It's easy and it's not a fiddle!
WRONG!  HA! I hear that train a comin' comin' round the bend and I ain't seen an all time high since I don't know when |
|
|
|
|
that's what we are already doing
|
|
|
|
I am witnessing this censorship.
As much as I disagree with them, deleting posts is cowardly and shameful.
Let us confront their ideas in a free and open forum, selective deletion only strengthens their claims, a corollary of the Streisand effect, foolish and counterproductive.
It may be hard to get to the bottom of this. We don't yet know if any censorship occurred. Peter R would have been sent a message about the removal of his post. If there is any proof, please let's see it. Otherwise it must be construed as further dishonesty. I saw posts that were gone on refresh, I suppose it is possible that they were deleted by the author. Peter R I don't really know, I just don't see jbrher stooping to that level. |
|
|
|
Maybe the odds for breaking upwards rather than downwards have shifted from about 53%, which would have been yesterday's assessment to about 56%, at the moment? Am I missing something?
56.75% as of latest. (Trying to keep a serious face. I can hold it as long as I please.)  |
|
|
|
|
You heard it here first folks, BTC under $5K tonight!
Have your fiat ready. lol
|
|
|
|
|
I am witnessing this censorship.
As much as I disagree with them, deleting posts is cowardly and shameful.
Let us confront their ideas in a free and open forum, selective deletion only strengthens their claims, a corollary of the Streisand effect, foolish and counterproductive.
|
|
|
|
Guys, my email gets filled with spam, no end. Do you have the same problem ? it´s like this, since bitcointalk supposedly got hacked, i think. Do i have to live with that ? From now on, when i log in: No, no, really not ! Allright, i just have to man up, just thought, there´s a trick to this. They got me good. It has to do with the amount of bullshit you´re talking, i´m completely convinced  totally, I recently let my domain expire and soon will recapture it, I am hoping all the bounces in the interim will let me reactivate that address with lower ICO spam |
|
|
|
Bitcoin gains it's value by proven exclusion of any third party intervention in a value exchange network between peers.
This is achieved in "The original vision" by that both the sender and receiver peer can independently get a proof by running a full node that there is no double spending on a transaction between them. No need for a trusted third party can be only achieved by this independent verification process, which needs the physically possible minimum technical requirements for running a full node for the most participants. A large block size excludes most peers doing this, essentially destroying the very core of bitcoin's value.
There was nothing about how the cost of transactions (fees) would be "fair" in the white paper; the costs of doing transactions in a voluntary, opt-in value exchange network is entirely upon the peers do decide between themselves.
You are basically saying that the free market is not working to establish the subjective valuation of the actors to reach a price of transacting. You think you can "spend their money better than they do".
That is the problem, not the vaporware you shill.
This is the fundamental truth that I think holes the bigblock argument below the waterline. Thank you for formulating it so succinctly. Of course they retort that low transaction throughput will force most transactions on to L2 or L3 solutions, thus reintroducing a "trusted" third party into the equation. I say, fine, for low value transactions I have no issue with taking my chances with some gatekeeper, or using a lesser coin. But when I want to move a significant lump of value, bet your ass I will gladly pay whatever the fee at that time is to take the responsibility for the security of that transaction myself. |
|
|
|
Reuters reports, former Fortress macro hedge fund manager Mike Novogratz - who we most recently profiled here - told Reuters Global 2018 Investment Outlook Summit in New York that he bought $15 to $20 million worth of Bitcoin over the weekend in that recent pullback. we have motive |
|
|
|
giggle
be serious man there's work to be done  holy hell, sauce on that? I would gladly wear a respirator for a year restoring those E types...wow |
|
|
|
good opportunity to buy more. i dont know where the bottom will be so i'm buying 0.05 at every $300 drop  JJ will be proud of you... That is exactly what you supposed to be doing.... And were the hell have you been during this shit storm? You alone could have worn all the BCH shillers down with you never ending walls of text. giggle JJG, our secret weapon DON'T MAKE US GO JAY MAN! |
|
|
|
so you want to say that 6$ fee for a 40$ transaction is normal ? i'm shocked..
Ok dude... don't even go there. With everything that happened this weekend and the massive backlog created by Ver/Wu and their army of spammers, if you still wanna go there, then I'll just say go use BCH and GTFO troll. just answer the question and don't try avoid this blaming me for trolling because i'm not , I don't give a shit about bch We have been answering it. >recent days have seen the largest spam attacks on the mempool ever >the market dictates the transactions that will be included in blocks based on the fees paid...ergo >in periods of high demand (like during a spam attack and high volatility) fees will be higher if you don't like the way Bitcoin works there are other coins you can use also...who the hell uses BTC for a $40 transaction ffs? That's like digging up your PMs and cutting a sliver off a krugerand to buy a tank of gas. |
|
|
|
|
lol, amazing how quiet it gets in here when the eye of Sauron looks away
last couple days were like a drive-by shooting
got to hand it to jbrher, at least the man commits to a thread and STICKS WITH IT ffs
|
|
|
|
BTC is laterally useless which makes its only usage left as a dump scheme for the next bag holder. The exact definition of a Ponzi scheme.
Prove me wrong.
permalinkembedsaveparentreportreply
[–]th1nkpatriot 2 points 23 minutes ago
BTC is laterally useless...
Exactly. Bitcoin travels vertically.
hahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
|
|
|
|
meh, I can't get my config working, says the pool is removed from the list
pointing back to ZEC
|
|
|
|
|
amateur hour in cryptoland...just pathetic
|
|
|
|
I just have a personal computer with a GTX 1070. Not going to get rich. But what the hell.
hope you're not on suprnova, sounds like the BTG devs fucked that whole chain |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
