Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 10:00:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 »
681  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 10:39:53 PM
The fees have severely harmed bitcoin but they have definitely not killed it, there are still solutions in the pipeline and people have belief for the future. If it persists for a long time then it can really damage bitcoin but it won't come to that.

The name you were looking for was "Lightning Network" but I am sorry to say but I have investigated it, read the white paper
and the hubs are banker, Bob turned into Alan Greenspan, Alice ran off with the milkman but please don't let me stop you from reading it.
https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

Hang in if you can afford to loose or get out whilst you still can

682  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smart people have bought a bitcoin on: January 23, 2018, 10:33:21 PM
Bitcoin price is unstable as hell, it really depends on a lot of news from goverments and banks all over the world. It is useless to say about the growth in the future at the moment bitcoin has a stable profitable growth since its begining Smiley

It won't scale, fees are a rip off and that other pledge of being safe from government intervention
is another shoe to fall and the price has never been stable to use as a currency.

I am sure your a nice guy, smile, turn away slowly and head towards the door and remember to tip the
miners $15 or they won't open the door.
683  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smart people have bought a bitcoin on: January 23, 2018, 10:28:01 PM
I did not buy a bitcoin Sad  But I did mine one Cheesy.  I was skeptical about renting mining equipment but so far so good.  I got a little over a bitcoin with a small investment.  I wanted to go with Hashflare because of their reputation, but they raised their prices.  I went with a newer company in Amsterdam, and after 3 months finally got a little over a bitcoin, but I keep investing.  I really do think BTC price will go higher.

The company i chose is Hashzone.  And it seems that for a limited time they're offering 20 GH/s free mining power with new accounts.  More info here:  https://hashzone.io/?ref=126775  But efinitely buy/mine and hold.  Dont be pressured into selling.

Wow and why not go for a full page advert and if mining was so profitable then miners would not be renting out the
equipment but using it themselves so I hope you brought the equipment and go bust because it's the Bitcoin miners
and the development team with their greed that blew it up for everyone

I bid you $12.55 for a 1080 GPU
684  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Smart people have bought a bitcoin on: January 23, 2018, 10:23:30 PM
if smart people pay $25 just to store 250 bytes of data on a block chain then I must be a billionaire
because I have a whole 1GB movie on my disk drive

Come on guys its turned into a scam and was these "Smart" people to pay a software developer like
me to research the lightning network then they would understand that it's designed to host a network
of banks that they are calling hubs and they would understand that the cat has been let out the bag

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

685  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 09:46:43 PM
But what the heck is that pack of the 1sat/B transaction with the size more than 40 MB?
Protest vote and people are sending $0.01 maybe and I don't blame them myself

Why don't these sites just give us the cost in $UDS because that's what we pump into the machine

You broke my browser you know
686  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 09:36:02 PM
Nope. Already near 19% of transactions are using SegWit and transaction pool is not so big as it was. Also now a correction continues so price of almost every cryptocurrency is very low

Mempool at about 135,000 today and in the past it was at the same number so if fees are set by "Market Forces"
then how come they are about $15 today and in the past when the pool had about the same number were we charge
$40 ?

Monopoly by miners maybe https://blockchain.info/pools or was the code changed in the full nodes to simply use lower fees
Hey you don't think the BTC prices going down has anything to do with what miners can rip us off for do you   Cheesy
687  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 09:29:26 PM
The huge fees is getting its solution I think its the chronic disease of FUD's that is killing bitcoin in general. If we see as a whole today there are lot of people involved in crypto trading so just a slightest of a rumour is more than enough to burn the whole market these days. Fees problems is getting solutions like the lightning network and segwit. Segwit itself has been good at removing high fees problems.
The FUD is often based on facts like slow speeds, high fees and you forget that Segwit came out five months ago and fees just kept going up
so trust in the development team has been lost because they sat on their hands and did nothing. Lightning Network now has the spot light
on it and many developers don't like what they see and Mr Poon is not answering emails

Have you taken the time yourself to read the lightning white paper to understand just whats going on ?
https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf
Quite simply if you care to look the correct name for "Hubs" is banks and Channels are "Credit Lines" but if your not convince
then search the document for "Savings Account"
688  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: cryptocurrency that you think is a good long term investment. on: January 23, 2018, 09:19:33 PM
Last but not least I am a huge fan of High Powered Blockchain which is a company that is making it's own blockchain based on software AND hardware for super quick transaction times and transfers. I am huge on this crypto because of the fact that they are partnered with China UnionPay (which is bigger than VISA and Mastercard) and the sole fact that NEO is a angel investor and connected.

See we do get people here that do homework and back up a statement with facts !

Nothing wrong with Linux but a lot of developers are windows spyware based and get locked out from code that won't even compile
in windows even when they say it will so they will like NEO because it's all windows and smart contracts can be written in C#

Not just China but Asia are locking the west out because they can see how people like Google and Microsoft have taken over
and we lock them out to so this time they are ready to play us at our own game. if gas was traded on more than just one exchange
then I think I might go for this one myself
 
689  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: cryptocurrency that you think is a good long term investment. on: January 23, 2018, 09:09:31 PM
ETH for about another year so long as it does not become mega popular (Won't cope)
Ripple in case government closes things down (Good coin for beginners)
Neo as modern replacement for ETH but only one exchange trades "Gas"
IOTA because it's 12 times faster than Bitcoin

Cardano but only because people are starting to talk about it not that I have had
the time to look at the nuts and bolts that all the slot-machine players forget about

690  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 08:58:27 PM
Just so you know ,bitcoin is also a currency which has it's own standard ways of addressing it's smaller subsets that are agreed upon by the community.I don't think it takes a genius to just use a currency calculator. https://99bitcoins.com/satoshi-usd-converter/
But back in the real world people work with whole numbers and they all know that more or less a
GBP=EUR=USD and this is what 99% of people get paid in and it does not take a genius to see
that Bitcoin has become your religion.

I put real money into the machine so fees shown like that are fine with me


691  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 08:49:32 PM
Is the lightning network going to be implemented at all? And if yes, then when and under what conditions?

You better hope NOT and this guy only scratches the surface of whats wrong with it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g
or you can read the noddy version where Bob falls in Love with Alice and they play Ping-Pong
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/understanding-the-lightning-network-part-completing-the-puzzle-and-closing-the-channel-1466178980/
Here is the white-paper https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf
But if you want my version then see my post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2776719.msg28395400#msg28395400

Notice the abuse I get, don't shoot the postman  

692  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Fees are killing/have killed Bitcoin.... it is sad but true. on: January 23, 2018, 08:39:14 PM
Yes fees have killed it and sent me off down the road of looking at the Lightning Network
and for those of you who don't know yet it includes banking hubs and not just Bob and Alice
like they want you to believe https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2776719.msg28395400#msg28395400

the fees are 6 bucks for a median transaction

https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/

it says
Quote
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 220 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 225 bytes, this results in a fee of 49,500 satoshis.

I am not a human calculator so how do you get from 49,500 to $6 and why don't they just show in
in the first place
693  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Question: Hashgraph on: January 23, 2018, 08:26:46 PM
Fast: 250,000 transactions per second. (7 transactions / second in BItcoin)

Note: Bitcoin block chain is replicated

That's a mentally high number so i get how the word gets around (Gossip about gossip) but how the hell
do they get nodes to record and store this information in what must be a distributed block-chain split between
nodes and know how to put it back together to find anything.




   
694  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why didn't bitcoin scale using both proposed solutions? on: January 23, 2018, 08:04:36 PM
and the condition become worse because slow adoption.

Maybe because of the conversion fee to new address and few exchanges or known wallets like Exodus and Jaxx work with it and the output
addresses also have to be Segwit to save you money on fees and then (i am told) the savings are low

Never again will I bet taken in by "Virtually free transaction fees" and that includes LN and the banker/hub fees because it will be
the miners that are running the big banking hubs that they like to hide when talking about Bob playing ping-pong with Alice

695  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why didn't bitcoin scale using both proposed solutions? on: January 23, 2018, 07:27:41 PM
It was increased, 4 months ago.

I agree and fees kept going up afterward to peek at $55 and I was corrected today about Tx fees being at $30 because they
are at $15 when i checked so from now onward I will use $25 when talking about the fees to reflect the mid price

See mempool https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-size
At about 135,000 so given the backlog how come before now the miners have been charging $35 +
when we were at these levels if it was market forces and not out and out collusion within the mining
pool monopoly and I have a graph for that too https://blockchain.info/pools

Ten top miners control 90% of the network
696  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning network - fast and low fees on: January 23, 2018, 06:53:34 PM
Lightning network is well complicated and has lots of code to deal with transactions within
the network so if a banking hub (in theory) goes bad you can broadcast to the BTC network
to get you money back

See white paper https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

what people are not getting about lightning is that just because you deposit your
money at the bank in a ledger it is not the banks money (You can get it back) and the bank has to forward
it own money out from a separate ledger on to the next bank before Alice gets paid

See http://forum.cryptolivecap.com/posts/t31-Lightning-Network  
Dave is this case is the bank  or watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

697  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why the fuck did Satoshi implement the 1 MB blocksize limit? on: January 23, 2018, 06:27:21 PM
You are clearly sent here to do some concern trolling. Nobody is paying $15. Pay your $5 and get on with it. If you don't like it go use whatever the fuck you want.
I gave you the link, it says $15 so get your nose out of the miners bum because it's gone brown

Lets see a link that has them at $5
698  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why the fuck did Satoshi implement the 1 MB blocksize limit? on: January 23, 2018, 06:16:53 PM
Here is your chance, use segwit and fees instantly reduced to $1-2

Well that would cost me $15 to convert, won't work with my Jaxx or Exodus wallet that I like or
shapeshift or most of the exchanges and why should I pay for the because the developers decides
to break backwards compatibility without asking us first

Man why you defending the bankers and the $1-2 is bull even if sending to Segwit address 
not that I know any
699  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why the fuck did Satoshi implement the 1 MB blocksize limit? on: January 23, 2018, 05:59:48 PM
How did you come up with that number? Are you dumb enough to pay $30 while everybody else paying $5? (current fee for a max. 1 hour tx is 100sat/b)

If yes (it seems like a yes), then you are not clever enough for this shit. Stay with credit cards.

I like a man with attitude so wait a few seconds and I will check the charts and be right back to you

Nope it's $15 according to this https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html
and was about $30 a week ago when I last looked but I will reduce it to $25 to take in to account
the $55 it was at. Ripple fees are so low that they don't show up on most charts so if $5.00 makes you feel smart then jobs
a good one.
700  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why the fuck did Satoshi implement the 1 MB blocksize limit? on: January 23, 2018, 05:55:32 PM
So... we will never understand what his true intentions were. As far as I know, what we know is having full nodes in the hands of a few corporations only would centralize the system at layer 0 (BCash). If LN centralizes or not, it's yet to be seen. I trust no one.

The dispersed network theory where even if everyone kept open two channels instead of just one because these things
are expensive in miner fees has been blown out the water and it would be like trying to use the Tor network with 300 relay nodes
and that's if you could workout the routing.

I contend that having banking hubs is centralization and was a bank to go down then people would broadcast a message
on the Bitcoin network en-mass and the BTC block-chain at just 7 transactions per second could not cope with demand and unless all
the LN internal channels are able to close down gracefully then chaos would ensue.

In the lighting Network white paper they even talk about "Spending accounts" and "Saving Accounts" to be used for security
and reading whats shown below I can even image insurance brokers being built into the network to reduce risk

Quote
If one wishes to broadcast the transaction chain instead of agreeing
to do a Funding Close or replacement with a new Commitment Transaction,
one would communicate with the third party and broadcast the chain to the
blockchain. If the counterparty refuses the notice from the third party to
cooperate, the penalty is rewarded to the non-cooperative party. In most
instances, participants may be indifferent to the transaction fees in the event
of an uncooperative counterparty.

Yes sure, here you go miners have another $30 on me and just where is that button in my
wallet to contest transaction since it is built into the protocol or will the banking nodes all
be running much more sophisticated software which put paid to the saying "Anyone can be a bank"


 

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!