2014-12-03 03:21 UTC
Ok, you're in. But that's the last one
|
|
|
Guessing is closed
BitcoinNewbie15 - 02:47:42 McKnight - 05:38:34 chilly2k - 10:50 shimlbit - 4:37 dextronomous - 23:59 nikos64 - 03:15 ssaxe9 - 03:38:33 ValleyOfTheWolves - 14:10:06 Ptah - 3:21
|
|
|
1000% is just insane... woah...
Network inflation is estimated to be well under 2% daily while personal staking will earn more than twice that. Our transaction fees are no joke
|
|
|
Let's do it again...Whoever is closest to guessing the time on http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs for block 94,000 will receive 2500 BALLS for free! Block 94,000 is when we finally settle on a permanent 1000% yearly yield from staking If it passes your time, you lose, even if you are the closest. Whoever is the closest without the block going past their time wins Go! The time zone on the explorer appears to be GMT. One guess per person. Posting more than one official guess gets them all disqualified Same as last time...if you guess it to the minute, I'll double it to 5000 BALLS I'm writing them down, so don't try to edit it later. 15 minutes to go
|
|
|
8hrs from now!
I'm going to put you down for 4:37, that's 8 hours from your post
|
|
|
8hrs from now!
Post hours:minutes in gmt
|
|
|
Let's do it again...Whoever is closest to guessing the time on http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs for block 94,000 will receive 2500 BALLS for free! Block 94,000 is when we finally settle on a permanent 1000% yearly yield from staking If it passes your time, you lose, even if you are the closest. Whoever is the closest without the block going past their time wins Go! The time zone on the explorer appears to be GMT. One guess per person. Posting more than one official guess gets them all disqualified Same as last time...if you guess it to the minute, I'll double it to 5000 BALLS You have 30 minutes to guess before entries are closed
|
|
|
I've been talking with the state and federal government for well over a year and people call me a scammer all the time. Doesn't mean anything, obviously
|
|
|
TIX was fair, don't lie; it's a year long whine so I'm over your tears about it. The algorithm is scrypt-jane, though, so it's not comparable at all with varying n's That's not the only place difficulty adjustments are calculated, mudda...however, you are proving that you can do nothing but change one or two lines and clone a bunch of shit without actually taking the time to understand how everything really works. You are showing your amateur card. You sure you wanna go down this road with me again? I've stepped my personal game up in the last year or so and it looks like you have fallen very far behind now Man...it really is tough to check the explorer and see it adjusted every block ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) In case you are too dense to figure it out, difficulty is the 3.5's. Don't forget this had over 800 Terahash on it for several days. Many blocks were being found per second on very reputable pools. Do I really need to get more unaffiliated, trustworthy forum members and pool ops that were there at launch to come in here and vouch for the coin's fairness? Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=2016&hi=20162016 2014-11-01 09:20:17 1 40 3.552 80640 0.0334606 92.3891 0% 2015 2014-11-01 09:20:17 1 40 3.55 80600 0.0334838 92.3891 0% 2014 2014-11-01 09:20:16 1 40 3.547 80560 0.0334838 92.3891 0% 2013 2014-11-01 09:20:13 1 40 3.545 80520 0.0334722 92.389 0% 2012 2014-11-01 09:20:12 1 40 3.543 80480 0.0334722 92.389 0% 2011 2014-11-01 09:20:11 1 40 3.54 80440 0.0334722 92.389 0% 2010 2014-11-01 09:20:09 1 40 3.538 80400 0.0334722 92.389 0% 2009 2014-11-01 09:20:08 1 40 3.535 80360 0.0334722 92.389 0% 2008 2014-11-01 09:20:06 1 40 3.533 80320 0.0334722 92.3889 0% 2007 2014-11-01 09:20:05 1 40 3.531 80280 0.0334722 92.3889 0% 2006 2014-11-01 09:20:04 1 40 3.528 80240 0.0334838 92.3889 0% 2005 2014-11-01 09:20:04 1 40 3.526 80200 0.0334954 92.3889 0% 2004 2014-11-01 09:20:02 1 40 3.523 80160 0.0334954 92.3889 0% 2003 2014-11-01 09:20:01 1 40 3.521 80120 0.0334954 92.3889 0% 2002 2014-11-01 09:20:01 1 40 3.518 80080 0.0335069 92.3889 0% 2001 2014-11-01 09:20:00 1 40 3.516 80040 0.0335185 92.3889 0% 2000 2014-11-01 09:19:59 1 40 3.514 80000 0.0335185 92.3889 0% Now let's go ahead and look at the first 23 blocks I used to set up the network and avoid an instamine Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=23&hi=2323 2014-11-01 07:51:07 1 40 185.359 920 0.16581 92.3272 0% 22 2014-11-01 07:49:13 1 40 185.42 880 0.172025 92.3258 0% 21 2014-11-01 07:47:44 1 40 187.02 840 0.17919 92.3248 0% 20 2014-11-01 07:34:18 1 40 187.742 800 0.178819 92.3155 0% 19 2014-11-01 07:27:44 1 40 187.67 760 0.183669 92.3109 0% 18 2014-11-01 07:27:16 1 40 187.576 720 0.193553 92.3106 0% 17 2014-11-01 07:26:59 1 40 187.643 680 0.204745 92.3104 0% 16 2014-11-01 07:25:28 1 40 188.417 640 0.216481 92.3093 0% 15 2014-11-01 07:18:31 1 40 188.309 600 0.226088 92.3045 0% 14 2014-11-01 07:18:20 1 40 206.46 560 0.242118 92.3044 0% 13 2014-11-01 04:58:28 1 40 232.184 520 0.163611 92.2073 0% 12 2014-11-01 01:57:59 1 40 232.609 480 0.0519097 92.0819 0% 11 2014-11-01 01:54:20 1 40 233.594 440 0.0540972 92.0794 0% 10 2014-11-01 01:47:14 1 40 233.555 400 0.0545718 92.0745 0% 9 2014-11-01 01:46:28 1 40 235.37 360 0.0601042 92.0739 0% 8 2014-11-01 01:34:16 1 40 235.489 320 0.0591435 92.0655 0% 7 2014-11-01 01:32:32 1 40 251.823 280 0.0664005 92.0642 0% 6 2014-10-31 23:51:36 1 40 251.728 240 0.00737269 91.9942 0% 5 2014-10-31 23:51:08 1 40 251.762 200 0.00851852 91.9938 0% 4 2014-10-31 23:49:56 1 40 253.95 160 0.00981481 91.993 0% 3 2014-10-31 23:36:25 1 40 254.188 120 0.0037037 91.9836 0% 2 2014-10-31 23:34:03 1 40 256.003 80 0.00392361 91.982 0% 1 2014-10-31 23:22:45 1 40 256.003 40 0 91.9741 So my "solo instamine" was with blocks at significantly higher difficulty to sync initial nodes up and get a few checkpoints in. This is what someone who knows what they are doing to launch a fair coin that won't break does. Just because you aren't used to legitimacy around here doesn't mean those who do it right are in the wrong Just putting this on the newest page so it doesn't seem like I haven't responded
|
|
|
Block time has not changed at all. There have been over 1000 blocks since the fork kicked in yesterday so the timing is exactly the same at roughly 720 blocks per day
OK. Is there something I need to do to speed things up? Why the disparity in confirmation times for mint-by-stakes from 4 hours prior? Isn't 2 confirms in 12 hours for my transfer from Bittrex to my wallet extremely slow? Yes, it is, but that makes no sense as blocks are being found every few minutes
|
|
|
48 hours I only staked just over 1k balls and i have over 40k so it looks stuck to me, since this morning it still says 8 hours to stake, it hasn't moved and wallet is unlocked..Is there anything wrong with staking?.Also haven't sold or moved any balls for 3 days was hoping it would stake and accumulate.. I am ill so not much online, will be back tomorrow..
@ iGotSpots In my wallet disappeared a block of about 16,000 BALLS. What can you say about this situation? How is it possible or what happens? Please answer me. Thank You. This has been covered several times. The wallet has a bug, in that is doesn't report stakes correctly. The coins are currently staking, and will reappear once they have matured. You can get your accurate total by going to the debug/console and typing "getinfo". Thanks @chilly2k. That means you the number of coins that disappear in balance, are staking, but when they finish staking, then appear again in balance? Yes, and it can be really weird. I think only the first stake is missing. If you have 2 stakes going on some of the coins show in the stakebalance. Have no fear, the coins are still safely in your wallet. getinfo will always be accurate
|
|
|
I have 6+ M coins in my Stake balance (none anywhere else) that have been there most of the day, if not longer. The grey arrow says nothing is staking because I don't have mature coins. How can I get the Stake balance back to my regular balance or how much longer do I have to wait?
Goto "Transactions" tab in the client and hover your mouse pointer over the latest transactions (icon to the far left of thr transaction) and it'll tell you how many blocks til that stake is available, (all up it takes 120 blocks so yeah can be awhile). Thanks, but the total unconfirmed transactions is less than .02M. That is not the reason. It is! It doesn't show you the coins that are staking just the stake earned, but until the blocks are up the whole stake won't be released. OK, got it. It seems like the confirmations have slowed WAY down ever since about midnight last night. Something is wrong. None of the 13 Mint by stakes I received from Dec 1 have finished confirming, and they are still at the same number of confirmations as they were last night (the oldest stuck at 82), about 12 hours ago. It's worth noting that my mint by stake from 4 hours earlier on Nov 30 has 215 confirms. I did successfully do my monthly send of all available M to Bittrex and back and that return has confirmed 2 of 6 since 10pm last night. It used to be MUCH faster. Block time has not changed at all. There have been over 1000 blocks since the fork kicked in yesterday so the timing is exactly the same at roughly 720 blocks per day
|
|
|
If i send or receive M in my wallet, then would the maturity be reset for all the coins in my wallet and i will have to wait for 24 hrs to stake for all the coins or just the new ones i received?
Just the new ones
|
|
|
So when our coin sits at Bittrex, is Bittrex collecting a stake on those coins?
Probably. Bittrex is known for doing anything to make a buck. They even go as far as getting insider information from devs and running bots on their own site to accumulate cheap coins. Wouldn't put that as a possible procedure at some exchanges, but there's no evidence that Bittrex is or isn't doing that. There needs to be regulations on some things in cryptos. Imagine if the stock market didn't have some form of regulations, the elite would certainly price fix and manipulate the market to there favor completely. I've spoke with Richie before about just ripping all the staking code out; I believe that is what they do While badgering Cryptsy to add us, I learned for sure that they do actually stake coins that have over a 24 hour maturity, which puts us right on the cutoff. That's part of the reason I was pretty mad at Cryptsy last week and stopped trying to get us added there. Imagine the largest wallet staking nonstop in a system designed to get around fees. Easily transferred in-system to not pay any fees on a totally staking node. It would be catastrophic to our inflation control system for both BALLS and MMXIV for us to be added and have that happen So when some of you think we may be lazy not getting added to new exchanges, there are actual, concrete reasons we are doing what we are doing
|
|
|
SO can this problem be resolved as cant get old wallet to work How do I convert my wallet.dat over to new wallet as its not working when I replace new wallet with old wallet that has coins in. I get the following error when re scanning ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FdcbC2.png&t=663&c=obyKhoh9FY7t1A) Did you repairwallet? Wallet was working fine before the updated new wallets and was working fine since backing up and using new one I get the following error Yes, I understand. Have you tried repairwallet or salvagewallet? Type the error into google, I'm sure there will be a solution. That's all I would do to give advice anyway if a wallet is borked I know the wallet is fine as just found old rar for the old version and loaded ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FddlzF.png&t=663&c=UMqD5HWcdoa9bg) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FddlHi.png&t=663&c=9CFQBjlqgGm3Pg) So I don't get how it works on that one yet does not work on new one. Managed to dump priv keys and collect them going to see if can port to new wallet via import option What version does it work on? That looks like the old blockchain EDIT: I see your addresses start with 1, not M - It's probably not going to work. If it's from the old blockchain then it definitely won't. We did a coinswap on Bittrex like 6 months ago
|
|
|
SO can this problem be resolved as cant get old wallet to work How do I convert my wallet.dat over to new wallet as its not working when I replace new wallet with old wallet that has coins in. I get the following error when re scanning ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FdcbC2.png&t=663&c=obyKhoh9FY7t1A) Did you repairwallet? Wallet was working fine before the updated new wallets and was working fine since backing up and using new one I get the following error Yes, I understand. Have you tried repairwallet or salvagewallet? Type the error into google, I'm sure there will be a solution. That's all I would do to give advice anyway if a wallet is borked
|
|
|
SO can this problem be resolved as cant get old wallet to work How do I convert my wallet.dat over to new wallet as its not working when I replace new wallet with old wallet that has coins in. I get the following error when re scanning ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FdcbC2.png&t=663&c=obyKhoh9FY7t1A) Did you repairwallet?
|
|
|
With the 10000% on block 85000 the coin transformed to rubish, low buy orders and people just want to sell for what they Get...i think the price Will never return to what it Was... Im also loosing money started to buy at 0.0000217 now i dont know what to do ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) If you're in it long term, the current price means nothing. If you're looking for a quick flip, I could see why you'd be pissed
|
|
|
There are only 76 of these for sale at any price on both Bittrex or Poloniex total. That's crazy
|
|
|
Hi!
May i recommend that dev now starts to buy up cheap snowballcoins and then send them directly to destruction! This is an effective way to force the price upwards!
Rarity of a coin, has its own value in the cryptocommunity! vademecum1974
If you want a rare coin, MMXIV is for you. Still less than 2200 of those You're basically asking me to burn $20 bills with a box of matches
|
|
|
|