|
its entirely possible. its only $1 on their merchant network
|
|
|
|
According to this; we can all do this. Create massive amounts of rigs on betarigs, each one with 0.0001 higher price. In the back have only 1 rig. In rig config, set highest priority pools to ones with higher price. That way your rig is constantly hired, for no work time customers need to fill ticket (if they do - some don't). You can gain a lot that way. How do you fight against such manipulation? That user actually does have that many rigs. (I know them personally) That is why he has so many rigs listed. there is no manipulation going on. Ahmed Well rig 10149 is offline now. Will see if it's "technical" or if the owner is using failover with a higher rate. That rig owner is finalhash. If its offline it's due to an issue with it. (Theres electrical certification going on) Make a ticket and i'll sort you out with a refund Ahmed |
|
|
|
I do understand that the site ran for months fine when mux ran things. The big difference is mux barely ever updated the site since it first launched. We've been constantly adding more and more features
More features? Cool, like what kind of features? more algos, multi-coin payments (DGC/LTC/BTC/QRK/MEC (more are coming soon)). I was working on mass rental (which was why the site was down) yesterday. We also have a partnership with mintsy which allows betarigs rig owners to lease their rigs to mintsy customers without doing anything extra once its launched. We've got some other stuff that i cant share yet too. Ahmed |
|
|
|
|
whoops. sorry about that guys. Cache was playing up.
I do understand that the site ran for months fine when mux ran things. The big difference is mux barely ever updated the site since it first launched. We've been constantly adding more and more features
Cleared it now and everythings back to normal
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
Ok,
Your cries have been heard. I will be helping Ahmed today fix the issue of no failovers. No promises of having it done today, but i will PERSONALLY be digging into some code...
Thanks for letting us know!
If you take the site down please do it at a sensible time (Like 4am) to reduce impact on users. Nicehash is currently down and my blood is boiling. It's also ridiculous how pathetic people are getting because some are leasing multiple rigs. I'm splitting my small rig. Might only be 3TH but it's mostly S1's. Certainly true I see no issue with people splitting their rigs up. There's many big rig's out there but they dont get as much rental time since people cant afford to. Do many people find the need to rent multiple hundred TH of rigs? (I know i dont i rent a few hundred gh, maybe up to 10TH for testing) As you get bigger and bigger it becomes neccesary to split them up which is why people e.g. us at finalhsh do it.. Any code modifications shouldnt need the site to be down for now (Except for cache cleanss which is a 2 min downtime). Also timezone's are a big issue so theres no ideal time in a way Ahmed |
|
|
|
According to this; we can all do this. Create massive amounts of rigs on betarigs, each one with 0.0001 higher price. In the back have only 1 rig. In rig config, set highest priority pools to ones with higher price. That way your rig is constantly hired, for no work time customers need to fill ticket (if they do - some don't). You can gain a lot that way. How do you fight against such manipulation? That user actually does have that many rigs. (I know them personally) That is why he has so many rigs listed. there is no manipulation going on. Ahmed |
|
|
|
How would I go about setting up a permanent node for ADT? I wouldn't mind setting up 1 or 2 depending on price. One in the eastern hemisphere, and one in the west, if that matters.
Just run a copy of the daemon. Add the following lines into your config file: maxconnections=1000 irc=1 (not neccesary but i find its better) Then post your IP Address and i can include your nodes inside the source code Ahmed |
|
|
|
I've just had a chat with mullick and we stumbled onto CAP and then onto ADT.
I think i know what the issue with ADT going onto its own fork. Which actually is an issue from CGB surprisingly. Will get a patch put up and see if it fixes the issues.
(All thanks goes to mullick for the fix he did for CAP)
@Crestington. I dont have a coin dev box anymore, you mind compiling win wallets for me for testing?
Ahmed
Sure I can do that, they won't be with all the bells and whistles but will get the job done, send me a link to the repo and I'll see if I can build it. Great, thanks man |
|
|
|
|
I've just had a chat with mullick and we stumbled onto CAP and then onto ADT.
I think i know what the issue with ADT going onto its own fork. Which actually is an issue from CGB surprisingly. Will get a patch put up and see if it fixes the issues.
(All thanks goes to mullick for the fix he did for CAP)
@Crestington. I dont have a coin dev box anymore, you mind compiling win wallets for me for testing?
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
i have no problem with someone else doing work on ADT and i wish you every success. I wont hand over the repo mainly since
a) i do the code reviews along with several others.
b) cryptsy and other services use our repo and so its only right that we make sure all the code submitted is good.
So aslong as any commit is made and a PR made. In most cases i'll look over and merge it the same day (or suggest improvements or commit them myself where appropriate)
Ahmed
Well so you are the reason why this coin is broken then... Since you agreed on the changes, I think I've seen enough here to not want to be involved here anymore. Tooo much shortsightedness and from the looks of it a bunch of kids. I'm not the reason the coin is broken. I agreed on the changes made by one of the other developers. Zack didnt agree with the removal of PoW. which caused enough issues in itself. They were also his choice of parameters. Ahmed |
|
|
|
|
i have no problem with someone else doing work on ADT and i wish you every success. I wont hand over the repo mainly since
a) i do the code reviews along with several others.
b) cryptsy and other services use our repo and so its only right that we make sure all the code submitted is good.
So aslong as any commit is made and a PR made. In most cases i'll look over and merge it the same day (or suggest improvements or commit them myself where appropriate)
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
As soon as any changes are made to ADT's v2 repo i will look over it and pull it in to the main repo.
EDIT: Under no circumstances will the repo be transferred over. zack is not the owner so he cannot be the one to transfer it. I am.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
I'm both a renter and a leaser too. (although my rigs are turned off currently).
Mux did have a limit of 5 and we do recieve limit increase requests and i provide them as i find no problem with them.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
freedom of choice??? what about respect? all prices were above 0.0120 BTC and you come up with 0.0117btc, on all your 55 rigs! not-honest competition, unfair competition.... how low can you go and how many miners do you have?  To be fair he has full right to keep his prices lower than everyone else. It's basic competition. Nothing else. theres nothing unfair about it. Ahmed Not my rigs if your aiming your comments at me. I rent 3.2TH on Betarigs and they're mostly S1's. I'm thinking breaking the rig down individually. No.. no. i'm talking about acpromotion who maverick was initially talking about. Ahmed |
|
|
|
freedom of choice??? what about respect? all prices were above 0.0120 BTC and you come up with 0.0117btc, on all your 55 rigs! not-honest competition, unfair competition.... how low can you go and how many miners do you have? To be fair he has full right to keep his prices lower than everyone else. It's basic competition. Nothing else. theres nothing unfair about it. Ahmed |
|
|
|
all of his are at 0.0117 BTC. he update all of them yesterday and crush the price. yes, the price was a bit high what he is doing, i see as flooding maybe even spamming! i would not want different price for different miners. as a renter i would not care if i get 10 sp30 or 1000 s1; speed and stability is all that matter, in my opinion Also true. I will see if i can contact the owner and get him to compact his rigs into fewer miners Ahmed And destroying freedom of choice. Think I might split all my miners up when the current rental finishes. If a persons miners take up an entire page, MOVE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Fucking easy! I wont force anyone. It might be he has a particular reason why he wants it like that or theres something missing off the site  As always if theres something i can resolve then why not contact then Ahmed |
|
|
|
all of his are at 0.0117 BTC. he update all of them yesterday and crush the price. yes, the price was a bit high what he is doing, i see as flooding maybe even spamming! i would not want different price for different miners. as a renter i would not care if i get 10 sp30 or 1000 s1; speed and stability is all that matter, in my opinion Also true. I will see if i can contact the owner and get him to compact his rigs into fewer miners Ahmed |
|
|
|
then what if i buy 100 or more s1 and dump them all, filling front page of the sha256 rigs, or pages .....
he can add more miners together to form a bigger ''rig''
got all of mine in 1 mini farm as it is easier and nicer to manage all at once, plus communicate with only 1 renter
very true. Difference is if you want to have individual prices per rig. Ahmed |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
