Yes, he is not wrong when he says that money does not guarantee our happiness and that story is an example. But as everyone said, between choosing to be rich but not happy and poor but also not happy, which would you choose?

Also, I don't think you will be happy if you don't have money. How happy will you be when you cannot meet your daily needs? How happy will you be when your children are equal to their friends? You can't take care of your parents...you won't be able to do anything in this society without money, how can you be happy? Money cannot buy happiness, but certainly when you have a lot of money, you can maintain the happiness you have, or at least it is a hundred times better than when you are poor but also unhappy.

But I think if someone can afford silver then they can also afford gold, so why don't we buy gold in the first place when it can bring more benefits than silver? Gold is completely superior in both fighting inflation and providing better returns so there is no reason for us to buy silver. So I think those who invest in silver instead of gold because they have their own calculations and maybe they expect silver to give higher returns than gold.

Similarly, if bitcoin and litecoin gave the same returns then no one would invest in litecoin, they would invest in LTC simply because they expected it to give better returns than bitcoin.

If I remember correctly, there are dozens of similar topics on the forum and if you look hard enough , you will see that most will choose and give advice to choose bitcoin because we are in the bitcoin forum and we are all bitcoin investors .
Gold is a safe and very good asset but when it comes to investments, most people only think about profits and with bitcoin being a more profitable investment there is no reason for people to choose gold without choosing bitcoin . So , I will also choose bitcoin , but if you have a lot of money and want to minimize risk , diversification is necessary and you should not put all your eggs in one basket .

If this result is correct, I will be quite surprised that the Biden administration is ignoring and has so far not had any impact on this group of voters when they make up 40% of the US population. Although not all 40% of these voters will trust and support Mr. Trump, it is clear that Mr. Trump's public support of cryptocurrency will have a significant impact on this group of voters, while Mr. Biden completely completely ignored.

Meanwhile, I found another result and there is a big difference from what you found. Only 15% of Americans participate and invest in cryptocurrency. Therefore, I still maintain my opinion, the issues that American voters are concerned about today are inflation, economic crisis and war rather than cryptocurrencies.



Source: Triple-A

They are poor, but that does not mean they are so poor that they cannot meet their living needs and do not have money to invest. Poverty here means that they cannot have a high income and a better life than developed countries, not that they are so poor that they have no food . Additionally, if you regularly watch the news , you will see that countries with high inflation are also more likely to accept and use cryptocurrencies than developed countries despite government bans.

I just took our forum as a small example, and if you use other social media platforms , you will also see the rate of cryptocurrency usage and participation from 3rd world countries still very high .



https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2023-global-crypto-adoption-index/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/20-countries-highest-cryptocurrency-adoption-114036029.html

Manchester United is most probably going to go into the next season having the coach that they have right now, Ten Hag. So far the coach has not been approached or said anything about being fired from the managerial position of Manchester United. I talked to even though he was able to win the FA Cup, he is still going to be fired. But I guess the FA Cup saved his career.

They are actually good quality coaches. Those are just not available. A few weeks ago I heard that Zidane was interested in managing Manchester United. What happened to that? If he was interested himself and Manchester United did not approach him, I have to say Manchester United authority is just dumb.

Anyway, Fabrizio Romano confirmed that MU wants to bring Ruud Van Nistelrooy to Old Trafford. Last week Burnley posted they are trying to appoint Ruud Van Nistelrooy as their head coach, maybe that deal will not happen if Ruud Van decides to accept Ten Hag's offer to become part of Old Trafford and join Ten Hag’s coaching staff. Returning of Ruud Van will add another twist 

The player was going through a lot. I expected the club to actually do something more to help the player in this situation. But the club was actually busy saving its own self image. I cannot say that the club did the wrong thing. But I can definitely say that the player needed help and it would have been great if the club actually helped him. And we have seen a lot of these cases actually come forward. This thing has reached a certain point where I instantly think that the person, the male who has actually been alleged to do the offense has actually done nothing and he is actually the victim.

There is a reason why a lot of clubs should not and do not listen to the fans. Because the fans do not always know what is best for the club. At the same time, people are always going to be divided into two about any certain thing.

I am honestly very doubtful about Kompany. If I remember correctly, Xabi Alonso was able to improve the Leverkusen team a lot even in the 2022/23 season. And this season we all know what he did with Leverkusen. on the other hand when we look at the managerial career of Kompany, just in this season he has actually taken his team to the relegation. I just don't understand how Bayern Munich actually brought in a coach that has taken his team to the relegation.

Kompany definitely has an easier task compared to Alonso. That's because he has a great squad. Maybe he will be able to implement good tactics with this really good squad. Only time will tell. But I am honestly very skeptical.


At the end of the day, can we actually not say that it is a fair battle between Leverkusen and Bayern Munich? Think about it, Leverkusen does not have a great squad like Bayern Munich. But they have a great coach. On the other hand, the coach of Bayern Munich is not someone who has proven himself in the past. But they have a very good squad. They have striker Harry Kane, who was the highest scorer in the Bundesliga in this season. So I think actually that advantage is with Bayern Munich. Problem is they are just inconsistent even against weak opponents. And it does not matter which team or which club it is, if they are inconsistent, they are not winning anything.

Maybe the coach that he is playing under is not being able to utilize him properly. Not everyone is Carlo Ancelotti. We have seen a lot of players not play that good for his national team but play very well for the club. Maybe that is something which is happening with Mbappe. And him not playing well in the euro also does not mean he's not going to play well with Real Madrid.

If we talk about Mbappé, I think he’s not going to have any problems adapting to the Carlo Ancelotti system. He is a good player. Probably the best in the world right now. The only thing that might be a little tricky is that the midfield of Real Madrid is going to change very soon. Kroos has retired and Luka Modrić is also going to retire soon. Maybe Ancelotti will not have the great quality that we have seen recently.

I think it’s because, at that time, the situation was different. At that time people had to think about the money that was being generated. And at that time people also kind of worshiped good players. I am not saying that they don’t do it now. Another reason was that people probably felt the need to protect Ryan Giggs. But now that society has become femcentric (not sure if I am saying this correctly or not). The feminist ideas and feminism as a whole have almost destroyed many essential things about society. That’s why whenever any of these allegations come up, it doesn’t matter if the man is in the right or wrong, he doesn’t even have to be proven guilty, he is instantly shamed and his career is in jeopardy instantly.



I was a little sad to hear that he did not renew the contract with Real Madrid. But it was actually a good decision for him. He is quite old and now he needs the money. I support him and any other player trying to get as much money as they can before they eventually end their career.

I also come from a 3rd world country and what I feel is that bitcoin is growing in those countries more than in developed countries. Because as you know, life there is extremely difficult due to inflation, and government corruption...people are always looking for solutions to escape those bad things so they will easily approach and accept bitcoins.
But there are still people's misunderstandings about bitcoin. Because people's lives are poor and ignorant, many people may fall into fraudulent projects labeled bitcoin, thereby having misconceptions about bitcoin.

You can also see that the most active boards on the forum come from third world countries rather than developed countries.

I agree with you that Mr. Trump only mentioned supporting cryptocurrency in a few statements, he never spent much time seriously discussing it. But we also need to know that the cryptocurrency industry is still not a field with a large number of participants, or plays an important role in the economy of a country like the US. It is just an emerging trend and is gradually becoming popular. It cannot be more important than other issues such as promoting the economy, immigration, war...other painful problems in society. So we don't need to be too picky about why he doesn't hold any dedicated discussions on cryptocurrencies.

I feel that Mr. Trump's strategy is to attract and win the trust of minority voters in society, and cryptocurrency is one of them. Just because we are crypto investors we feel dissatisfied but for other voters, they care about other things rather than focusing on crypto like us.

Teaching bitcoin to others is a good idea but to do that you need to have enough knowledge, experience or even deep expertise to be able to teach others and take their money. You can't take advantage of people's ignorance and give them knowledge about bitcoin when you yourself don't have too much knowledge about bitcoin. Not to mention, knowledge about bitcoin is not too difficult to find on the internet and everything is free. So if you want to open a center or a class to teach about bitcoin, there is nothing wrong but you need to provide them with knowledge commensurate with the amount of money they pay you. Education may sound simple but it is no simpler than business related to bitcoin.

And no one is saying OP is wrong in choosing short-term investments, but we need to admit that long-term investments bring more benefits. We have heard many stories about people becoming rich through bitcoin but most of them are long term investors, there are no stories about people becoming rich or making huge profits by investing short-term investment in bitcoin.
Or like in recent days, bitcoin's fluctuations have a wide range and from statistics we can see that hundreds of millions of dollars are liquidated every time bitcoin fluctuates.

I also know many traders but I don't see anyone making profits in recent days. Of course, long-term investors cannot make profits with the current market situation either, but at least they don't lose money and their money is still intact. Short-term investing sounds attractive because we can make money immediately, but things don't work like that, short-term investing is like a trap for the market to take our money faster.

Wait so if a player from the squad gets just alleged, not proven to be guilty, just alleged to have sexually assaulted his girlfriend, the club has to make sure that he does not stay in the club to save their reputation? But when they have some PR stuff being done with iShowSpeed that does not hurt the club? Does that increase the reputation? Maybe I am just too old but that’s not how it should work. Maybe I am wrong but if a player is going through a rough time, the club should help him in my opinion. By the way, was he just alleged or proven to be guilty? I thought he was just alleged, no?



I understand very well why the club did this. But I am surprised that nobody is seeing any problems with this. So any woman can actually come out and say that a famous football player has committed sexual assault on her and his career will be over even if he is not Guilty? The charges against Mason Greenwood were dropped. Does that mean he was guilty? I don’t think the judges actually found him to be guilty.

In the 15 years of bitcoin's existence and development, it is not a too long or too short period of time, but it is enough to prove that bitcoin is very trustworthy and worthy of our trust in it. Therefore, we should not only be grateful to those who created bitcoin, but also grateful to those who have supported and trusted bitcoin over the past 15 years because thanks to them, bitcoin could become as popular as it is today . And for me, before learning or researching anything, I always consider the popularity factor because if it is not good, it will certainly not receive the trust of the crowd . Therefore, popularity can be a reliable measure for us to rely on when learning about bitcoin.

For those who are participating in the market and are planning to invest in bitcoin these days, what they should learn about bitcoin are the pros and cons that it can bring them, and the use cases bitcoin...from there they can decide whether to invest or not, IMO.

But what OP is talking about is should we give investment ideas to others when we don't have money to invest in bitcoin. And you have supported this idea but in my opinion it shouldn't be like that.


Regarding financial education, if you want to educate your children or relatives about finances. That's an extremely good thing and I support it. But you cannot teach them knowledge that you have only learned online and have never experienced. If we want to teach someone about finances then we at least have some experience and success with it.
You have never given advice to anyone but why do you support OP giving investment ideas to others when he has never even invested in bitcoin?


That's what I'm trying to say, if we have never invested in bitcoin then giving ideas or giving advice to others is not right and a bad idea. Personally, I wouldn't listen to advice from people who have no experience and are only theoretical.

If you are implementing a weekly/monthly DCA strategy and are determined to hold for the long term, you can even buy without looking at the price. But if you only have a certain amount of money and want to invest in bitcoin, you need to consider and analyze carefully before making a buying decision to avoid buying at too high a price. Not all investors have the conditions and ability to DCA for a long time . If all investors had a stable income and implemented the DCA strategy regularly, we would not have losers in the market. Therefore , it is necessary to have a specific investment plan and that depends on each person.

If a coach does not want to work with old players, it is fine. In general of the younger players are, the better they should perform and the less they are prone to injuries. So it is a good thing to work with young players. But then he will lack experience in the field. The best idea is to have a squad that is balanced. Not too many young players and not too many old players.

Thiago Motta should add more players to the team. And I think they are doing the right decision by bringing in midfield players so that the supplies from the midfield to the attack are better. Because they have definitely not scored enough goals in the last season. At least not enough to compete for the title.



Having old players is not a big problem if they are performing. Just look at the Real Madrid squad from the last few seasons. The Whites had almost half of the main squad that was literally in the mid 30s. The problem is, Juventus has been facing a lot of issues recently. And at the same time, the older generation is not performing that well. Just look at the ban of Paul Pogba and the point deduction that Juventus got in the season before this one.

Ultimately, I agree that they have to bring in new players preferably younger ones.

@Oluwa-btc, Bro, you said, . And after that, you said I have no idea about what I am talking about. I can’t even take this seriously at all.

About the player having scandals with his girlfriend, that is something which is relatively common actually. The problem is, doesn’t matter what the outcome is of the case, the player will have to suffer. They slander your name as soon as you are alleged.

@punk.zink Yes, that’s true. Manchester United does need some extra funds right now. That is going to help them bringing in some new players. Because the ones that they have actually brought in are not performing well. Well, I think even if some of them are actually performing well, the performance of Antony seems to catch the eye of the people a lot. People look at his failure a lot more. I also think they are supposed to be because 95 million is not a small amount of money.