Such a talented guy you Maus0728, congratulations! You won in 3 category at once damn bruh , 1st place of hand drawn contest 1st place of digital art 2nd place of craftmanship Unbelievable achievement. You just bagged $2,000 from the contest  , worthy talent. Keep up the good work , we love to see them. I want to say I really loved your submission, it's one of my favorites. Congrats for your amazing art work.
FACE PAINTING
Because drawing on a canvas is too mainstream...
I looking for extraordinary one and Here i bring you painting roo in the face.
[...]
|
|
|
|
c'est mieux exprimé ainsi, en effet.
mais ce n'est pas important, je ne veux pas polémiquer là dessus.
Quand tu dis ça tu donnes vraiment l'impression d'avoir d'autres explications. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu ne veux pas en dire plus alors que c'est le sujet du thread. |
|
|
|
C'est le feu à l'intérieur de la tour qui a causé l'effondrement en fragilisant la structure au bas de la tour.
non. mais ce n'est pas important, je ne vais pas polémiquer là dessus. Comment ça non? c'est ce qu'on a toujours entendu dire  |
|
|
|
Je pige pas, si tu rentres juste tes 2 secrets, qui n'ont pas du tout l'air d'être des clé privées, comment peux tu dire que l'utilisateur est le seul qui a accès aux clés privées ?
Pareil je ne vois pas comment c'est possible Ils n'ont pas l'air de vendre ça comme une solution de "cold storage" sécurisée mais comme un outil simple et pratique pour détenir des bitcoins, à destination de la masse. Ca peut être une solution intéressante pour entrer dans l'univers des cryptos pour stocker quelques centaines d'€. |
|
|
|
Les services de réanimation se remplissent inexorablement. Comment va-ton faire pour soigner les autres pathologies ?
« Si gouverner, c’est prévoir, c’est agir pour l’avenir, qui seul dépend de nous, plutôt que pour le présent, qui, enfant du passé, n’est pas plus en notre pouvoir dès qu’il vient de naître ». Blaise Étienne Manuel J'ai l'impression qu'on se dirige vers un mur à 160 à l'heure et que le gouvernement attend d'être au pied du mur pour aviser et trouver une solution magique... A moins qu'il s'imagine réellement que fermer les bars de quelques villes est la solution miracle  |
|
|
|
I was not aware of the long lasting health issues of Novak Djokovic and i am watching the match i thought it would be an easy match for Novak Djokovic but Stefanos Tsitsipas surprised me by coming back strong after Djokovic was on match point in the third set and then come back to win that set and then winning the 4th set as well and the first game of the fifth set and if Stefanos Tsitsipas wins it would be a great comeback against one of the best players but i am still rooting for Novak Djokovic to win the match.
Edit:
We have Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal in the final.
I stopped watching the match and magically Novak Djokovic won the rest of the games. I have to watch what happened because when i was watching Djokovic was struggling with the backhand return of Stefanos.
Unfortunately I think we have not the final only... we have the winner of the tournament too. Djokovic is not in good enough shape to beat Nadal. Odds for him to win the contest are very small. It's sad for him |
|
|
|
That is enough news for me to place small bet on Tsitsi on one of the bookies that grade forfeit as a regular bet. Always worth a shot. Wbet7 for instance considered match as regular if 1 game has been played. Have to check if that is still true. Some other bookies like Nitrogen grade it as regular if one set has been played. And some void the bet even if somebody forfeits two points from the end of the match. I wasn't really able to find more sources to confirm this, but I also placed a (handicap) on Tsitsipas. On the women side, I expect Kenin to win but Swiatek was impressive this French Open and! What is a bit surprising to me, is that the bookies see Swiatek as the favorite (@1.55) ?! Swiatek is really on fire. She comfortably defeated number 2, Simona Halep, Kenin on the other hand had just 1 straight set win out of last 4 matches. The match between Djokovic and Tsitsipas is about to start and there are no any official news about calling off by Djokovic. This could be a competitive match if Djokovic comes all fine in the court but Djokovic seems to be struggling with his fitness and it would be difficult for him. I'm a little bit disappointed about Djokovic, I thought he was in a really good shape this year and he could win the tournament. But now his fitness seems to be too bad to overcome Nadal. It's a pity. |
|
|
|
Lots of gambling sites now but I suggest you go with the sites that have already existed for years and make sure they have an ANN thread in the forum, that will help you find real feedback about the site, this one seems new so it could be legit but the risk is high as anytime like any new sites they could disappear.
Yes, they seem to use a provably fair algorithm https://funxbets.com/provably-fair but it's not a guarantee against exit scams or withdrawal issues, so it's better to be careful and to not gamble big amounts on these kind of sites. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the information and detailed explanation. AFAIK, it is possible to change player seed on many gambling platforms and this should increase randomness. Few months in the gambling industry and I've never seen anyone ever questioning: How am I supposed to be sure that what am I playing is based on pure luck?
The owners could have simply programmed the numbers in a way to always be profitable, but not 100% lucky. The problem is that even if the admins were honest and said that the numbers of their game are getting generated randomly, there's no proof that they do. You still have to trust them and since we're talking about entrepreneurs, we can't be sure they're not lying. By making the program open source, yes, you do have made a big step, but still, the client can't view the back-end's code to check that the files are the open sourced ones.
[...]
I'm sorry but being provably fair doesn't mean being perfectly random. With this system, you can still chose combinations less often played by users. For example it's well known people like to play dates of birth in this kind of games or figures deemed to be lucky numbers as 7, 1, 13, etc That is why gamblers prefer to bet on lucky numbers aka date of birth, wedding day, etc. Btw, is it possible to achieve 100% authentic randomness? AFAIK authentic randomness can only be achieved with physical randomness like real dices, coins, card decks, nuclear activity, etc. But here we are talking about unbiased randomness, it's quite different. Actually, if we talk of authentic randomness, as in random in the strictest sense of the word, there is no such a thing, not even in the physical roll of a dice, or flip of a coin, and so on. And so we are only settling on an acceptable amount of randomness, something which far exceeds our unaided human computation. I guess this is good enough for RNGs. I agree with you but I was talking about "authentic randomness" with the meaning of being the opposite of pseudorandomness... I agree with you perfect randomness is really hard to achieve and maybe not even reachable. But there is also randomness in the choice of your not perfectly random dices... |
|
|
|
AFAIK authentic randomness can only be achieved with physical randomness like real dices, coins, card decks, nuclear activity, etc. But here we are talking about unbiased randomness, it's quite different.
I believe it's vice versa. I've seen articles about people rolling physical dice to their advantage, coins being rigged with one side slightly harder than another and things like wind or surface playing their role. So I think that only a virtual dice can fall to one of the six sides with exactly equal probability and thus truly randomly. And of course many games offer not random results, but with the special outcome probabilities that a player chose (which can also be done only virtually). As for the specifics of a provably fair system, maybe it doesn't matter that much, as long as there's no way a casino would cheat. I disagree with that. A computer can easily generate outcomes with a specific probability value but it doesn't mean the outcomes will be really random. For example 123456 123456 123456 is an outcome with an equal occurrence of all sides of a dice, but it's not random. |
|
|
|
Moyenne hebdomadaire le 8/9 : 15 décès
ça fait juste du +367% en un mois...
oui, et quand on passe du 8 mars au 8 avril, de 3 à 975 décès, ça fait juste du + 32 400 % en un mois... te rends tu compte que l'évolution du dernier mois écoulé est juste 90 fois plus lente qu'en mars ? 80 vieux obèses meurent par jour, et tu penses qu'on va tous mourir avant noël ? tu es ridicule. tu ferais bien de ne pas acheter de cadeaux pour ce noël pour tes enfants, vu qu'ils vont mourir avant, ce serait un gaspillage inutile. En effet, c'est mieux que si c'était pire je te l'accorde... Non je ne crois pas que l'on va tous mourir avant noel, en revanche que l'on va connaître des problèmes insurmontables de saturation des services critiques des hôpitaux ça me parait déjà acté. Alors pas sûr que tu penseras encore aux cadeaux de Noël lorsqu'on va t'annoncer que si tes enfants ont un pépin on risque de ne pas pouvoir les soigner.
Ca y est, on attaque les 20 000 nouveaux cas/jour et les 10% de positivité, oklm  |
|
|
|
Thanks for the information and detailed explanation. AFAIK, it is possible to change player seed on many gambling platforms and this should increase randomness. Few months in the gambling industry and I've never seen anyone ever questioning: How am I supposed to be sure that what am I playing is based on pure luck?
The owners could have simply programmed the numbers in a way to always be profitable, but not 100% lucky. The problem is that even if the admins were honest and said that the numbers of their game are getting generated randomly, there's no proof that they do. You still have to trust them and since we're talking about entrepreneurs, we can't be sure they're not lying. By making the program open source, yes, you do have made a big step, but still, the client can't view the back-end's code to check that the files are the open sourced ones.
[...]
I'm sorry but being provably fair doesn't mean being perfectly random. With this system, you can still chose combinations less often played by users. For example it's well known people like to play dates of birth in this kind of games or figures deemed to be lucky numbers as 7, 1, 13, etc That is why gamblers prefer to bet on lucky numbers aka date of birth, wedding day, etc. Btw, is it possible to achieve 100% authentic randomness? AFAIK authentic randomness can only be achieved with physical randomness like real dices, coins, card decks, nuclear activity, etc. But here we are talking about unbiased randomness, it's quite different. |
|
|
|
Few months in the gambling industry and I've never seen anyone ever questioning: How am I supposed to be sure that what am I playing is based on pure luck?
The owners could have simply programmed the numbers in a way to always be profitable, but not 100% lucky. The problem is that even if the admins were honest and said that the numbers of their game are getting generated randomly, there's no proof that they do. You still have to trust them and since we're talking about entrepreneurs, we can't be sure they're not lying. By making the program open source, yes, you do have made a big step, but still, the client can't view the back-end's code to check that the files are the open sourced ones.
[...]
I'm sorry but being provably fair doesn't mean being perfectly random. With this system, you can still choose combinations less often played by users. For example it's well known people like to play dates of birth in this kind of games or figures deemed to be lucky numbers as 7, 1, 13, etc |
|
|
|
Yes you're right, this is the probability to lose 11times in a row when you play 11times in a row AFAIK but if you play many times odds to get a losing streak of 11 loss will be different IMO.
This is not just your opinion, its mathematical fact. This is described by Bernoulli's law. If I remember correctly, if you flip a coin 100 times, you get a sequence of 6-7 heads in a row with 100% probability. With 1000 tosses, you are guaranteed a sequence of 9-10 heads or tails. And so on. 100% probability? No it can't be 100% It's the number of 100items combinations with at least 6 heads in a row divided by the total number of combinations ie 2 100. There are many combinations with at least 6 heads in a row, but not 2 100. |
|
|
|
@Saint-loup Neymar got very lucky in this case, but now he really needs to perform on the pitch by scoring goals and help PSG win more games.
League operators usually want to give special protections on their biggest stars (to keep traffics, TV audience ratings and income) and I do not doubt that Neymar is one of biggest starts in Ligue I. I can understand the final result of Ligue I's investigation on Neymar case. However, Ligue I has a history of very strict bans on rule breaks and Neymar case can be a bad precedent on the league. It's an interesting point of view, I didn't think about that to be honest. But it would imply that the commission is not fair neither unbiased. That's a bold statement. |
|
|
|
Et j'anticipe à peine en disant que ces restrictions vont s'inscrire dans le droit commun, tout comme l'ont été celles de l'état d'urgence après charlie hebdo.
Alors vous faite comme vous voulez, mais moi j'appelle ça un enculage à sec avec du verre pilé.
Tout ça pour 30 000 morts en France d'âge médian de 71 ans. Magnifique.
Ca fait 10 ans que mon ratio temps passé en France/temps passé au Canada diminue, et ce n'est pas avec cette enième crise que ça va changer.
L'herbe n'est pas forcément plus verte ailleurs, l'Allemagne a 4 fois moins de nouveaux cas et de décès que nous, pour une population plus importante et ils vont limiter les déplacements entre régions et instaurer un quasi couvre-feu à Berlin le soir. |
|
|
|
Le nombre de mort n'est pas en train de diminuer, il est au contraire en pleine augmentation
moyenne hebdomadaire des décès en france : 67 le 28/09/20, 68 le 29/09/20, 71 le 30/09/20, 72 le 01/10/20, 70 le 02/10/20, 71 le 03/10/20, 72 le 04/10/20, 70 le 05/10/20, 68 le 06/10/20, 70 le 07/10/20. le nombre de morts n'est pas en pleine augmentation, il est très stable à un bas niveau. Forcément si tu prends les chiffres sur 10 jours à peine, on ne va pas voir grand chose... Mais sur un mois déjà? Tu ne vois pas une certaine augmentation? Moyenne hebdomadaire le 8/9 : 15 décès ça fait juste du +367% en un mois... |
|
|
|
saint-loup, il n'y a pas de deuxième vague. il ne faut pas regarder la courbe des faux positifs et des asymptomatiques (18 000), il faut regarder uniquement la courbe des décès (80). je l'ai déjà dit ici : si on arrêtait de faire des tests à tord et à travers sous prétexte de gratuité, on arrêterait de trouver des faux positifs et des asymptomatiques. évidemment qu'avec une prime de 50 euros par faux positif, les labos en trouvent en pagaille des faux positifs. à l'inverse, si demain on fait 10 fois plus de tests qu'hier, on va trouver 180 000 faux positifs et asymptomatiques, la femme affaire... et le bon motif pour persécuter la population avec des interdiction de travailler et de sortir de chez soi...
Le nombre de mort n'est pas en train de diminuer, il est au contraire en pleine augmentation, idem pour les réanimations, le plan blanc vient d'être à nouveau déclenché en Ile-de-France. Le pire est à venir. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
