U manjim gradovima i na selu je situacija drugačija nego u većim gradovima u Njemačkoj. U Štutgartu i Minhenu su stanovi i kirije skupi i velika je potražnja. Mislim da je Minhen najskuplji njemački grad za život a Štutgart je na drugom mjestu. Puno toga ide preko maklera i ljudi su spremni da plate dodatnu premiju sa strane da dobiju informaciju prije vremena. Nije neobično da stan recimo u ponedeljak bude ponuđen na tržištu za iznajmljivanje, ti ujutru odmah nazoveš a već neko uselio.

I would add the Blockstream Jade to that group. It can be used as a normal hardware wallet (not-airgapped) or as a stateless signer, as it uses SeedQRs just like the Seedsigner. The one thing that is questionable is that it requires Bluetooth or USB connection with the Blockstream Green software wallet during the initial setup to download the firmware. After that, everything can be done with QR code scanning. The official shop is in the US, but they have a bunch of resellers all over the place.

I have never heard of such an attack or read about someone suffering from it. I remember seeing mentions of maliciously altered fees, but that's all. I don't know how it's possible to modify a transaction that was already signed by a private key that only you have access to. Wouldn't such a modification require access to the signing keys because it's different transaction data @nc50lc? In that case, you would need to ask yourself who has got your private keys?

Ima smisla, naravno. Ako baš moraš trgovati tokenima na Ethereum mreži, pokušaj da to radiš u jutarnjim i prijepodnevnim satima po evopskom vremenu. Radnim danima sam primjetio da su tad dosta niže naknade i može se napraviti transakcija između 40-50 gwei-a. To će te koštati kod ERC-20 tokena $10-$15. Iza 3 i 4 po našem vremenu to već ide na iznad 70 ili 80 gwei a ni +100 nije rijetka pojava. 

Ethereum has never been user-centric. Their philosophy is worlds apart from that of Bitcoin. It has always been a network where a selected few who belong to the Ethereum Foundation has the say on the future. Just remember the big DAO hack of many years ago when these 'big' players lost. What did they do? They simply clicked the restart button, and it never happened. That same button would never have been hit if you and me lost that money or anyone else of less importance to them. 

Interesting slogan. I mean the #SometimesLoseAlwaysWin from your subject.
It's true to some degree. You get cashback when you lose, retrieving a part of your lost wagers. Is the cashback applicable only for lost wagers or all bets in a specific time frame? Most casinos give cashback only for losses, but occasionally, you can find one that considers all bets.

A tip. Perhaps you shouldn't call the supported altcoins shitcoins. They are, but still. Maybe some of your players will take offence.

Čuo sam za taj slučaj. Nisu ni u pitanju mali iznosi jer korisnici su primjetili da im fali nekoliko desetina tisuća USD. Čak su i uništavali dokaze onima koji su javno progovorili o tome. Izbrisali bi im povijest transakcija. Ako nisu prethodno preuzeli te podatke, ne bi više mogli. To onda za sobom povlači i druge probleme kao što je tačno prijavljivanje poreza, prikazivanje kapitalne dobiti, itd.    

Teoretski, kripto ti mogu blokirati u roku od par minuta poslje depozita ako ne prođe određene kontrole i historijat pokaže da potiče iz sumnjivih izvora. To ide automatski a onda se ti pravdaj i objašnjavaj. Centralizovane mjenačnice su odlično oružje za borbu protiv svega onoga što Bitcoin predstavlja.

Britanski sud je donio odluku povodom Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) tužbe protiv prevaranta Craig Wrighta koji je tvrdio da je Satoshi i da je napisao orginalni Bitcoin Whitepaper. Sudija je zaključio da Wright nije Satoshi, nije napisao Bitcoin Whitepaper, i nije programirao početne verzije Bitcoin softvera.

Ovo je odlična stvar i još jedna u nizu poraza ovog prevaranta.
Ne znam kako će ova odluka uticati na buduće tužbe i one već presuđene. Npr, zbog nepojavljivanja na sudu suprotne stranke (Cobra) koja je željela ostati anonimna, Wright je uspio ostvariti pobjedu na sudu i Bitcoin.org ne smije dozvoliti preuzimanje whitepapera u Velikoj Britaniji. Možda se uskoro i ta greška ispravi.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/14/craig-wright-not-satoshi-didnt-author-bitcoin-whitepaper-judge-rules/

One usually follows the other. If I can afford or want to purchase a PC/laptop with good amount of RAM and a CPU, I can do the same with storage. And I can also invest in an internet package that supplies me with the bandwidth that I need to run my full node. But you are right in stating that there are areas where all this is unfortunately still a luxury. 

I think it's telling you that there is a possibility that someone could change and try to manipulate the transaction. That doesn't mean it will happen. After all, it's you creating it and you broadcasting it afterwards. Why don't you try the entire process with a small amount of a few dollars to see if it will work. Create a $5 BTC transaction on your online machine, bring it over to your airgapped computer for signing, and finally broadcast it on the online computer. 

Good idea. Use it only as a communication medium between your hot and cold wallet and format it every time on either end if you are worried about catching malware.  

That's again adding new complexities to the transaction creation process that don't need to be there.

Edit:
I am now also willing to accept DAI in exchange for BTC.
Post here and PM me your offers.

Bitcoin miners aren't opting for dirty sources of energy because they hate the planet and want to help in its destruction. It's very simple: they are using the cheapest energy they possibly can to make money and make as much as they can. Unfortunately, that's fossil fuels. It it was wind, hydropower, or electricity from solar panels and there was enough of it for bitcoin mining and other community needs, they would use that. 

Do whatever you like. Don't let what I said stop you from developing what you like and creating your own tools. However, I would make sure that I place a visible warning for the brain wallet generator in a way so that anyone who wants to use it sees the notification. That should stop people creating such wallets and funding them. With such a warning, you have done your part of informing people about the dangers. It's their job to take it seriously.

I have never been a fan of overcomplicating things and trying to come up with non-traditional systems. It's one thing to be interested in learning and experimenting. That's ok. But creating an unorthodox setup increases the risk that you took a wrong step somewhere which could prove costly. Both Electrum and Bitcoin Core can run as hot or cold wallets. All the user has to do is to pick one or the other. There really is no increase in security to combine the two. And perhaps it can cause compatibility issues of some sort in the future.

To use it for testing and playing around with, sure. But it should never be advertised as a way to generate your keys. Brain wallets aren't safe. And we humans are bad at randomly picking anything. Such a wallet would be less safe than one created from random sources of entropy. It could lead to loss of funds if you were to deposit bitcoin into a wallet created that way that would then get brute forced by someone.

Were is the offensive comment about him exactly you neanderthal? Can't you tell I am making fun of your coloring skills? You are a bit slow, aren't you? The type that gets the joke the day after.

Kissing ass won't get people to support you. Nice try, though.

Congratulations! Did you get yourself a nice coloring book to celebrate? It can help you to stay within the lines while coloring pandas, tigers, various birds, etc.

---

Watching your failed attempts to stir up drama has been fun. But I have no intention to talk to you anymore. It's been going on for too long already. I will not be replying to your uninspiring colored posts any longer. Try and get someone else's attention. I will only get involved in the discussions if I get tagged or quoted by other users.

Try not to bite your tongue off out of frustration or anger that no one took you seriously.

A properly airgapped computer is safer than a hardware wallet connected to the internet.

OK, good. I was worried that your intentions were to export your seed from Trezor and import it into an Electrum hot wallet. Electrum supports BIP-39 seed phrases and Electrum's native seed format, so you shouldn't have problems there. The only other software wallet I know of that supports both seed formats is Blue Wallet.

Iz tvojih usta u Božije uši. Pošto nisu totalno anonimni, možda će samo malo da ih zabrane a ne totalno. Ja po prirodi nisam optimista i ne vidim svjetlu budućnost bilo čemu što običnim ljudima poboljšava iole privatnost. Što ne znaći da ne bi volio da bude tako kako ti kažeš.

Svako preko blockchain explorera može da vidi liquid adrese korištene u transakcijama i naknade koje su plačene. I to je to. Primaoci i pošiljaoci mogu da vide sve ostale detalje. Kako je objašnjeno u tom izvoru, postoji ključ kojeg učesnik u transakciji može podjeliti s trećom osobom koja bi onda također mogla imati uvid u sve detalje te transakcije.   

Hello,

I have two users that I have traded with already. You didn't state how much you have.
Send me a PM with your offer, so that I can consider it in the future. If I like it, I will contact you when I need more tether.

Šta im uslovi korištenja kažu za KYC, jel ima neki iznos do kojeg se može trgovati bez verificiranja naloga?

Jesi imao priliku koristiti MEXC koja je isto navodno no-KYC mjenačnica. To ti i naglase kad komuniciraš sa njihovom korisničkom službom. Međutim TOS pokazuje drugačiju sliku. Piše da su obavezni da poštuju KYC i AML propise i naravno imaju pravo da uvijek zatraže da korisnik prođe verifikaciju profila.

Moj savjet je da skloniš taj kod na kraju. Ako neki admin zaluta, izbrisat će ti temu. Šteta je. Stavi kod u svoj signature potpis, svakako nemaš tu ništa napisano.