A war like this are often overexaggerated, just like it happened with Russia and Ukraine, there is no world war anywhere, at least not so soon. The Russian-Ukraine war still continues and the world has moved past that when it comes to how things are compared to how they were in the wake of the war. As it is in the Israel-Palenstine war, cryptocurrencies initially sold off due to the war, but what later happened? It moved back upwards afterwards. The sudden shock in the market is what is causing that, which couples with the risk-on nature of the crypto market among others. However, it will have little or no impact on gambling, this will be so, because gambling will continue as usual in most quarters and the last time I checked, Iran, Palestine and Israel are not the big names in the gambling industry. So, they can't pull the ground in any way in this area.

Also, with the inception of crypto and online gambling, nothing serious can ever happen if a full war breaks out. The war may though push more people to stay indoors, just like the time of Covid-19. What happened? More online activities happened of course, and this will cause the gambling industry to witness more patronage. But I do not see this war escalating. Iran is just foolish but the way the whole world is treating the situation and calming the tension shows that there can't be an escalation. Israel is now mature enough not to retaliate but demanded heavy sanctions against Iran. So, everything will soon get back to normalcy in both the cryptocurrency world and the gambling industry which it never affected yet.

Above all, casinos remain the winner here, and I mean in all ramifications because a whole lot of things are in their favour. They can wire any game in their favour as long as it is a casino game, and they may charge you fees for games played, for deposition and withdrawal, and they can charge commission where applicable as well. They can even determine the fees at which they use to credit your cryptos, so it is a win-win for them. But I believe you take it far in your own explanation about the food, drinks and other extras, and with the way I see it with the main OP, he did not necessarily talk about the brick-and-mortar style of casinos that you are trying to refer to, that's extreme.

I believe it is basically about online crypto casinos which will also surely have all the opportunities over their customers in my view. At first, it might be difficult for casinos, but later when they are getting more popular, they will have enough money from the losers to pay the little winner and not continue to pay the winners from their own pockets. Over time too, this will stabilize where at least 75% of the winnings go to the pocket of the house, while the winners keep the remaining. This could even be adjusted more in the favour of the house with some casinos, so I do not see any chance of the gambler winning them in the long run. Though the good and lucky gamblers will win often, it doesn't matter, the house is still the boss. If not, the casino business will not be as lucrative as it is now.

The most important thing about casinos token is that it is a reflection of the shares-like performance of the casino, it can be rightly said that it is a reflection of the progress of the companies as well. If big casinos like Stake decided to create its token today, even without hyping and marketing it much, it would hype and market itself naturally, that makes the difference and is more reason why RLB and not BFG tokens is performing better. BFG token is not even a token to think about, it is a shittoken in my opinion. Even with the space it (RLB) uses in gaping the next rival is more than #300 by the number on the crypto market rating, which can only indicate that it is doing really well as far as their token is concerned.

This is beyond the marketing in my opinion as coins and tokens will get to a point and start marketing themselves based on the news, headlines, recent breakthroughs and company success among others. All these matters to naturally call supporters and investors that will continue to invest their money in such projects. And over time, in the next 1 year, I am certain that the price, value and market capitalization of the likes of RLB would have increased significantly, and maybe the position would have moved from the current #224 to #above #150 on the crypto rating platforms.

The subject of using the VPN with casinos has been so controversial in my opinion as some casinos would say they accept it while others would say they do not accept it. Nevertheless, my conclusion on this remains that if you can do without the use of a VPN, please do, this is better than putting oneself in any controversial circumstances where the casinos will now be using it as an excuse. At times, it is not about the terms and conditions of the casinos, they might even be silent about the use of VPN, but when the issues arise, you will see them talking about double or multiple accounts by a single user, which is where gamblers hands are always tied. This is especially bad because the casino will only be alleging this but will not be able to prove it openly. However, the fairest ones may just send you further proof, but certainly cannot give you their system to verify, so you have no say here. So it is all about the casino in this regard.

Many are already victims of this since there are no independent investigators to work it through for both parties and I am certain that in most of the cases, the casinos would be lying, those guys might just be the victims of that because if they can use that as an excuse to lock people's account and confiscate their money to themselves. This is when the VPN was never the issue, how much more when the person uses the VPN? It could be worse. I wonder why they do not even do an independent investigation internally to be sure if the same person is actually behind the screens. After all, if casinos are sincere, the gambling styles of the players can never be the same.

This is why I say you should not put your money in what you do not understand. Maybe such a person should be on the lookout at first to gain the right knowledge on how those people doing it are actually going about, and when money is to be committed to it, it should be a small amount of money that is gradually increased over more experience. This is how beginners will not be wasting money unnecessarily, and I hope the person is fortunate enough to be wagering that little amount of money via the casinos that can provide that affordability. Also, in games like Slots, I do not think there is one big speciality to be learned, and I must say that it often comes to the gamblers naturally on how to play it and also at the time to make a change of pattern by instincts.

Again, no matter how the gambler thinks he knows how to play the Slots games, it is all about luck and nothing more. You might believe that you need more learning since a better pattern or good skills made someone hit it big in Slot games, but I say it is not. It could merely be a positive circumstance at that time.

Your concluding part is good in this kind of arrangement and will never trust a reviewing site that was all written by the owner of the website. No matter how good or pretending they can be, I can't trust them because that site was actually created for such a purpose, it is all about making money, so what do you expect? In some cases, the website could compare the casinos together in the form of rating them, but they trickily say better/best of their well-paid masters and carefully reduce the value of the better ones by their rating. This makes it awkward unless the review site is such that is being reviewed by external users where the truth can averagely be known.

Also, the sentiment of the reviewers matters too, since you can't check review sites on the reviews written about 10 different casinos and they are always the same. That means something must be wrong somewhere, which I know could be because of the money paid or just a sentiment about the casinos by the writers of the reviews. This is also the reason why everything we read as reviews should be averaged, and before this can be done, we must read reviews from many sources and not trust a single source to avoid being the victim of the two factors that could influence reviews.

I didn't get you correctly due to the poor English, or perhaps you forgot to read and make corrections. Notwithstanding, did you mean you support the licenced ones or what? If yes, you've made the right bargain, but it is not an automatic endorsement of sincerity or serving you right. You might do yourself a better favour to actually verify them well if you can go through the stress, though it is not necessary. Some do this because many of these so-called licenced casinos are not actually licensed, it is a pure lie, and since they are using the pretended licenced numbers of weak regulators, that will continue to go unabated since those regulators will not even search for sanctions or to issue public warning.

Also, I love the remark that you eventually made here in relation to Bitcoin talk. Though, they can't entirely be trusted, but some of the casinos that are not licenced but advertised and vouched for here delivered so well since there were little or no complaints at least from Bitcointalk members. But like I said, it is not all of them and there are a few of them that people were unable to get their money from. So, serious care is needed here to avoid issues as well.

I wouldn't like to downplay the role of good strategies in some aspects of gambling. Good, if you are referring to the casino games, then you could be valid since we are actually playing against some kinds of algorithms, so we need much luck to win. That is why I always say that in casino games, one may start gambling today and win the Jackpot, while the person who has been gambling for a long period of time may not be able to win at all. But when it comes to sports betting, my friend, it is practical and speculateable. Maybe we should say that it is not all speculations that are right but that doesn't call for us to downgrade the importance of having the right experience and skills above luck in this regard.

This is where the proper budgets and management come in as well because if you believe you are the best speculator in sports betting, you will have the time that you will lose also. For this, one has to plan on the right management during the losing time. Aside from this, I am certain that more expertise and plans are needed than luck in bettings that relate to sports as the overall result will still be to your advantage, unlike other aspects of gambling.

You have some nice advice, every beginner should calm down, trading is not what they will achieve in just a moment, it takes time and the length of time it takes depends on the beginner. This is because they are more serious about trading than each other, many of them may be ranting or playing too-know, what shows what they really are in trading will always be their trading performances. Unfortunately, the performance of beginners is always the same, some may try in the beginning but will still fail.

It was so annoying with some beginners when I was also learning how to trade. In fact, no one is lousier than the new traders if they know a simple trick about the market, you will see them making their mouth about it but they will always lose their money back. As a calm and collected person, I like to do my thing without intimidating, but these guys were so intimidating about a little success. In the end, they will lose them back. Today, none of them is trading again, but the calm and collected one, which is me is still trading.

So, it is not about being lousy or rushing for success, but training and perseverance until your joy is full. Even the so-called professional and expert traders are still losing and facing enough challenges of their own about trading, so why rush and make it look as if you know it all already as a beginner?

I'm glad to be reading your post that was dated 11th of March today, to have seen who won between you and JP Morgan. Like I always say, those renowned analysts are not perfect, be it in the banking industry or any great institution. They at times say whatever comes to their head and when they are right people will start idolizing them. But now, you got it correctly ($72k) as Bitcoin reached the peak of about $73,850 before it hovered so long around the level but wasn't able to breach it. But JP Morgan failed ($42K) as Bitcoin was not even dreaming of dipping that low. These guys may be getting it right with their fiats guessing but I think they should leave cryptocurrency for its lovers and experts.

At the moment, the asset has succumbed to some selling and I expect it to sell further over time since it is now in an extreme bearish phase nearing the bottom of 2024. I will be bullish again on this asset if it shows serious rebounds and a bullish reversal of the current bearish correction.

Well, in my understanding, halving has been hyped so well in the past to the point that it has created the needed demand for Bitcoin as intended. For this, we can't take it lightly this time too as it has helped the market to attract FOMO and investors over time. This may not particularly happen immediately, nevertheless, it happened in the past all the same. It could take months for the bull run to start, but it could be faster than that at times, especially when the market is already at the bottom levels and still maintains a much bearish view when the halving happens. But if the halving meets a bullish sentiment, it might want to wait for a while before moving higher.

As for this year's halving, I am still strongly in doubt, but thankfully Bitcoin itself is nearing $59,000 as I write this post, so it could be an encouragement in this halving period since it will meet a bearish outlook which it might turn bullish. Insightfully, the ETF has changed the narrative since last year where for the first time the asset hit again its former ATH before halving. This is where my calculation about Bitcoin in relation to halving got scattered, but I hope that soon I can be able to take the pieces together again.

However, all focus is now on halving, and I would like to advise you to analyse your trading chart accurately in line with it and never be a blind follower of what you see or hear about Bitcoin.

In your dreams, bro, the $400,000 is way too high. Don't tell me you are one of the dreamers of the last cycle that their dreams never come to fruition. This is for obvious reasons as they were not calling unreasonable prices. Do you want Bitcoin to do a magic? Because I do not possibly know the amount of money that investors could garner in such a small time space that will pump it with about $5T to warrant reaching that level. Even with the way the coin has been behaving since around February, don't you think it is stressed for now? This is for the lack of more sustainable liquidity and more reason it has not been able to hit the expected $75,000. Well, the much-anticipated halving is near now, let's see what will come out of it.

Notwithstanding, let me conclude you are just making the joke of the century, however, if Bitcoin hits $120,000 in this bull run, we should all be grateful for it.

You mean you like to be meriting your own posts...lol Well, I've always seen that merit button on my posts but I believe it's not a big deal, especially if the system can tell you upon trying it that it is not possible to merit your post as the creator.

And if you had practically tried that before, then I must say you are one of the bravest hearts on this forum and curiosity must have pushed you towards that experiment. I've always been tempted to try it, even yesterday before you posted this topic, but I've tried my best to avoid it because if it mistakingly pushed through, I know I will have enough people to explain to on the forum that it was a mistake.

You know how our people behave.

I wouldn't even dare to think WIF is not a good project because I know that no project listed on the Solana ecosystem will be bad, at least for now. And with the way people are appreciating and supporting the meme coins listed on this blockchain, I would never have doubted that. Also, Solana still has low meme coins listed on it compared to others, so it still has room to accommodate many more.

In my case, I think what happened could be termed negligence, I just lacked the seriousness. I placed all my attention on BOME due to how it performed on the first day of listing. Not knowing that the meme coin had done what it had to do on the very first day of listing, but only added a few more in the weeks after. But WIF performed much better, it conveniently moved x3 of its closing price of the first day it was listed on Binance within a few weeks. It would have been a very good success in that short time.

Well, it is never too late as it has moved back to around $2.5. The coin may still move towards 50 in the next 1.3 years.

Thank you for this, at least, if it doesn't help me, I am sure it will help a lot of people.

When I started trading, I was busy chasing indicators, robots and other trading software in the bid to unlock the secret of trading, not knowing that "what I was looking for is in my pocket." I discovered this many years later, and I have never regretted being a price action trader today. Price action is simple and could act as a pattern to know the trend of the market and also acts as support and resistance. I use this very well in both trading analyses and risk management to set my stop loss decisively. It has been so useful to the extent that a day will not go by without me using the price action, to show how important it is to my trading.

I can frankly say that price action can do everything traders need to spot the trend, place the stop loss and take profits. The patterns are simple and undeniable, though many people often underrate it since it is simple, not knowing that simple systems are the most powerful in some circumstances.

And for the record, I use Price Action, Support and Resistance and a Trend indicator to spot all of my trades in any market possible, and I must say that the results have been so lovely.

I was reading about OMNI a while ago but I never took it seriously. Anyway, thank you for this short information that goes deep to an extent. But why list it at this time, didn't they have a speculator? Some projects are good and perhaps also hyped well, but it becomes a problem when they are listed at the wrong time. The crypto currency is still on a bearish correction quest and we do not know how long this will last. They should have waited for after halving, having carefully studied the market mood before making these announcements of the airdrop and listing on major exchanges.

The hype and heat are much as the top exchanges like Binance, Bybit, and Kucoin among others have listed it today, but the coin has been on the bearish trend. This is why I do not really go for the hype but follow the market trend, the project itself and the market position, which includes people's projections toward the project. The purpose of the projects also matters, which I believe will later help OMNI.

As for me, I will wait, there is no need to in buying a project that is listed in the middle of a bearish crypto market's general sentiment.

I like your concluding part, it at least levelled the whole discussion. I know that there are thieves and people who do unspeakable things for the money, and if such people are gambling, I believe that they can naturally think towards that angle since they are bad people. This is the school of thought I picked my reply from and the only reasonable angle I can think of people that bad people will always be bad and can go to any length to achieve their badness.

If such people are now gamblers, some people would say they acted because of the addiction/desperation of gambling, but no, they acted in such a manner simply because they are bad and shameless and nothing more. This is all about needing money, what you use the money to do does not matter, what matters is how you get the money, is it good or bad? That's what defines you. If the source of money is bad, then you naturally want it in a bad way, that's why you went for that choice and not the gambling that makes such a person do that. You can imagine the example you narrated, that guy was desperate already, and that's why he resorted to stealing someone's wallet.

That's so senseless because no one forces him to gamble all his school fees, the greed of needing more money, or the frustration of not having enough pushed him to that. Something must have pushed every thief also. This may not even be an addiction case but a mere case of a victim of gambling who later became desperate. No matter why, anyone who goes to the length of stealing to gamble should be rehabilitated immediately. If not, such is near his true physical madness because such is already insane.

What you just explained is the market dynamics, you can't expect what it would do in the very next minute at times. This is why it is good to be well-informed about it before trying to risk your money on it. The market can rise or fall at any time depending on the prevailing sentiment caused by many factors (fundamental and technical), which can't obviously exclude manipulation as well depending on the asset we are talking about, the relevance matters.

Above all, try to learn to be a good speculator, this is what will help you in the journey of trading and investments. The more you know how to read your chart very well and act rightly, the better for you. This is even as you should be ready with the right money and risk management no matter how good you are at reading your charts. Anything surprising can always happen in the market, so be advised!

I am confident to say that the hugest return that I've realised in my crypto activities was through the meme coins, and practically, I have the same belief in meme coins because the cryptocurrency industry itself is a virtual industry that is being made valuable due to people's money. For this, how are meme coins different from other coins linked with some projects? The reality of what we see now speaks volumes, and it was mainly the dominance of the likes of Dogecoin, Shib, Pepe, Floki and others initially, but when these meme coins were unable to live up to expectations after the last bull run coupled with the magnitude at which they dropped, it created fear in the minds of people, so they relaxed in them.

This is even as many meme coins created later did not perform up to expectations. This was a huge discouragement for people, but thanks to the upgrade and higher scalability in the Solala ecosystem, this did not only help Solana but also the projects listed in it. No wonder the likes of BONK, BOME, WIF and others performed so well. Solana actually made this happen, so I expect nothing less, and now, many projects are being listed on the Solana ecosystem and I advise everyone to be on the lookout for it as it is where bias has shifted lately.

Due to this, meme coin or not, it has a high likelihood of performing well with the Solana ecosystem.

Litecoin was one of the few coins I had my eyes on when I newly discovered cryptocurrency and I used it in place of Bitcoin for many years to make payments and receive money. And the fact that it was so convenient to do that, I believe that it was a voice to reckon with, especially by the status of the second cryptocurrency ever created. But this coin refuses to live up to expectations, and I think it's because of the too-much similarity to Bitcoin. Everything you see as improvements in Bitcoin will quickly be replicated in Litecoin. The scalability is another issue, we can't compare it with the likes of Ethereum, BNB chain ecosystem, and Solana among others.

Well, if it can break away from copying Bitcoin and improve its scalability, anything can still happen in the future.