This article, in which I foresaw Israel's strategic cooperation with Turkey and Azerbaijan, was published in the Israeli newspaper “Our Country” on 11/19/1997.

  

                                                                                                                 Alik Bakhshi

                                               Israel and the Moscow-Tehran Axis

  


                                                                        
  Turkey and Israel are an ideal pair of strategic partners.
    
    For the past two centuries, Russia has been Iran's most dangerous neighbor. Iran was the last obstacle to the advance of the Russian Empire to the Indian Ocean. And the weak impoverished country would certainly become its next victim, if not for the intercession of England. Moscow made its last attempt to carry out its aggressive plans at the end of World War II, when Soviet troops occupied part of Iranian territory, the so-called South Azerbaijan. Only the political talent and foresight of Winston Churchill, who foresaw the era of the Cold War, forced Stalin to withdraw the army from Iran.
        Subsequently, under American patronage, the SEATO bloc was created, which included Turkey, Iran and Pakistan. This trio formed a military-political shield against the possible expansion of the Soviet Union to the South. Given that Turkey is a member of NATO and has a bilateral mutual assistance pact with the United States, SEATO was as unassailable as NATO.
      Iran at that time received a lot of American weapons and economic assistance. The Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, who graduated from an institute in Switzerland, was a supporter of the development of his country on the model of Western civilization, like Turkey, which made a rather bold step for the religiously orthodox East, separating religion from the state. But, if Atatürk had support in the person of the Young Turks in his progressive reforms, then Pahlavi did not have such support. And yet, thanks to petrodollars, the country was developing rapidly in technical and economic terms and was on the verge of an economic boom.

      Following American goods, the seeds of Western culture entered the country. American films literally flooded cinemas and television. Young people like a sponge absorbed everything new and unusual. The "corruption of the souls" of the faithful aroused the wrath of the religious elite, who saw in the cultural transformation of society a threat to their influence on the masses. All attempts to convince the shah to turn off the chosen path, which runs counter to religious dogma, were unsuccessful. Moreover, the shah did not stand on ceremony with his ideological opponents, and the future father of the Islamic revolution even had to leave Iran and turn into a kind of martyr for the faith.

      Everyone knows the tragic finale of the transformations of Iranian society, undertaken by none other than the Shahinshah (Shah of all Shahs) of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. A proud loner, ahead of his time, ended his last days in exile. Cruel terror scattered the sprouts of a new life. The Revolutionary Guards took great pleasure in public executions of women who dared to appear with an open face, or who were convicted of treason. Cinemas were burning along with the spectators locked in them. The black veil of religious fanaticism has again descended on Iran, protecting it from the rest of the world, and in an instant plunging the country into an era of medieval obscurantism.
     The civilized world was shocked by what happened in Iran, and only Moscow remained silent. The communists have always respected all totalitarian regimes that are close to them in spirit, be it fascist in Germany, dictatorial in Libya or Iraq, and now another version of it - religious totalitarianism in the face of the Islamic state of Iran.

    Knowing perfectly well that democracy is the main evil for their power, the religious oligarchy declared Western civilization the enemy of Islam and all Muslims. (This is fundamentally not true, if only because it was the military action of the West that saved the Bosnian Muslims from the genocide committed by the Serbs.) Naturally, America and its ally Israel became the main opponent of the revolution, and not for the reason that Israel is at war with the Arabs, Iran and he himself fought with Iraq for 8 years, but because Iran, like any totalitarian regime, needs an enemy to mobilize the spirit and eliminate the slightest free-thinking within the regime.
    Iran is trying to assume the role of leader in the Muslim world, and for this it is necessary to back up propaganda with some more active actions. You can't reach America, but Israel is nearby.

     The collapse of the Soviet Union, an empire that occupied a sixth of the land, changed a lot on the political map of the world, reshuffling the interests and military-strategic plans of many states. In the sphere of geopolitics, Russia is failing, especially in Europe. NATO is expanding to the East, getting closer and closer to Russia, and if the former Soviet Baltic republics and Ukraine become NATO members, then Russian naval forces in the Baltic and Black Sea will be effectively blocked.

   The situation is no better in the southern direction, where Moscow quite reasonably foresees a threat to its Turkic-speaking underbelly from the Caucasus and Central Asia. Here, the contours of the bloc of Turkic countries emerging under the auspices of Turkey from Asia Minor to Altai, which cuts like a wedge into the very center of the Asian continent, are becoming more and more clearly visible here. The possibility of reviving Turkic cooperation on such a vast territory changes the geostrategic situation. This legacy of Timur has a great military-strategic potential not only because of the space, but also because of the presence of huge oil and gas reserves, not inferior to those of the Persian basin. Russia undoubtedly fears such a change in the geopolitical situation and takes preventive measures to prevent the emergence of a union of Turkic countries.

    The weak point of the Turkic community is the absence of a continuous territorial corridor between Turkey and Azerbaijan, which is also the reason for the difficulty in implementing the project of laying an oil pipeline from Baku to Turkey. In strategic terms, the situation is aggravated by the occupation of 20% of Azerbaijani territory by Armenia. But in case of reunification of Azerbaijan with its southern part, located in Iran, the bloc will become monolithic. Naturally, for Iran, the prospect of losing a significant part of the territory, where about 30 million Azerbaijanis live (there are 9 million Azerbaijanis in Northern Azerbaijan), seems like a nightmare. This is where the geopolitical interests of Russia and Iran intersect, and the existing Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran axis just serves as a noose in this most vulnerable spot. In addition, the unfinished Karabakh war plays the role of a smoldering fuse in order to start military operations in this region with the hands of Armenia at a favorable moment for Moscow.

     In military cooperation with Iran, Russia sees a worthy response to the West for NATO expansion, and assistance in the construction of a nuclear reactor, which, with an excess of natural energy resources, Iran undoubtedly needs to create an atomic bomb, is a good irritating factor for America and Israel. And politicians who consider Russia already completely defeated are greatly mistaken. The Evil Empire is still capable of burning the Earth with nuclear breath in death convulsions or giving birth to its own kind in the face of Iran.

      The Moscow-Tehran axis should also protect Russia's economic interests. Russia cannot accept the fact that Azerbaijan is single-handedly extracting oil and gas from its shores and from time to time raises the issue of some unclear status of the Caspian Sea. Moreover, it should be taken into account that oil from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan may be added to Baku oil. Thus, Baku will become a transit hub for transporting oil from the Caspian basin through Turkey to the countries of the Mediterranean Sea. It is very important for Russia that Caspian oil be transported to the Black Sea through its territory, and by political leverage, using the Karabakh conflict, Russia will in every possible way prevent the laying of an oil pipeline from Baku to Turkey. On the other hand, the throughput of the existing oil pipeline through Chechnya is insufficient to carry out the pumping of the amount of oil that is planned to be produced in the Caspian. Moreover, it should be taken into account that oil from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan will be added to Baku oil. Along with technical difficulties, Russia also has political problems due to the instability of the general situation in the North Caucasus.
Taking all this into account, the Turkish option for building a new oil pipeline remains the most promising. In this case, oil will become more accessible to all Mediterranean countries, including Israel, and then there will be no need to bring oil from distant Mexico.

    Thus, Caspian oil is the cause of future political and possibly military clashes.

    After a series of political defeats in the Middle East, Russia does not give up hope of resuming its activity in this region, which is not desirable for both Israel and Turkey.
    Having common political opponents and not having friends in the immediate environment, Israel and Turkey need mutual support and the union of these countries is the best response to Moscow's demarche to return to the political arena of the Middle East with the help of Iran.

    Turkey and Israel are an ideal pair of strategic partners. The combination of a country that has the largest army among NATO members and in the Middle East region, and a country that possesses nuclear weapons and is not associated with any military bloc and, as a result, is able to make decisions independently, represents a serious force that cannot be not to take into account strategists in Moscow and Tehran, not to mention closer neighbors.
         Hence the recent visit of Minister of Foreign Affairs Yevgeny Primakov to Israel, one of the purposes of which, I think, was to probe how deep Israeli-Turkish military contacts are.

    In the current situation, the conclusion of an alliance between Israel and Turkey would undoubtedly cool the ardor of the Tehran fanatics and make it clear that any intentions to upset the balance of power that has developed in the Middle East will not go unpunished.
  
     11/19/79.

Putin's hope that the West was tired of the war turned out to be in vain. The United States has planned multibillion-dollar deliveries of military equipment, including longer-range missiles. Germany will give Ukraine the Patriot system and armored personnel carriers. And in Russia it seems there is nothing to make up for the losses.

Надежда Путина на то, что Запад устал от войны оказалась напрасной. США запланировали многомилиардные поставки военной техники, в том числе ракеты большей дальности. Германия передаст Украине систему "Патриот" и БТРы. А в России похоже нечем восполнять потери.

On New Year's Eve, a high-precision missile strike was launched in Makeyevka on the building of a vocational school where the Russian military was stationed. As a result, up to 400 soldiers died and 300 were injured. Russia admitted to the death of 63 soldiers. The reason for the strike was "high cellular activity of military personnel" (the strike was allegedly delivered just after midnight). Yes, congratulations on the New Year on mobile communications ended in tragedy.

В новогоднюю ночь был нанесён высокоточный ракетный удар в Макеевке по зданию ПТУ, где размещались русские военные. В результате погибло до 400 военных и 300 было ранено. Россия призналась в гибели 63 солдат. Причиной удара стала "высокая сотовая активность военнослужащих" (удар был предположительно нанесен сразу после полуночи). Да поздравления с Новым годом по мобильной связи окончилось трагедией.

Alik Bakhshi
Awakening of the West
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                               Professor Martin Schulze Wessel

    It seems that in the countries of the tolerant West they began to realize what Russia and the Russian people are. Thus, Dr. Martin Schulze Wessel, a professor at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, said: “It is difficult to compare the situation in modern Russia and Germany, at least at the beginning of World War II. However, in both cases, we are talking about the fact that political leadership is impossible without the support of people. In Russia, this is support for the army, support for business, and, therefore, this is not Putin's war, this is Russia's war.'' (https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-61720392).
     Everything that happens in Russia primarily comes from its people, Putin is only a proper conductor of the innermost aspirations of the Russian people and their mentality.

    In 2014, in the article “Great Russian chauvinism and Putin is his Fuhrer” (1), I pointed out that Russia’s aggressiveness lies in the mentality of the Russian people, in its imperial worldview and Great Russian chauvinism. Putin only opened the floodgates to Great Russian chauvinism, the wave of which brought him to power. Going to meet the desire of the Russian people to return Chechnya to the bosom of the empire, Putin started a war with Chechnya. In gratitude, Putin was elected by the people to the role of a leader in line with his imperial worldview. With the tacit consent of the people, Putin returned the former system of power to the country, mysteriously calling it a sovereign democracy, defining himself, one must understand, only as its sovereign (in Russian, - ruler).

     The West for a long time refused to understand that democracy in Russia did not take place. The mentality of the Russian people does not accept democracy, because democracy and empire are incompatible things. On the other hand, the Russian people cannot exist outside the empire, without the empire they will be lost. The victory of democracy for the Russian people turned into its complete impoverishment and the final collapse of the Russian Empire. Is the Russian people ready for such a price to pay for their freedom? Do people need freedom at all, carrying the gene of Oblomovism in themselves? Only a dictatorial regime is suitable for a society that does not want to deal with either political or economic problems. So the appearance of Putin is not accidental, but fateful for the Russian people. (2) The vector of Putin’s policy is “back to the empire.” (3) Yes, Putin is implicitly pursuing a policy of restoring the Russian Empire within the borders of the Soviet Union under the pretext of protecting the collapse of the USSR live in the former Soviet republics, or as he says, the "Russian world", Russia threatens their security.

    “Russian World” and aggression are inseparable concepts.(4) The phrase “Russian World” should be understood as a concept designed to protect the “moral health” of the state-forming people, the core of the empire, with the return of a falsified history that does not cause moral damage to its relic imperial worldview. Not a single people in the world, except for the Russian, calls itself great, and the language of the Great Russian people, respectively, is Great Russian. This self-determination is flawed. Hence the desire of the Great Russians for Great Russia, which, after the fall of the communist regime, somewhat disintegrated, but remained a "prison of peoples." Putin gave the Great Russians hope for the restoration of the empire within its former borders, and in this Putin's revanchist is no different from Hitler's revanchist, with the idea of creating a Third Reich, backed up by fascist ideology. In this regard, Putin is no different from the fascist Hitler. Associations with Hitler are evidenced by indisputable facts. Putin surprisingly follows in Hitler's footsteps, emulating the methods used by the fascist Fuhrer.(5,6) Lies and cunning in achieving goals have become the hallmark of the Russian Fuhrer. These accompanying words have become a hallmark of Russia under Putin. Involuntarily, but Putin once again proved that Evil and Falsehood do not exist one without the other. The Empire of Lies perfectly complements the well-known definition of Russia as the Empire of Evil (7).

     Wessel's words point to Putin's Nazism:
“Putin, in his speech back in July last year, made it clear that he does not want the existence of Ukraine as an independent nation. He started a war against the Ukrainian nation, and any war against a nation has the dimension of genocide.”
    
     Putin's Nazism is clearly expressed in his "historical discovery" that there is no Ukrainian people as such, that they are Russian people. The Russian Fuhrer, without concealing his intentions, defined the goal of the war he started - denazification, in other words, the extermination of Ukrainians. If this plan is implemented, there will be neither the Ukrainian people, nor the country with the name Ukraine. (Somewhat digressing from the topic, in imitation of Putin the historian, I wrote an article “Jews and Russians are one people” (. I believe that my research is no less worthy of a historical digression. So the Jews, respectively, have the right to claim Russia and annex it to Israel.)

    Interesting remark doc. Wessel about Russian emigrants, who, in his opinion, can change the political situation and, in general, the attitude of Russian society to the war:
     “As for the influence of intellectuals, I'm not sure that our voice is heard in Russia. Russia is a totalitarian country with no independent media anymore, Western media have virtually no opportunity to take part in communication and informing [the Russian population]. Therefore, Western intellectuals can hardly influence the opinion of Russians.
Perhaps this can be done by Russian emigrants who do not agree with the actions of the authorities, but are still connected with the Russians [within the country]. Russian political emigration may play a role in the future.”

     However, the hope for Russian emigrants is very doubtful. The fact is that most of them see all the blame in Putin, and not in the Russian people. Many emigrants, including Jews, who are usually anti-Putin, believe that Crimea is Russian, and it is enough to throw Putin and his criminal gang out of the Kremlin and Russia will return to the path of democracy. By the way, quite a few Russian emigrants, living abroad, support Putin and the war with Ukraine. Thus, this is reflected in detail in the decision of Latvia to close the broadcasting of the Dozhd TV channel, in whose programs Russian propaganda was found that violated Latvian law.

     Martin Schulze Wessel believes: "Ukraine's victory will certainly mean the end of Putin, because he will not be able to remain a political leader after Ukraine regains its territories."
     Further, he correctly understands that there is no guarantee of a fundamental change in the Russian public in the event of a change in the master of the Kremlin:
   “But this will not necessarily lead to a revolution in Russia. Although it may lead to another form of authoritarian government. In this case, the realization of the experience of this war will be very slow.”

      Finally, the role of the Russian people in the confrontation between Russia and democracy began to reach Western liberals. There is no doubt that if in the 90s, at the time of the collapse of the USSR, the West had not provided assistance to Russia, then the Empire of Evil would have finally collapsed, and today there was no war in Ukraine and “friend Putin” would not blackmail the World with a nuclear war.


1. Great Russian chauvinism and Putin is his Fuhrer. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html
2. People's fate, or each cricket has its own hearth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
3. Back to the empire, or the restoration of historical justice according to Putin. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22792.html
4. The reason for the aggressiveness of the “Russian world. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/85537.html
5. The ghost of Hitler haunts Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html
    6. Who are they rashists. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/83536.html
7. Empire of Lies and its main liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html
8. Jews and Russians are one people. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71168.html

01.01. 2023

 Алик Бахши
Пробуждение Запада
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                   Профессор Мартин Шульце Вессель  

   Похоже, в странах толерантного Запада начали осознавать, что такое Россия и русский народ. Так, профессор Мюнхенского университета имени Людвига и Максимилианa доктор Мартин Шульце Вессель сказал:   «Сравнивать ситуацию в современной России и Германии, по крайней мере, в начале Второй мировой, сложно. Однако в обоих случаях речь идет о том, что политическое лидерство невозможно без поддержки людей. В России это поддержка армии, поддержка бизнеса, и, следовательно, это не война Путина, это война России». (https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-61720392).
    Всё что происходит в России в первую очередь исходит от её народа, Путин лишь должный проводник сокровенного стремления русского народа и его менталитета.

   В 2014 году в статье «Великорусский шовинизм и Путин его фюрер» (1) я указал, что агрессивность России кроется в менталитете русского народа, в его имперском мировоззрении и великорусском шовинизме. Путин лишь открыл шлюзы великорусскому шовинизму, волна которого и вынесла его к власти. Идя на встречу желания русского народа вернуть Чечню в лоно империи, Путин начал войну с Чечней. В благодарность Путин был избран народом на роль вождя, отвечающему его имперскому мировоззрению. С молчаливого согласия народа Путин вернул стране прежнюю систему власти, загадочно нареча её суверенной демократией, определив себя, надо понимать, не иначе как её сувереном (по-русски, - властелином).

    Запад долгое время отказывался понимать, что демократия в России не состоялась. Менталитет русского народа не приемлет демократию, ибо демократия и империя вещи не совместимые. С другой стороны русский народ не может существовать вне империи, без империи он потеряется. Победа демократии оборачивалась для русского народа его полным обнищанием и окончательным развалом Российской империи. Готов ли русский народ к подобной плате за свою свободу? Нужна ли вообще свобода, народу, носящему в себе ген обломовщины? Только диктаторский режим подходит для общества, не желающего заниматься ни политическими, ни экономическими проблемами. Так что появление Путина не случайно, а судьбоносно для русского народа.(2) Вектор политики Путина - «назад в империю».(3) Да, Путин подспудно проводит политику восстановления Российской империи в границах Советского союза под предлогом защиты русских, которые в результате распада СССР проживают в бывших советских республиках, или как он говорит, «русского  мира», Россия  угрожает их безопасности.

   «Русский мир» и агрессия понятия неотделимые.(4) Под словосочетанием «Русский мир» надо понимать концепцию, призванную защищать «нравственное здоровье» государствообразующего народа, стержня империи, с возвращением сфальсифицированной истории, не наносящей морального ущерба его реликтовому имперскому мировоззрению. Ни один народ в Мире кроме русского не называет себя великим, и язык у великорусского народа соответственно – великорусский. В этом самоопределение чувствуется ущербность. Отсюда и стремление великороссов к Великой России, которая после падения коммунистического режима несколько распалась, но осталась «тюрьмой народов». Путин дал великороссам надежду на восстановление империи в прежних границах и в этом реваншизм Путина не отличается от реваншизма Гитлера, с идеей создания Третьего Рейха, подкреплённой фашистской идеологией. В этом плане Путин не отличается от фашиста Гитлера. Ассоциации с Гитлером свидетельствуют неоспоримые факты. Путин удивительным образом следует стопам Гитлера, подражая методам, используемым  фашистским фюрером.(5,6) Ложь и коварство в достижении целей стали отличительной чертой русского фюрера. Эти сопутствующие слова стали визитной карточкой России при Путине. Невольно, но Путин лишний раз доказал, что Зло и Ложь не существуют одно без другого. Империя Лжи превосходно дополняет известное определение России как Империя Зла (7).

    На нацизм Путина указывают слова Весселя:
«Путин в своем выступлении еще в июле прошлого года дал понять, что не хочет существования Украины как независимой нации. Он начал войну против украинской нации, а любая война против нации имеет измерение геноцида»
    
    Нацизм Путина ярко выражен в его «историческом открытии» о том, что украинского народа как такового нет, что это русский народ. Русский фюрер, не скрывая намерений, так и определил цель затеянной им войны – денацификация, другими словами истребление украинцев. В случае осуществления этого плана не будет ни украинского народа, ни страны с названием Украина. (Несколько отвлекаясь от темы, я в подражание Путину-историку написал статью «Евреи и русские это один народ»(. Полагаю, что и моё исследование не менее достойный исторический экскурс. Так что евреи соответственно в праве претендовать на Россию и присоединить её к Израилю.)

   Интересно замечание док. Весселя о российских эмигрантах, которые по его мнение могут изменить политическую ситуацию и в целом отношение российского общества к войне:
     «Что касается влияния интеллектуалов, я не уверен, что наш голос слышен в России. Россия - тоталитарная страна, в которой больше нет независимых СМИ, западные медиа практически не имеют возможности принять участие в коммуникации и информировании [российского населения]. Поэтому западные интеллектуалы вряд ли могут оказать влияние на мнение россиян.
Возможно, это могут сделать российские эмигранты, которые не согласны с действиями власти, но все еще связаны с россиянами [внутри страны]. Российская политическая эмиграция может сыграть свою роль в будущем.»

    Однако, надежда на российских эмигрантов весьма сомнительна. Дело в том, что большая их часть всю вину видят в Путине, а не в русском народе. Многие эмигранты в том числе и евреи, обычно настроенные против Путина, считают, что Крым российский, и достаточно выкинуть из Кремля Путина с его преступной группировкой как Россия вернётся на путь демократии. Кстати, не мало русских эмигрантов, живя за границей, поддерживают Путина и войну с Украиной. Так, это обстоятельно отражается в решении Латвии закрыть вещание телеканала «Дождь», в программах которого была обнаружена российская пропаганда, нарушающая латвийское законодательство.

    Мартин Шульце Вессель считает: «Победа Украины, безусловно, будет означать конец Путина, потому что он не сможет остаться политическим лидером после того, как Украина вернет свои территории.»
    Далее, он правильно понимает, что нет гарантии в кардинальном изменении российской общественности в случае смены хозяина Кремля:  
  «Но это не обязательно приведет к революции в России. Хотя может привести к другой форме авторитарного правительства. В таком случае осознание опыта этой войны будет происходить очень медленно.»

     Наконец, до западных либералов стала доходить роль русского народа в противостоянии России и демократии. Нет сомнения, если бы в 90-е годы в момент распада СССР Запад не оказал помощь России, то Империя зла окончательно распалась, и сегодня не было войны в Украине и «друг Путин» не шантажировал Мир ядерной войной.  


1.    Великорусский шовинизм и Путин его фюрер. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html
2.    Народная судьба, или каждому сверчку свой шесток. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html                          
3.    Назад в империю, или восстановление исторической справедливости по Путину. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22792.html
4.    Причина агрессивности «Русского мира. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/85537.html
5. Призрак Гитлера бродит по Европe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html
   6. Кто они рашисты. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/83536.html
7.    Империя Лжи и её главный лгун. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html
8.    Евреи и русские это один народ. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71168.html

01.01.2023


   
  

It is likely that the Ukrainians will destroy the Crimean bridge with missiles, through which the main supply of the Russian occupying army in the Crimea goes, after which the Crimea will be liberated from the invaders. I believe Turkey will begin to assist in the restoration of the Crimea, as well as the indigenous people - the Crimean Tatars.

Here the topic is about the Russian people, their mentality, and what does the USA have to do with it? Is there really a connection between the mentality of the Russian people, their history and the United States? None other than some kind of nonsense! Russians as a people with their mentality have existed for 1000 years, and the United States for 200. Your comment is more like childish babble than the reasoning of an adult.

Всё идёт к тому, что крымский мост, по которому идёт основное снабжение крымской группировки оккупантов, будет разрушен, после чего русская армия в Крыму попадёт в плен, у России нет кораблей, чтобы в короткий срок вывезти армию из обреченного Крыма.

С изгнанием русских оккупантов из Крыма, восстановлениeм там хозяйства займётся Турция.

Кедми похоже Мудозвон уговорил остаться, и показать тем самым, во-первых лояльность власти к любому мнению, а во-вторых, это возвращение Кедми в шоу Мудозвона можно рассматривать как смирение перед тем, что делает русская военщина в Украине. Короче, Кедми вторично продал свою Совесть за хорошее вознаграждение.

Dozhd is a Jewish television channel that sees only Putin as the main opponent of democracy in Russia, not taking into account the mentality of the Russian people, and also does not support the aspirations of other peoples of the Russian Empire for freedom. But the main force behind the collapse of the empire is precisely this circumstance. The issue of belonging to the indigenous people of Crimea, which has been subjected to genocide for 200 years, has never been discussed at Dozhd. "Rain" for the preservation of Russia as a state, but a democratic state, where the rest of the peoples will remain to the role of colonial. On "Rain" they would not mind if the peoples of the Baltic states remained in the empire. The main thing is to remove Putin and take power, leaving the Russians as a people without initiative, easy to manage, as it was under Lenin. As for the Crimean Tatars, it doesn't matter to Dozhd.

In the Baltic countries, which were Russian colonies, the broadcasting of the Russian channel "Dozhd" was closed, because the channel supported the Russian people, seeing only Putin's fault.

Russia today is a country with a totalitarian regime, which has always been throughout its history. Without freedom in economic activity, a country cannot produce and develop successfully. Russia does not produce anything that is not available in other countries. Russians use everything that is produced in other countries, food raw materials, which are not only in Russia. Therefore, the world can easily do without Russian oil and gas. The only thing that is done in Russia is the murder weapons to seize other people's lands and exploit other peoples. This attitude of Russia towards its neighbors leads to the global isolation of Russia, which will end in the complete decline of its economy and, as a result, the collapse of the empire.

Alik Bakhshi

Russians as a state-forming people


  
    
       To emphasize the special leading role of the Russian people, the Kremlin ideologists declared it to be a state-forming people, introducing this definition into the Constitution, so that all other peoples would know their place in the Russian Empire. From now on, the Russian language, as the language of the state-forming people, is the only state language in Russia, and if in the Soviet Union there was no requirement for compulsory knowledge of the Russian language, now all other languages ​​of the peoples of the multinational state have lost their state status. It should be noted that the state-forming people have a very indirect relation to the formation of the state, because the Russian state was formed by the Varangians Ruriks, then they were replaced by the dynasty of German kings who converted to Orthodoxy. By the way, Catherine the Great, under whom Russia grew in territories the most, could not connect two words in Russian. Russia reached its greatest power under the Georgian Stalin, who not only returned almost all the lost lands as a result of the First World War, but also acquired new ones (Tuva, Prussia, South Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands). The USSR, as a state created by Stalin, existed after his death for another half a century, until the Russians who came to power destroyed it. Today, Putin seems to finally end Russia as an empire, returning the Russian people to the borders of Muscovy as a primordially Russian state. (1)

    From a historical point of view, it is fundamentally wrong to call the Russian people a state-forming people. The Russian people had the opportunity to govern the state. The collapse of the communist regime put the Russian people in front of a dilemma of choice between freedom and dictatorship, and the people decided not to tempt fate and traditionally chose the latter, in accordance with their mentality. (2) For the people, in whose mentality there is servility to the authorities and the inability to rational political and economic activity, which has been observed throughout history from the moment the Russian state organized by the Ruriks to the present day, democracy is nonsense. The inability of Russians to rational work is known as a definition rooted in Russian classical literature - Oblomovism. There can be no Democracy in a state without at least some more or less active participation of the people in politics, and, most importantly, no democratic state is viable without the initiative economic activity of its population. with the tacit consent of the people, all responsibility is assigned. In the very name of the people "Russian" there is a definition as an adjective. To the question - whose slave are you? The answer was Russian. That is, a serf (slave) of the Russian prince Rurik. The genus of Ruriks (Rurik translated from Scandinavian is a falcon) from the Rusa tribe. Hence the name - Rus.

     The Vikings of Rurik created a country whose population is Russian, that is, slaves. How can one not recall Lermontov's poem, which accurately defined Russia as a country of slaves and masters, a country in which subservience to any official has survived to this day:

    Farewell, unwashed Russia,
    Country of slaves, country of masters,
    And you, blue uniforms,
    And you, their devoted people.

     The “Russian world”, which Putin is trying to establish with the help of weapons in other countries, is a world of slaves and masters. (4)
    
      It is no secret that the Russian people support Putin's political vector for the restoration of the Russian Empire within the borders of the USSR. The war in Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine with the seizure of territories in favor of Russia, as well as numerous speeches by Putin and members of the State Duma with threatening territorial claims to Kazakhstan, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania do not cause resistance among the state-forming people. However, there is a very interesting moment in the attitude of the Russian people to the war in Ukraine. The fact is that from the beginning of the hostilities, the Russian army mainly consisted of Buryats, Dagestanis, Chechens, but due to failures at the front and heavy losses in manpower, Putin decided to take a forced step, namely, he announced mobilization. It was then that the state-forming people made their feet, showing a real attitude towards their status. Of the thousands of unfortunate patriots hastily leaving the borders of Russia, there are neither Buryats, nor Chechens, nor Dagestanis - entirely mental warriors of the Crimea.
 
  1. After Putin. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/84577.html
  2. People's fate, or each cricket has its own hearth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
  3. Empire democracy is contraindicated. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/23826.html
  4. The reason for the aggressiveness of the "Russian world". https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/85537.html

16.12.2022

 Алик Бахши

Русские как государствообразующий народ


  
    
      Чтобы подчеркнуть особую лидирующую роль русского народа, кремлёвские идеологи объявили его государствообразующим, внеся это определение в Конституцию, дабы все остальные народы знали своё место в Российской империи. Отныне русский язык как язык государствообразующего народа является единственным государственным языком в России, и, если в бытность СССР не требовалось обязательного знания русского языка, то теперь все остальные языки народов многонационального государства потеряли свой государственный статус. Надо заметить, что государствообразующий народ к образованию государства имеет весьма опосредованное отношение, ибо русское государство было образованно варягами Рюриками, затем их сменила династия германских царей, перешедших в православие. Кстати, Екатерина Великая, при которой Россия наиболее приросла территориями, и двух слов не могла связать по-русски. Наибольшего могущества Россия достигла при грузине Сталине, который не только вернул почти все потерянные земли по результатам Первой мировой войны, но и приобрёл новые (Тыва, Пруссия, Южный Сахалин, Курильские острова). Именно благодаря уникальным организаторским способностям Сталина и прекрасному пониманию менталитета русского народа российская империя стала вторым после США мировым лидером. СССР как государство, созданное Сталиным, просуществовало после его смерти ещё пол века, пока пришедшие к власти русские, не развалили его. Сегодня Путин похоже окончательно покончит с Россией как империей, вернув русский народ в пределы Московии как исконно русского государства. (1)

    С исторической точки зрения называть русский народ государствообразующим в корне неправильно. У русского народа была возможность управлять государством. Крах коммунистического режима поставил русский народ перед дилеммой выбора между свободой и диктатурой, и народ решил не испытывать судьбу и выбрал традиционно, сообразно своему менталитету, последнее. (2) Для народа, в менталитете которого присутствует раболепие перед властью и неспособность к рациональной политической и экономической деятельности, что наблюдается на протяжении всей истории с момента организованного Рюриками русского государства до наших дней, демократия это нонсенс. Неспособность русских к рациональному труду известна как укоренившееся из русской классической литературы определение – обломовщина. Не может быть Демократии в государстве без хоть какого–нибудь мало-мальски активного участия народа в политике и, самое главное, никакое демократическое государство не жизнеспособно без инициативной экономической деятельности его населения.(3).Русский народ нуждается в царе-батюшке, на которого с молчаливого согласия народа возлагается вся ответственность. В самом названии народа «русский» присутствует определение как прилагательное. На вопрос - ты чей холоп? Следовал ответ – русский. То есть холоп (раб) русского князя Рюрика. Род Рюриков (рюрик в переводе со скандинавского – сокол) из племени Руса. Отсюда собственно и название – Русь.

   Варяги Рюрики создали страну, население которой составляют русские, то есть рабы. Как тут не вспомнить стихотворение Лермонтова точно определившее Россию как страну рабов и господ, страну в которой раболепие перед любым чиновником сохранилось до наших дней:

   Прощай, немытая Россия,
   Страна рабов, страна господ,
   И вы, мундиры голубые,
   И ты, им преданный народ.

    «Русский мир», который Путин пытается с помощью оружия установить в других странах, это мир рабов и господ.(4)

    
     Не секрет, русский народ поддерживает политический вектор Путина на восстановление Российской империи в границах СССР. Война в Чечне, Грузии и Украине с отторжением территорий в пользу России, а также многочисленные выступления Путина и членов Государственной Думы с угрожающими территориальными претензиями к Казахстану, Молдове, Эстонии, Латвии и Литве не вызывают у государствообразующего народа противления. Однако, есть весьма интересный момент в отношение русского народа к войне в Украине. Дело в том, что с начала, боевых  действий русская армия в основном состояла из бурят, дагестанцев, чеченцев, но в связи с неудачами на фронте и большими потерями в живой силе Путин решился на вынужденный шаг, а именно объявил мобилизацию. Вот тут-то государствообразующий народ сделал ноги, выказывая действительное отношение к своему статусу. Из тысяч горе-патриотов, спешно покидающих пределы России, нет ни бурят, ни чеченцев, ни дагестанцев, - сплошь мысленные воители Крыма.  
 
1. После Путина. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/84577.html
2. Народная судьба, или каждому сверчку свой шесток. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
3. Империи демократия противопоказана. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/23826.html
4. Причина aгрессивности "русского мира". https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/85537.html

16.12.2022

  

 Жду когда же Путин вновь восстановит Конституцию России в Херсоне, иначе он будет её нарушителем,

I'm waiting for Putin to restore the Russian Constitution in Kherson again, otherwise he will be its violator,

Это называется разрухой. Типичная картина русского мира.