An ANN for a script coin but no Windows wallet  However cute it is, it isn't ready for an ANN.

Another vote here for Kraken, used them recently, very impressed.

Blimey that's lower than I'd expect - was getting 2.1MH/s on my 970. Upgrading to a 1070 this week so by that token (see what I did there?) I should get 2.3MH/s, which is a crap increase. Will see.

Thanks for this. I did wonder with regards to false positives. Other wallets return a lot less than this though in terms of results, so I will still pass. Cheers anyway.

Sorry took it from this:

"Binaries for Linux/Windows/Mac to be released soon"

That the source on the site was available for Windows. Will compile if I want it hard enough

Windows wallet isn't compiled:

28/05/2017  23:30    <DIR>          .
28/05/2017  23:30    <DIR>          ..
28/05/2017  19:27         6,532,032 clipsecoin-qt

It isn't an executable.

SHA256:   b4e7339166bdd55daadb7d854535226e4ecc1a384ef2ea6b0121ca7531e59513
File name:   clipsecoin-qt
Detection ratio:   0 / 55
Analysis date:   2017-05-28 22:27:41 UTC ( 0 minutes ago )

Hmm based on the 7/61 Virustotal results, I shall be (unfortunately) passing on this one.

Yeah will be doing that, no probs.

Well that seems to make perfect sense.

I'll definitely be mentioning this one in my mag column plus I'll do a clip on my YouTube channel.

Interesting question in terms of why you would mine it. Interesting to me anyway, as I've spent the evening 'building' a free/demo coin on walletbuilders for my own info, which as notsofast correctly pointed out is clearly behind this coin.

Thing is though, provided it's done properly (i.e. demonstrably a thought through ANN, with a roadmap, a purpose, something clearly different and a reason to mine it, and not just a random post which looks for all the world like a pump and dump) should it matter that a 'dev' has used walletbuilders to create it? And I don't mean the free 5 day-to-expiry effort that I've created this evening (and had a laugh mining 4k coins from, 50 a time, popping into the wallet every 20 second or so which for some reason makes me smile, however utterly meaningless it is) but the paid for option because somebody has an idea, wants to create a coin but no go through the process of finding a separate dev?

I've actually been toying with the idea of posting in the altcoin forum for reaching out to a dev in order to create something. That seemed the logical thing to do. But it appears that's what walletbuilders is(?), and what I may be looking for. So if it's legit (anybody know of any horror stories), and I've got what I consider to be a genuinely good idea, is it flawed as a potential approach?

Sweet OP May have a look at this one and throw some hashing at it.

Sold, that works nicely.

Posting links in Google Forms would work and linked to the wallet address. Nothing which isn't already available to the public anyway.

Better than most

Don't invest what you cannot afford to lose. I had 60k DOGE on Cyptsy. Looking at its recent moves, I'm even more pissed off than what I was at the time.

Dev - I'll be socialising this on Twitter and Facebook, plus I may also mention it in my magazine column. How are you going to track those different sources when the accounts are named differently? Are you relying on people to manually link them here...?

Aaaaaand another block. So as the diff goes up I find more hohohoho!

---

ok we're flying now, another block

Block found woohoo! One lousy block in 211 blocks WTF