BitStars.net added, thank you guys for telling me. I have decided to keep Ponzi's and HYIP in this overview thread, because sed make some valid points and I don't want to risk my credibility, so yeah.
NastyFans' Signature campaign is for NastyFans Seat Owners only. These places are either brought or gifted (if I am not mistaken) and most people that come here don't have a seat. Not sure if I should add them because the payment is one NastyPool lottery ticket, which will get you BTC IF you win. Seeing that you get one of these per accepted P2Pool share, they are pretty worthless. What do you guys think? Add them or not?
EDIT: This is my 5000th post!
|
|
|
I'm thinking of not adding any Ponzi/HYIP scheme's to my topic (and removing the one I have right now). I don't want to promote them and people might not even get paid for wearing their signature. It's, of course, their responsibility, but I feel bad for those that decide to join such a campaign and get nothing in return.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
is the campaign going to continue through next month? The campaign will not be renewed: List updated, payment will be done in less than 24h! Thank you all for participating(currently we will NOT renew the signature campaign!)
|
|
|
Just received another package from Only. Thanks man.
|
|
|
CoinLock allows you to upload a file and ask for a certain amount of BTC to unlock the file. You could put your paste inside a .txt file and upload it to there.
|
|
|
Ik snap sowieso niet waarom je Bitcoins via Marktplaats zou kopen. Je kunt er dan toch van uit gaan dat je daar wordt opgelicht?
|
|
|
I prefer the current design and I have no reason to change my opinion about that. A lot of people have tried to change it something else, but it never catched on. I'm sure this will happen with your design as well, sorry man.
|
|
|
Are these still available? I would love to get one for my collection.
|
|
|
Isn't Luke-Jr under the default trust? I only follow default and see Bob's trust as red. He is. Which is why most people see BiPolarBob's rating is red.
|
|
|
This is a nice campaign but is kinda confusing as I don't really understand the terms Let me summarize it for you: You cannot participate because your rank is to low.
|
|
|
I just bought a $100 gift card from him. Obviously I was concerned about chargeback risk, but he offered to let me log into his gyft account and verify the gift cards myself. After checking out his account, I can safely say that all of his purchases on gyft were made using bitcoin (no chargeback risk!). His deals may sound insane, but he's legit.
edit: grammar This is very interesting and a pretty solid vouch. How many cards were purchased via gyft this way? Not gonna lie, I assumed he was getting the things he's selling from illegal places or via illegal ways. Still, something just doesn't seem right about this guy but I hope I'm wrong. This place makes you pretty cynical pretty quickly. All of them... there are currently 90 BTC purchased cards in my gyft account. My Steam codes are also BTC purchased. There is a reason why nobody has complained about a gift code going bad. BiPolarBob has shown me where he buy's the Steam Wallets and I can confirm that they were bought with BTC.
|
|
|
Just 1 more day left! Get in your bids before it's to late.
|
|
|
The table looks perfectly fine to me. Maybe cut down the 1 Silver bitcoin wallet etc to just silver wallet etc to make it fit in a little nicer, but it probably doesn't matter. Maybe it looks more screwed up on smaller devices or screens? Changed it and yeah, most likely. Not much I can do about that though, since it's a forum specific issue.
|
|
|
Shorena, that looks good to me. It's what I see as well. FortuneJack is not full anymore, PocketDice is now closed for full members. Updating FortuneJack now. PocketDice will remain where it is, since not all positions have been taken. It is not my duty to check if people can join with their current rank.
|
|
|
bitcoininformationnow you just messed up table Care to post a screenshot? It looks just fine for me.
|
|
|
Should this campaign be added seeing as it's not paying out in bitcoins but a physical product? Haven't you refused to included other deals for not paying out in btc? I think maybe none-btc ones should have their own section. There was a campaign paying out in Alt Coins, which I rejected. I believe that this campaign should be up here, since it promotes Bitcoin, just not sure if it should be in the current table. Will think about it though.
|
|
|
Just hoped too much when he said: To the others who entered and did not win...I will offer you a slot in the sig campaign. I was thinking .1 BTC for 1 month minimum 50 posts Even he makes that 150 posts, i am in. Blazedout419 is giving you exactly what he promised. A spot in the signature campaign. He was thinking of 0.1 BTC per month for the minimum of 50 posts, but that doesn't mean it will be. Thinking != going to. It's a great offer if you ask me, take it or leave it. And if you leave it, piss off and stop post padding.
|
|
|
Dogecoin is a worthless shitcoin, which should have been abandoned a long time ago. It only survived because of the hype and because people keep pumping and dumping it. Not saying that Bitcoin will stay the "Number 1"-coin, but it certainly won't be Dogecoin with it's limitless supply of coins.
|
|
|
Meuh6879 explains it a bit (but not good enough if you ask me) and digicoin's post doesn't help that much either. OP didn't want to know if the deep web should use something else, he just asked what it is. A mixing service can be used to mix one's funds with others', with the intention of confusing the trail back to the funds' original source. In traditional financial systems, the equivalent would be moving funds through banks located in countries with strict bank-secrecy laws, such as the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas and Panama[1].
Mixing helps protect privacy, but can also be used for money laundering - mixing illegally obtained funds. After laundering, the funds appear legitimate[2]. Mixing large amounts of money may be illegal, being in violation of anti-structuring laws.
There has been at least one incident where a Bitcoin exchange has blacklisted "tainted" deposits descending from stolen bitcoins[3]. Manual or lightly automated mixing methods can make detection of taint more difficult unless the exchange follows the trail[4], but this approach does protect privacy like a true mixing service would.
Caution: Mixing services may themselves be operating with anonymity. As such, if the mixing output fails to be delivered or access to funds is denied there is no recourse. Use at your own discretion. Source: The Bitcoin Wiki
|
|
|
Even though you explicitly state that you win based on who makes the most noteworthy posts, I am pretty sure that a lot of spam will be generated by this campaign. Might be smarter to accept people based on their previous posts (but that is my personal opinion). I do recommend you to use escrow. A lot of people got screwed in the past, which makes them wary of joining new signature campaigns. If you have any questions about that, just send me a PM
|
|
|
|