Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 09:44:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 290 »
641  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja on: November 06, 2023, 11:15:59 AM
[banned site] kampanja je bila privremeno pauzirana prošlog tjedna, ali ponovno će se nastaviti od sljedećeg petka i trenutno ima slobodnih mjesta za nove članove.
Plaća se maksimalno 25 postova tjedno, a nema minimalnog zahtjeva. Postovi u Local sekciji se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:
Code:
Full-Member Rank: 1$ /Post
Senior: 1.5$ /Post
Hero & Legendary Rank: 2$ /Post

Hello everyone, the team has sent the payment for next week so we can continue the campaign.

If you were a part of the campaign last week, then post with the text "I was a part of the previous week."

The campaign will begin on Friday.
642  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What I did just to invest in Bitcoin. on: November 05, 2023, 10:38:02 PM
I sold our family land and used the money to invest on bitcoin.
<snip>

That was a stupid move. Was it before or after you bought yourself a new iPhone?

You might want to think about giving your resume skills section a little makeover.

Skills: Investment coach. Feasibility and Viability analyst.
643  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A Simple Reason Why Bitcoin is not Money on: November 05, 2023, 10:20:13 PM
If stuff just exists cuz people like how it looks then that stuff has aesthetic purpose. It creates a specific amount of benefit and one can estimate that benefit with benefits provided by other products to exchange stuff rationally.

Yes, that's it!  Bitcoin serves an aesthetic purpose, at least for me – can't speak for everyone else. It's all about finding beauty in those numbers. Glad we got that sorted out!

It hilarious how you managed to create the whole religion from that pyramid.

Hey there! Mocking someone's religion ain't cool. It's basically a form of religious discrimination.
644  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A Simple Reason Why Bitcoin is not Money on: November 05, 2023, 10:34:42 AM
<dung>

So, you think all things got to have some official purpose?  Nah, I don't think so! Sometimes stuff just exists cuz people like how it looks or it's fun or whatever and  the whole idea of purpose is kinda subjective anyway and means different stuff to different folks.  When you look at the big picture of life and everything, some say trying to figure out your purpose is a basic human thing to do, but that doesn't mean every single thing in the universe has got to have a cosmic purpose or whatever.  I mean, take a pretty waterfall for example.  Its just water going over some rocks - doesn't really do anything.  But people enjoy looking at it and hearing the sound of water.  It exists for its own sake.  Or dancing - it don't accomplish anything concrete necessarily but people do it cuz it's fun and it feels good.  Life is messy and complicated like that.

The same goes for Bitcoin.  Who's to say it must serve some grand purpose? Perhaps we're just here for the joy of watching those pretty numbers dance on our screens.  Cheesy
645  Other / Meta / Re: Services board is very hard to browse on: November 05, 2023, 10:11:21 AM
You have failed to understand that it is even because of the presence of signature campaign services that the poor people's advert (according to you) is seen or noticed. If a separate board is created for signature campaigns, definitely no one or a few will visit the board of poor people's services.

You have failed to understand that the Services board was not originally created specifically for signature and bounty campaigns; they came much, much later. I don't deny that bounty campaigns are a form of Bitcoin-related services, but claiming that such a campaign is more important or popular than some other "poor people's" service is pure speculation. Do you have some metrics or stats to support such a statement?



Exchanges, Mixers use the Service Announcements section but freelancing jobs should be in Services itself.

"Exchanges" and "Web Wallets" have their own child boards under the "Service Discussion", why do you think campaigns can't have the same under the "Services" board?
646  Other / Archival / Re: ♻️ [banned mixer] — FAST, SECURE and RELIABLE BITCOIN MIXER (Since 2016) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ on: November 05, 2023, 08:52:45 AM
We are talking about the receipt of coins in my wallet.
The transaction is in two parts - the first part arrived yesterday, the second never arrived

Is that other transaction still hanging in your wallet with the unconfirmed status? Can you check what the transaction fee is in sats/vB?

Right now, mempool.space is suggesting that you need at least 60 sat/vB for your transaction to make it into a block and get confirmed. A few hours ago, it was a bit lower at around 30 sats/vB. So, if your fee is way below that, you might be in for a wait. Now, there are a couple of moves to consider. Cryptomixer could potentially help by using RBF, or you can try CPFP on your end if you don't want to wait for their support.


Sent you a personal message.

Yes, as I suspected, it looks like they created a transaction with insufficient  fee - less than 20 satoshi per vbyte. The current recommended transaction fee is at least 50 satoshi per vbyte.

You have several options here:

1. You can wait for [banned mixer] to be online again and see if they solve your problem from their side.
2. Another option is to use a paid transaction acceleration service like ViaBTC, which you can find at https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator.
3. The third option, as I mentioned before, is to use CPFP from your wallet to create a new transaction with a fee that is enough to pay for both transactions.

Here are the basic steps for using CPFP from your wallet:
- Identify the stuck transaction.
- Create a new transaction that spends the same inputs as the stuck transaction
- When creating the new transaction, make sure to set a higher fee (something like 70-80 sats/vbyte should be enough)
- Sign and broadcast transaction to the network and wait for the confirmation

If you are using the Electrum wallet, right-click on the stuck transaction and check if there is a menu option "Child pays for parent...". If it's available, select it, and then follow the instructions provided by the wizard.
647  Other / Archival / Re: ♻️ [banned mixer] — FAST, SECURE and RELIABLE BITCOIN MIXER (Since 2016) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ on: November 04, 2023, 11:33:15 AM
We are talking about the receipt of coins in my wallet.
The transaction is in two parts - the first part arrived yesterday, the second never arrived

Is that other transaction still hanging in your wallet with the unconfirmed status? Can you check what the transaction fee is in sats/vB?

Right now, mempool.space is suggesting that you need at least 60 sat/vB for your transaction to make it into a block and get confirmed. A few hours ago, it was a bit lower at around 30 sats/vB. So, if your fee is way below that, you might be in for a wait. Now, there are a couple of moves to consider. Cryptomixer could potentially help by using RBF, or you can try CPFP on your end if you don't want to wait for their support.
648  Other / Archival / Re: ♻️ [banned mixer] — FAST, SECURE and RELIABLE BITCOIN MIXER (Since 2016) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ on: November 04, 2023, 10:14:47 AM
Hello.
The transaction has been in the "Pending confirmation" status for more than 19 hours. I didn't set a delay.
How to speed up the process?

The transaction fees seem to have gone way up compared to just the other day.  That likely means there's some stuck transaction because of too low a fee.  If it's about sending coins out from your wallet to the mixer, you could try RBF (Replace-By-Fee) to get it moving faster.  But if it's about getting coins into your wallet from the mixer, CPFP (Child-Pays-For-Parent) could work if your wallet supports it.

Check out these sources for more info:
How Replace-By-Fee (RBF) an Child-Pays-For-Parent (CPFP) can speed up confirmation
[TUTORIAL]getting a low-fee transaction unstuck by creating a CPFP with electrum
649  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Some BTC to whom solve the puzzle on: November 04, 2023, 09:39:53 AM
How do you solve this thing anyway?

You don't!

Quote
SHA256 is a hashing algorithm. There is no direct method for SHA256 decryption.
https://10015.io/tools/sha256-encrypt-decrypt

You can try to brute force it, though. But good luck with that!  Cheesy
650  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: No advertisement for btc on: November 04, 2023, 09:11:57 AM
From the name bitcoin, the first thing you will know is that “bitcoin is a desensitised digital currency ...

Desensitized? You're probably right, but I don't recall anyone using that term to describe Bitcoin before. Bitcoin doesn't have emotions that could be "desensitized." Did you perhaps mean "decentralized"?
651  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: November 04, 2023, 08:51:51 AM
Users without posts don't show up on theymos' weekly Trust data dump, so I had to check Hierarchical Trust settings to confirm polymerbit is the one who included him.

Is this why we can't see RebelMoney on polymerbit's trust list?
https://loyce.club/trust/2023-11-04_Sat_05.07h/811213.html
652  Other / Meta / Re: A small merit-sending UI tweak on: November 04, 2023, 08:35:23 AM
I think going with "Approach C" is the most sensible option. Using a placeholder value is a common practice in user interfaces, and it shouldn't create any confusion, even for new members.
653  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum not showing any transactions on: November 04, 2023, 08:15:19 AM
Thank you Zaguru and Omega. It worked. I didnt even know that there is something to be prefixed while importing the private keys. Thank you so much.

There's no real standard for whether a private key generates a Bech32/SegWit address, a P2SH (nested SegWit) address, or an old-school P2PKH  address.  It's totally up to each individual wallet to decide what type of address to derive from your private key and  so if you want a specific address type for your private key, you have to explicitly "tell" your wallet what you want.  This is where prefixes come into play. Kinda annoying but it is what it is.
654  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Is This sites Legit?? on: November 03, 2023, 02:20:41 PM
Yeah, this whole thing smells real fishy to me.  The Company Profile page is super vague, with no real specifics on who runs this thing or where they're located.  And the Contact Us page? It's just a generic email - no real address, no phone number nothing.  All the signs point to this being one of those ponzi scheme deals masked as some hot new dropshipping opportunity and  you'd have to be crazy to put any trust or money into an operation this sketchy.  My advice? Steer clear.  Keep your wallet in your pocket on this one.
655  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: No advertisement for btc on: November 03, 2023, 02:01:08 PM
Back in those early days when Bitcoin first started, it was mostly getting talked about on cryptographic message boards, newsgroups and other online communities. It seemed really experimental and niche and the adoption was slow at first as people tried to understand what it was all about.

But over time, as more nerds and libertarians started getting into Bitcoin, it started getting articles written about it online and offline, and talked about in the news. People pitched it as an alternative to the traditional financial system where you had to deal with high fees from banks and credit cards and wait days for transfers. With Bitcoin transfers could be free and instant since everything is on a decentralized ledger. Of course, it still felt pretty experimental and risky back then. But the hype around Bitcoin grew as more people learned about its potential.
656  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Pregled Bitcointalk Signature-Ad kampanja on: November 03, 2023, 01:31:19 PM
COINS.GAME kampanja ima slobodnih mjesta za jednog Legendary i jednog Sr. Member člana.
Minimalno 15 postova tjedno (od toga barem 10 u Gambling-u), a bit će plaćeno maksimalno 25 postova. Od toga 5 postova može biti u Local sekciji.

Payouts & Positions:
Code:
Legendary - $4/post.
Sr. Member - $2.6/post.

We have 1x Legendary and 1x Sr Member slot open.
657  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A Simple Reason Why Bitcoin is not Money on: November 03, 2023, 01:16:52 PM
This dude just won't quit! I've seen him around here for years, posting the same tired nonsense from different accounts. 

He'll make a new profile when he gets banned or tagged, but anyone whos been here a while can tell it's the same person.  His writing style and fixation on certain topics gives him away every time.

We've seen him use fxsurfer, antikvark, Antithesis, Snowshow and probably more and  don't waste your time responding - he just wants the attention.  Better to ignore repetitive trolls and not feed their need for attention and drama.
658  Other / Meta / Re: I raise a motion to create a board where health issues can be discussed. on: November 03, 2023, 01:03:54 PM
What I realize is that almost all of us have another perception of health and other health-related issues. For instance, those who did signature campaigns and other traders always focused on the screens of their phones, tablets, laptops, and computers, which have an effect on the eyes. With a health board, you can understand this and also know some ways and solutions to manage these issues. So, not that I am insisting, but I feel there is a need for that because we can’t focus on making money and forget our health.

What kind of half-baked argument is that? I get it, staring at screens all day long probably isn't terrific for our eyeballs, but trying to tell us that we need some health board on a bitcoin-related forum because of that? Give me a break. A little thing called common sense goes a long way.

Obviously we should be mindful of our health and all, but let's be a bit more practical about it!
659  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Jesmo li pronašli Fxsurfera& Antikvarka? on: November 03, 2023, 10:51:13 AM
Čekaj, zar nije da se on obično pojavi kad BTC dosegne vrhunac i cijena krene prema dolje? Možda ga sad boli ovaj rast. Znam da smo već raspravljali o tome ali meni i dalje nije jasno kako netko ima volje doći na BitcoinTalk forum i pisati protiv Bitcoina toliko opširne postove. Čovjek je otvorio tri teme i u prvi post napisao skoro 1000 riječi teksta.
A ja sam nekao imao dojam da se on pojavi kad je BTC na dnu da likuje kao i svi ostali trolovi pa se onda pokupi kad bitcoin krene pumpati. Sigurno zna da je bitcoin pred halveningom sto znaci da ce cijena poceti rasti pa se pojavio da se malo zabavi dok moze. Jedino me cudi da ovaj put nije navratio kod nas, da nam malo napumpa statistiku.

Nisam siguran. Čini mi se kao da se ovdje radi o nekoj ozbiljnoj dijagnozi. Mislim, mogao bih ga shvatiti da je nekakav gold bug poput Petera Schiffa, i da samo navija za svoj tim. Ali ovako... Pokušavam vidjeti logiku iza njegovih namjera. Možda tip iskreno vjeruje da njegovi pamfleti mogu zaista utjecati na tržište i pokušava ugrabiti nešto jeftinijeg Bitcoina prije sljedećeg bull run-a?  Wink
Tko zna što mu se mota po glavi!
660  Economy / Reputation / Re: What's up with all the Bitget shills? on: November 03, 2023, 08:43:31 AM
On the other hand, I don't know if you think we should report them? Tagging them is not going to have any effect and in any case it should be with a neutral, I understand.

"Report to moderator" is probably the best course of action. We can use this thread as a reference so they have a better picture of what's going on, and the moderators might also start giving out temporary bans .
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 290 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!