I do not believe that it's a good project.

However, I do believe that we can profit with it as there seems to be a huge hype about it though I don't believe that it's worth in the long run.

I agree, most are underwater especially during this bear market.

It's not that easy to choose an ICO to invest now considering the large numbers of projects to browse and read. I'm really considering investing on blockchain ICOs.

I believe it's good for them to gain more popularity. Especially starting here in bitcointalk is a great idea because most of the users here are of course very interested in crypto and they are target market for these campaigns.

The topmost importance of it for me is its convenience, security and transparency.

You are in charge or you own that wallet as long as you know how to secure your private key. Transactions are transparent and you will have no doubt about it.

I think that majority of them might not know what to do or didn't follow the rules correctly.

Or maybe just dummy accounts.

It's definitely a good news.

However, I don't think that Facebook and Google are against crypto, but against scam ICO's and investment scams. I have seen a lot of scam projects on advertisements and I think they are probably made the right choice back then. Their reputation is being taken down by scam advertisements and that makes sense to ban most until they deal with filtering those ads.

Yes, it's possible but I think it's highly unlikely as of this moment.

Every time bitcoin moves, there's always a huge impact among the altcoins.

Often times it's less than 2% but I do agree that most probably sell them immediately and maybe a lot of multi accounts.

Maybe because it's the limits of their brains or can even be because of they are sold accounts.

I think that often times it's worth it but there are times that things don't go as planned or maybe too much allotment to bounties.

Because they have dreams and keep on working for it.

They don't give up and try to understand the current market and profit from it.

Absolutely true, that's why a lot of people are not successful because they do not educate themselves and are just here for the quick gains. Yes, it is only us to blame if we fail. Educating oneself doesn't mean that you'll be successful always but will be most of the time. Failing to educate oneself is the road to failure, as the most significant battle is within us.

I don't think so, but whatever the market, I will be accumulating more and more for my long term goals.

Airdrops are profitable but less likely than bounty campaigns.

The good thing about airdrops is you usually spend a minute to be eligible for an airdrop. Most people won't regret wasting that amount of time.

I think it did brought a lot of change. Especially in the ICO space, a lot of ICO's were using the Ethereum Platform for their tokens.

I think they can do away with bitcointalk but it's betterr if they are on bitcointalk.

I also see most ICOs on bitcointalk, but definitely not all, though I haven't personally assessed what difference it makes. But if ICOs post here then that should signal a positive effect if the are on BCT. I believe BCT gives a great edge for ICOs.

I totally agree, people who just doubt the crypto space will probably regret it. If we start from somewhere then we can track our progress and try to better as days goes by. We need to find our strengths and utilize it in the crypto space and one day we would be proud of ourselves, at least, if we did chose to start somewhere.

Yes, and if these people are visionaries then they probably trust the crypto market. The convenience crypto brings is what makes it futuristic. Demand will come sooner or later, but I know it will come.

These are the things I look out for.

-If the founder and teams are legitimate.

-If the founder seems like a visionary and knows what he/she is talking about.

-If the projects seems feasible and or legitimate.

I think that those things are the foundations of a good ICO. However I kind of rely on ICO rating sites and bounty sites to do the job for me.

When there are too many participants on a particular bounty, then the rewards also decreases.

Bounty is not dead, but if people are just here for pure profit and they can say it and leave this forum.

At least they should respect the forum and post at least useful or constructive replies.

I believe it's better than the traditional banks because of the transparency. And transparency is what gives it an edge and unfair advantage over the old ways.

The newbies must understand to respect the forum.

Sure, we can earn from posting with signature campaigns, but at least make their post constructive or make sense.

Though some of them might not be capable of making great post, I hope they will learn through time.