.o config.o msg.o server.o util.o db-sqlite.o db-mysql.o db-postgresql.o -lcurl -levent -lpthread -ljansson -lcrypto -lz -lmemcached -L/usr/lib -lpq
msg.o: In function `cli_op_work_get':
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/msg.c:562: undefined reference to `htole32'
server.o: In function `cjson_decode':
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/server.c:167: undefined reference to `le32toh'
server.o: In function `cli_send_hdronly':
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/server.c:328: undefined reference to `htole32'
server.o: In function `cjson_encode':
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/server.c:231: undefined reference to `htole32'
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/server.c:234: undefined reference to `htole32'
server.o: In function `cli_read_hdr':
/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1/server.c:468: undefined reference to `le32toh'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [pushpoold] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bc/pushpool-0.5.1'
make: *** [all] Error 2
kokade:~/bc/pushpool-0.5.1#


Any ideas?  endian.h exists, is it to do with it being 64bit arch?

Hey dude

whats your rough price?

and 170/a month @ 415 - eletric costs is more than i make from 700 without electric costs soo ~~ but anyone, interested in card - not got any price in mind at all?

Please full specs on the 4 card setup, and also what's rough shipping cost to UK (if possible)

yes was installed, this is fixed now - ty to tortib on irc.

Hi guys, wondering if someone could be as kind as to help me

poclbm only detects the CPU (not the cards - 2 x 6950's)

here's some outputs/logs:

andrew@sky:~/bc$ python poclbm.py
No protocol specified
No device specified or device not found, use -d to specify one of the following

•     AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor

andrew@sky:~/bc$ sudo aticonfig --list-adapters
* 0. 01:00.0 AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series
  1. 02:00.0 AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series

* - Default adapter



andrew@sky:~/bc$ lspci
....
00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman PRO [AMD Radeon 6900 Series]
01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman PRO [AMD Radeon 6900 Series]
02:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
....

andrew@sky:~/bc$ lsmod | grep fglr
fglrx                2490187  120

andrew@sky:~/bc$ dmesg | grep fglr
[    9.542661] fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[   10.107514] [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 1884 MBytes.
[   10.107587] [fglrx]   vendor: 1002 device: 6719 count: 1
[   10.107590] [fglrx]   vendor: 1002 device: 6719 count: 2
[   10.107849] [fglrx] ioport: bar 4, base 0xc000, size: 0x100
[   10.107900] [fglrx] ioport: bar 4, base 0xd000, size: 0x100
[   10.108326] [fglrx] Kernel PAT support is enabled
[   10.108347] [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.86.5 [May 24 2011] with 2 minors
[   11.875173] fglrx_pci 0000:01:00.0: irq 49 for MSI/MSI-X
[   11.875672] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1118
[   11.875706] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1119
[   11.875739] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1120
[   11.876016] [fglrx] IRQ 49 Enabled
[   12.443914] fglrx_pci 0000:02:00.0: irq 50 for MSI/MSI-X
[   12.444486] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1122
[   12.444521] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1123
[   12.444554] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1124
[   12.444973] [fglrx] IRQ 50 Enabled
[   12.660510] [fglrx] Gart USWC size:628 M.
[   12.660513] [fglrx] Gart cacheable size:247 M.
[   12.660517] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Shared offset:0, size:1000000
[   12.660520] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:fb07000, size:1f9000
[   12.660522] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:3fff4000, size:c000
[   12.967517] [fglrx] Gart USWC size:628 M.
[   12.967520] [fglrx] Gart cacheable size:247 M.
[   12.967525] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Shared offset:0, size:1000000
[   12.967527] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:fb07000, size:1f9000
[   12.967529] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:3fff4000, size:c000

andrew@sky:~/bc$ fglrxinfo
No protocol specified
Error: unable to open display (null)
andrew@sky:~/bc$

andrew@sky:~/bc$ tail -n6 ~/.bashrc
fi
export AMDAPPSDKSAMPLESROOT=/home/andrew/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${AMDAPPSDKROOT}lib/x86:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
export AMDAPPSDKROOT=/home/andrew/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/
export ATISTREAMSDKROOT=/home/andrew/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/
export LIBRARY_PATH=$LIBRARY_PATH:$ATISTREAMSDKROOT/lib/x86/



I'll ship 1 BTC to whoever gives me the solution, and yes, X is running and I did do aticonfig --adapters=all initial + reboot.  

*hopeful*

Fair enough, it depends what the op ones.

$20 equates to at most 1hour work for a coder,

I see this project as:

-> Install monitoring software on each of the mining rigs + add conf for miner specific stats, write docs so op can do it himself going forward
-> design management website, with admin console to add / remove new miners (prob also install/conf nginx or apache)
 --> user account has access to X rigs stats, controlled by admin which rigs
 --> user account has account stats, controlled by admin again
 ->admin interface, controlling above.
-> website design itself (imgs/css etc boring stuff)

I dont think it can be achived in 1 hour, i'd say it's a good couple days work, that was my logic behind my quote. 

I think it depends what kind of solution op wants.

Assuming your mining rigs are running some *NIX derivative (Linux or BSD), and, as is your webserver, i'll write this for 30BTC.

PM me for refs, I am experienced etc.

I for one, am getting sick of people, posting on threads in the market, to which they have no interest of buying the product, just to flame the op, and trash the thread. 

Let the people sell them for whatever they want, in their own threads. 

If you've got something to wine about, make your own thread.

Is this card even unlockable? I bought some 6950's last week, 2 of, from a UK store - neither were unlockable.

Even with unlock, 432MH/s is pretty unattainable, esp if you have air cooling or more than 1 in a box or a closed case.

Maybe you have some screen caps of it running at 432MH/s and unlocked GPUz cap?

IBM eServers x366

do these have PCIe slots? you mention good for mining, also, do they come with any HDs?