Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 06:19:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 696 »
6561  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: How To Mine GRIN - GrinGoldMiner AMD & Nvidia GPU Mining Guide For WINDOWS on: January 13, 2019, 03:27:29 AM
What is stock rx-580 expected rate?
6562  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Grin | PoW Mining | Electronic transactions for all. Community driven. on: January 13, 2019, 12:02:30 AM
And no DEV Tax like Beams 20%, SWEET!
6563  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Acorn M.2 FPGA based GPU Accelerator on: January 12, 2019, 11:10:23 PM
Hello, and great work on your unique project!

Will any drivers or programs be required for this device to be recognized on PiMP OS (based on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) ? If so, please describe what we will need to do. We want to make sure that we can support your Acorn devices with PiMP OS. If you have the capability to test it, we would be most appreciative!

Also, a common question we get is whether it is cost-effective to buy an Acorn or another GPU for the rig. What's the best "TLDR simple answer" in your opinion? Thanks!

~ melt
getpimp.org | miner.farm

IT is not cost effective as there is NO GPU Acceleration at this point, only unfulfilled promises and unconfirmed statements.
6564  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] BEAM | Mimblewimble | Private | Scalable | No ICO | No Pre Mine on: January 12, 2019, 11:05:50 PM
Where this coin can be bought at this moment ? I see discussion where someone wants to sell at $1 that looks nice offer. I just joined telegram but till need time to understand what has been discussed. A coin with such features and lot of positive hype is really cheap at this price and looks good investing opportunity without any doubt.

here for example
https://www.hotbit./exchange?symbol=BEAM_BTC
after we go to coinmarketcap and whattomine
price of this coin be increase, but this is my opinion.

do not use Hotbit
Why?

the majority of their volume is fake.
they have a min cashout of 500Beam
they demanded a fee of 0.3ETH to allow a deposit of 0.23ETH from me.


avoid Hotbit.

Very good reasons, IOU 1+sM
6565  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: January 12, 2019, 10:33:04 PM
Pretty shaky start of the year.  First Fortnite, then Kovri drama, then Fortnite denial and now 1% supply ransom. If this year will continue like this, my hearth might not make it to the end. Sad

Oh and what I would add to the kidnapping thingy: Privacy is the first pillar of security. If these criminals would not know she is a multimillionaire they would never kidnapped her.

Whoa whoa whoa...  What?!  Nothing bad seems to be announced in here or I may have missed them.  Care to share more info on the 'Kovri drama' and the 'Forthnite denial'?

https://i2p.rocks/blog/kovri-and-the-curious-case-of-code-rot-part-1.html
https://i2p.rocks/blog/kovri-and-the-curious-case-of-code-rot-part-2.html

I don't have the skill to know if this is FUD or not, sorry. Smiley

I would like to see a rebuttal as the guy who wrote that also says he has written what we are looking for already although when I read that info (I think it's called loki) I saw one gapping attack vector but I'll not mention that unless we are considering using it.

6566  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: January 12, 2019, 10:29:59 PM
"Not really. The unknown hashrate is just... unknown. It's not all controlled by one entity."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg49172936#msg49172936

- NO! Unknown hashrate is NOT just... unknown. It is a Potential Threat of 51% attack if not proven else.

People that support a privacy coin like to solo mine or mine on private pools, what's wrong with that?

And do you think a 12 fold growth (from a low percentage to high) in a few days is normal organic growth?

Well there should be a effort to find out if those Hybrid FPGA's add up to this added rate as they do release secret bitstreams and they do have a host service that may not be reporting. Although I don't see why they wouldn't report it as the pow will fork at the next upgrade just for the unknown factor even though IIRC it is a plan anyway. So basically if they report that rate it will not hurt them or change anything and would help them as no-one would be thinking about it being an attack.


"Not really. The unknown hashrate is just... unknown. It's not all controlled by one entity."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg49172936#msg49172936

- NO! Unknown hashrate is NOT just... unknown. It is a Potential Threat of 51% attack if not proven else.

People that support a privacy coin like to solo mine or mine on private pools, what's wrong with that?

And do you think a 12 fold growth (from a low percentage to high) in a few days is normal organic growth?

Well I do think that the rapid growth is something to think about. Someone moving a big mining farm over from another coin? Someone received a bunch of FPGAs and finished programming a bitstream for CryptoNight variant 2?

I just think it's a bit silly to just see it and immediately scream that it's an attack.


It's not even remotely silly, ALL POSSIBLE security threats need to be addressed and EVERY Attack vector (as I warned about json a year before the labs found the vulnerability) investigated. This is not some POS winblows OS, this is a currency that needs to remain unchangeable to serve its only function.
6567  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Status of WEX (World Exchange Services) on: January 12, 2019, 03:55:23 AM
6568  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Grin | PoW Mining | Electronic transactions for all. Community driven. on: January 10, 2019, 09:00:49 PM
infinite supply?
this is first time to see POW with infinite supply.

Tail emissions are extremely important as coins are lost/destroyed and it allows for growth, many coins have them. They are usually very small just to keep the network secure after the initial rewards period ends.
6569  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: January 10, 2019, 08:22:22 PM
ANYONE mining or using Beam.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052151.msg49163769#msg49163769
6570  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] BEAM | Mimblewimble | Private | Scalable | No ICO | No Pre Mine on: January 10, 2019, 08:17:10 PM
About the Vulnerability Team Beam discovered on January 9th, 2019.  
https://medium.com/beam-mw/team-beam-discovered-a-critical-vulnerability-in-beam-wallet-658f2c0344e2

WHY THE FUCK would you release a fix with the same version number!!!!

That is fucking retarded at best and scammer tactics at worst.

And this should be in the topic !!! Are you trying to hide this?

Quote
Team Beam discovered a critical vulnerability in Beam wallet
Go to the profile of Beam Privacy
Beam Privacy
Jan 10

January 9th, 2019, 08:20 PM (GMT)

Our Dev. Team discovered a Critical Vulnerability in Beam Wallet on January 9th, 2019, at 08:20 PM (GMT).

The vulnerability affects all previously released Beam Wallets both Desktop and CLI.

So far, we are not aware of Beam’s users being affected by this vulnerability.

We are working with various providers in the ecosystem to upgrade their systems.
Updates

    The vulnerability has been fixed immediately
    Updated binaries can be downloaded from the website and the website only
    Please do not use wallets built from Source Code since the Vulnerability Fix was not committed to a public branch to avoid disclosure

Required actions

Do not delete the database or any other wallet data.

The vulnerability does not affect wallet data, secret keys or passwords.

All Beam users are required to follow the procedure below quickly.

    Stop your currently running Beam Wallets immediately.
    Uninstall or delete your Beam Wallet application and executables from all machines. Please, do not remove the database or any other wallet data.
    Make sure the application was deleted. Check the documentation for the location of Wallet app files.
    Download the Beam Wallet from the website. It will have an identical version number as previously published archives. Make sure the SHA256 of the archive matches with the one published on the website.
    Install the new application.

We will publish as soon as possible the results of our investigation together with a full transcript of the solutions we applied to solve the issue.

If you find any kind of bug, issue or vulnerability, related to the one we face today or not, please make sure to reach us as soon as possible via email: security@beam.mw or submit an issue on Github.

Thanks for your patience and your understanding. Team Beam will continue with your help to build a confidential, comprehensive and secure ecosystem.


AND the bolded needs to be emphasized! You guys are gonna make the scam section pretty fast with this response.
6571  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Acorn M.2 FPGA based GPU Accelerator on: January 10, 2019, 08:14:09 PM
Yeah a ton of people were dropped from the default list and others added, mine would have gone down as well except some new DT users replaced those that were dropped giving me a net increase in trust.

I very rarely do any business that I need to worry about the trust here but keeping it green is important. I may PM some guys that never left me feedback and have that oversight corrected. Nice to see the riffraff off DT1, seeing good people with red was really a smear on the face of this forum.
6572  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Acorn M.2 FPGA based GPU Accelerator on: January 10, 2019, 06:42:42 PM
not on anything but 1 coin at unimpressive numbers.

no GPU boosting like was promised.

by the time GPU boosting comes out, ETH will probably have switched to ProgPOW for the death blow of these things.

+1 sM

The main reason to buy these was for gpu boosting, so gpu miners could compete with fpga for a little bit longer.  Sure they can standalone mine too, but that wasn't the original purpose.  If you're going to standalone mine you should have just sold off your gpus and used that money to buy a real fpga.

IOU +1 sM

Nah, I think I do but no names will be named.

Its just funny that I get dropped for the first time by someone/multiples who had nothing to do with this. "This" being my defense of Sqrl labs customers.

I was dropped by someone/somepeople for commenting on this problem though. For sure. Crypto is becoming more corrupt than ever. And thats hard to do.

Sock puppets are afoot.

As was said, look at an archived snapshot and let us know what you find.

IOU +1 sM


Use a chached version to see who had previously given you trust and the reason, I haven't ever had trust dropped and I have said a lot of shit. I don't think SQRL has the influence to push almost anyone on the DT list. Maybe someone like OG is cleaning up old positives?

Or someone that had given him trust was dropped from the default list.

Lol, my trust rating was halved in the last day or two once I started to complain about "Sqrl labs". After years of going up Im now going down by the day. Strange behavior on bitcointalk for sure. Pay to play?

Maybe a default trust member that gave you trust is now removed from the list? been changes to the default trust list

see:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0;topicseen

Thanks for the link.

BTW, Momero hash has recwntly popped up so is there a secret bitstream?

6573  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: January 10, 2019, 06:07:41 PM
Circle/Poloniex doing an AMA on /r/cryptocurrency:
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/aeikjp/ama_we_are_sean_neville_jeremy_allaire_team/

Several questions about Montenero (and return of the trollbox).

Non read only link.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/aeikjp/ama_we_are_sean_neville_jeremy_allaire_team/
6574  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: January 10, 2019, 05:42:38 PM

God why did I check prices today! I wonder if

http://images.gawker.com/imqalmhsaxu4zssrjheg/original.gif

Is behind this.
6575  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: January 09, 2019, 09:54:00 PM
Can't say I know wtf is going on here but I don't like the bolded. Monero is a testbed for nothing, it's not in beta anymore.

https://paste.debian.net/plain/1058561

Quote
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

#monero-dev

2019-01-03 23:24:37     anonimal        If anyone is confused or angry, I implore you to ask questions.
2019-01-03 23:25:30     thrmo   I'm just sad that you wasted so much your time and the community ditched so much money and hopes (and the opportunity to research other venues) on kovri
2019-01-03 23:25:39     thrmo   other than that I wish sekreta the best
2019-01-03 23:26:09     krakn   Can anyone fill me in on this issue?
2019-01-03 23:27:27     anonimal        krakn: which one? Sekreta questions are in #sekreta / #sekreta-dev
2019-01-03 23:28:00     krakn   What thrmo said
2019-01-03 23:28:54     anonimal        Ah, there's a very clear timeline and I can certainly harp on the various issues. Not #monero-dev worthy though for the most part.
2019-01-03 23:29:08     thrmo   this is probably not the best venue for that krakn
2019-01-03 23:29:14     krakn   Gotcha
2019-01-03 23:31:14     anonimal        So, let's clarify some of the confusion, as it's #monero-dev related.
2019-01-03 23:33:49     thrmo   please go ahead then anonimal

First, to your clarify the "so much money" claim (it's not the first time this has come up), $50k is not a lot of money for a year's wage. Market manipulation made it go in every direction. I was screwed in 2018 just like a lot of other people. I would've made more money working at ABC corp instead of Monero; less stress too, and less taxes on fake money instead of real electronic money. Oh, and did I mention how much of my time I've donated over the years?

Secondly, I do feel like I wasted *some* of my time but I'm ultimately responsible for my actions. My FFS clearly documents what has happened over the course of development. I've built this project from the ground up after everyone else abandoned it. I've also taught every developer that has come through the project - and that's not a waste of time.

Thirdly, this codebase is a steaming pile of dog-shit. Still. Because of the following reasons:

* I was the only dissenting voice before the fork that said DO NOT FORK THIS CODEBASE. I should've ignored fluffypony.
* I've only been able to dedicate ~30% of my time so far to code development because, up until now, no one else was running the project (see my FFS)
* There was no design planning, no concept of architecture, nothing but stream-of-conscience writing in the code that was forked. A very large, convoluted technology with no planning or even conventional coding standards = recipe for disaster.
* Every code change makes every other change a complete waste of time to deal with because there's no real design in place to support either. Experienced developers see the overarching problems and walk away. To simply "swap-out" old code with new code has proven to be a waste of time because all the old interfaces need to go.
* fluffypony flaked, on multiple levels, hardcore, having left me to do everything after promising before the fork that Monero contributors would be involved (why the fuck would I create Kovri if Monero wasn't going to contribute? Answer: incentive, and because I believed in Monero technology and still do, but I could've simply contributed to Monero code instead of doing this project).

In hindsight, I should've ignored everyone and done this correctly from the beginning. Kovri is an *extremely* sound idea, and is absolutely necessary as a concept; but Kovri 2.0 needs to happen before Kovri 1.0; and almost no one in this community seems to fully understand this nor care for that matter (but maybe that will change now?).

If I had my way, I'd spend the next ~4 months designing a new router implementation from the ground-up and write it from scratch. At this point though, I'm tired, and I've created a better solution with Sekreta.

Now, if you want me to hook this pile of crap into Monero, ask yourself why haven't YOU (metaphorical you) done it? Why do you expect ME to be the fall guy, yet again? Why ignore 99% of the critical-problems in favor of solving 1% of non-critical problems?

Integration and dependencies are a COMMITMENT. A REAL COMMITMENT. Do you even KNOW what you'll be committing to? Why would ANYONE here want to commit to something that they've put almost no time and effort into and know almost nothing about?

Keep in mind, if I was a malicious person, I would've hooked Kovri in 2017 and reaped the bounty of 0days; thus doubling my profits at the community's expense. But I'm not that person.

So, if the Monero community, of which less than 10 people have actually contributed to Kovri Project, really wants to be a leader in privacy; then I'd advise for everyone to please look at the situation more objectively.

Single-system overlay network anonymity solutions are NOT THE FUTURE. I truly believe this because evidence is starting to grow supporting this idea.

I believe that Sekreta *is* the future. If not Sekreta, then an offshoot of (or something very similar) until societal collapse engineers new hardware from the ground-up. At that point though, the cheapest solution will win; not the most private. So, until then, the massive gaping holes for network privacy adoption are filled up more by Sekreta than anything else at the moment. This has been empirically proven.

Sekreta is also the chance for this community to redeem itself while proving to be a privacy leader. I'll tell you right now, the SOCKS proxy cop-out, a proxy of which I offered to implement years ago but was shot down, the proxy I wanted to implement because MONERO COULD'VE BEEN USING KOVRI THIS WHOLE TIME AS A RESULT, the proxy of which its non-usage was (affectionately called) Ponzirelli's foundation for the Kovri movement, should be a greater danger signal than anything else.

Now, where do we stand? If you're still concerned about having a baked-in I2P router, then you're completely missing the big picture. Here's your best options at this point:

1. Allow me to bill my 2nd to last milestone to Sekreta. By "allow", I mean that only the very few people who donated $50k should really have their voices considered
2. Allow me to use my *last* milestone to integrate Sekreta into Monero. Monero gets the credit as privacy leader as well as opens up the possibility to adopt Sekreta as a Monero Community project
3. Integration will consist first of the convenience API. Monero will be the testbed for developing this extremely important component. Rudimentary hooks into Tor and/or Kovri will soon follow. Components like SEK and 4SE can still be in the design process at this time because Monero would be only using a primitive SSD via the Convenience API. I want this done now. NOW. I can complete the integration by Q1 2019 and preliminary hooks by Q2 at the latest (this would interfere with the planning phase so expect related inconveniences as a result). If I have experienced engineers helping me though, we could get this done sooner.
4. My future FFS requests would be primarily for Sekreta as it is a new, innovative, solution - but I have no plans on "abandoning" Kovri.

*or*

1. Don't allow me to bill for Sekreta, piss me off, lose the opportunity to innovate, and get a shit-router integrated instead. Other privacy projects will realize that Sekreta is *NOT* a Monero thing and will adopt as a result
2. You're stuck with a dependency that no one will have the confidence to use and will instead want to default ALL OF THEIR TRANSACTIONS over Tor via Monero's proxy-of-shame https://forum.getmonero.org/9/work-in-progress/90923/lee-clagett-vtnerd-broadcast-transactions-over-tor-hidden-service. This is a great threat to privacy: not philosophically, but absolutely fucking empirically as proven by Sekreta - and puts Monero into shit-coin tier innovation. Boring.
3. Pigeon-hole Monero while projects like Nym take the lead in privacy https://www.coindesk.com/this-binance-backed-crypto-startup-wants-to-anonymize-everything (Sekreta eliminates a big chunk of Nym's edge)
4. My back taxes (apparently no one mentioned that monero = income tax), and being burned in 2018, will make me do what I need to do to survive.

I recommend that Kovri continue development in tandem with Sekreta. I've handed over almost all the reigns to Sean so I can devote time to Kovri code development over anything else kovri related, but I have no interest in Kovri 1.0. Also, Monero should have no interest in Kovri 1.0 because other implementations are being developed in tandem (as noted in the Sekreta draft). Sekreta CAPITALIZES on this new privacy ecosystem VERY WELL at YOUR benefit, so I would advise to think about the future and diverge your time and funding as appropriate.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RpFS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6576  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] BEAM | Mimblewimble | Private | Scalable | No ICO | No Pre Mine on: January 08, 2019, 11:47:31 PM
SPARKPOOL does not publish blocks mined
SPARKPOOL has over 60% of the network


for these reasons alone, you should NOT be mining there. if you do not know why, you simply shouldn't be mining.

Spark working normal. But if you don't like Chinese language,
you can reconnect to another pool. I receive >16 BEAM's   :-)

We’re pleased to release Bminer 11.4.0.

The release provides experimental support mining beam with AMD cards.

Please see https://www.bminer.me for more details.

Happy mining!

[FATA] [2019-01-08T23:45:44+03:00] No supported devices are available for the AMDCL platform
[WARN] [2019-01-08T23:45:44+03:00] Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

You are Idiot? Sorry but AMD cards is Not supported!

Confirmed, you are the Idiot.
6577  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: January 08, 2019, 10:44:58 PM

JJGs shortest post ever, and an answer that made me laugh.

I do so prefer his new short style.

Must be a New Years resolution, or the AI program is completed now. Cheesy
6578  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: January 08, 2019, 09:55:56 PM
I "mined" most of my bitcoin playing poker...  I was inspired years ago to write this about the tables at Seals with Clubs:

Flopped a straight!  ALL IN!
Call, Call, Call, Fold, Call, Call, Call
Beaten by a flush...

Too many fish in the net will pull you overboard! Cheesy
6579  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: January 08, 2019, 08:50:51 PM
so if you are not sheep, your post will be deleted.

Nope but if your a dickhead your post will get deleted and you will be ignored, welcome to ignored.
6580  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: January 08, 2019, 05:31:54 PM
have sold some shitcoins and converted them back into BTC, sended them to a wallet..... but the whitdrawl  mail is still pending from yesterday........
f***ing exchanges
someone knows what the problem could be ?

edit: nevermind n00b misstake, all of the mail come through but the approve whitdrawl went to JUNK ......

Fucking hate that, I think it happened on Binance to me the first time I withdrew and I was getting pretty pissed off about it until I noticed they were going straight to spam for some reason even though the registration emails never did.
Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 696 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!