I will help you get a loan but you will have to give me €500 in advance without asking a question to the address located on my profile. Send it then text with the transaction ID. I will start processing. Are we in a deal?

I do. To be honest for last half an hour I was playing with the visualizer to see different accounts. It was interesting. It took me a long time to find my bubble though.

As long as there are no chance to know the public key by others, there are no risk involved.

I think your friend is concerned about the IP log that may the explorer log when you are entering any address or transaction to check details. But as long as it does not have a lot of btc stored in any address, I don't think anything will trigger the admin of these explorers to check a specific address and the locations it was searched. Even if they get the location, there are no concrete evidence for them to hunt you down.

Lucky you. Winning a 13.95 odd is amazing.

I once had such luck for an 8 folds but that was decade ago. My stake was £20 as far as I can remember and it was in a betting shop. That time online gambling platforms were not as much available as it is now. Congratulation.

I think this is what causing all confusions and constant drama in the reputation board. Sometimes a user ABC is creating a topic and sometimes JollyGood is creating topics such as this one.

Long ago when I was investigating the case of starmyc [he personally wrote me and complaining], I went through many feedback he left and my conclusions were

[1.] Most of the neutral feedback he lefts are kind of personal notes but when he writes the notes he is basically publicly insulting and devaluing the person. Problem become bigger when a person is on the forum from long ago and JollyGood was not even existed or a person is somehow established a good name for him on the forum from years of activity. To be honest, no one likes these types of feedback on their feedback page. If something you need to remember about the user then maintain a private note.
[2.] Most of the negative feedback are backed with very less facts than speculation and his personal thoughts. Even most of these negative feedback he left are more appropriate with neutral feedback but better to have private note.

The feedback on BenCodie's feedback page is a prime example of an unnecessary feedback that led him to create the topic and he was trying to justify his feedback. The worse is, he is not even making any statement even after a lot of people left their opinions because none of the opinion seems gone in his favour.

Problem with JollyGood is, that he thinks he can write anything to anyone's feedback page and no one should speak against it. If anyone does, he will just ignore to response and if that does not work then he will start insulting the person and keep telling others that they are in his ignore list.

What?
Did you not even see some red fonts warning something like [well to be exact]?


Since you already did, what is your agenda now?

In the fine line between live and death, I think we will meet theymos in the other side and ask what was it all about LOL

Trust system was not created for ass kissers to back up fellow liars or such things, it was created to give support or oppose to the feedback left by forum members depending on the correctness of the feedback. The feedback system was created to appreciate trades that conducts on the forum so that other can take some idea about a member before they make a potential trade.

But unfortunately people don't use both systems for the reason it was created. The system is not bullshit but the people who use it for their own benefits.

Like I said even in the top10 seems very hard for the Chelsea team if not impossible. You are winning.

No one is to take the side anymore?

Congratulation. My only wish is I will rank up high on the pool table LOL

Point noted for Girona LOL.
My knowledge about these leagues are nearly shit. Have no idea of the teams, how they play. I only depend on the result I see online and make my guess from it. Maybe that's the reason of the bad position on the point table for me.

Anyone have more to say about some other teams or any insights that can help people like me? We can always use tips and helps from people who know the league better than others.

To be honest many gambling websites have such easy registration system. No business whats to give their potential customers some hard time and risk to lose the customer.

Even with some of the fiat casinos [as far as I can remember] you will not be asked for anything before even depositing. When you will try to withdraw winning then they will ask for a full KYC.

As some others already suggested, read terms and conditions. There are nothing to feel unfair. You will feel frustrated if you fail to understand the contract between a casino and you.

I am not worried and you are not the first time too. What do you think I can miss since 2015?

FYI, moderators are not going to do anything, unless anyone reports it.

Anyway, i don't want to be the bad guy here. I am trying to say what works and what does not in the forum. If your works are good then have proper marketing plan and execute it instead of spamming the forum with those paid shills. You will do better.

Just look at my card



Zero exact point out for 49 matches. Unbelievable.

LaLiga is not working for me. Experts tips and tricks will be appreciated LOL

Newcastle upsets me the most [Utd does not make me upset because I accepted that they are unpredictable]. I had high hope for Castle considering their games in last season. Having promoted to the CL, I was expecting more from them but from 5 matches their earning is only 6 points. I am not disappointed that they lost against City and Liverpool [In-fact I was convinced that they will win Liverpool though] but against Brighton and Brentford [although they won] they did not look a better team. Champions league needed a better team from England, certainly Castle is going to make it boring.

We never know LOL
Just look at their performance so far. A draw today against Bournemouth! Lost against Forest, the only team they survived was against Luton and we all can understand it. But the way the team is going, in the Luton home match they will surely lose point.

Maybe a better and competitive market can be if Chelsea will be in top 10 of the point table? "No" at what odd? Make me an offer LOL

I understand your frustration darling. Let's settle it after end of the season with other side bets. But don't lose you hope, it's still long 33 rounds to go.

Merit was introduced in 2018, it's been only five years. The forum is around 14 years old and we survived 9 years without any merit point. Haven't we had a lot of quality posters back then? We had. But at that time we had many spammers too who were easily increasing their activities and achieving rank.

When you will actively participate in discussions, you will be visible to others. When you give positive contribution, people will know you and appreciate your work. You don't need some points for appreciation or a post to make to say I appreciate it.

The reason for introducing merit was to filter spammers quickly from people who are at-least giving some efforts in their writing. I am not going to say it worked very well, there are farmers who are always trying to abuse merit to rank up. However with abusing merit you can not continue much far. There maybe some exceptions but the people who made to at-least Sr and above, a lot of them contributed well to achieve it. Without merit these members would still rank up because of their contributions.

You are not alone. I think we all have our regrets. It's been five rounds and I still am looking for an exact score. Imagine in 50 matches you never got an exact score, you will feel bad. That's me LOL. I am in two other pools. Serie A and Premier League. Not doing well in Premier League too but at least have a few exact scores in both PL and SA.

It's too early to think of anything though so don't lose your hopes.

Don't get the idea that I did not see it. Of course they are real people but difference is their posts are not organic. One of the following that happened.

[1.] You hired someone from cheap Fiverr platform and they promised you to bump your thread.
[2.] You bought these accounts from a or many account sellers and posting from the accounts
[3.] You farmed the account yourself to use it for vouching for any service you had in plan.

AliArbi, oflibaba, Koinnokami are some of the accounts.

I had a 0 - 3 too and when a team score 5 goals then everything goes wrong. In the pool nothing has changed. Everyone got 1 point each.

My understanding about Atletico was they were favorite.

I am disappointed with my performance so far LOL. In fact in La Liga I feel like I am totally stranger, looking at the position in the point table.

Anyone is watching Bouremouth vs Chelsea? Still goalless although it not even half time. Where is flumpnuggets? Do you still think Chelsea is going to finish ahead of Liverpool? Maybe now there is another side bet we can think about which is will Chelsea be relegated? LOL

Here is where I was coming from. For example Bruno, many people distrusted his judgement but the person is no longer alive. Zepher is distrusted by many too. Same applies for him too. None of them will be leaving any more feedback to anyone anymore so there are nothing left to trust or distrust their judgement. They are above of all judgement.

In other words the feedback system looks isolated, depending on Lauda. it's not a good outcome.

This topic is inspired from the discussion happening on the other thread.. My understanding in general is when a user is not active for long time, not participating in the default trust system; we can consider not to vote for them [avoid both inclusion and exclusion]. Some possible plots can be as follows to understand the matter a little clear. I also think from a good discussion we may have even better understanding for the current feedback and default trust system.

Satoshi came first in mind. The current default trust system is totally irrelevant for the account. [1.] The are no feedback given by him to anyone, [2.] He does not have anyone to perform a DT voting. The account is a great history but is not useful in DT system due to the inactivity.

TMAN: [1.] Left many feedback [2.] Performed DT voting [3.] But not active anymore. It has been over three years now. Three years ago the forum environment and current environment is totally different. It changed a lot. A feedback left by him three years ago can be very inappropriate today. A good example is the feedback left for Best_Change.

Bruno: [1.] Left many feedback [2.] Performed no DT voting [was he died before the new default trust system?] [3.] Not alive [RIP brother], of course inactive. Someone wanted to use his account and wanted to scam users but failed. Whatever the case is, I don't think having the account in Trust inclusion or even in Exclusion leaves any weight in the current system. Very similar for Zepher [RIP] too. He can not edit a feedback, give a feedback or remove a feedback. These accounts can not use the system at all.

There are other users who are [1.] Active but not performing in DT voting however since they are active and somehow or greatly involved in trades or forum events having them in inclusion or exclusion is relevant.

From the above scenarios understandably we can conclude that when a user is not active for long time, any feedback it left or received carry no weights or very less weights. After many years, the time has changed, a lot of things of the forum has changed; an old-inactive account is outdated to be in the trust or distrust setting.

In my opinion this small detail will improve a lot of weight of the forum feedback system. The feedback and default trust system will look more appropriate than before.