DEV: Please reply to Suchpool's PM, both of us are having the same situation with the wallet and we need a solution for this as our miners can't withdraw their coins.
Yep, waiting on some kind of resolution, if not simply recognition of the issue. This happened between the first and 4th fork where a couple of SEEDS went missing. In our cases, estimates show about 6.5 gone including the profits we wouldve made for that period. It would require a full audit, but considering the price of the coin I won't be loosing my time spending hours on this and might just buy what's missing, but would surely appreciate cooperation from the devteam. PS: You guys should ALWAYS backup your .dat before updating. Good thing we do all the time. What I paste next is just following the latest update: seed@data2:~/seedcoin/src$ seedcoind seedCoin server starting seed@data2:~/seedcoin/src$ seedCoin: Error loading blkindex.dat Be careful guys! Bad code can cause big headaches |
|
|
|
|
dogecoindarkd getpeerinfo | grep startingheight
"startingheight" : 501,
"startingheight" : 502,
"startingheight" : 502,
"startingheight" : 502,
"startingheight" : 503,
"startingheight" : 503,
"startingheight" : 505,
"startingheight" : 536,
"startingheight" : 539,
"startingheight" : 544,
"startingheight" : 544,
"startingheight" : 545,
"startingheight" : 500,
"startingheight" : 553,
"startingheight" : 436,
"startingheight" : 569,
It seems nobody is on the same block around here! We all split different ways?
Here are some block to check from pools to ensure if forked or not:
dogecoindarkd getblockhash 575
0000000015484059b21d4b1c75bf25d076366b6a1291fa02c7cf7c141e86491f
dogecoindarkd getblockhash 570
000000000c54d0ee350aa247423a62974650ed651f6c82060602303686d0469f
dogecoindarkd getblockhash 565
0000000009220cd6dda7d517d43a6f92f533027df01daa2fe7debfede81b9bf8
dogecoindarkd getblockhash 560
00000000076c843829981be587399ac09477e0c581f963c490387b65ea0d93dd
EDIT: The 3 listed pools appear on the same block, I guess we are good for the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Goldmines, you seem on a different 4461 blockhash vs suchpool and ipominer
|
|
|
|
|
The fork occured on block 4395, confirmed between ipominer and suchpool
Here is suchpool's data before and after the fork:
4393 00000000000de475b65d9cb210f2337e423cd7d7c741f67b3117efbc41afe1cd
4394 0000000000a1ad3cbebf7b151597f0f7e8a993aba83dfd209115bdf773c8f547
* FORK
4395 00000000001552b212136ce3a1bb50468c47c3996c05cd7915cb781a9f089279
We are now in sync back
|
|
|
|
|
I can confirm a fork:
seed@data2:/root$ seedcoind getblockhash 4450
000000000049787b83776bbb8065ed364d42a0b1870e4c247122f0faa45b6016
seed@data2:/root$ seedcoind getblockhash 4451
000000000049b84ea7bd90dd8de2c74f203b7875c1a18d4750841d76e7b4089d
seed@data2:/root$ seedcoind getblockhash 4452
0000000000ef7b01db3382c857e45b33f17e8aa023d7ae073b02860477f2fb2d
seed@data2:/root$ seedcoind getblockhash 4453
818a5e07367281ccfc19a272a4d96288194c621cb2ded801e5dd7fdfa69bb4c2
|
|
|
|
|
Back in sync.. let's see for how long!
|
|
|
|
|
Will resync once again! Let's see..
|
|
|
|
|
"version" : "v0.9.1.0-49-g49f746b-dirty",
"protocolversion" : 60013,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : *******,
"newmint" : 0.10000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 3459,
"timeoffset" : 53,
"moneysupply" : 400.86230125,
"connections" : 4,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "*********",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 47.45957567,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00000095
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1412674459,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00001000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
|
|
|
|
|
What a forkfest right now :/
|
|
|
|
So is new wallet good to install now or not?
This. And if it is not, REMOVE IT FROM THE OPENING POST. Which wallet should I be using? and if its the old one does anyone have the rar password? The new one seems safe to use. We did some investigation and it seems the old wallet often is ~1 block back, but the block hashes eventually match. |
|
|
|
|
There we go, 129 went through
|
|
|
|
|
Still at block 129, been a while now. Sup
|
|
|
|
|
On fire! Good launch, good nethash. Ninja of the day!
|
|
|
|
Same over here, still on the old wallet while new intel comes out.
Also its always better to notify pools, I wasn't actively lookin in this thread thanks for minerpools pointing out the update.
I caught him literally just in time I think.. You guys know who runs suprnova? Yes it's ocminer |
|
|
|
|
Same over here, still on the old wallet while new intel comes out.
Also its always better to notify pools, I wasn't actively lookin in this thread thanks for minerpools pointing out the update.
|
|
|
|
Definitely agree. It is a scam coin with a massively botched launch on top, and a developer that's deleting any and all negative posts. Here's a quick rundown of the problems with this coin:
1) Extreme censorship of posts, including deleting dozens of legitimate posts from reputable altcoin community members deleted within the first 45 minutes after launch
2) Heavily instamined for >200 blocks at launch, with no source posted
3) 4% premine on a 15 year mining period
4) Front-loaded block rewards (reduced by 20 satoshis per block)
5) Total lack of nodes in wallet or in the announcement post
6) No algorithm listed in the announcement post at launch
+1 dev deleting stuff, listing me before i even have a pool up.. smell CK |
|
|
|
|
Wallet looks alright, no issues nothing missing, easy compile.
Taking a peek at the source while waiting for nodes. So far looks alright!
|
|
|
|
Does this apply for pools then? Can we post "Coin added to the pool, please see my thread" or something like that?
1. Yes, it applies.
2. No, you can't.
Ok now this is even more confusing and it goes beyond insane. You've pretty much said that the Exchanges can post on a coin ANN thread to let people know they've added a coin, that they can't post the URL but the exchange is now supposed to refer people to go to the Exchange's thread for the info they need regarding the coin. Why is it so bad that c-cex or bittrex posts information about a coin being added? that's one of the fundamental parts of an altcoin.
You're telling me that the same rule does apply to the pools as well, but that we can't tell people to go to our thread for the information they need?. How does that make sense to you in any way? And please don't say that you didn't make the rule because you're the one enforcing it.
You can discuss the coin's community, specs ,algo, issues with the coin, benefits and disadvantages of it, when a certain feature will be implemented, feature discussion, troubleshooting and support for the coin, updates, hashing speed of the coin, config suggestions for more effective mining, etc.
So people in the Altcoin mining sections can't discuss the most important aspects of an altcoin which are:
1. Extraction
2. Markets/Exchanges/Price
This entire forum is full of scammers, fudsters, there are actually organized groups that have destroyed even good coins by spreading lies and creating fake accounts posing as the actual coin dev. (This happened on GNS and the scam group killed the coin within hours of it being launched) And what happened with the fake accounts? I posted about it and my posts got deleted, the dev had to actually lock the thread and create a self-moderated thread although it was too late, the coin was dead already, this made a lot of people lose money while the scammers just went to the bank.
It's pretty obvious that some of you actually want the altcoin section to go away, you guys treat the section as a nuisance, when in fact it generates the most traffic for bitcointalk, do you honestly think the huge traffic increase in the past 10 months has been because of Bitcoin?
Keep it up and that traffic will simply go somewhere else.
Good point there. One thing that seems to be missing in BCTalk moderation is discerning. Not every message is subject to be considered spam, however they apply it with no exception, going all nuts over that. I think it's time for people to shift to another forum where intelligence can still be used while moderating. |
|
|
|
|
I can't believe the chain is not reset, no relaunch just an updated source.
For this reason, we are out.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
