That is  so true yes such a small number of bitcoin users remember it. I as a Greek was surprised that local media had no coverage on that matter.

But ism't the point of cryptocurrency that there's no central authority? All the freedome it can offer stems from that.

I'd be more than happy to write a review for this. Let me know if you're willing to give away a nother copy.

The coin just went up by 22.6% on BITTREX... Quite impressive how fast this happened. Wouldn't this be a goot time to buy to catch the next uptrend early?

Those are not my numbers. You can click on the images for the source.

What about Smartphone Subscriber Market Share

Here's the global one:


And the US one:


Apple is still the leader the US, most people who own a smartphone there own an apple one.

Bitcoin mining through home computers is dead. Most of the work in the network now is done by sha256 specified asics. Those chips are made for the sole porpuse to solve the mathematical problems behind bitcoin mining and are the reason the difficulty is increasing each month. Bitcoin mining is now an investmnent rather than a hobby, so you should look into the miner's price and power thoroughly before ivnesting on it. You should look if it has a potential to break even.

I'm paying for 5 and I usually get 5.2 or something. Maximum I can get is 10, my upload speed would still be shit though.

Some people are talking for a general downtrend at the end of each month, I'm not sure if that's a real thing or if they're bringing this up to change people mind from being bearish. To be honest I can't really spot such a thing in longterm charts. I don't feel like people are mass selling at the end of the month, it could be a whale dump again that caused the downfall.

Did the other guy end up giving you those 25$? Update

Well, buying apple is now a trend and I feel like apple perfectly took advantage of it. But for now, it's only the phone industry that apple is coming first in. If bitcoin's future is transaction from smartphones, well that's when we should be worried.

This is a concern I've had as well. I couldn't really tell why bittrex was having such big volumes while being founded this year. It has a life span of almost half a year and older, more established and stable exchanges still get a lower volume than bittrex. This just doesn't seem realistic to me, the difference between the volumes is also huge. It would be hard to prove that the volumes are not real though.

gjhiggins, can you tell by the code in the zip if the technology he claims the coin will use actually exists?

Guilible? Well yeah right. The point I was trying to make was that he/she was judged by the claimed gender. And while being female seems unlikely to most of us I feel like it would be more appropriate to straightforward ignore it and just report the person in case of actually attempting to scam someone.

User pretending to be female to gain trust. sounds a bit over the line. Vod should stop unless he wants the forum to be raided from feminist activists.  

Edit: Besides the trolling, I just saw vod's post. The image above seems not to be edited. You can see in the exif that the device the image was taken with is still showing. This means it's not edited with software, editing usually leaves a trace notable through the exif or ELA (analysis below, click the link). I don't usually go on rants trying to defend people, and I'm not trying to be a white night here, but telling someone to give up on his anonimity to prove that he's female just doesn't sound right. Why would someone be trying to make people trust him by pretending to be the opposite gender in the first place? Who falls for that and what difference does it make? We should judge people by other criteria rather than their gender when it comes to business.


http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=2440b83903bcc2f0b4ef2572edcb53985c3de5d3.331776

I think games and rounds would be an ideal board for that. It's the only board that encourages forum-based games. Even though it's a child of the gambling board forum based games are not necessarily gambling.

I would never expect  businessinsider to write such an article. It's not that I'm amazed by them writing about bircoin, but you don't usually see so big websites write about internet scams such as bitcoin ponzis.

I'm guessing that it's because of their absence. I have been waiting for a reply for weeks now. I have ~10 DRK that were sent to my address but they never appeared into my wallet. I contacted playtin in the forum but no one has seen my mesage and the problem is still not fixed. People are losing their interest.

Sorry to inform you but dogecoin is not dead. Hundreds of thousands of dollars are traded through it each day.


Does that look dead to you? Between all the coins, it comes fourth in trade volume. It still holds ~1.95% of the total trade volume even though the price has plunged since the hype. Don't you think this is normal for an altcoin?

Whatever the case is, dogecoin is not dead. Even from a developing prespective, there are people who constantly work on improving it and interacting with the community.

Wow, spndr7 replied to his own post more than 4 years after he posted it. What a comeback man.