Ponzis are becoming more and more brazen these days. Well, best thing to do is just avoid them . They will die themselves. The ponzi period will be over soon. Just let it pass.
|
|
|
Why isn't just-dice in the list ? I think that is a very old site and one of the most trusted ones. Should definitely be in the list.
|
|
|
What is the reasoning for weekends usually dumping coins?
No bank wires coming to exchanges. Is that because buy orders won't be enough ? Other than that another reason would also be people cashing out to spend on different places.
|
|
|
I can help you with this. Sending you a PM. EDIT: It is from Belgium Itunes, so a US store won't work. I wasn't able to buy it for him, so I believe he is still looking for it.
|
|
|
What's the deal if you just got paid out earlier than you should have been?
I remember yesterday thinking 'these payments are coming back fast' and reinvesting (because they came back fast).
It was only much later on I saw I had been paid for one transaction BEFORE I SENT IT. I thought that was a little odd. I know this is an honest ponzi, but I didn't expect psychic.
So last time I looked, last night, I had two transactions in the unpaid part of the queue that I have actually been paid for already. I don't know where they are now or even if they are marked as paid.
I am away from home and can't get into my blockchain wallet till midnight, but when I do get home should I return these prematurely sent funds or will that mean they will no longer be paid when they do reach the end of the queue?
Well, if you are an honest person, you should return them. Look here: https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi/status/555979373707141121That would probably be him sending himself those extra 50 BTC. And just making an excuse for the missing funds. I am sure, he would have also sent small transactions of 0.005 - 0.02 , triple their amount, so we have few people in here claiming they got tripled the amount, and he can get away with the big chunk of it. Typical Ponzi.
|
|
|
Its all speculation right now and some people saying they have proof, Nothing proved yet.
|
|
|
Yesterday someone was given a negative trust for posting something like this .You might want to be careful.
I wasn't fully awake at that time. Don't lynch me for it. I have removed that guy's feedback. D: It wasn't you It was someone else. But it was partly op's mistake, since he didn't post it in a pure way of it being a joke. It was half ponzieness half joke.
|
|
|
Free suite at any choice of hotel for a reputable member/mod in return for a review!
Thats looks tempting, some trusted member should jump at that deal soon . What about the names and personal information required to stay at a hotel? Just saying, that if it involves an illegal method(which I am hoping not) , then that could get the person in trouble.
|
|
|
Thank you?!
Depends on what part of the world are you in . For canada you can use quickbt.
|
|
|
Our game algorithm is "Provably Fair", each and every roll can be verified instantly, which means that we cannot alter in any way the lucky number outcome for a roll. Generally, this is true for players but not for investors, as the site operator has knowledge of the server seeds generated by the software and could, in fact, predict all lucky numbers. We have developed a specific solution to this issue : a stand-alone roll server, to be deployed on a machine managed by large investors, or an highly trusted third party.
The roll server task is to generate a server seed for each request and calculate the lucky number for each roll played on the site. Generated server seeds are stored locally on the trusted machine and only revealed when discarded, on player input. The game back-end only requires their sha256 hashes to operate. Our solution removes knowledge of the server seeds from anyone who operates the site, making it impossible to play against the investors and steal their money. All relevant code will be reviewable by the parties, or by an external auditor nominated by the parties.
Additionally, investors funds will be stored in a multi signature cold wallet with a 2-of-3 address, where we would have knowledge of 1/3 of the keys required, while the other 2/3 of the keys would be shared with the trusted parties. This scenario provides some degree of protection to investors if one of the parties disappears for any reason or refuses to cooperate. All transactions from the cold-wallet to the site hot-wallet would have to be authorised and signed by both us and one of the two trusted parties.
We are looking for a partnership with an highly trusted community member and/or interested investors for managing the roll server and multi-sig cold-wallet.
[/center]
You should contact dooglus and a couple of trusted escrows on the forums for the multi sig wallet. Also, how do you plan to implement refilling the hot wallet incase neither of them is online for a long time? As for this : We have developed a specific solution to this issue : a stand-alone roll server, to be deployed on a machine managed by large investors, or an highly trusted third party. Would there be a risk of that trusted party to take advantage of the seeds?
|
|
|
Why ponzi scheme anywhere Thats because of the ponzi schemes got a lot of action over 700 BTC . And as a 5% fees the guy who ran it got 25-30 BTC as commision. Now people are trying to achieve a similar thing, and some are just launching to get a newbie to try it out and be able to steal the funds.
|
|
|
And there goes another one. By the way the address on your site is wrong . Its all capital . Guys don't bother investing or trying it out.
|
|
|
At this time I am pleased to spend on BTC... the infrastructure advances and Microsoft endorsement (plus many others) sways me to believe it is now a safe bet.. the cost is not a high risk today... jump in the water is warm Microsoft and all the other news came about a month back . The price has actually fallen since then. The trend has been fall in prices after every big news.
|
|
|
We know the the address of the Bitstamp robber. Is it feasible for future regulations to ban merchants from accepting coins from a specific address? This means also banning bitcoin mixers from doing the same.
Well just think it like this. If Person A stole bitcoins, and everyone now knows Person A's face, then Person A could mix and send his money to Person B , and approach the merchants. I don't think the merchants will keep checking the relationship between A & B all the time.
|
|
|
Yesterday I saw 3 ponzis posted on the gambling section. And within minutes they received 5-8 BTC and the funds were locked .The threads are locked now as well. Despite the risk of losing money in a ponzi people risk losing money to the person running them as well.
|
|
|
Most of the incoming transactions are from one address and is probably to show action on the ponzi . This is probably just a scam.
|
|
|
There seem to be people creating new threads with new ponzi schemes targetting new people. Looks like couple of ponzis stopped paying out, and have stolen the funds now. You do want to be careful before sending any money to the new ones.
|
|
|
Are there any good texas hold em games going? Doesn't seem like they are advertised very much. Thanks for letting me know.
You should try Sealswithclubs, there are almost all the time games happening there.
|
|
|
such high risk for only 10 % payout ?
Been only 2 minutes after launch and seems he himself is sending funds to show some action on the address. i don't think it's him .. Maybe, just saw crazy action on another ponzi going on the gambling thread. But A lot of ponzis this week . yeah man, make money fast, lose money fast But another few threads: stopped paying out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919370.0So its a huge risk right now to invest a penny in these.
|
|
|
such high risk for only 10 % payout ?
Been only 2 minutes after launch and seems he himself is sending funds to show some action on the address. i don't think it's him .. Maybe, just saw crazy action on another ponzi going on the gambling thread. But A lot of ponzis this week .
|
|
|
|