I think Floyd has not refused to fight Pacquiao, it is just the timing is not yet there. Floyd is retired in boxing and has not fought for almost 2 years and he may need a tune-up fight before he face Pacman. Every time Manny fights, his morale is high and he wants his fans to be entertain and happy as well.
I am not sure whether Floyd has made his retirement official or not. His last fight against Conor netted him more than $300 million and he can expect a similar amount in case he takes on Manny Pacquiao once more. My opinion is that he is still capable of 1-2 fights. If Manny wins against Thurman, then the prospect of a Floyd vs Manny rematch may be too hard to ignore for everyone.
|
|
|
I see nothing unusual in this news. Almost all inventions of mankind can be used with a criminal purpose. It has always been and it always will be. People sit in prison and try to use the free time that appears to make money. Earn someone as you can. However, almost every use of cryptocurrency with a criminal purpose gets into the news channels. This creates a bad cryptocurrency image.
The mainstream media shapes public opinion. They decide whether an individual, an organization or an asset should be having a positive image or a negative one. If they decide for the latter, then they will publish all sort of negative news and unfortunately a lot of people (especially the middle-aged and the elderly) still relies on mainstream media more than the social media for their daily dose of news.
|
|
|
For me bitcoin is better than USD. Because usd is more vulnerable to inflation. While bitcoin has the advantage of the easy of running it. Bitcoin investment is fairly easy because it can be done remotely (online) from wherever the investor is. Only by turning on the computer or smartphone and internet network, then you are ready to run this investment.
Inflation is the only point you got right. It's actually a lot easier to use fiat money. I can take money out from my pocket right now and pay some guy for it. No fees. Instant. But you try using Bitcoin to pay a guy rightaway without internet. Even with internet it could take 10 mins or 1 hour, if you're not lucky. So before running investments as you call it, maybe try understand Bitcoin first. You are right. Currently, Bitcoin is not very suitable for making payments and that's why the vast majority of the users treat the coin as an investment asset. Also, third party payment processors needs to be used for BTC payments, as getting confirmations can take anywhere from 5 minutes to 1 hour. But Bitcoin is still in its infancy. As time progresses, it will become more user-friendly.
|
|
|
I saw more trolling from BSV people. Remember BSV fans - Bitcoin is always the king. If somehow Bitcoin fails, BSV and all other alts will fail.
After a sharp rise during June, BSV is once again losing its value. During the past 2-3 weeks, the coin has lost more than 40% of its value against Bitcoin. And the mining difficulty for BSV also shows a corresponding drop. That explains why the BSV promoters such as Craig Wright are resorting to desperate measures to keep the coin afloat.
|
|
|
Well, it is definitely not impossible for Bitcoin to reach a $1 Trillion Market Cap, but I would not put my reputation on the line to predict a specific time-frame for this to happen. It is also not a good idea to believe predictions like this, that are coming from a person that are bullish about Bitcoin. How can a person be biased in his statements, if he has loads of money and time invested in this technology. Do you think Warren Buffet would say anything bad about Berkshire Hathaway Inc... if most of his wealth is determined by the success of this holding company? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) His prediction is a very realistic one. He is not dishing out wild imaginations (such as the $1 million per coin claim from John McAfee). Right now BTC is nearing $250 billion market cap, and another 4x rise is definitely possible within the next 5-6 years. If you ask me, I would say that it will happen even before that. We can trust Willy Woo much more than either Warren Buffet, Jim Rodgers or John McAfee.
|
|
|
As more tokens keep coming into the market, it is assumed that more cyptocurrency exchanges will raise. this, we all know have a risk effect which is that hackers are empowered to try their luck especially on vulnerable ones. The good side is that more tokens has the oportunity of getting listed on exchanges. example; NCHT( nano healthcare) project just got listed on etherbase exchange.
It means more headache for the bounty hunters. Imagine what will happen, if a bounty hunter participates in 12 different bounty campaigns and end up with a dozen different tokens in his wallet. Now let's imagine that all these tokens got listed in different exchanges. The bounty hunter will have to register with all these different exchanges and he needs to undergo KYC for each one of them. On top of that, he need to pay the deposit / withdrawal fees to multiple exchanges.
|
|
|
Looks like the New Zealand vs India semi-final is going to be an one sided affair. The former have been playing horribly for the past 3-4 matches and I don't think that they have much of a chance against a strong Indian lineup. On the other hand, the other semi-final will be a closely fought one. Both Australia and England have almost equal chances of winning.
In this world cup I have seen so much rise and fall we know India is good team to play, Zealand will also play good so we can say India will play well, so let’s see what happen, according me match wittedness and England will also show good performance, this world cup went interesting but I felt bad when Pakistan did not reach semi final. Pakistan did not reached in semi final just because of 1 match against West Indies, they all out 105 against West Indies, and after that they were never recovered from that negative net run rates. This is why I said before the start of the tournament that teams from South Asia should arrive in England at least two weeks prior to the start, and get themselves acclimatized to the conditions. Bangladesh was the only Asian team which did that, and the impact was evident from the first round of matches. That said, both India and Pakistan fought well after the initial setbacks.
|
|
|
Once Manny gets tired, Thurman can go for the kill.
I'm sorry but did we see Manny got tired in any of his fight? I think that's why he is winning because he is too condition and the only way to beat him is through bias decision or if he is hit with a lucky punch. OK.. Let me summarize the positives and negatives for both Thurman and Manny: Manny Pacquiao: Advantages: 1. Overwhelming fan support 2. Decades of experience in boxing 3. As per reports, he is in good form recently Disadvantages: 1. At 40 years, he is nearing retirement 2. Stayed away from boxing and got involved in politics recently 3. Floyd's refusal to fight him might have affected the morale Keith Thurman:Advantages: 1. At 30 years, he is in prime age. 2. The fight will happen in the US and there is a chance that the jury might be in his favor 3. Recent form has been good Disadvantages: 1. His last win by KO was almost six years ago 2. There is a lot of pressure on him to win this fight 3. Betting odds are rapidly shifting against his favor
|
|
|
Terrorism is just another excuse from the authorities to force KYC down out throats. Do you really believe that these "terrorists" are too retarded to use their own KYC info? They can easily get stolen KYC info from the dark markets for $25 or $50. Nowadays, the word "terrorism" is frequently used by the authorities to snoop down on ordinary people.
|
|
|
Thurman may be younger but pacquiao already proved his reputation to the boxing community. He already defeated some world champions before and been undefeated for some years. It's obvious that pacquiao has greater odds on sportsbetting websites. Imo this is just like his previous fights, pacquiao will win and he'll earn more money again.
Even if he lose, he will still earn big money, but let's hope he will win so he will have more fight before he will retire. Thurman did think he can beat Pacman and made him retire, that's mouth will be shut when they fight in the ring comes the scheduled fight, Manny will once again win and prove that he is not too old to retire in boxing. Its not that simple. For sure he will earn a great deal of money even if he loses the fight. But in case he loses it, then his future prospects may be in jeopardy. Getting a good opponent is very important, and Manny will be getting a big boost if he upsets Thurman on July 20th. Also, in case he loses this one, then his fans may not turn out in great numbers for the upcoming fight against Khan.
|
|
|
This will happen over and over again , but think about how many of these operations a day is carried out with fiat
The mainstream media still want to paint Bitcoin as a currency of the scamsters and criminals, although the latest data indicates that usage of Bitcoin for illegal purposes have come down from 7% in 2013 to less than 1% in 2019. 99% of the Bitcoin transactions are being used for legal purposes and the mainstream media never highlights it. Oh wow great analysis mate, We know that medias can't highlight the good news of bitcoin but if bitcoin get people get involve using bitcoin in bad ways they highlights that news speciythe media personality against in crypto as new form of money. You can check this article yourselves: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-01/bitcoin-criminals-set-to-spend-1-billion-on-dark-web-this-yearSee the language that they have used. They have highlighted the slight increase in the overall USD value (that may be due to the increase in net worth of the coins that were already deposited to the dark market wallets). But the most important fact is hidden somewhere in the middle of the article. It sates that: Illegal activity has accounted for less than 1% of all Bitcoin activity so far this year -- down from 7% in 2012, according to Hannah Curtis, senior product manager
|
|
|
Bitcoin has survived so many obstacles and competition ever since its creation in 2009. It survived tough competition from alts such as Litecoin, Ethereum and Cardano. The forking of coins such as BCH and BSV was another tough battle for Bitcoin. Now the next obstacle is going to be the competition from Libracoin, which may get launched in 2020.
I think the competition was against Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash, but as you have said, bitcoin remains on top of the game. And I don't think that we have doubts specially the attempt in 2017. It has survived the test of time. I don't know about Libracoin though, the community is still divided as to whether it will be a direct competition of bitcoin or will it just be another crypto pegged to a certain currency. As far as I understand, the exchange rate of Libracoin will be determined based on the market dynamics. The only difference between the other cryptocurrencies is that Libracoin will be a centralized cryptocoin. So in case Zuckerberg doesn't like your FB profile, then there is a chance that he may freeze your coins and impound your wallet. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Considering there are thousands of coins and tokens out there, what sort of dominance should Bitcoin have which shows that even though it remains the dominant force there is still a lot of space for others to narrow the gap?
Currently the BTC Dominance according to CMC is: 62.6%
During mid-2017, the dominance was down to 33% and Ether was closely behind with 31% (BTC lost a large chunk of the market share when BCH forked out). But even then, Bitcoin was the most dominant coin out there. Now the market share has grown by almost 2x from those levels and we don't need to worry about the future of Bitcoin anymore.
|
|
|
Somewhere, a group is preparing an attack on Bitcoin. It will come around the next big pump. The attackers will have an exponentially large advantage of computing power. If the network isn't compromised, it will be severely damaged.
Are you talking about a 51% attack? That may be possible with some of the little known cryptocurrencies, but not with Bitcoin. For launching a 51% attack on BTC, you need millions of mining rigs and many Gigawatts of electricity. I don't think that all these can be procured on short notice. Is there any evidence of an impending attack? Else, please refrain from spreading FUD here.
|
|
|
I don't think if you check the market cap there a lot of cryptocurrencies, that are gaining support and interest from the community, and there are a lot of cryptocurrencies that keeps on developing their products and platforms, cryptocurrency is here to stay and they are going to stay alongside Bitcoin. Increasing market cap doesn't guarantee anything. And for many of the lesser known altcoins, a large part of the circulating supply is not in free-float, which means that these coins are not actively traded. So the market capitalization calculated by coinmarketcap may be inflated. Right now, I would say that the market cap stats are accurate only for Bitcoin.
|
|
|
But I guess, Manny being the favorite now and the shift shows the he still commands a lot of followers amongst Filipinos around the globe.
The odds may be favoring Manny as of now, but still in my opinion Keith Thurman is having a better chance of winning the fight. Anyway just 12 days to go for the event, and the long wait is about to be finished. This fight is more important for Thurman, as his promotional deals may take a hit in case Manny is able to upset him with a KO or a unanimous decision.
|
|
|
I want Sir Jadeja to play in the semifinal match against New Zealand. Mediocre players like Kedar Jadhav and Vijay Shankar were given multiple opportunities so far in the tournament, but the best Indian all rounder was left out of the team in 8 out of the 9 matches. When he was given a chance at last, he made the maximum use out of it and got the crucial wicket of Kusal Mendis.
He wasn't playing in the team because England mostly pitch don't spin much, so his bowling not a good option so much and his batting is not upto the mark last some months, that is why he was out of the team. Vijay Shankar was in team because he can bowl medium pace and that helped to win match against pakistan when Bhuvi got injured. If spin is not suitable for English conditions, then why did India played two full-time spinners (Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal) for their match against England? And Jadeja is a batsman who can bowl, rather than the other way around. He is capable of pushing the run rate upwards in the middle order, unlike players such as Dhoni and Jadhav.
|
|
|
It may be impossible to physically ban Bitcoin. But at the same time, the government authorities are capable of preventing the usage of Bitcoins, by arresting its users. This tactic has been used by third world nations such as Bangladesh, to scare away people from transacting with BTC. And the Indian government, as per reliable reports is also moving towards that direction.
|
|
|
Bitcoin has survived so many obstacles and competition ever since its creation in 2009. It survived tough competition from alts such as Litecoin, Ethereum and Cardano. The forking of coins such as BCH and BSV was another tough battle for Bitcoin. Now the next obstacle is going to be the competition from Libracoin, which may get launched in 2020.
|
|
|
2025? Nope. We don't need to wait for another 6 years to witness that. If you remember, in 2017 the total crypto market capitalization was only a tad short of the $1 trillion mark. And looking at the current market situation, it looks like this milestone will be reclaimed sometime in 2020, either before or after the next block reward halving.
|
|
|
|