Finally the developer/ author himself has made it to the forums! Now it's my turn to respond to your replies.Firstly, I'll answer UserU directly - and explain a bit about our ad blocking detection systems our security partners use.
UserU - all 3 of our separate security partners detected you were using an adblocker - which is against our terms of service, which you accepted when you first signed up to the application. During our email exchanges (of which we are saddened to see you didn't include the full chain, just some emails picked out by you), we told you the reasons why some users might not realise they are blocking adverts when they are. If you would like to ask for a copy of the report we get from our security partners - which does include sensitive information (IP address, device ID's etc) please feel free to contact us. We are transparent why we do things.
We utilise 3 different application security partners and when we process a claim, we get a report from each of them stating if they have broken any of our 3 pillars of our terms and conditions. These are - Ad blocking, Captcha success and the use of multiple accounts on a device. We know no system is perfect - and we do get false positives we are sure of it - that is why ask for dialog between users we suspend and us. We employ several support staff to handle this. If we were scammers, surely we would just ban everyone and not reply?!
That's the same cookie-cutter response you've been dishing out. Over 90% incorrect submissions, you've used ad-blockers, you're accessing it from China or VPN, yada yada yada. Anything else you're hiding up your sleeves?
I'm well-aware of the reviews before I joined after seeing people complaining about the ban, yet I gave you the benefit of the doubt and installed the apps. Mind you, I'm using a stock non-rooted OnePlus 3 and I don't give two shits about installing ad-blocker, entering incorrect values or accessing from China (as per claim from your email) since I'm satisfied with the OS itself.
The CAPTCHAs served were clear as day and all entries were accepted with the "Good CAPTCHA!".
Funnily of all faucets I've registered on, I've only been banned from your faucet, and that's right after I submitted the first claim a few days ago before that Friday.
40,000 Satoshi min withdraw, that's a high minimum withdrawal and it should be obvious if we were cheating way before the cashout, you should have banned us yet you didn't because you just wanted us to waste our time for the
nasty surprise. In the email,
I've asked for proofs if I cheated, yet you suddenly diverted.And if the negative reviews keep mounting up, with the exact same scenario that bans were issued during withdrawals, it's definitely your problem, not ours.
Also, you said I've been hiding the full chain? Here it is in full, let the community judge by themselves, shall we?
Faucethub in our experience isn't legitmate. We try and offer low withdrawl amounts, and we tell our users to claim as often as they can if they are unsure we payout.
FaucetHub isn't legitimate? I'd love to see how the developers would respond to this. At least they don't pay their users to
shill positive reviews like you do!
Of course we respond to reviews from people who have broken our terms. Wouldn't you?
We have never paid for any reviews, in fact we work very closely with Google in the reporting of accounts that do contact us offering cheap (usually around 5p per review) reviews. You'll notice the influx of reviews is when we either post a news story on the app asking if users would be so kind to review us, or we through up an in app notification after a user has been paid successfully. We find users who get banned for breaking terms and conditions are very keen to post reviews - which is why we get an influx on a Friday when we process payments, but users who actually get paid are not so keen, so need a little prodding!
Of course, because they don't deserve the ban at all after doing the menial tasks for you! Advertisers pay you as a publisher to serve the ads to end users, end users click for months to earn the Bitcoin fractions and all you have to do is to pocket 100% of their earnings and throw a wrench in the works. Who wouldn't be mad, eh?
Of course we offer second chances to users! Why wouldn't we?
Because you're just looking to fool them twice. You were lucky because my first cashout was made to an incorrect address, or else I'd have found out sooner.
"We'll unban your account, just forfeit your current payout, wait for your next cashout and SHAZAM! Oops, too bad you didn't see that ban coming... again." Of course we are "trying to their fullest extent to not pay". We never pay out users who broke our terms. We didn't back out of anything - if you actually read the first email we sent, we asked for proof to be sent across. Every device is different, we cannot tell a user what to do or what proof we would need for proving there device isn't rooted etc. And again - no fake reviews.
Sorry for the wall of response - that's my mistake not knowing about this thread. If you would like to discuss this further, I have turned on notifications to this thread so should be able to respond much quicker in the future.
Really? If you think those negative reviews are allegations, feel free to promote your Bitcoin faucets here, I'll be waiting
Show Posts
