I always wonder what cryptohunter/The-One-Above-All looks like while typing then those long posts that nobody reads, followed by several edits to make absolutely sure nobody will ever read them. Which one is it? Can you just tell us, or can we have a vote? 3.![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcmkt-image-prd.global.ssl.fastly.net%2F0.1.0%2Fps%2F6503705%2F1820%2F1214%2Fm1%2Ffpnw%2Fwm1%2Fczefg5k9atdwhorbz4nbnvmiucv69uahar3rvk8jkwiv4r40sdcn4wndziclefhi-.jpg%3F1559909010%26s%3D5af39938903c0e5cd415e49ec2a6b11d&t=664&c=HXo7yzknpEACSA) I vote for this one. Seems age appropriate. And the name of the JPG does also does him justice: stressed-child-with-keyboard LOL. I have a feeling his living quarters looks a little something like this: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FAXK5kVIsaJg%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&t=664&c=3MLcQio8iL78_A)
|
|
|
What does that have to do with him including 7 Turkish DT1 users in his trust list within a week or two of them being added to DT1? Please, let's let him answer for himself.
What you are asking him is not even relevant to the issue in the OP. Its relevant because it explains why OP's neg shows up as default now. You never bothered to explain why you added me to your distrust list, and you are lecturing about someone else's inclusion, which is totally off topic here anyways.
Er what? You combined two thoughts into one here. If you must know, I distrusted you because I don't trust reformed shitposters that suddenly decide to take an interest in forum issues. You're trying too hard. It always looks like how he says dude ! rules for thee but not for me
Yes, you're exactly right. TECSHARE wants to fight trust abuse while regularly engaging in it himself.
|
|
|
Yep, you can have nice decorations when you do not agree on segwit is BitCoin.
Meh
Dude, segwit is bitcoin. Why don't you take your altcoin shilling to the right subforum? Forget about the right subforum, he needs to go to a different forum altogether. This is the Bitcoin Forum, and his whole schtik is pretending Bitcoin isn't Bitcoin. And btw, who tf says/write BitCoin? You lost all your credibility right there.
Craig Wright, his hero and savior, used to spell it that way back in 2014, before he got the idea to pretend to be Satoshi. So you're right, he would have lost all credibility, but he can't lose something he never had.
|
|
|
He's never interacted with these users as they all post exclusively on their local boards (except when they make the exception to visit Meta or Reputation to address trust-related issues). I'm going to assume that he doesn't speak enough Russian or Turkish to understand the ratings left by these users and (for the most part) they don't speak enough English to understand his, and the only reason he included them was to gain enough votes to be back out of the negatives on DT. Without them, he would be back at -4.
That's pretty simple dear, they like how Mr.TECSHARE handles some forum situations like this one with mutual conclusions.. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) What does that have to do with him including 7 Turkish DT1 users in his trust list within a week or two of them being added to DT1? Please, let's let him answer for himself.
|
|
|
Maybe i will resurrect the old account, and get my insta 1000merit......and sacrifice this one by resurrecting all those compromising Lauda posts of vigilantism, attempted extortion, and admin failure.
Many, many have tried, and not one has actually been successful. I don't recommend going that route. I just know we have a similar mindset when it comes to things like BSV as I remember you from your posts in the 2 BSV threads. I think you're a good poster and happy to have you on board.
|
|
|
Yeah, for the last few weeks he has been putting aside his morals and belief structure to get back on DT. He stopped distrusting everyone and started trusting many others, hoping for retaliatory trust. It was a good example for Theymos to see just how easily idiots can get on DT right now. This is correct. TECSHARE has been trying to get reciprocal inclusions for a few months now. Its finally paid off. The DT1s that he has nothing in common with except for reciprocal inclusions are: WhiteManWhite (Russian local board poster) Kalemder (Turkish local board poster) bobita (Turkish local board poster) Matthias9515 (Turkish local board poster) (left a positive trust for TS on 6/29, was added by TS a month later, during the first week that Matthias was on DT1) mhanbostanci (Turkish local board poster) He's never interacted with these users as they all post exclusively on their local boards (except when they make the exception to visit Meta or Reputation to address trust-related issues). I'm going to assume that he doesn't speak enough Russian or Turkish to understand the ratings left by these users and (for the most part) they don't speak enough English to understand his, and the only reason he included them was to gain enough votes to be back out of the negatives on DT. Without them, he would be back at -4. He also included two other Turkish posters soon after they were added to DT1, PHI1618 and by rallier whom he subsequently dropped (I imagine it was for not getting the reciprocal trust he was hoping for) He's still waiting for Vispilio to reciprocate, probably unaware that he just fell off DT1 for not having the minimum number of inclusions. Outside of OP's issue with ABitNut, this is exactly the kind of behavior that should be discouraged in the DT system.
|
|
|
Ah... Lauda still abusing the Trust system I see.
Done it to me, also. She really is a pathetic little kitty, eh? Lauda.....fuck off I think you're somebody's alt account but Lauda shouldn't be leaving negative feedback for personal criticism -- neutral feedback at most. I'm leaving you a counter green rating until Lauda removes their rating.
|
|
|
Most I see here is fake evidence and PoSM.
And that's why you are considered to be untrustworthy. You are unable to process incoming information that is contradictory to your outdated, disproven beliefs, despite the fact that the larger crypto community has suspected Craig was a fraud for years and a federal judge confirmed these suspicions in a court ruling. Craig has a high regard for the law -- you should too. What more authoritative source on the matter do you want?
|
|
|
Hmm... white guy wearing shorts and what appear to be Crocs... Empty space. Looks like the entrance to something official. Security guard in upper right hand corner. Well I'm stumped but I gave you one merit so now you have an even number and thus one more to send to whoever does know the answer.
|
|
|
This extremely mentally ill bitcointalk account believes that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 online casino scam reports received and no one ever lost money while dealing with game-protect! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You have a pretty serious complaint about taking somebody's money and doing nothing on their behalf. On the other hand, there is zero proof that you have ever actually helped anybody! @kwamina.bondzie if you pay this person to "act" on your behalf, you run a strong risk of getting nothing _and_ being doxxed by game-protect if you should happen to complain about their lack of progress. Just read through the thread linked above. Mind you that this report exists, yet no instances of game-protect helping anybody can be found anywhere*. *outside of the one instance by Get-Paid.com, who seems to no longer be a fan of game-protect.
|
|
|
Tiananmen Square?
When I was in the Shanghai airport for a layover, the first thing I did was fire up my laptop and attempt to google "Tiananmen square massacre," but it turns out everything related to Google is blocked, because you're supposed to use Baidu. Facebook and Wikipedia were also blocked entirely. I did manage to connect to Tor and find the Wikipedia article on it that way. When I was getting on the connecting plane, they made re-open my laptop case and open up my laptop, and they swabbed it with some kind of liquid on a brush. My worst fear was, "oh no, they're erasing my hard drive or something," but who knows what they were actually doing... testing it for bombs? I still have no idea.
|
|
|
That's fair. Two takers already. Here's more, though not much help (yet), I'm afraid. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFu8WOXX.jpg&t=664&c=UMIa1jXh0gemMw) My guess would have been Times Square but its just too empty.
|
|
|
I'll probably get a 3000 character reply now.
[6310 characters]
Gotta love this guy. Always giving more than what's asked of him. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Does anybody actually read a full CH post at this point? I get like 3 sentences in, determine its going to be exactly the same as every other post he's ever made, then give up. Then scroll down through the post, always thinking "Good lord there's no way I'm reading that! How can he actually expect people to read all this?" If only he put his time into something constructive, maybe he could write a novel, or a series of novels, with titles like: The Merit Scammer The Account Seller A Collection of Observable Instances of Wrong Doing, aka Cryptohunter's Autobiography
|
|
|
Well, it would appear we were all wrong ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) except for Dave and the other 2 people who voted for Green Bay in the poll! Good job Dave F. Here's what we have going on this Sunday: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM5Q7pMs.png&t=664&c=zPOiU-kstJFY-A) I'm going to have to do some research before deciding on anything for sure, but immediately I like the Rams at -2.5 over the Panthers.
|
|
|
I just put in my vote for Green Bay. Both are good teams, but in the preseason GB just seems more put together. Can't really explain it, but in my mind they just seem a very small bit better.
Let's see what happens Thursday.
-Dave
To be honest I haven't been paying a whole lot of attention to the pre season this year. I got burned trying to bet on it a couple times last year, so this year I held off, knowing that the games are meaningless and who knows what jumble of reserves you'll get on the field at any given moment. Normally I would have bet on the Packers in this situation, but I think the Bears are coming up and the Packers are headed down. Plus its a home game for the Bears, that's why I have to go with them.
|
|
|
That word is extremely uncommon, and I've only seen it maybe once on this board. Didn't Gleb Gamow make it a favorite of his to use? I honestly can't recall, but I think I remember him writing it in a rant somewhere. I know OP is an alt account. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether it's an alt of cryptohunter alone or perhaps other personalities as well.
No, its definitely not Gleb. Gleb / PG / YTC / Al the Alpaca / Nikki the Bitch has a large vocabulary, which explains his use of obscure terms. CH has a small vocabulary and thus explains why he uses the same words over and over and over and over again, and why his alts are so easy to spot. I remember the first time I heard the term "felch" was in Pink Floyd's The Wall, in some in-between song dialogue, when somebody was doing a prank call asking if there was a "Rose Felcher" there. I can't find any record of it on the internet but it does happen to be the real name of at least a couple people.
|
|
|
Hmmm.... TerroristUSASan Francisco did what was the right thing to do! If you ask me, I would line up and shot in the head all white supremacists like you! America is on the edge of a civil war and I hope most of those like you will be killed. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Don't ever take Antifa to your mouth you trash! You don't even know what is Antifascist. ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) Not positive its the same guy but definitely leaning towards "yes."
|
|
|
Jezus the hell crist!!!
So we are still here with mösenprognose and its friends kruglikov whatever discussing who has more fake profiles?
Goodness... So Community and new members what is your opinion here?
WHO is fake here?? and who is trying to harm the project? those who post news here from the real bankera chat? Or those how tell the project is scam after they asked the project for money for good promotion of the project?!
Its funny when scammers make up conspiracy theories. First blackmailing, then saying "project is scam after they asked the project for money for good promotion of the project"... Could it be, just possibly, that investors aren't happy watching their investment fall to 15% of its original value? Given the dozens of complaints against SpectroCoin and its founder (the same person who founded Bankera), there's little doubt that this project was a cash grab. Its obvious nothing is going to come of it and that you are furiously trying to rope new suckers in to prop up the price of this dying turd.
|
|
|
Congrats JJG, welcome to the club. Being in DT isn't that significant anymore, now that you only leave orange marks next to peoples' names (lame), but nevertheless its a great way to stratify people and have an excuse to look down on everyone else.
|
|
|
A lot of recent as well as previous ranked member has zero knowledge on bitcoin. It's annoying to see people with zero knowledge on bitcoin is also growing up to the next rank, even with the new rank system "merit". What will be your answer if someone newbie ask you for technical support but you can't assist him because you don't know even though you are a Hero/ Legendary member?
Don't go hating because they're were you dream to be. This is a forum, we're all here to learn. What you don't know you leave for others would do instead of trying to help but end up passing on a wrong information. We have different topic been discussed on the forum so technically everyone doesn't have to know everything about bitcoin before him or her can rank up. If that was the criteria then what will the average human do? Just understanding the procedure to send, recieve and secure your wallet is enough to become a bitcoin user why then that of the forum should be different. You don't have to be a bitcoin genius to advance in the forum and that's a good thing. The forum only demand the ability to post quality threads. You're exactly right about that, but don't take OP's words too seriously. He's using an alt account from which he posts just to stir shit and be a general nuisance. If he was doing anything beneficial for the forum then he would post from his main account.
|
|
|
|