You are spamming this forum with your trash post. Go spam elsewhere, I ain't asking about the pizza story.

Did you really read my question?


Just like these new projects, bitcoin too wasn't popular at the beginning. Rome wasn't built in a day.

Forgive my capturing the title that way. I didn't know how best to express my inquiry within a limited space.

With so many new projects issuing giveaways and airdrops to announce their presence this day, I am wondering if Satoshi Nakamoto at any point did an airdrop for Bitcoin? I have searched the forum for any clue on this question but couldn't get my finger on any thread that treated it. Thus my question now.

Could any of the earlier adopters here tell us how it was at the beginning with Bitcoin.

Haaba, my guy wetin happen na?

I think you will have a hard time getting in if you keep supplying that Bitcoin address here where campaign instruction reads, address MUST be SegWit.

Why not make your pick from these selected few since the selection was made only recently.

One can still be wrongly determined. This thing takes accurate information to be realized. And that information has to be activated for that to come to pass. This is why I believe that information isn't really power but Potential power until it is activated that's when it becomes power.

I think sincerely that taxes in cryptocurrency will come as interest rates just like banks do. It would be changed based on per Satoshi. It shouldn't matter how small or big anyone is cashing out. I don't see any issues with that. The government sees to that and I don't think it will be any problem for American citizens who are already used to paying taxes.

You may want to fix that error in post requirement.

No doubt, I believe this thoughtless action of yours for posting this irrelevance here will get you blacklisted in Yahoo's campaigns. I wish you seriously even get tagged. But of what use is it tagging a noob account.

The war of attrition already started here? Damn! Trump fooled me watching the cable for his Chinese attack.

BTW, this thread should be locked for peace to reign. I believe the issue has been resolved, except both parties love the sound of their keyboards. Silence is golden most times.

What incentives do you really get spamming this thread, Gyrsur? I guess you derive a level of unexplainable sadistic pleasure prodding Darkstar. Is it plain envy for attaining a height you dream of and haven't been able to attain?

Dude, just go troll elsewhere.

Yah, I know the best would be to ignore you...

Obviously, jekjek and LegitizeDrops are the same person.

I guess you didn't realize you just slipped by posting from your freaky alt account. A campaign manager with this type of behavior on a forum like this that seeks to restore quality and constructive post level is a bad influence.

By the way, you can't edit your title thread for error in "campaign"

Michael Gyrsur

Now it's clear you are an obvious troll. But isn't such an ignominious game for noobs or posters lower in rank than yours? Ok, now that we are at it I would like to remind you of your parole/probation status at BitBlender. Lutpin, take note. This isn't making constructive and quality posts. It is spamming.

Michael Gyrsur Jackson.

Now, Michael can you hear me?

Nothing in life is truly isolated. For one to get the true value of anything it has to be compared with another. That is what bitcoin does. It has to square up to a fiat. Dollar is the most widely accepted of all the fiats (Pounds and Euros inclusive). And that is why bitcoin is paired with the dollar. So, when people advocate for the abolition of banks so that cryptocurrency can become mainstream I look at them and take a good laugh. Abolition of banks will mean goodbye to fiat, right? That isn't going to be possible.

Ok, to be honest I am still pondering the relevance of that to this thread. Does anyone know, apart from it being spammy or are we having a belated anniversary for Michael?

What the heck will gauging people or the press because they think differently achieve? You ask me about this and I would say it's going to achieve nothing. This forum isn't run as a communist state where zombies are expected to exist. This is a democracy and you expect people to have and express diverge opinions and views. People should feel free to make their choices whether to FUD or FOMO on Bitcoin. It shouldn't deter anyone from making their financial decisions.

By the way OP, if you know this much here as Junior Member, I bet you know more.

There's a reason the search engines are there. Go Google that question. It's a straightforward one and I believe the answer you seek is there.

And you are sure the services are without any hidden charges? I asked that because in the past we had seen such services come up only to turn around and demand certain payments as subscription levels.

If a campaign title reads "Full" like it is here, it means there is no available slot. So, why still apply?

Your guess is as good as mine or as anyone's here. The noobs have discovered that they can't rank up with mere increase in activity (which of course is dependent on post counts which needlessly encouraged spamming). With this awareness, the noobs as well as certain veteran members have stopped junk posting. Some have actually stopped posting entirely while those who ran numerous accounts are now concentrating on one account and improving on it as account farming is now frown upon here. I guess this explains that.


This is one of such cases in question of how to spam. Yes, I nitpicked it but does anyone even understand what this post is saying in relation to the issue at hand or the quote he attempted addressing?

Below is the complete quote of the above:

Ok, dude. Would you mind explaining what it is your services are if you think OgNasty is in the wrong.

Otherwise, this below may stand true: