If there are no security concerns with the data, https://wetransfer.com/ does the job gracefully.
You can click the (...) and select "Get Transfer Link" and you won't also need to mess with e-mails.
Then, after upload, you'll just get a link you can post or PM.

Sorry, you should DYOR before using that wallet.
If you read topics like Freewallet.org - SCAMMERS CONFIRMED - Pending Litigation or the reference links for the negative (red) feedback in Freewallet profile you'll see that the chances for the ticket to be solved are not great. Good luck though 

They also cannot buy those video cards because of the worldwide chips shortage.


The difficulty drop is small and for the miners, although it makes mining a tiny bit easier, it decreases the revenue from tx fees. If we talk about small percents, this fits in.
I don't think that it'll make such a difference.


Coins mined easier should mean the miners can sell cheaper.
Also since tx fees will drop, it will also be easier for weak hands to sell.
So the price should fall by your logic.

But I think that it has fallen enough, the rebounding will continue and the small change in difficulty will be basically unnoticeable in the price.

You've "miscalculated" the "average audience", but that can happen easily.
One tip: don't take the numbers by the noise, there will always be some noisier ones which will want to make you think they do represent the majority. And if maybe sometimes they do, it's a seldom case.
And another tip: most bitcoiners may not be maximalists.

Sorry, but then you can say about all scientists and all sciences that they are religions or they start a religion.

Imho it's a huge difference. In religion you hope that a "supreme being" will basically save your soul and maybe help you out here and there too. In sciences you base onto proven facts and logic and usually know what to expect (as opposed to just hope).

Of course, many go for Bitcoin only by hoping it'll make them rich no matter what and maybe that can be seen as religion. But that's for newcomers, not for long time holders. The long time holders did (imho) their homework and know what to expect, else they would be no longer holders (usually because they got scared at certain price fluctuations).

There are many types of people on the forum. There are good and bad newbies and there are good and bad high ranks too. It's .. like everywhere in the world, actually.
This being said, just nicely guiding somebody will not always happen, because that one may be or act like a scammer, or maybe because the higher rank wants to scam him (less chance though).
But usually people are nice and helpful here. One has to not be lazy and also not be afraid to ask away and the information will start to flow.
Obviously, one will have to be careful and filter the information a little, and again, if unsure, just ask.

Can you call this counseling? Most probably yes. Will somebody become specifically counselor for somebody? Most probably not and also not recommended (it can lead to either scam, either accusations).

I'd add something not brought into discussion yet.

[1] Can make even more sense if some of the campaign managers use scripts to collect all the data for the spreadsheet to be used later.
[2] In some case it can show your commitment for the job; else all users could just overload campaign managers by applying, but not actually joining (for example applying to multiple such jobs simultaneously). Of course, it makes sense in the range of lower paying campaigns. And of course, it may have been sometimes abused by campaign managers for free advertising.

And on the same page, I wonder how you didn't also ask why the wallet address is necessary at applying and isn't sent as a second step only by those accepted 

Since your "request" looks like a blatant attempt to scam, I don't think that you can demand respect.
Talk is cheap and you didn't prove that you want or can do anything. And also you don't have to.
So, with all due respect, stop dreaming and get your scam attempt somewhere else.

Unless he offers some grants, zero-interest loans or such, I find it a cheap PR and not much else.
Or... it has just occurred to me... he may try to sell "clean" electricity to the miners or some batteries his company produces, i.e. he just does marketing for his own products.

Sorry, since they still support anti-consensus things, I don't trust them for being fair also in their news. Do you have other source for this "information"?
I mean that 50% drop sounds catastrophic, but on the other hand the number seems to be plainly out of the belly. So without better proof, it can go straight into the FUD bin.

This kind of situations happen more often than you or we'd like. What can be done is not much, as you've seen from the previous answers.
What you can do is DYOR, be more cautious and stop jumping head first into bounties.
And also keep in mind that even if you do get paid for bounty campaigns there's a good chance the tokens you receive will be (almost) worthless in the moment you receive them or you'd want to sell them.

It's about time. I wish I'd see many more think like this instead of baaaa-ing after each tweet of these "personalities" for which the followers are only some numbers for their pride.

While on the long term in can help Bitcoin mining stay sustainable even in the days the block reward will drop under the tx fees, I find it a rather cheap PR move, unless they would get to help miners acquire their own regenerable energy source.
I mean, if one look closer some 2/3 of the mining is OK (else it would be way too expensive too). And the rest of the miners didn't care and won't care.

It never did and never will.




When ETH will become PoS it'll probably get dumped heavily and the money will be invested in more worthy coins, like, you know.. Bitcoin.

For each very good project there are maybe 100 weak and scam projects there. And everybody will tell that the project he invested in is undervalued. Don't trust them and DYOR.
Also please don't shill your projects on Bitcoin sub, there are plenty of altcoin subs for that.

Packet sniffing means "taking a look" in each and every internet packet going to your computer and out of your computer and usually filtering for certain information (your ISP can do that, but it's illegal to be used arbitrarily)
https://www.lifewire.com/what-is-a-packet-sniffer-2487312#how-packet-sniffers-work

By looking for certain key information in the traffic, the ISP can disallow certain packers go through.

And while this works well in totalitarian countries, as already said, this has zero chance to work in a proper democratic country.

Did you check XMR in the last years, or you've just read some extremely old news on this?
Monero has GUI wallet for quite some time and I find it super friendly. I've even looked up a guide for you, which, although it has the images in Spanish, I think, can give you quite a good idea.



For years people were expecting institutional investors come and put their money into Bitcoin. Now they have come. Banks are inevitable in this.
But the devs are just fine. They did well and they know that community has to also consent the changes, else chaos can come out i.e. a lot of forks.
On the other hand, LN is seen by many as a way too big step towards centralization, so the future won't be all nice and shiny. Still I think that LN can be more private than on-chain tx.


This is off-topic, but I'll answer:
It's known fact that 2/3 of mining is OK. And the rest of the miners will most probably don't care. All in all this is a strangely weak PR move and basically that's all.

The discussion on what is tainted and what is not can become very difficult. I guess that after some point there will be not possible to accept only clean coins for on-chain transactions. And then what's to be considered "bad"?
- will one input make the whole transaction bad or will "dilute" (become less bad)? Or will a service accepting also tainted coins will become "black sheep"?
- after how many transactions (the money containing) an old tainted input is no longer considered tainted/bad?
- if a miner is accepting tainted transactions, will the tx fees be considered good or bad?

It's difficult to foresee what's going to happen and I feel that it's very early to discuss.
However, I don't think that "all our bitcoins" will be tainted, ... just most of the ones circulating (and not locked for decades in cold storage).

This is the sensitive point. I didn't see much more than just telling that this or that is not OK. No fines, no nothing.


Nice answer, but far from the topic. Ethereum came live in 2015. SEC was telling about it in 2018. "technology moves fast"... but 3 years is a lot.


And what are the consequences for selling them unregistered? Because that's the bit I feel like it's missing. I've basically seen none...

That's correct. But not all governments will issue CBDCs simply because those need a certain infrastructure too and grandma' will prefer paper money while grandson will prefer bitcoin.
And as government you better be permissive with Bitcoin before people turn to... Monero, instead of your CBDC.



New things always bring hype. I still read now and then posts here from people who think that if you put any kind of project on blockchain it will become extremely good.
Yes, more decentralization is necessary in the world, but certain balance has to be found.
Also more privacy is needed, but most governments have a different agenda.
Actually on Bitcoin too, we can guess based on current actions. In the future many things will probably be much different than we'd imagine. But [back to initial topic] stopping Bitcoin is very difficult now. It got the traction it needs to survive - at least the decades to come.