this will be ASIC farm compatible right ?
otherwise whats the point?
how will the people that invested thousands into ASICs be able to control the issuance?
seems stupid.
fucking dumb Ecuadorians !
>: (
Huh, are you just trolling or what's your point? From what we can tell this currency seems to be centralized. so there effectively isn't any need for decentralized record keeping or third party miners securing the network. Funnier yet is that this centralization is exactly what DigitalIndustry is shilling in his/her annoying FUD threads.
|
|
|
don't stick your head in the sand - this has been posted in Twitter , Reddit and to many key Peers in the Bitcoin community.
putting me on ignore doesn't work.
its like ignoring Cancer it doesn't go away.
please name a "key peer" in the Bitcoin industry who believes in your scheme? I tweeted it to Alex Jones. of the info wars network? Let me get this straight. - You sent a one-way text message - limited to 140 characters - therefore devoid of meaningful content - to someone who until recently was one of the bigger nay-sayers of Bitcoin, - he has not responded, - so you don't even know whether or not he read it And we are supposed to believe that this is proof of the validity of your scheme? You are right about one thing though - you are like a cancer, in that you are a continual irritant that is hard to expunge.
|
|
|
The IRS has proven that it was can levy retroactive taxes.
I can't help but think that you are misrepresenting the situation here. Can you provide a link to more info? To my limited knowledge, the IRS cannot levy a retroactive tax. I cannot help but think that you are confusing this with the IRS clarifying that income from bitcoin is taxable. And that such clarification came after a tax year where such income should have been reported, but was not. Here is a clue - according to the IRS, _all_ income is taxable. Just because income comes from bitcoin, does not make it exempt from taxation. They event sent a 100%+ bill to certain people due to declaring mining as self income, penalties for not paying the prior year and then capital gains on the difference.
Again, a link to more info on this incident would be helpful. By law, they cannot tax income at a rate any greater than that legislated. I don't know all the details, but I am pretty sure the law does not provide for taxation at a rate greater than 'all of it'. The scary prospect about Bitcoin is your country may decide: "no wait you weren't suppose to pay capital gains.. you are supposed to pay the "digital currency tax" we just made up which is 80% on gains. Please pay up or else.."
In the USA, The Constitution bars the legislation of any ex post facto law. Yes, sometimes they get away with it, but I believe such laws, if fought, are typically overturned.
|
|
|
In the US this is really not a problem as ISPs cannot really block these kind of connections due to net neutrality laws.
Exactly -which- net neutrality laws do you believe apply to this situation?
|
|
|
the fact is in the Ross ulbrich case, NSA needed to send a drive image(ISO) to the UK's GCHQ so that the british secret service could bruteforce the password.
This is an interesting assertion. Do you have a link to a source article? Lack of support for the assertion is noted... Oh yeah - I forgot: Do not take any information given on this forum on face value. Please do your own due diligence and respect what is written here as both opinion and information gleaned from experience. If you wish to seek legal FACTUAL advice, then seek the guidance of a LEGAL specialist
Indeed.
|
|
|
I've created a sculpture from used fast food chopsticks and white glue - that only I know is meaningful - let alone how to decipher into hexadecimal representation of my private key.
|
|
|
Bitcoin/sha 256 is the Model-t of virtual currencies. What happened to the Model-t?
What happened to the Model T? The Model T spent several decades as the dominant automobile in the marketplace.
|
|
|
i contact him by email and brought the 3 database... one user use the same password in email, i open the email and i see the blockchain wallet the same password, for my surprise booommmmmmm 33.78 btc in him wallet, that the btc is in my wallet now ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . It may be that I misunderstand your poor English, but I doubt it. The way this looks, you're a fucking lowlife thief. sure i dont american, sure i dont forced know english, but iam profit. looooooool. with your skillls in english, you have money? good to you! bulshit people have to fucked, my teory. Karma has a way of catching up...
|
|
|
i contact him by email and brought the 3 database... one user use the same password in email, i open the email and i see the blockchain wallet the same password, for my surprise booommmmmmm 33.78 btc in him wallet, that the btc is in my wallet now ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . It may be that I misunderstand your poor English, but I doubt it. The way this looks, you're a fucking lowlife thief.
|
|
|
$150k is literally nothing.... also I'd imagine this figure is wildly inaccurate
No. Zero is literally nothing. I don't think you know what the word 'literally' means.
|
|
|
He made the thread about a theory an implausible hypothesis
FTFY
|
|
|
This video highlights some of the problems that need to be fixed.
No, this video highlights that a pair of drunk bored idiots, who want to ignore all suggested courses of action, can find a way to screw themselves using any available technology.
|
|
|
The president could not order that bitcoin (or any other asset) be confiscated. This would be against both the 4th and 5th amendments to the constitution. Although for president Obama, this does not seem to matter.
You need to study your history. While I agree that such would be unconstitutional, there is precedent for such an action. See (IIRC) executive order 6012.
|
|
|
Is this hash rate sustainable? If it continues to increase logarithmically, then I am afraid that at one stage we will hit the limit and the entire Blockchain system will collapse completely.
I'd be interested to know what limit it is about which you are worried.
|
|
|
control will be true freedom
War is peace Freedom is slavery Ignorance is strength Jeebus
|
|
|
You should really check out my signature and look at other signature campaigns ...
You should really check out my signature. Everyone here wants/needs money. I am the latter, I need most of it to live ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) So these campaigns DO help At what point does one go from being a mere whore to a dishonorable shill? There is a cost. Ain't nothing free in this life. Just something to ponder as you're selling your soul.
|
|
|
If the Protocol was updated to do something more like a lot of altcoins do I feel this is what would truly make the Bitcoin price sky rocket.
Skyrocket? It is to laugh. You explain to me how the piddly <5% additional cap that would come from each and every alt coin liquidating and going into bitcoin would cause more than a whimper in bitcoin cap! and I'll pay attention. Otherwise, you're just pissing in the wind.
|
|
|
You should really check out my signature and look at other signature campaigns ...
You should really check out my signature.
|
|
|
They are already fully-compliant with the legislation, which hasn't even been passed into law yet.
Don't confuse regulation with legislation.
|
|
|
I do also have to agree with dKingston though as I thik the subjects of this story will have a hard time getting any kind of real job, and will not be able to continue to work in the porn industry as they get older.
While the front-of-camera role likely favors the young (at least in terms of volume, tough I imagine there is a niche for granny porn as well), the back-of-camera and biz development roles favor experience. Perhaps a budding entrepreneur might make even more money by mentoring up-and-coming actors. IOW: I think your skepticism reflects limited imagination.
|
|
|
|