I have no idea what is going on here. My regular wallet is on my laptop. Exported private keys when I went on vacation. Imported private keys while on vacation onto my tablet. Deposited some BTC to Cryptsy to buy some Ripple. When I returned home I started up the wallet on my laptop and it says I have way less than I actually have. e.g. this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx-index/acf04882a3ba85f37c7212de9055c5c33f2f2f79f81c180ff9bbb306a55bdecb3.62077 – laptop says I sent this, I did NOT .01 - tablet says I sent this – I DID What is going on!? My laptop wallet says I have 8.0077071 BTC Tablet wallet says I have 14.57890441 BTC The tablet is correct, but why won’t the wallet on my laptop reflect this? How do I fix it? OK – just now to test I sent .001 from the tablet wallet to Cryptsy. Laptop wallet says I just sent .2419!  ?? I assume you are using some kind of non deterministic wallet (like bitcoin core or the "old" multibit"). Judging by the section it would be bitcoin core, but that would be pretty heavy on a tablet. Anyway... The TX in question is sending change worth ~3.6 BTC to 14qejgAVxgrm22d9jX8hbLA19CW3WmLYxq The private key for this address was probably generated by your tablet and thus your laptop wallet does not know about it. Seeing that you are missing a bigger amount there are probably more transactions like these which resulted in change. Export all private keys from the tablet and import them into the laptop wallet. |
|
|
|
1H2wbx1uYNncZWPALWFHG2WfEypPKJyvrJ
my address here !
|
|
|
|
HP is down: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://www.cloudthink.io/quoted for possible reference. We know that some users in this thread are on a witch-hunt and more users are claiming their facts like sheep. We have posted some answers and explanations to these accusations in our official thread. Please post your answers here as we do not want your spamming junk to fill our campaign thread. Here is the post: We are very disappointed on how the community received our Signature Campaign. First, some newbie accounts started spamming our thread with accusations and accusing us of theft!! (WTF?) and then other users followed with negative things about us without even researching the services we promise. I will try to cover all accusations, questions and other problems which where posted in this thread or in any other threads which had posts about us. Please PM us if you need any other explanation regarding these or any other problems. DON'T POST THIS KIND OF POSTS IN OUR CAMPAIGN THREAD, OPEN ONE YOURSELF! 1. For users asking for mining address, mining pool and other mining information:How in the hell did you arrive at the conclusion that we are offering cloud mining? Did you even bother to READ OUR WEBSITE? Someone starting asking questions like: "where's the mining address?" "show us the mining address" and then others with NO RESEARCH WHATSOEVER have started to ask these questions and calling us a scam or ponzy because we don't want to provide this information. THIS SHOULD BE VERY CLEAR IF YOU DON'T EVEN BOTHER TO READ OUR WEBSITE: https://cloudthink.io
I AM JUST ONE OF MANY EMPLOYEES OF CLOUDTHINK, DON'T EXPECT ME TO KNOW EVERYTHINGWE DO NOT SELL CLOUD MINING CONTRACTS, CLOUD MINING HASHING POWER or anything like this. We do not offer users mining power or mine in to their address. We do not give any public access to our mining farm. We didn't say anything about cloud mining or offering hashing power to our users. This is NOT our business plan, this would be very a inefficient plan in comparison to what we do. This and many other details about our business plan and services are available on our website. Did you bother to read at least the first part of our posts? What about this one: Please note that we do not offer cloud mining contracts. I explained this to Muhammed Zakir over and over again but his lasts posts say: mirjangka couldn't provide me mining details. Thank you so much for taking the time to read and listen to us. And that's also why I'm deleting your posts. I will do anything in my power to provide the community with documents, explanations, technical data about our mining farm but it would be perfect if you could at least read our website and talk about our Strategy or Investment Plans, not this useless information. 2. For users claiming that we stole (really?) photos.The photo which was posted as Richard Coleman (our Chief Executive Officer which is also helping me write this post) was indeed a photo taken from another website. This was a I mistake and Richard will fully assume this mistake. He asked the designer to post a temporary photo so his identity or family doesn't receive any weird messages or threats. The user which started the post in Scam Accusations (ReckLess.6) is in fact NLNico which is on a personal vendetta, we currently don't know his motive. He is posting a lot of confusing and false accusations to convince the community that we plan to fraud people. He is acting like we deleted his posts or other to cover or tracks (really???). WE ARE DELETING YOUR POSTS BECAUSE ALL OF THE ABOVE AND BELLOW REASONS 3. For users claiming that my user (mirjangka) has been used for a ponzy scheme.This user has been purchased a few months ago. If necessary I will give full details about this transaction so everyone knows we didn't have anything to do with the activity of this account. The motive we purchased this account is because we needed an account from which we can respond to our users without having to wait ages. If this is seen as a red flag, I apologize for this and I will do anything necessary to prove that we have not been involved with anything illegal. Did you take the time to think of this? No, you just want to kill our business with. 4. For users complaining about EscrowWe have stated this in about 10 or 20 posts and PMs: We have absolutely no problem in sending the funds into a trusted escrow of your choosing to cover all costs. If you do not want to, PLEASE do not apply to our campaign until we have an escrow and the funds are confirmed. Why do you still complain about this. Why? Just decide on a trusted escrow and I will start sending funds to cover the spots. I will lower the available slots and price/post, at least for the first week. Do you really have something with us providing a very good price for quality posts? This is madness.... The funds will be escrowed, I will even put 30% more if that would satisfy your madness. I will post details about how the payouts and slots will be changed and I will also change the main details in the official thread post. Stay tuned until I LOWER THE PAYOUT so we can be of more trust. Madness, I know, but what can I do? Continue to fall prey to these false accusations and we will terminate the campaign because it is starting to be very frustrating and its insulting our staff. We can not accept that, our staff has worked very hard to build this company. I WILL DELETE ANY POST WHICH IS OFF-TOPIC OR IRRELEVANTPlease post any junk to the thread opened by NLNico and ReckLess.6 or any other thread of your choosing. We will respond to those threads if we think the posts have a decent point or question. For users who already registered in our campaign or plan to: I'm very sorry but I may have to post another post in the following hours with details about how I am going to lower the payouts. I hate to repeat myself but I think I really have to repeat this a million times: we will very soon find a trusted escrow and we will send the funds so you know for sure that you will receive your payouts. We planned to keep this signature campaign a few months but this seems out of reach for now. |
|
|
|
-snip-
2. no they didnt even issued a warning, just deleted some post and banned me. didnt even have time to say sorry.
Thats the warning. There is no reason for you to say sorry, it does not change anything. 3. shorena, scammers and doubtful profiles get away, and someone posting gets banned.
No, spammers get banned. 4. i posted a lot since i had time, replying many mostly off topics and on some economics and altcoin.
5. how will i be "unbanned"??
Wait. 6. tomatocage was banned then unbanned too.
That is totally unrealted to your issue. Tomatocage was banned by theymos because TC lost control over the account. It was a security messure. 7. no i have never been banned.
Thus your first ban should be 5 or 7 days. 8. i have seen some posts of your they are just one word like "rate?" in selling 1 btc. i dont know if the forum moderator expect me to write a paragraph to ask for the rate of the person selling / buying bitcoins They dont expect you to write an essay if you have a simple question no. If you however (just an example did not check, might not apply to you) just ask for rates without ever actually trading it looks like you are just farming the account. 9. i pm'd theymos 1 day before my account was banned, there was 1 post which i made was deleted, it was something very funny that someone has posted, but its ok that they deleted it. but it was only one post. then the next day (friday) few other posts deleted and banned straight. no comments, no warning, no time waiting. nothing
and i was banned by a forum moderator
Not sure what you want to say with that besides rephrasing #2. |
|
|
|
I noticed that Shdvb has traded big amounts of bitcoins and he is not even in Depth 4. That's weird.
Same goes with many others.
The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do. I think this is where your approach has it wrong. Someone said it earlier - IIRC Welsh - the number of trades one does is not as relevant as why and how they leave feedback ratings. The feedback by a known scammer can be valueable. |
|
|
|
Hi people !!
just wann aknow who gets the miner fee..
The miner that finds the block which includes the transaction issuing the fee. more correctly and lengthly my question is when we transact a nominal bitcoin fee is reduced and paid to miners who process the Transactions.
A transaction consists of inputs and outputs. Inputs refer to transactions you have received in the past and can spend. Outputs cab be used as inputs at a later date, either by someone else or by yourself (e.g when there is change). The fee is what is left if you take the sum of the inputs and substract the sum of the outputs. Thus it is not reduced from the amount you send, it is the leftover you do not send to pay the miner. E.g. 2 inputs with 1 BTC each and you send 1.9 somewhere the rest 0.1 is considered the fee. Most wallets do not handle it this way though, but rather let you decide how much fee you want to pay and create a change output for the rest. how our transactions are processed and there are lot of miners are there who simplyfy out that this block 'A' will be solved by this miner 'X'.
The transaction is send from your node (or the node your service (like bc.i) provides) to all other nodes it is connected to. These nodes spread the transaction further throughout the network until every node knows about it. Some of these nodes are mining. They build blocks out of the transactions and try to find a hash matching the target value (essentially "find a hash that as a number is smaller than this number", e.g. 13<14 just very larger numbers) in order to receive the block reward and the fees attached to the transactions they include. There is no way to know in advance which miner will include your transaction. i have seen a lot of people adding a significant amount of miner fee to make their transaction quicker..is that possible.
In a sense yes and no. No matter how much fee you pay you can not make the miners find a block faster. You can however give them and incentive to include your transaction in the next block they find. They order the transactions in a certain way and the size of the block is limited and thus the number of transaction in each block. This picture shows the number of transactions my node knew about last night that had not been confirmed at the time. The white lines are just bad performance ignore them.  As you can easily see in the picture certain transactions do not get confirmed when a new block is found even though they pay a fee. They might be low though, e.g. 1 satoshi. A miner would commonly prioritize a TX with 2 satoshi fee over one with 1, some miners do not consider anything below e.g. 500 satoshi a fee at all. Currently the rule of thumb is that you need to pay 10k satoshi per 1000 byte of transaction size in order to get your transaction confirmed within the next few blocks. The size depends on the number of inputs and outputs used. please reply in technical terms.. any noobs please dont spoil the thread...  Sorry for trying to avoid technical terms. I dont think complex or fancy words make the understand easier. When I say miner I mean everyone that is potentially creating a block, be that mining pools, solo miners or p2pools. |
|
|
|
From the looks of it, you was probably banned for insubstantial posts. I looked through the last 2 pages of posts that you made and they was not 1 that I seen that was over 2 lines. Most of your posts consists of 5 or 6 words. I would say this is the most obvious reason that you were banned. Bitcointalk is making a crackdown on spam quality posts. In the future try to put a little effort into it.
Errm i dont think so, the message would be : you have been banned for insubstantial posts. The thing is that the message you get when you are banned seems to lack information, thats the huge problem. There are threads like this one every day because the message is just not clear. Even insubstantial + sig is not clear at all, for someone that doesnt know english very well that doesnt explain shit. Something like: banned for insubstantial posts, off topic or useless posts wearing a signature campaign would be a better message BadBear commented on this in the past and said: nope. The banning process already takes time and there is limited space for the message anyway. The reason is most likely spam, wether OP thinks they did not spam does not matter. In fact when they write "as far as i know i didnt scam, steal, OR spam anyone." I think they dont even know half the rules here anyway. |
|
|
|
Why doesn't devthedev or whoever is running the show code a counting bot that will pay automatically after a line of writing and spare himself all the hassle.
For signature campaigns? Posts need to be checked and things like that. I was tempted to make a website where signature campaign managers can offer their services, signature campaign owners can go to find a manager, and people who want to participate in a signature campaign can go to find one but I can't be bothered. Even that would only save the log side of things e.g. spreadsheets. Managers are basically a necessity. A necessity for what exactly? The forum has been ridden with spam scams and drama and people go to learn about bitcoins to other sources of information. The circle jerk is running this shitshow here anyway. That is kind of true, but Bitcointalk is still quite large and obviously the (mostly casinos) companies/people who want to run signature campaigns find some kind of benefit from it else they wouldn't pay for them. You can't really argue with the money-flow. #1 what does this have to do with the topic at hand? #2 if you want to advertise your siganture (as you both do) and/or buy the signature from someone else for advertising purposes it is in your interest to make sure that spam is dealt with. Preferably not by admins. BadBear has been swinging the ban hammer very well, but there will be a point where they are just sick of it and just bad signature campaigns. If you think a bot can handle this you are mistaken. You will need a human to judge the quality of a post in its context (for now). Marcotheminer is using a bot to assist the count, but AFAIK is still doing manual checks. Ndnhc et al. are very strict which posts/users they pay for which is a good development and takes some of the burden from the staff. |
|
|
|
I think theymos issued the ban to make sure the account is not misused. No, not even close. |
|
|
|
I was not able to get my node seen. I will give a screen shot.
I am optimum online running 10.2 bitcoin windows 7
-picture-
Looks like a Mac to me. Anyway, you need to make sure your router is forwarding the port 8333 from the outside to the machine running the node. |
|
|
|
Hy! Normal kann das nicht passieren. BTCs verschwinden nicht einfach  Dafür gibt es ja die blockchain, und die ist auf X Tausend Rechnern gespeichert. Es kann höchstens sein, das deine wallet.dat beschädigt wurde. OP nutzt bc.i, da gibts keine lokale Datei die beschädigt werden könnte. Wenn du kein Backup hast, sind die BTCs zwar noch im Netzwerk, also der Blockchain aber für immer verloren. Da keiner mehr Zugriff auf die Coins nehmen kann. Prüfe mal auf blockchain.info deine Wallet Adressen ab. Hier solltest du sehen können wo deine BTCs nun sind Beste Grüße Funktioniert mir shared send auch nicht. @OP am besten an bc.i wenden, Du müsstest einen Code bekommen haben um den Stand abzufragen. |
|
|
|
Da die automatisch generierten Keys nach der Umstellung des Core Client für neue Anfragen nicht mehr genutzt werden, sollte es bezüglich der Platten kein Problem sein. Swap und RAM sind, unabhängig vom Tool, nochmal ein anderes Thema.
Ok. Ich sehe worauf ihr hinaus wollt: Erst verschluesseln und dann die Keys erzeugen!Einfach aber genial. Muesste man die Anzahl an automatisch erzeugten Schluessel minimieren. Nur um Missverstaendnissen vorzubeugen: die Aussage "Da die automatisch generierten Keys nach der Umstellung des Core Client für neue Anfragen nicht mehr genutzt werden, [...]" soll eigentlich heissen "Da die automatisch generierten Keys nach der Umstellung des Core Client für neue Empfaenge Anfragen nicht mehr genutzt werden sollten, [...]" so wie bei shorena. Richtig? Mit der Methode kann ich leben  Naja, irgendwie beides. Wenn Du bitcoin core das erste mal startest erzeugt es eine wallet.dat die sieht in etwa so aus: key #1 - label: "nix"
key #2 - hidden
...
key #100 - hidden
Wenn Du jetzt ein Password setzt dann werden keys 2 bis 100 entfernt und neue erzeugt. Nachtrag: Wenn Du dann 13 benutzt, erzeugt bitcoin core bei nächster Gelegenheit (wallet.dat wird entschlüsselt durch z.B. senden von BTC) neue um den sog. keypool wieder aufzufüllen. key #1 - label: INSECURE
key #2 - label: a
key #3 - label: a
key #4 - label: a
key #6 - label: a
key #7 - label: a
key #8 - label: a
key #9 - label: a
key #10 - label: a
key #11 - label: a
key #12 - label: a
key #13 - label: a
key #14 - label: a
key #15 - hidden
...
key #100 - hidden
...
key #114 - hidden
|
|
|
|
This was about as useful as trying to milk my man boobs mate. I never asked how long it takes, but have I lost my small potential activity aimed at admin or theymos . There is less frequently, and there is a day later. I am calm enough what makes you think different? because I asked a question with 15 expletives. or for asking for help lol Maybe I wasnt clear enough. No, you did not lose anything. (see above: "that this is the only change.") Yes, it is currently not updating for some people and all we currently know is that theymos said "its less frequent". (see above "less frequently" and for more info the link) |
|
|
|
Da die automatisch generierten Keys nach der Umstellung des Core Client für neue Anfragen nicht mehr genutzt werden, sollte es bezüglich der Platten kein Problem sein. Swap und RAM sind, unabhängig vom Tool, nochmal ein anderes Thema.
Richtig. Maximal der erste erzeugte key ist ein Problem, weil der über das verschlüsseln und das neue erzeugen existiert und benutzt werden kann. Wenn man also paranoid ist: #1 bitcoin core starten #2 alle angezeigten Addressen mit "DO NOT USE INSECURE" labeln #3 password setzen #4 neue Adressen/keys erzeugen (anzeigen lassen) |
|
|
|
... "geshreddert"?
Nein. Ich frage, weil die Loeschung von Plaintextwallets durch shred empfohlen wird um die Datei vollstaending vom Datentraeger zu loeschen.
Shred funktioniert nur bedingt, z.B. müsstest Du bei einer SSD die gesamte Festplatte überschreiben um wirklich sicher zu gehen das die Daten überschrieben wurden. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass dies von bitcoinqt nach Verschluesselung der Wallet automatisch durchgefuehrt wird. Liege ich mit meiner Annahme richtig? Zumindest wuerde dies das Verhalten des Clienten erklaeren.
Nein, die alten privaten Schlüssel werden verworfen. Bitcoin core generiert 100 Keys vor, nach dem verschlüsseln werden alle Keys die dir noch nicht angezeigt wurden neu erzeugt. Edit: Gibt es sonst noch irgendwelche Tipps worauf man achten sollte bei der Verschluesselung der Privatekeys durch den Originalclienten bzw. Probleme die auftreten koennten? Also sowas wie Passwort laenger als 12 Zeichen, Zeichen aus der Menge {a-z, A-Z, 0-9, Sonderzeichen} ...
Die 100 keys werden regelmäßig erneuert, Du musst also regelmäßig backups machen. Was das Passwort angeht wird die Verschlüsselung so ausgelegt das jeder Versuch die Datei zu entschlüsseln an Deinem Rechner ca. 1 Sekunde braucht. Das gilt natürlich nicht für andere Rechner, da diese ggf. schneller sind. zur Stärke von Passwörtern -> https://blogs.dropbox.com/tech/2012/04/zxcvbn-realistic-password-strength-estimation/ |
|
|
|
Hey guys i know about how activity works but if you check my profile i only have 41 activity so the minimum i should get by now is 42
Yes you should have 42 and not 41, maybe this is related to the downtime? Not sure. |
|
|
|
Wow shorena, you are the bomb! Tip sent! thanks  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
