Sure it is better to get to fuck you status in your 20s, 30s or 40s, than to get there in your 50s or 60s, yet at the same time, you cannot try to act like you know what is going to happen, so the best that you can do is to try to make all of the better of decisions, and don't end up fuckning up by trying to rush matters.  There rare a lot of folks who never get to fuck you status, ever, so the mere fact of getting there late should not be a problem.

Also, if you only make it 1/4 or 1/2 to fuck you status, you swtill likely will be better off by doing the best that you can and making progress in that direction rather than considering yourself as a failure becuase you did not quite make it to fuck you status.

There are a lot of people in the world (even in affluent countries) who have very little to no savings/investments, and even the amounts of their investments and/or savings might not even amount to 1 or 2 years of their annual salary/cost of living... so fuck you status is usually in the 20x to 30x range of annual income/expenses and so people who reach such status are more likely exceptions rather than the rule.

Entry level fuck you status is just being able to quit your job and to be able to live off of your investments (and/or if you end up being able to receive benefits and/or pension payments), so frequently, if anyone plans to pull such lever at a lower age, even in their 40s, they have to keep in mind that they may well have to support themselves from their investments for quite a long time, so frequently, there are benefits to making sure that the calculations (and valuations) of the assets are based on sound assessments rather than just going based on the spot price of a volatile and fluctuating asset, and bitcoin fits into that highly volatile category.

Small changes in practices might have big rippling affects 10, 20 or 30 years down the road, and we might not even know the extent to which we made good decisions/choices or bad ones until our investment plays out for many years and/or when we either get close to fuck you status or we get into fuck you status (hopefully based on sufficiently accurate calculations).

Fuck crypto and fuck trading... especially talking about those ideas in this thread.

Let's talk about bitcoin and various methods to accumulate it without necessarily resorting to selling, and if you believe that you need to sell in order to acquire more bitcoin, then you probably need to go talk about those kinds of nonsense (gambling) ideas in some other thread.

Just because you do that, it is not necessarily going to bring better results to be making those kind of adjustments to how much someone is buying.. but surely the longer that they buy bitcoin, the more that the are likely going to have more options because their bitcoin stash has gotten BIGGER, and they can be better informed and decide what they would like to do based on having more information, but even if their BTC stash is getting bigger and the BTC price is going up, it still might not necessarily be a good idea to reduce the amount invested into BTC.  Let's say that a person is new to bitcoin, and they are trying to get to fuck you status in 10-20 years, and the sooner they get there the better, but they ONLY have around $200 per week that they can use to buy BTC.  They might want to spend most of that with just regular buys, adn sure, if they want to save $50 on the side for buying on dips, then that might be o..k... but it may or may not end up working out as well as just using the whole $200 to buy bitcoin every week, and so after 1 year, they would have invested $10,400 into bitcoin, and so after 10 years they would have invested $100,400 into BTC.

My fuck you status chart shows that such person might need to have around 4 BTC by the end of 2033 in order to reach entry level fuck you status

So maybe if such hypothetical person had gotten up to 4 BTC, then they would be getting close to fuck you status in 10 years.. but we cannot be sure how many bitcoin they would have been able to get if their purchases of $200 per week were to be spread over 10 years...maybe they were ONLY able to accumulate 1-2 BTC with that kind of an investment approach.. which still might be o.k. to have 2 BTC by 2038, as shown in my chart.

I agree with most of what you are saying here, and surely there is value to interactive kinds of learning that involve ongoing actions rather than just reading about the theory and not doing anything... so year, there may be some needs to put some plans into action, whether that is $10 per week or some higher amount that might depend on personal circumstances, and maybe even a smaller amount in the beginning while learning and gaining confidence.

Sri Lanka started well today but later on they could not hold on to wickets. Their partnership was good when they scored 116 runs in 21 overs but could not score more runs in the match due to the fall of wickets later on. Since the dismissal of Pathum Nissanka, no batsman has been able to pair the game well and since then the wickets have fallen the most and the run rate has slowed down. At the moment Sri Lanka have lost 8 wickets, but their runs have not increased much. 8 for 199 Sri Lanka are under enough pressure at the moment and I think they will lose all their wickets very soon. They could have scored 300 runs if they could have played the game today but from this score they failed and it is not possible to increase their runs. But Australia is bowling very well especially Adam Zampa bowled brilliantly and he took 4 wickets, his bowling performance put Srilanka under so much pressure today.

It seems to me that DCA is the best in terms of practicality - especially since a considerably large number of folks (perhaps even an overwhelming majority) don't even have any kind of lump sum investment funds available to them to even have that option, and even if they did, they might be better off to figure out some kind of strategy to spread out their investment rather than putting it in all at once.

I frequently tell people that it would be good to think of their BTC investment in terms of 4-10 years or longer, so in that regard, if someone starts a DCA strategy that s/he is intending to invest $100 per week (which would be $5,200 per year) for the next 4-10 years, then they are still building their investment with each time that they buy some more BTC... so there might be some point in which they either say that they invested enough or that they might start to think that the could increase their investment to $200 per week or reduce it to $50 per week.

And if they get a bonus payment from their work of another $5k, they might consider whether and how they are going to invest that into BTC, and their decision might well depend upon where they are at in their BTC accumulation journey.

Hopefully, it is ultimately a balance, and some people really enjoy certain kinds of activities, even nerdy ones, so it is not like it would necessarily be an all or nothing approach, yet at the same time, when someone is brand new to bitcoin, it may well be a lot better for them to attempt to employ a system that does not take up a lot of time.. because they likely would have already spent  some time just figuring out their bitcoin sourcing... maybe setting up accounts to buy bitcoin... and maybe they have one or two jobs that take a lot of their time and a family and maybe some other stuff that they either like or feel obligated to do... so then at some point they might be weighing how much time they are able to spend to study certain aspects or to try to determine if the BTC price is dipping, why it is dipping and if it is going to continue to dip.. which after they do the whole assessment, then they might still end up being wrong. .so then there could be some value to just being a lot more modest in their approach and so then something like DCA could end up building up a decent amount of BTC over 4-10 years without even giving too much thought to it.. and maybe just reading about some BIGGER areas, or listening to podcasts, but not really getting into particulars of trying to predict if the BTC price is going up or down in the short-term.. which surely can be time consuming and even adding some unnecessary stresses.

Don't jump into conclusions too quickly because that is the mistake I did yesterday, but in the end it was a complete shocker. I still believe 260+ can be a challenging total at this kind of pitches, especially with quality spin attack like Sri Lanka.

Another surprising twist, there is some drizzle and play has been stopped now for a while, hopefully it won't alter the dimensions of the ongoing game.

At one point, it looked as if Afghanistan may make 300. But they lost some quick wickets and then ended up with a total of 284. All credit goes to Rahmanullah Gurbaz BTW. Without him, Afghanistan would have never made such a competitive total. He started by attacking Chris Woakes and Sam Curran. Both these bowlers ended up with economy rates of more than 10 runs per over. He deserved a century, but got run out as a result of a mistake from the Afghan captain, Hashmatullah Shahidi. Then it was the turn of Ikram Alikhil to get Afghanistan to a decent total.

This is the big upset match of 2023 in which England is beaten by Afghanistan. England all out on 215 runs as they failed to reach the given target of 285. Except for Harry Brook, no one played a good innings as he made 66 runs in 61 balls with 7 fours and a six. Except for this player, no one hits a six in the team England.

Whether Afghanistan played good cricket today, Rahmanullah Gurbaz scored 80 runs in 57 balls consisting of 8 fours and 4 blistering sixes. Also, Ikram Alikhil played some good shots for the side of Afghanistan with 2 sixes and 3 fours.

However, that was an upsetting game because, from the England team, we didn't expect that, even though they had a strong batting lineup and a strong bowling lineup. But sometimes it happens even with the best teams in the World.

Whoaza MusaPk...   You should be careful in the way that you describe that DCA calculator.

It is not showing you results that you can expect to get, but instead it is showing you results that you would have had gotten if you had DCA'ed in the way that you input into the various fields that are contained therein.

So surely past results are likely not going to be the greatest in terms of projecting what might happen in the future.. so we need to be careful in terms of describing past results in that kind of a way.

Don't get me wrong.. DCA is likely amongst the best, if not the best method to accumulate BTC for an overwhelmingly large number of normies, and BTC is likely among the best, if not the best, asset to be investing into, especially if you have a 4-10 year time horizon or longer and you tailor your BTC investment approach and level of aggressiveness in accumulating it to your personal and/or psychological circumstances.

That's true.  You can see how effective that DCA has been in the past, and hypothesize how effective it can be in the future, including how effective it is likely to be in the future, but you cannot guarantee that it will be effective.  One of the greatest of underlying presumptions in regards to DCA working out is that the BTC price needs to ultimately go up to prices that are higher than your average price per BTC by the time you sell them, but it is not guaranteed to go up, even though many of us recognize bitcoin as a very strong and/or solid bet based on a variety of factors, including its ongoing building of network effects due to its strengths as the most sound of money that the world has ever witnessed, and to have been accomplished in a digital manner which brings many additional features of portability, divisibility, ongoing verifiability, etc.

Sure.  It is possible to customize DCA in a variety of ways that may well help to cause the BTC investment to be less risky from a personal approach because it is tailored to the circumstances of the individual to account for each of the individual factors.. but merely attempting to make a strategy less risky will not always result in less risk because sometimes people make mistakes in regards to either their attempts at timing and also in terms of their position size.. so mostly when we are attempting to consider the trade-offs of less risk we also are likely attempting to account for a variety of other factors that may well also include considering how much time that we are spending to employ such strategies, is our information better as compared to just employing a more blind and regular strategy.. .might we be spending our time in other useful and enjoyable ways and maybe even increasing our cashflow so that we might merely be able to buy more bitcoin on a regular basis rather than fucking around with studying charts and maybe not even getting our calculations correctly when we could have used our 1 month worth of time to earn an extra $1k or $2k and then use most if not all of that extra money to buy bitcoin directly on a regular basis without spending so much time trying to figure out short term moves and getting them wrong 30-60% of time time.

I guess using the right align tag is enough like what @digaran said?
Ex.

Or does Urdo writing goes like this
If it's the latter, i guess you need to use a keyboard in mobile and an extension in desktop mode to be able to come up like this writing.

I don't know, maybe someone can enlighten me between the two examples.

[right]!morning Good[/right]

[right]آپ رائٹ الائن آپشن استعمال کر سکتے ہیں اور یہ بہت اچھی طرح کام کرتا ہے۔[/right]

Still the performance of Afghanistan is admirable. Afghanistan made 106 runs in 14 overs. And they didn't lost any wicket. The first partnership is going well. If this partnership will remain on pitch so I am sure that Afghanistan will make 300+ runs and this will be a good target. And and will be little bit difficult to chase by England. By the way we can't say anything at this time. Let's watch who will win.

Jay's opinion is the best at the moment to encourage us to invest wisely, because investing without knowledge and also having a target is just a gambling activity.

why is the DCA concept highly recommended to every bitcoin investor because that way you have full control over the money you make, for example every month you make $1k from the work or business you do and you invest $300 or $400 every month to buy bitcoin, so you still have around 65% of the money you earn left, you can use it for your daily needs and set aside a little for your emergency fund, however, this emergency fund is what you can use later for urgent expenses, so you don't sell Bitcoin that you invested so far.

You cannot drop the whole shit on the bowlers it is impossible for them to prevent them from bating or taking wickets as they also go under pressure, the three wickets they take are their big achievement. The whole thing did are the middle order They were out on just 2 or 4 runs. In the beginning, the match went smoothly but after 140 runs they all dropped very easily just Rizwan and Baber gave the runs. It was very disappointing for the Pakistan Crickets fans we watched just for the aggressive battle but they won the match very easily you can't neglect the performance of the Indian team they are the strongest and have the ability to defeat every team in this World Cup and seem like they will win this world cup just like the Asia cup.

Now, we are witnessing something Pakistan is known for, a middle-order collapse. After Babar's wicket, Pakistan lost 5 wickets for 16 runs. From nowhere, Pakistan is finding a way to bowled out below par at a flat wicket. Good tight bowling by the Indian bowlers; at one stage, Pakistan was looking for a target above 300, and now it seems that 200 will be a tough ask. Only a miracle can save Pakistan from losing this match.

Let's see how the bookies see this match and whom they think is the favorites for this match.



Clearly, it seems that it is India who seems the favorite but do not forget these odds can change quickly if we see good performances by the Pakistan team. Since you said that the Pakistan team is unpredictable. hence anything can be expected in this match.

LOL.. in the social media, the vast majority of the users are against all this. They don't want the BCCI to provide such a warm welcome to the Pakistani team, when the border tensions are still on. The match is going to take place in the largest cricket stadium in India (Narendra Modi Stadium at Ahmedabad), with a seating capacity of 132,000 people. Organizers are expecting a full-house, with many of the celebrities from India are expected to attend. I believe that the match was shifted to Saturday, so that the reserve day is set for Sunday. Anyway, no rains are predicted for today, and therefore the question of match getting extended to tomorrow should not arise.

I am not worried about the price. Because the war created fear in everyone's mind, but it did not have any effect in reality. Because many people use bitcoin to send money to the war area here too we find the use of Bitcoin. But we will not always take it negatively because for those of us who have been waiting to buy, an opportunity has come again. Although I think this situation may return to normal in a few days, but during this period those who exploit and buy bitcoin from the dip will be comparatively more profitable than others. Since we are committed to investing in Bitcoin for a long time, we are not worried about temporary price fluctuations.

Salam dosto

So as promised half payment from the Campaign id going to out community.

Which will be 0.004142/2 *  $27,520 =  $56.99

Please suggest I will wait for your suggestions and mean while I will put $57 ~ USDT in our FunCoin Karobar.

With this after quite some time let me update the latest balance sheet.

Aakhir pe Funcoin Karobar ki Update#13 (12-10-2023):

Last update was exactly 3 months back.. sorry for the delay guys

Check karin phir Allah ne kesi barkat dali hia hamaray Karobar main dekhin balace $57 se jump maar kar aik dam $114.63 hogia hia.

Aur ye tu abhi bear-market chal rahi hai... zara bull run aane dein.

Please apni apni qeemat aara se zaror nawazing... we have 57USDT and 35TRX spare in ko kahan invest kia jae? Ya inko aise he rakhna hai? Agar koi short term dekhna hia tu ADA, DOGE, FIL, NEAR? kia kehte hian..?


Contribution Percentage:
shahzadafzal          10%
Sayeds56               63%
MusaPk                  11%
WatChe                  10%
Gladitorcomeback    6%

MusaPk                35 TRX
shahzadafzal       57 USDT



You can track our wallet here
https://coinstats.app/p/geFhnE

Yar thora explain karyn gay what is this? Lately wasn't active is thread main to idea nai ha is baray main. Agar app telegram group main bhy yyeah ideas wgera share kae deya karyn to pata lag jye. daily m.a yahan kafy posting ho rhy hoty han to kafy cheezyn miss ho jaty ha.

Mongolia was playing their first ever international match. What do you expect from them? The issue is that stronger teams play against these associate teams only in competitions such as Asian Games. Therefore I am also not in favor of taking away this opportunity. JSRAW has a valid point here. Each and every nation should take part in the qualifier tournament. The BCCI wants teams to get direct entry based on the T20I ranking. But then, the ICC ranking is heavily biased in favor of the full members and I am not in favor of using it as a means of qualification.

In my point of view if New Zealand will take first turn and will go above 300 runs so it will be little bit difficult for the Bangladesh team. Because Bangladesh were unable to win the match against England and England scored 364 runs and Bangladesh team got out all of the team at 277 runs. In the previous two matches bowled well and I hope today will also bowl well. So let's see who will win, I think New Zealand will win today match.